[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Why did I post; There is no Constitution....
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 10, 2007
Author: Richard
Post Date: 2007-07-10 20:31:05 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 125
Comments: 8

The actual title to the information is; There is no Constitution – it is a carefully crafted illusion.

I posted this info, There is no Constitution...., to several locations and various individuals. There has been a surprising lack of response, with some exceptions.

I have come to realize, after a few responses did come back, that the information is simply too new and too big for most to deal with in a short period of time.

The real information contained in that post came from this; IN RE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 77 U.S. 273 (1869)

This information from the so-called Supreme Court is the only information that I have ever found that details the authority of the Supreme Court, and which comes from the Supreme Court itself. In this regard, as far as I know, this case is unique. (If I am wrong about this, and if you are aware of another case cite which details this information, I would appreciate it if you would send me the info.)

In this case cite, we find, from the Supreme Court, the admission that the authority of the Supreme Court comes from The Judiciary Act of 1789, September 24, 1789, 1 Stat. 73; AND NOT FROM THE CONSTITUTION. In addition, in this cite, it is explained that the power of the Supreme Court comes from the Congress; again, not from the Constitution.

Is this important? Well, again from the post There is no Constitution..., we can deduce from this information that the court that is specified in the Constitution, the one supreme Court specified in Article 3, has never sat, as there does not exist any case law from that court.

Again, is this important? Depends on if you have friends who you have spoken with and who are not sure that something is truly wrong in America. And, if there is something wrong, what is it you-conspiracy-freak-you? Because if you take the info that I posted, put it into your own words (or use mine, although I tend to be a little verbose), using the evidence of the ORIGINAL Constitution link that I put into that post, you can prove beyond any question that the so-called Supreme Court is not THE Constitutional court.

That should open a few doors where you can begin to open previously closed minds. Especially those minds which are adamantly pro-Constitution. And someone told me, after reading the info, “well, what you say is true, BUT, we will never be able to get the government to admit that!” And my point is; THEY ALREADY DID! That is what this case cite from 1869 is; it is an admission, by an organ of the government, as to the exact nature of the Supreme Court! And, anyone can use it to prove that something is seriously wrong in America, and, you can use it as an opening wedge to begin to wake people up.

There is, in America, today, a realization that something is wrong. More Americans believe this today than ever before. In fact, a recent poll found that most Americans no longer believe that there is any solution to the problems, and, that it is now the people against the government. This is your opportunity to use the government's own words to prove the facts, and to begin to show the lies that are/have been told.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Which brings up another, equally important part of this; why is info like this so hidden? Because those responsible for what is happening to America have no power; the power rests in the hands of the people of America, and, when enough people begin to see the real problems, then, and only then, will things begin to change. If those who think that they are in charge were not afraid of the truth getting out, then info like this would be openly taught in the law schools, and covered in school books.

But, those responsible for such deceptions can not stand the light of day. It is our responsibility to find these chinks in their armor, and bring the light to bear on the problems/deceit, so that our fellow Americans can begin to be fully informed.

To do that in the most effective way, we need to offer proof that is solid and beyond reproach. This case cite is such proof. Try it out on a few wavering friends, and see what I mean.

Fact; less than 1/10 of 1% of the people in the so-called patriot community have ever read the proof of the nature of the so-called Supreme Court. This includes all of those in the tax protest movement. Years ago I asked for this proof, and no one had it; a few could tell me that it existed, but they knew not where. (And I may be overstating the numbers of those who are aware of and have read the info!)

Fact; no one likes being lied to. And if 1/10 of 1% of the people who SHOULD know about this do not, how many do you think know about it in the general population? 0% would be a good guess. And therein lies the opportunity. And this is, largely, an opportunity that did not exist before today, with the growing discontent by the people of America, and, with the advent of the internet.

Fact; Every court in America, whose decisions are subject to review by the so-called Supreme Court, is and must be of an identical nature to the Supreme Court; i.e., NON-CONSTITUTIONAL. Do you get that? If you do not, then I suggest that you go back and re-read the post and consider this very carefully. Especially before you begin to put your faith in the Constitution.

