See other Sports Articles
Title: Should buckeroo be returned to the site?
Source:
My Self
URL Source: http://None
Published: Jul 30, 2007
Author: Me
Post Date: 2007-07-30 23:45:40 by Minerva
Keywords: None
Views: 13429
Comments: 168
Since BAC left the site has been operating without a designated kook. A former LP member has recently come over and tried to appoint himself as site kook, but his performance has been so lackluster that few people have noticed him. Not only does he have to tell people how smart he is, but apparently he also has to tell people how outrageous he is. Sad. I hope he didn't quit his day job. I suggest we bring back buckeroo for a second round. Buckeroo knew how to be a kook without becoming offensive as Ponchy did or becoming obnoxious like BAC. I would appreciate any feedback on this suggestion.
[Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 46.
#1. To: Minerva (#0)
What does one have to do to become 'site kook'? 'ol Buck seemed to be too normal from what I remember ...
If you have to ask, it cannot be explained to you.
From here: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=57217&Disp=40#C40 I found this (ain't Google great!):
i think you are jealous because we went buckeroo as the site kook instead of you.
i think you are jealous because we went buckeroo as the site kook instead of you. Okay, I think I have it figured out. You and buckeroo have some sort of 'attraction' thing going on, and this is all one big ploy to get him back here on a 'kook' admission, and I'm interjecting (which I don't mean to do) ... so I say "bring him in." buckeroo posted on 2006-09-17 0:45:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply From here: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=34966&Disp=216#C216 (I could also be wrong, so I beg forgiveness ahead of time.)
buckeroo posted on 2006-09-17 0:45:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply I'm jealous. buckaroo never told me he loved me. Nevertheless, I think he should be allowed back on this site.
Tell Christine to un-ban him. He is about to get banned from LP. 9. To: buckeroo (#2) You have a choice to make: Use my screen name Or end your presence on this website permanently. (How would you like ME to announce YOUR name? I could do it.) === The next violation will be your last. You won't get another warning. Goldi-Lox posted on 2007-06-17 20:20:56 ET
He must be calling her Sally and she does not like that.
That is what he did. Here is the thread: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=195359
this is the only picture of JCHarris that i could find on the web. we should try to get him to post another on his home page.
LOL High school adolescent. Minerva you are a vicious brown shirt at heart. Have you EVER posted anything of substance? Your only thoughts are the lowest possible; i.e. a cult mentality of cliquish groupie think. Done with you, shrew.
Actually boston fishwife, bollywood mare or high school dit applies also as well as the resident buzzard instead of owl. Does bottom-feeding get YOU kookdom status? Oh, sorry, you already have it in polite company.
We are training you to be the site kook. You are nutty enough for the job, but you are too quiet. We are trying to draw you out.
There are no replies to Comment # 46. End Trace Mode for Comment # 46.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: EdCondon (#1)
What does one have to do to become 'site kook'?
#12. To: Minerva (#6)
Minerva: I think hate is the core component of of the kook personality. A kook is someone who is so blinded by hate that they can't act rationally. AKA Stone is a good example. All the other kooks are the same way. way.
I'm getting a better idea of your perspective.
#16. To: EdCondom (#12)
#20. To: Morgana le Fay (#16)
Morgana. I love you.
#29. To: EdCondon, Minerva (#20)
Morgana. I love you.
#30. To: Diana (#29)
(Edited)
#31. To: Minerva (#30)
#32. To: Diana (#31)
#33. To: Minerva (#32)
#40. To: Morgana le Fay (#33)
#41. To: Minerva (#40)
Done with you, shrew.
#46. To: JCHarris (#41)
Replies to Comment # 46.