See other Sports Articles
Title: Should buckeroo be returned to the site?
Source:
My Self
URL Source: http://None
Published: Jul 30, 2007
Author: Me
Post Date: 2007-07-30 23:45:40 by Minerva
Keywords: None
Views: 8980
Comments: 168
Since BAC left the site has been operating without a designated kook. A former LP member has recently come over and tried to appoint himself as site kook, but his performance has been so lackluster that few people have noticed him. Not only does he have to tell people how smart he is, but apparently he also has to tell people how outrageous he is. Sad. I hope he didn't quit his day job. I suggest we bring back buckeroo for a second round. Buckeroo knew how to be a kook without becoming offensive as Ponchy did or becoming obnoxious like BAC. I would appreciate any feedback on this suggestion.
[Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-46) not displayed.
.
.
.
#47. To: farmfriend (#22)
I would like to see buckeroo post here. I'd also like to see continental op aka Ponchy aka Solomon Kane be unbanned. He's been a very lonely man lately.
Hmmmmmmmm. We would then have buckeroo, Ponchy and Brer posting here at the same time. Is that safe?
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
What was his offense?
Don't axe me. I missed the dustup.
mouthing off to the wrong people.
Noone should be banned.
It wasn't really his fault however. It's just his nature. Asking him to stop would be like asking a bear to stop shitting in the woods.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
I disagree, I dont want to join in with any outfit that would allow me in.
read what buckeroo just posted on LP: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=58296&Disp=44#C44
Ron Paul for President
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made.
what if buckeroo makes a public apology for saying that? could he come on then? he could just say that he was drunk when he said it. people would probably believe him.
From what I've heard, only sick codependent abused wives fall for that line, and you won't find anyone of that description on this 4um. ;P
Ron Paul for President
you wouldn't believe buckeroo if he said he was drunk? the odds are that he was drunk when he said what he said above.
Few understand this is the zen of kookdom. You cannot explain a joke and expect it to be understood, and one cannot explain kookness without people saying they couldn't possibly be that insane.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
If he says he is sober, the odds are he ain't. Even if it is early morning, he could well have been up all night stuffing Franklins into the G strings of strippers at the local watering hole.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
Same here. I have my high standards too.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
Have been reading - there is no point to this thread.
Newt, Giuliani, McCain, and many like-minded GOPs and neocons, they could serve as nice cooks. I believe that McCain is one of the few cooks that's sincere. The others... they're cooking Teevee dinners and then they're calling themselves 'famous chefs'.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I think we should start insulting O'Reilly. Look at all the publicity Daily Kos is getting for doing that.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
There is one person with the nic of Unknown_Person that should be banned if it shows up here just on general principles.
Even if they fill the Kook slot? I have seen Buck act less then kookish, but he still is just chatting up a storm with nothing to do with the issue or story at hand. If he is let backin to be a token kook, the entertainment value should be enough to consider the lad a being worth his salt... and tequila.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
It would be a shame to be stuck with Brer as the site kook. I don't think he has the wits for the job. His list five insult posts have basically all said the same thing.
Bunch of internet bums ... grand jury --- opium den ! ~ byeltsin
christine Damn, chrissy ! Known you about 10 years now and that's the first time I ever heerd you write like a LAWYER ! (-; Must be one o dem night school Bar Mitzvah Exams ? (smile, at least an attempt at court house humor)
TRUTH NEEDS NOT WAX ELOQUENT ! WHEN SUBJECTS ARE NOT COMPLEX. lol
I thot it was just me that thot Christine has been hiding something under her hair.
Cynicom Llllaaaawwwwdy Mercy ! Is THAT where itz at?
Thell me about it. Boring, the guy is in a rut. He's been calling me a "stinky cat" for ages, which doesn't discribe a mustilid like a stink weasel well, to say the least. We should allow Buckeroonie back in and give bunnie butt to him as an apprentice. To do it right we need to fly him to Buckeroonie land to learn how to stick Franklins in G strings with his two remaining front teeth all the while muttering how Christine is out to destroy 'Merica' and the Internet, and other things near and dear to his perma-tweaked mind. If kooks were as lame as this long earred, small balled wonder, the Internet forum world would of never left the USENET cradle. Buck would have a serious challenge on his hand teaching this furball how to dance through a forum with the panache of a drunk 16 year old driving over cars during rush hour any eity U.S.A. in an M1 tank. We could dub him the Tonto of the Liberace of the Internet. I'm sure we could get Ward Churchill to give him lesons in how to simulate Indianess enough for this role if we have to.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
Sniff...sniff...sniff... Aw, that's wonderful
Bunnie, you know and admit the two dimensionality of your being. That's the
first step out of the world of kookdom. Of course with you that one step
forward no doubt will be immediately followed by two steps backward. It's just
how you are.
Thesis: Official 9/11 story is an unproven conspiracy theory. http://911truth.org http://Justicefor911.org http://summeroftruth.org Probable-cause standards have been met for an unlimited investigation of unsolved crimes relating to the events of Sept. 11, including allegations of criminal negligence, cover-up, complicity or commission of the attacks by US officials and assets of intel services.
He posted this recently? Yes they are lies and how he could not know the truth is beyond me.. these accusations are vicious and absolutely not true.
.. and the very few that have been banned it was done with much consideration and deliberation.. we arent perfect.. we do make errors in judgment but not often :P ..
Anyone who does not kiss Minervas fat ass is a kook. Simple. Know the rules and act accordingly.
And what of the minds that abrasively insult others for no reason except to seemingly make themselves feel superior?? And, After all you participated in this "lowest minds" threads.
"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men" Plato
Have you EVER posted anything of substance? Your only thoughts are the lowest possible; i.e. a cult mentality of cliquish groupie think. Hmmm ... reminds me of that ditz, that shrew, that offense to female-humanity "That Poppins Woman" (from TOS.)
He wouldn't have any Franklins.
"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men" Plato
Anyone who does not kiss Minervas fat ass is a kook. Simple. Know the rules and act accordingly. If, and when (if-ever that is, if it comes to that or water-boarding in a FEMA relocation camp that is), can I get an alcohol "Prep Pad" (Alcohol Swab) applied first? I don't want to catch anything.
There are elements of the truth in them. He spins them to his advantage...that is the buckeroo persona...love it or leave it. He won't change, nor should he. He shouldn't be banned.
.. nope.. there is no truth in it.. sorry I know the truth.. and what he's spinning is bullshit.
They aren't totally false. Slander is the spoken word. I've been waaaay over the line on a few occasions but Bret let me back in. I don't like an echo chamber and that's one reason I read and post on elPee.
I've read of the IP mining exchange on here. No doubt, it was trying to figure out one or two Clown infiltrators which I would try to do myself. Are you saying that there is no truth to that?
Yes I am saying there was no truth in that..chris nor I gave anyone IPs .. it never happened.. not something I would do nor would chris..it is not ethical.. that was the charge and it is not true..
who are you? Well ... I guess we could start with "I'm certainly not _Jim" and work down from there.
Comments (88 - 168) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#48. To: Fred Mertz (#47)
#49. To: Fred Mertz (#47)
continental op aka Ponchy aka Solomon Kane be unbanned.
#50. To: Cynicom (#49)
#51. To: Cynicom (#49)
What was his offense?
#52. To: Minerva (#0)
#53. To: Morgana le Fay (#51)
mouthing off to the wrong people.
#54. To: war (#52)
Noone should be banned.
#55. To: Fred Mertz (#47)
#56. To: war, robin, Zipporah, Critter, Minerva, Morgana Le Fay, Diana, Cynicom, JCHarris (#52)
#57. To: robin (#55)
#58. To: Morgana le Fay (#57)
#59. To: robin (#58)
(Edited)
#60. To: Minerva (#6)
"If you have to ask, it cannot be explained to you."
#61. To: Morgana le Fay (#59)
"the odds are that he was drunk when he said it."
#62. To: Cynicom (#54)
"I disagree, I dont want to join in with any outfit that would allow me in."
#63. To: JCHarris (#42)
Great minds talk about ideas; mediocre minds discuss things; the lowest minds talk about people.
#64. To: Minerva (#0)
#65. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#64)
(Edited)
#66. To: christine (#56)
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned.
#67. To: christine (#56)
"When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made."
#68. To: Ferret Mike (#67)
#69. To: christine (#56)
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made.
#70. To: Minerva (#68)
His list five insult posts have basically all said the same thing.
#71. To: JCHarris (#69)
Damn, chrissy ! Known you about 10 years now and that's the first time I ever heerd you write like a LAWYER ! (-;
#72. To: Cynicom (#71)
I thot it was just me that thot Christine has been hiding something under her hair.
#73. To: Minerva, JCHarris, Bunnybuttsticktoatarbaby (#68)
"It would be a shame to be stuck with Brer as the site kook. I don't think he has the wits for the job. His list five insult posts have basically all said the same thing."
#74. To: JCHarris (#70)
"TRUTH NEEDS NOT WAX ELOQUENT ! WHEN SUBJECTS ARE NOT COMPLEX."
lol
#75. To: robin (#44)
#76. To: christine (#56)
When it's obvious that an individual is here with an agenda meant to do harm to this forum or its members and not in a good faith effort to earnestly debate and discuss issues, then they should be banned. Since 4um's inception, there have been very few who have met that criteria and all of them were given ample time before the decision was made.
#77. To: EdCondon (#12)
#78. To: JCHarris, diana (#42)
Great minds talk about ideas; mediocre minds discuss things; the lowest minds talk about people.
#79. To: JCHarris (#40)
[to Minerva]
#80. To: Ferret Mike (#61)
could well have been up all night stuffing Franklins into the G strings of strippers at the local watering hole.
#81. To: willyone (#77)
#82. To: Zipporah (#75)
Yes they are lies and how he could not know the truth is beyond me..
#83. To: Fred Mertz (#82)
#84. To: robin (#44)
These examples of totally false accusations, slander really, are why buck will never post on 4um again.
#85. To: Zipporah (#83)
#86. To: Fred Mertz (#85)
(Edited)
#87. To: Diana (#25)
.
.
.