See other Sports Articles
Title: Should buckeroo be returned to the site?
Source:
My Self
URL Source: http://None
Published: Jul 30, 2007
Author: Me
Post Date: 2007-07-30 23:45:40 by Minerva
Keywords: None
Views: 8847
Comments: 168
Since BAC left the site has been operating without a designated kook. A former LP member has recently come over and tried to appoint himself as site kook, but his performance has been so lackluster that few people have noticed him. Not only does he have to tell people how smart he is, but apparently he also has to tell people how outrageous he is. Sad. I hope he didn't quit his day job. I suggest we bring back buckeroo for a second round. Buckeroo knew how to be a kook without becoming offensive as Ponchy did or becoming obnoxious like BAC. I would appreciate any feedback on this suggestion.
[Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-31) not displayed.
.
.
.
#32. To: Diana (#31)
That is what he did. Here is the thread: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=195359
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
this is the only picture of JCHarris that i could find on the web. we should try to get him to post another on his home page.
I think he has another one posted over on the Log Cabin website. Did you check over there?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
That tight blue satin shirt makes JC look fat. JCHarris, you should post a better picture on your home page.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
it's true. there is a bad angle with the picture or something. it isn't very flattering. JCHarris should post a better one on his home page.
Interesting thread.
Buck should be here. I don't think he's a kook at all. 'Kook' means, to me, someone really off his rocker, or who has a single agenda repeated over and over in a bizarre manner. Buck likes a good drink every now and then, I think, but that's just more fun in my opinion! I vote 'yes' for Buckeroo!
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... This is something you, richard 90210 and inniebutton should understand perfectly
LOL High school adolescent. Minerva you are a vicious brown shirt at heart. Have you EVER posted anything of substance? Your only thoughts are the lowest possible; i.e. a cult mentality of cliquish groupie think. Done with you, shrew.
Actually boston fishwife, bollywood mare or high school dit applies also as well as the resident buzzard instead of owl. Does bottom-feeding get YOU kookdom status? Oh, sorry, you already have it in polite company.
Diana Stupid bottom-feeding brown shirt thread. Great minds talk about ideas; mediocre minds discuss things; the lowest minds talk about people.
LMAO from the anemic, washed out hair, bulemic twiggy wannabee with a Lenin cap on the vacuous head? This brown shirt joins in the stupid high school henry thread? LOL hyenas are carrion feeders after all.
These kinds of lies are why buck will never post on 4um again. ================================================= 29. To: Corn Flake Girl (#26) Why were you banned anyway? There is a dumbf**k retired NYC cop whom uses a handle, "Jethro Tull" on forum; he is Christine's secret admirer. That son-of a-bitch can't argue his way out of his own asshole yet, he is anti-semitic AND because of that deep issue within his singular brain cell has the HOTS for Sally. So, that SOB "Jethro Tull" gets on my case with his thug pals berating Goldie because of her religious beliefs. They failed on the challenge. So, I decided to play tit-for tat. I berated that stupid f**k ex-cop. And the spin continued. Jethro Tull is goddamned fascist PIG. He is my best friend (or so he thinks) in my new cloak over there. HAHAHAHA! buckeroo posted on 2007-07-30 23:25:31 ET Reply Trace ================================================= 39. To: malador, rant (#36) rant: I have thought 4um is a BATF front used to collect info on "gun nuts" and Patriots. malador: You would never have posted that if you knew the owner of the 4um board. You can be assured that that is not the case. Christine (web mistress of Freedom4um) has already been caught turning in IP addys to various conspirators. The facts are on her website. She has apologized many times because of her lack of experience and knowledge but the fact is, she turned over IPs of many of the posters. buckeroo posted on 2007-07-31 00:10:45 ET Reply Trace ============================================================== These examples of totally false accusations, slander really, are why buck will never post on 4um again. And these were posted just in the last several hours.
Ron Paul for President
how do you expect to be the site kook if you can't stand a little teasing?
We are training you to be the site kook. You are nutty enough for the job, but you are too quiet. We are trying to draw you out.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
I would like to see buckeroo post here. I'd also like to see continental op aka Ponchy aka Solomon Kane be unbanned. He's been a very lonely man lately.
Hmmmmmmmm. We would then have buckeroo, Ponchy and Brer posting here at the same time. Is that safe?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
What was his offense?
Don't axe me. I missed the dustup.
mouthing off to the wrong people.
Noone should be banned.
It wasn't really his fault however. It's just his nature. Asking him to stop would be like asking a bear to stop shitting in the woods.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
I disagree, I dont want to join in with any outfit that would allow me in.
read what buckeroo just posted on LP: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=58296&Disp=44#C44
Ron Paul for President
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made.
what if buckeroo makes a public apology for saying that? could he come on then? he could just say that he was drunk when he said it. people would probably believe him.
