[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Immigration See other Immigration Articles Title: Report: Anti-gang strategy failing badly LOS ANGELES - Anti-gang legislation and police crackdowns are failing so badly that they are strengthening the criminal organizations and making U.S. cities more dangerous, according to a report being released Wednesday. Mass arrests, stiff prison sentences often served with other gang members and other strategies that focus on law enforcement rather than intervention actually strengthen gang ties and further marginalize angry young men, according to the Justice Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank that advocates alternatives to incarceration. "We're talking about 12-, 13-, 14-, 15-year-olds whose involvement in gangs is likely to be ephemeral unless they are pulled off the street and put in prison, where they will come out with much stronger gang allegiances," said Judith Greene, co-author of "Gang Wars: The Failure of Enforcement Tactics and the Need for Effective Public Safety Strategies." The report is based on interviews and analysis of hundreds of pages of previously published statistics and reports. And though it is valid and accurate, the ideas raised in it are not new, said Arthur Lurigio, a psychologist and criminal justice professor at Loyola University of Chicago. "These approaches, although they sound novel, are just old wine in new bottles," he said. "Gang crime and violence in poor urban neighborhoods have been a problem since the latter parts of the 19th century." Lurigio, other academics and gang intervention workers have echoed elements of the report that found gangs need to be viewed as a symptom of other problems in poor communities, such as violence, teen pregnancy, drug abuse and unemployment. The report says Los Angeles and Chicago are losing the war on gangs because they focus on law enforcement and are short on intervention. It cites a report this year by civil rights attorney Connie Rice, who was hired by Los Angeles to evaluate its failing anti-gang programs. Her report called for an initiative to provide jobs and recreational programs in impoverished neighborhoods. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Police Chief William Bratton both commended Rice's report. But in February, they unveiled a strategy that focused on targeting the city's worst gangs with arrests and civil injunctions that prohibit known gang members from associating with one another in public. Rice describes the city's policy on arresting the city's estimated 39,000 gang members as "stuck on stupid." Wes McBride, executive director of the California Gang Investigators Association, dismissed the findings of the report, which he said was written by "thug-huggers." The investigators association is a professional organization for police officers. "Are they saying we can't put a thief in jail, we can't put a murderer in jail, that we should spank them, put a diaper on them, pat them on the bottom, hug them and let them go?" McBride said. "It's obviously a think tank report, and they didn't leave their ivory tower and spend any time on the streets." "Gang Wars" also criticizes politicians who overstate the threat of criminal gangs and seek tougher sentences. Greene specifically criticized a bill introduced by Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, that would make it illegal to be a member of a criminal gang and would make it easier to prosecute some minors as adults. But Feinstein spokesman Scott Gerber said the bill also calls for spending more than $400 million on gang prevention and intervention programs, which he said would be the largest single investment of its kind.
Poster Comment: Liberal writers do not seem to understand how simple it is to stop most of these gangs. Deport the illegals. Another simple solution is to take away the business license of all companies that launder drug money offshore through subsidiaries.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
The only real way to get rid of gangs, is to allow Law Abiding Citizens to hunt them down like the animals they are. By putting a dead or alive bounty on any and all gang bangers, you make it really unattractive to being retarded. There should be a final solution to gangs. Round them all up, and toss them in a furnace. A group of wannabe gang bangers killed a friend of mine's daughter back in 1993. She died because they wanted her car to commit a crime. They took her to a empty stretch of road and shot her in the back of the head. The problem with gangs, is the fact that we don't simply allow vigilante groups to hunt them down. 100 years ago it wouldn't be too difficult to get rid of people who make trouble the way gangs do. Unfortunately, this country has become pussified.
Dying for old bastards, and their old money, isn't my idea of freedom.
What a surprise. I have an idea: IED's could provide both recreation by making potholes and jobs filling them.
Burn up that quarter mile! Burn up that quarter mile! (Listen to 'em whine, whine whine. Listen to 'em whine, whine, whine.)
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|
||