Fact; the real problem in America is simple; more than 95% of all elected officials, in all city, county, state and federal positions, are attorneys. That means that they are sworn officers of the same courts named above, i.e., NON-CONSTITUTIONAL courts. And, they are sworn to conceal the nature of such courts from the public. Yet, Americans continue to vote for such in over-whelming numbers. Why, do you suppose that is?

Fact; if there is such a thing as separation of powers, then how does that work when 95% of all elected officials are sworn officers of the court system?

Please note the above. There can be no doubt that this dependance upon attorneys is and has always been the reason that America has moved so far from what was intended, by the people.

Everything comes back to education of people. Without that, nothing will change, and I think that this information is a good place to start with the education process when you are talking to people who do not understand what it is all about.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: richard9151 (#0)

I posted this info, There is no Constitution...., to several locations and various individuals. There has been a surprising lack of response, with some exceptions.

I have come to realize, after a few responses did come back, that the information is simply too new and too big for most to deal with in a short period of time.

The real information contained in that post came from this; IN RE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 77 U.S. 273 (1869)

This information from the so-called Supreme Court is the only information that I have ever found that details the authority of the Supreme Court, and which comes from the Supreme Court itself. In this regard, as far as I know, this case is unique. (If I am wrong about this, and if you are aware of another case cite which details this information, I would appreciate it if you would send me the info.)

In this case cite, we find, from the Supreme Court, the admission that the authority of the Supreme Court comes from The Judiciary Act of 1789, September 24, 1789, 1 Stat. 73; AND NOT FROM THE CONSTITUTION. In addition, in this cite, it is explained that the power of the Supreme Court comes from the Congress; again, not from the Constitution.

Is this important? Well, again from the post There is no Constitution..., we can deduce from this information that the court that is specified in the Constitution, the one supreme Court specified in Article 3, has never sat, as there does not exist any case law from that court.

Again, is this important? Depends on if you have friends who you have spoken with and who are not sure that something is truly wrong in America. And, if there is something wrong, what is it you-conspiracy-freak-you? Because if you take the info that I posted, put it into your own words (or use mine, although I tend to be a little verbose), using the evidence of the ORIGINAL Constitution link that I put into that post, you can prove beyond any question that the so-called Supreme Court is not THE Constitutional court.

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=56444 - There is no Constitution

....The Judiciary Act of 1789

September 24, 1789.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist…

Now, we need to look at the Constitution; Article 3, Section 1:

“The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, …”

Since Congress was ordered to establish and clearly did establish the supreme court of the United States, as an inferior court, BECAUSE THE CONGRESS IS NOT COMMANDED TO ESTABLISH ANY OTHER COURT, *** the Supreme Court is an inferior court to the one supreme Court established by the Constitution. That court, the one supreme Court, has never sat.

It is also important, and interesting, to note the close similarity of the names of the two courts – supreme court & one supreme Court. It is difficult for me to separate such deceptive practices out of my considerations about who is behind such things when I also know the names of the privately owned Bank of England and the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank of the United States.

Clearly, the Senate and the Congress established the so-called Supreme Court of the United States, and what they create, they control. It should also be noted that the process of this court issues in the name of the President of the United States, rather than under it’s own authority, and this is because this court has no authority on it’s own; it is not the court detailed in Article 3 of the Constitution. It is an administrative court created by Congress.

Do we have further proof of this? Yes, we do. For various reasons, what are called the SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES are considered to be important cases. Part of this is because they were some of the first, if not the very first cases, called before the Supreme Court, which addressed the issue of citizenship after the so-called passage of the 13th & 14th Amendments (more on this later). These cases, Slaughter-House Cases, (1873), are important, but what is more important are the U.S. Supreme Court -- IN RE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 77 U.S. 273 (1869), where it was determined if the Supreme Court had the jurisdiction to hear the cases.

Here, we find; “7. What power, then, has the Supreme Court of the United States in the premises?“

**** “2. The power given to this court by the Act of 1789 …”

“…Controversies determined in a State court which are subject to re- examination in this court, are such, and such only as involve some one or more of the questions enumerated and described in the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act …”

“…and the twenty-third section of the Judiciary Act provides to the effect that …”

“…complied in each case with all the conditions prescribed in the act of Congress …”

And why did the Supreme Court decide to hear the case?

“…. But it is equally competent for this court, in the furtherance of justice, to do the same …”

The entirety of this case is an admission that the Supreme Court only has the jurisdiction and power given to it from the Congress, and that it’s power does not flow from the Constitution. And, with this case, we can take things even further forward.

