Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Sweating official Washington
Source: xymphora blogspot
URL Source: http://xymphora.blogspot.com/
Published: Jul 9, 2007
Author: staff
Post Date: 2007-07-09 08:41:22 by Eoghan
Keywords: None
Views: 101
Comments: 4

Deborah Jeane Palfrey can now release or sell her phone records, the judge hearing the issue being baffled at what possible basis could have been behind the gagging in the first place, as it had no possible connection to the criminal charges she faces. The main argument that had succeeded in obtaining the temporary restraining orders was that the list could be used to harass witnesses, an obviously bogus claim made for the sole purpose of protecting the guilty Washington whoremongers. The prosecutors, who were given a rough ride in the judgment for their struggles at coming up with a plausible argument, would have fared better with a male judge, someone who would have understood the delicacy of the situation.

Now we are hearing the threats to release the records, an obvious ploy to sweat official Washington into throwing the criminal case out on a technicality or offering her an easy plea bargain. She can’t actually release the records because:

1. there could be a lot of innocent numbers on the list (or at least men who could claim innocence, with no way for her to prove otherwise), and the implications of a number being on the list are potentially defamatory, leading to all sorts of legal problems;

2. the only names that matter are the Washington hypocrites – politicians and bureaucrats who play the ‘family values’ card – and their names are only useful to Palfrey if they are not released, so they can be used as leverage.

There are very good reasons why this kind of list never sees the light of day. Once she gets her desired outcome the list will disappear.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Eoghan (#0)

1. there could be a lot of innocent numbers on the list (or at least men who could claim innocence, with no way for her to prove otherwise), and the implications of a number being on the list are potentially defamatory, leading to all sorts of legal problems;

The government already took all of her money; she's got nothing to lose from future lawsuits against her, and the added publicity may just increase the size of the advance from her inevitable book deal.

The "Department of Defense" has never won a war. The "War Department" was undefeated.

Indrid Cold  posted on  2007-07-09   14:56:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Indrid Cold (#1)

As long as these guys continue to vote for Israel, they have nothing to worry about...

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2007-07-09   15:01:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Eoghan (#0) (Edited)

2. the only names that matter are the Washington hypocrites – politicians and bureaucrats who play the ‘family values’ card – and their names are only useful to Palfrey if they are not released, so they can be used as leverage.

She can solve that problem by releasing the names one at a time. One a week, say.

Otherwise, they can apply this author's logic, and assume that she's bluffing.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-07-09   15:15:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Eoghan (#0)

Speaking of sweating, the temperature in D.C. is supposed to go up into the high 90's today.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-07-09   15:21:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest