See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: When Physics Trumps Hysteria in Global Warming
Source:
Grassroot Institutue of Hawaii
URL Source: http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/G ... erspective/PhysicsTrumps.shtml
Published: Jul 18, 2007
Author: Michael R. Fox, Ph.D.
Post Date: 2007-07-22 00:27:53 by sourcery
Ping List: *Agriculture-Environment* Subscribe to *Agriculture-Environment*
Keywords: None
Views: 168
Comments: 15
Michael R. Fox, Ph.D., a science and energy reporter for Hawaii Reporter and a science analyst for the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, is retired and now lives in Eastern Washington. He has nearly 40 years experience in the energy field. He has also taught chemistry and energy at the University level. Studiously hidden from public view are some extraordinary findings in physics which are providing new understanding of our planetary history, as well as providing a much more plausible scientific understanding of global warming. Regrettably, the current hysteria about global warming is based much more on fear, political agendas, and computer models that don57;t agree with each other or the climate, rather than hard-nosed evidence and science. The climate forces which have led to the estimated 0.6C degree temperature increase over the past 100 years or more (according to the International Panel on Climate Change) have been assumed to be man-made CO2 emissions from advanced nations including the U.S. We know this can57;t be true for several reasons. The first is that water vapor provides 95 percent of the total of the greenhouse gases, not CO2. The total of the CO2 represents less than 3 percent of the total. The second is that of the total atmospheric CO2 inventory, the manmade fraction is less than 3 percent of the CO2 total and therefore far less than 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas inventories. Third, studies of the recent climate variations are finding, for example, (See article by J. Oestermans, Science, p. 375, April 29, 2005) that glaciers have been receding since 1750 or so, well before any significant man-made CO2 emissions occurred. The mid 1700s were at the very depths of the Little Ice Age, which we have learned was the coldest climate over the last 5000 years. Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it. It seems more logical that natural forces are still at work with warming and cooling our climate. For example, Fred Singer and Dennis Avery pointed out in their book Unstoppable Global Warming that over the past 1,000,000 years in climate observations, there have been about 600 periods of warming, and we can surmise from these cycles that among them are about 599 periods of cooling. Now we have learned much more based upon observations of cosmic radiation, their sources, and the Sun57;s magnetic fields, combined and new discoveries in the laboratory. A new and more comprehensive understanding of our planetary environment has emerged. This gives us a scientifically defensible explanation of both global warming and cooling. As the Oesterman study of the 250 years of receding glaciers shows, warming preceded the CO2 increases of the 20th century. That is, man-made CO2 was not significantly involved in this 200 year warming period on the earth. Nor does man-made CO2 explain those 600 periods of warming over the past 1,000,000 years. We have known that cosmic radiation is a source of very powerful radiation, more powerful than any in those huge manmade accelerators. We also know that the more energetic cosmic rays can reach the surface of the Earth passing completely through the atmosphere. Those of lesser energy can collide with molecules in the air causing an avalanche of nuclear and particle fragments as they pass through the atmosphere. The energy is dispersed in showers of these particles while still in the atmosphere. These collisions are truly nuclear in nature, highly energetic, and take place in our atmosphere every second. These are the nuclear processes by which the atmosphere acts as a protective shield to inhabitants on the earth. These are well known to airline safety experts, as well as to those astronauts who spend weeks and months outside of our protective atmosphere. The streams of cosmic radiation originate from deep space sources both within our galaxy, the Milky Way, as well as from galaxies more distant. Most of the cosmic rays are charged particles (mostly protons) but less prevalent heavier particles are often measured too, and can be of enormous energy. Being charged particles they can be deflected and modulated by the many magnetic fields found in space. In the proximity of our Sun and the solar system incoming particles 60;feel61; the magnetic field of the Sun and are deflected. The extent of the deflection depends upon the strength of the magnetic field of the Sun. The solar magnetic field has been known, studied, and measured for only a few decades. As with other stars, the Sun is able to deflect many, but not all, of these particles of cosmic radiation away from our solar system and our planet according to well-known rules of physics and magnetism. Thanks to some recent excellent experimental work in physics by those such as Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark, we now know that cosmic rays and some of the debris from nuclear collisions with atoms in the atmosphere are directly involved with the initiating mechanisms of cloud formation. Basically, the more cosmic rays, the more clouds are formed and the cooler the temperature. Since many of the cosmic rays can be deflected by the Sun57;s magnet field, the cosmic ray intensity varies inversely with the strength of that field. The stronger the solar magnetic field, the fewer cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, fewer clouds are formed, and the climate becomes warmer. Today the Sun57;s magnetic field is more than twice as strong as it was at the turn of the last century. During the mid 1700s during the Little Ice Age there was a 70 year period when there were no sunspots (called the Maunder Minimum), and the solar magnetic field was very weak. The cosmic rays were not deflected as much by a weakened solar magnetic field, more clouds were formed, thus a cooler climate at that time. These findings provide a simple plausible explanation, defensible with sound physics, and don57;t involve a major role for CO2 at all. Some of the materials formed in the atmosphere by the cosmic ray collisions are radioactive as well, and are one of many natural sources of radioactivity. These are deposited in the Earth57;s surface, and are used to construct a very accurate history of the geology and climate millions of years ago. It can be measured with surprising accuracy. In this instance some important collision products formed in the upper atmosphere, are carbon-14 (C-14) and berrylium-10 (Be-10). Being radioactive they decay into non-radioactive products. These have accurately known periods of decay and scientists can measure these materials in both ice cores and geologic cores samples. The amounts measured are directly related to many important natural features. Variations in both C-14 and Be-10 can be used to deduce the historical record of variations in the solar magnetic field. By similar techniques the scientists are able to determine variations in the cosmic radiation rates directly, going back hundreds of millions of years. Since the rate of influx of cosmic rays over time has not been constant, our climate has not been constant either. What lies ahead are some exciting times in climate physics and our understanding of the environment. Unexplained findings in geological and climate histories are now being explained by these new lines of inquiry. It appears that the Sun57;s magnetic field has had a stronger effect on our climate than just the variations in solar irradiance could explain. Political leaders, environmental advocates, and even Oscar-winning documentarians who claim that 60;the debate of climate science is over61;, have been shown once again to be very wrong.