For instance, if you want a further shock, try these; “Independent of statutory regulations, the term supersedeas has little or no application in equity suits, as the rule is well settled in the English courts that an appeal in chancery does not stop the proceedings …”

“3d. That the judgment of the court remits the practice on this subject substantially back to the practice of the English courts of equity, …”

“Footnote 9 See General Order in House of Lords in 1807, …”

The above is added in here just in case you are in doubt as to who was behind the Constitution and the establishment of the courts of the United States.

If you understand what was being said, this decision of the Supreme Court is using decisions made in English courts in order to affirm what the United States court has decided to do.....

=============================================

....I gues this adds more credence to ....

The Ultimate Delusion: by Stephen Ames See APFN Web Pages: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knighthood.htm ... Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? ... www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/ultimate_delusion.htm

Clearly, the Senate and the Congress established the so-called Supreme Court of the United States, and what they create, they control. It should also be noted that the process of this court issues in the name of the President of the United States, rather than under it’s own authority, and this is because this court has no authority on it’s own; it is not the court detailed in Article 3 of the Constitution. It is an administrative court created by Congress.

so, is that what made the decideror think he could overturn the people in the Scooter Libby case?

the SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES are considered to be important cases. Part of this is because they were some of the first, if not the very first cases, called before the Supreme Court, which addressed the issue of citizenship after the so-called passage of the 13th & 14th Amendments

The US is STILL a British Colony. [ http://www.apfn.org/APFN/bcolony.htm Genesis 15:13-14/Galatians 3:16-29]. The original issue of citizenship went something like this:

.....divers others of our loving Subjects, have been humble Suitors unto us, that We would vouchsafe unto them our Licence, to make Habitation, Plantation, and to deduce a colony of sundry of our People into that part of America commonly called VIRGINIA, and other parts and Territories in America, either appertaining unto us, or which are not now actually possessed by any Christian Prince or People, situate, lying, and being all along the Sea Coasts, between four and thirty Degrees of Northerly Latitude from the Equinoctial Line, and five and forty Degrees of the same Latitude, and in the main Land between the same four and thirty and five and forty Degrees, and the Islands "hereunto adjacent, or within one hundred Miles of the Coast thereof;

And to that End, and for the more speedy Accomplishment of their said intended Plantation and Habitation there, are desirous to divide themselves into two several Colonies and Companies; the one consisting of certain Knights, Gentlemen, Merchants, and other Adventurers, of our City of London and elsewhere, which are, and from time to time shall be, joined unto them, which do desire to begin their Plantation and Habitation in some fit and convenient Place, between four and thirty and one and forty Degrees of the said Latitude, alongst the Coasts of Virginia, and the Coasts of America aforesaid: And the other consisting of sundry Knights, Gentlemen, Merchants, and other Adventurers, of our Cities of Bristol and Exeter, and of our Town of Plimouth, and of other Places, which do join themselves unto that Colony, which do desire to begin their Plantation and Habitation in some fit and convenient Place, between eight and thirty Degrees and five and forty Degrees of the said Latitude, all alongst the said Coasts of Virginia and America, as that Coast lyeth:

We, greatly commending, and graciously accepting of, their Desires for the Furtherance of so noble a Work, which may, by the Providence of Almighty God, hereafter tend to the Glory of his Divine Majesty, in propagating of Christian Religion to such People, as yet live in Darkness and miserable Ignorance of the true Knowledge and Worship of God, and may in time bring the Infidels and Savages, living in those parts, to human Civility, and to a settled and quiet Government: DO, by these our Letters Patents, graciously accept of, and agree to, their humble and well-intended Desires; .......

, and to every of the said Colonies, that they, and every of them, shall and may, from time to time, and at all times forever hereafter, for their several Defences, encounter, expulse, repel, and resist, as well by Sea as by Land, by all Ways and Means whatsoever, all and every such Person or Persons, as without the especial Licence of the said several Colonies and Plantations, shall attempt to inhabit within the said several Precincts and Limits of the said several Colonies and Plantations, or any of them, *** or that shall enterprise or attempt, at any time hereafter, the Hurt, Detriment, or Annoyance, of the said several Colonies or Plantations:......

...and our Will and Pleasure is, and we do hereby declare to all Christian Kings, Princes, and States, that if any Person or Persons which shall hereafter be of any of the said several Colonies and Plantations, or any other, by his, their, or any of their Licence and Appointment, shall, at any Time or Times hereafter, rob or spoil, by Sea or Land, or do any Act of unjust and unlawful Hostility to any the Subjects of Us, our Heirs, or Successors, or any the Subjects of any King, Prince, Ruler, Governor, or State, being then in League or Amitie with Us, our Heirs, or Successors, and that **** upon such Injury, or upon just Complaint of such Prince, Ruler, Governor, or State, *** or their Subjects, We, our Heirs, or Successors, shall make open Proclamation, within any of the Ports of our Realm of England, commodious for that purpose, **** That the said Person or Persons, having committed any such robbery, or Spoil, shall, within the term to be limited by such Proclamations, ***make full Restitution or Satisfaction of all such Injuries done, so as the said Princes, or others so complaining, may hold themselves fully satisfied and contented; And, that *** if the said Person or Persons, having committed such Robery or Spoil, shall not make, or cause to be made Satisfaction accordingly, within such Time so to be limited, That *** then it shall be lawful to Us, our Heirs, and Successors, **** to put the said Person or Persons, having committed such Robbery or Spoil, and their Procurers, Abettors, and Comforters, out of our Allegiance and Protection; **** And that it shall be lawful and free, for all Princes, and others to pursue with hostility the said offenders, and every of them, and their and every of their Procurers, Aiders, abettors, and comforters, in that behalf........

First Charter of Virginia 1606

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/states/va01.htm

http://www.blueletterbible.org/tsk_b/Mic/4/13.html

Ezekiel 34:11-13/John 10/Psalm 2:6

Ezekiel 17:1-10 http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Eze/Eze017.html

John 15:1 http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Jhn/Jhn015.html#1

Matthew 15:13 http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Mat/Mat015.html#13

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-07-10   23:14:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#1)

Stephen Ames

Pretty smart man, is he not? I would have enjoyed having the opportunity to study with him. To bad it can never happen.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-07-10   23:30:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: richard9151 (#0)

That should open a few doors where you can begin to open previously closed minds. Especially those minds which are adamantly pro-Constitution. And someone told me, after reading the info, “well, what you say is true, BUT, we will never be able to get the government to admit that!” And my point is; THEY ALREADY DID! That is what this case cite from 1869 is; it is an admission, by an organ of the government, as to the exact nature of the Supreme Court! And, anyone can use it to prove that something is seriously wrong in America, and, you can use it as an opening wedge to begin to wake people up.

It might be easier to use the Original [Missing] 13th Amendment....a few pictures are worth a thousand words.

http://www.apfn.org/APFN/13th.htm

http://www.amendment-13.org/

http://www.amendment-13.org/privatepubl.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-07-10   23:36:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: richard9151 (#2)

very smart man...do you know if he is still alive? I didn't read that version...one of them told how he was committed to the nuthouse and drugged, like so many others who saw the light.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-07-10   23:39:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#3)

It might be easier to use the Original [Missing] 13th Amendment

You might, IF they are already aware that there is a problem. If they are not, then you are not going to ever convince them that there is a missing amendment. JUST CAN NOT BE YOU-CONSPIRACY-FREAK-YOU!

Been there, done that.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-07-11   0:24:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#4)

very smart man...do you know if he is still alive?

My understanding is that he is still alive and still confined. He simply knows too much. And was willing to tell all. And I guess that is the true sin; willing to tell.

These people really can not stand the light of day.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-07-11   0:25:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: richard9151 (#6)

As far as I know, he's incarcerated in Pennsylvania. A few years back his home was being surrounded by feds. Later, I heard that he was committed or incarcerated and being drugged. He was apprehended for refusing to take the medication. (I alsobelieve there were some child custody issues.

Whatever the U.S. Government is, it can kiss my red, white and blue ass !

Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, plough, sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth?

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”

noone222  posted on  2007-07-11   3:08:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: noone222 (#7)

(I also believe there were some child custody issues.

I recall that to be true. He wanted to be left alone to raise his child in peace...Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness not on ZOG's agenda for the goyim.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-07-11   10:20:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]