From what I've heard, only sick codependent abused wives fall for that line, and you won't find anyone of that description on this 4um. ;P
Ron Paul for President
you wouldn't believe buckeroo if he said he was drunk? the odds are that he was drunk when he said what he said above.
Few understand this is the zen of kookdom. You cannot explain a joke and expect it to be understood, and one cannot explain kookness without people saying they couldn't possibly be that insane.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
If he says he is sober, the odds are he ain't. Even if it is early morning, he could well have been up all night stuffing Franklins into the G strings of strippers at the local watering hole.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
Same here. I have my high standards too.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
Have been reading - there is no point to this thread.
Newt, Giuliani, McCain, and many like-minded GOPs and neocons, they could serve as nice cooks. I believe that McCain is one of the few cooks that's sincere. The others... they're cooking Teevee dinners and then they're calling themselves 'famous chefs'.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I think we should start insulting O'Reilly. Look at all the publicity Daily Kos is getting for doing that.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
There is one person with the nic of Unknown_Person that should be banned if it shows up here just on general principles.
Even if they fill the Kook slot? I have seen Buck act less then kookish, but he still is just chatting up a storm with nothing to do with the issue or story at hand. If he is let backin to be a token kook, the entertainment value should be enough to consider the lad a being worth his salt... and tequila.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
It would be a shame to be stuck with Brer as the site kook. I don't think he has the wits for the job. His list five insult posts have basically all said the same thing.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
christine Damn, chrissy ! Known you about 10 years now and that's the first time I ever heerd you write like a LAWYER ! (-; Must be one o dem night school Bar Mitzvah Exams ? (smile, at least an attempt at court house humor)
TRUTH NEEDS NOT WAX ELOQUENT ! WHEN SUBJECTS ARE NOT COMPLEX. lol
I thot it was just me that thot Christine has been hiding something under her hair.
Cynicom Llllaaaawwwwdy Mercy ! Is THAT where itz at?
Comments (73 - 168) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#33. To: Minerva (#32)
#34. To: Morgana le Fay (#33)
#35. To: Morgana le Fay, JCHarris (#33)
(Edited)
#36. To: Minerva, JCHarris (#35)
#37. To: Minerva (#32)
#38. To: Minerva (#0)
#39. To: richard9151 (#26)
I like that. Puts the understanding right where it belongs, on the kook, who, admittedly, probably does not know he/she(?) is a kook!
#40. To: Morgana le Fay (#33)
#41. To: Minerva (#40)
Done with you, shrew.
#42. To: Diana, BlueEyedGirl (#37)
Interesting thread.
#43. To: Morgana le Fay (#36)
Morgana le Fay
#44. To: Minerva, Diana, Morgana le Fay, Jethro Tull, christine, farmfriend, EdCondon (#0)
#45. To: JCHarris (#43)
#46. To: JCHarris (#41)
#47. To: farmfriend (#22)
#48. To: Fred Mertz (#47)
#49. To: Fred Mertz (#47)
continental op aka Ponchy aka Solomon Kane be unbanned.
#50. To: Cynicom (#49)
#51. To: Cynicom (#49)
What was his offense?
#52. To: Minerva (#0)
#53. To: Morgana le Fay (#51)
mouthing off to the wrong people.
#54. To: war (#52)
Noone should be banned.
#55. To: Fred Mertz (#47)
#56. To: war, robin, Zipporah, Critter, Minerva, Morgana Le Fay, Diana, Cynicom, JCHarris (#52)
#57. To: robin (#55)
#58. To: Morgana le Fay (#57)
#59. To: robin (#58)
(Edited)
#60. To: Minerva (#6)
"If you have to ask, it cannot be explained to you."
#61. To: Morgana le Fay (#59)
"the odds are that he was drunk when he said it."
#62. To: Cynicom (#54)
"I disagree, I dont want to join in with any outfit that would allow me in."
#63. To: JCHarris (#42)
Great minds talk about ideas; mediocre minds discuss things; the lowest minds talk about people.
#64. To: Minerva (#0)
#65. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#64)
(Edited)
#66. To: christine (#56)
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned.
#67. To: christine (#56)
"When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made."
#68. To: Ferret Mike (#67)
#69. To: christine (#56)
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made.
#70. To: Minerva (#68)
His list five insult posts have basically all said the same thing.
#71. To: JCHarris (#69)
Damn, chrissy ! Known you about 10 years now and that's the first time I ever heerd you write like a LAWYER ! (-;
#72. To: Cynicom (#71)
I thot it was just me that thot Christine has been hiding something under her hair.
.
.
.