Poster Comment: Basic References: Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"): Other References:
Subscribe to *Agriculture-Environment*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: sourcery (#0)
Rainy days and Mondays always get me down. What did The Carpenters know, and when did they know it?
Some people buy popsicles just for kicks; but me and my baby we save the sticks; to keep brother and sister quiet as a mouse; we give 'em popsicle sticks to build a popsicle house
Another good one. I've seen that name before too.
Good post...duplicate of a couple of days ago but important for everyone to read it.
GLOBAL WARMING IS JUNK SCIENCE ETHANOL IS A MONEYWASTING HOAX AND DIVERSION INTO FAT CATS WALLETS NUCLEAR=>HYDROGEN CAN BE IN PLACE IN 5 YEARS FRAUD AND IGNORANCE PREVENTS TRUE SOLUTIONS AND FLEECES YOUR WALLET AND FUTURE
Man made or natural global warming, it does not matter. The Global tax is still the solution!
"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?"
amen bump
Only if world socialism (and world poverty) is your goal.
The cosmic rays were not deflected as much by a weakened solar magnetic field, more clouds were formed, thus a cooler climate at that time.
#2. To: sourcery (#0)
#3. To: sourcery (#0)
#4. To: Tauzero (#1)
#5. To: sourcery (#0)
Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.
#6. To: ladybug. everyone (#5)
Man made or natural global warming, it does not matter. The Global tax is still the solution!
#7. To: ladybug (#5)
The Global tax is still the solution!
 | Government Warning: The Attorney General has determined that Federal Regulation may be hazardous to your health |
#8. To: lodwick (#6)
amen bump Join the Ron Paul Revolution lodwick You ARE kidding, I hope. When is government confiscation a solution for anything? It is tyranny.
The Global tax is still the solution!
#9. To: ladybug (#5)
Straight from the MOUTH of MARX and HERSCHEL, dear ladybug !! GLOBAL WARMING IS JUNK SCIENCE ETHANOL IS A MONEYWASTING HOAX AND DIVERSION INTO FAT CATS WALLETS NUCLEAR=>HYDROGEN CAN BE IN PLACE IN 5 YEARS FRAUD AND IGNORANCE PREVENTS TRUE SOLUTIONS AND FLEECES YOUR WALLET AND FUTURE Global taxation is TYRANNY and an agenda for FOOLS or MARXISTS.
Man made or natural global warming, it does not matter. The Global tax is still the solution!
#10. To: sourcery (#7)
I was simply iterating the globalist point of view, not my own. Hell, I work incredibly hard to ensure that I am in no way liable for income tax, and am even growing tobacco in order to dodge the taxes on tobacco, and ride horse to town often to save fuel/fuel taxes.
Only if world socialism (and world poverty) is your goal.
"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?"
#11. To: ladybug (#10)
I thought that was probably the case. But I wanted to make sure the audience got the right message. Not everyone gets sarcasm.
I was simply iterating the globalist point of view, not my own.
| Government Warning: The Attorney General has determined that Federal Regulation may be hazardous to your health |
#12. To: JCHarris (#4)
All true, except there are no solutions.
Some people buy popsicles just for kicks; but me and my baby we save the sticks; to keep brother and sister quiet as a mouse; we give 'em popsicle sticks to build a popsicle house
#13. To: Tauzero (#12)
ETHANOL IS A MONEYWASTING HOAX AND DIVERSION INTO FAT CATS WALLETS NUCLEAR=>HYDROGEN CAN BE IN PLACE IN 5 YEARS FRAUD AND IGNORANCE PREVENTS TRUE SOLUTIONS AND FLEECES YOUR WALLET AND FUTURE -JC All true, except there are no solutions. Tauzero A hydrogen economy driven by nuclear-energy driven hydrolysis is completely possible with no new technology at all. The missing factor is the desire to again make the nation great instead of it becoming a sharia-greedymiddleman-flowerchild-jabberwocky-freelunch Dictatorship. The people are not educated enough to force the feckless political will into what is needed for the country.
GLOBAL WARMING IS JUNK SCIENCE
#14. To: ladybug (#10)
Hell, I work incredibly hard to ensure that I am in no way liable for income tax, and am even growing tobacco in order to dodge the taxes on tobacco, and ride horse to town often to save fuel/fuel taxes. I am truly impressed! Seriously....and any wackyweed? or St. Johns Wort? Now if you raise your own bees, make your own mead, grow your own mushrooms, and raise rabbits for protein, you are truly set!
I was simply iterating the globalist point of view, not my own.
#15. To: JCHarris (#14)
Seeing how you are actually making sense on an issue, I will grace you with a response. Can't eat rabbit, goat shall have to suffice. 6And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Now if you raise your own bees, make your own mead, grow your own mushrooms, and raise rabbits for protein, you are truly set!
Leviticus 11:5And the coney, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.
"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?"
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest