[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: No More Anonymous Food
Source: www.worldwatch.org
URL Source: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5202
Published: Aug 2, 2007
Author: Brian Halweil
Post Date: 2007-08-02 17:58:42 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 196
Comments: 15

At a potluck dinner last night, in the midst of local skirt steak, Montauk scallops, a frittata made with the year’s first potatoes, and a salad made with the year’s first tomatoes, the conversation naturally turned to the origin of our foods. The guests included a farmer, two winemakers, and a fisherman, as well as a nurse, several writers, and others who don’t directly make their living from food, but were happy to speak about it.

More than ever, it seems, people are talking about where their food comes from. It must have something to do with the recent news about contaminated food imported from China and other nations whose food safety laws seem equally porous. Food scares always push people toward farmers markets and more home-cooked fare made with fresh ingredients.

In North Carolina, concerned citizens recently issued a grassroots call for food labeling. Finally, there may be enough political will to fight opposition from international food makers and pass country-of-origin-labeling laws that, in the words of a recent New York Times op-ed, let Americans consumers “know where their food comes from before popping it into their mouths.”

But as my dining companions made clear, knowing where your food was grown is only the beginning. At a time when our food travels farther than ever before, eating local is not just about geography—it’s about the end of “anonymous food.” It’s about asking how our food was raised, who raised it, and what impact it had on the landscape. Remember, food is still our most intimate connection to the soil and water around us.

Consider two recent—and creative—“eat local” campaigns. The first was launched by the Center for a New American Dream as part of their six-month Carbon Conscious Consumer (C3) campaign. “Big changes start with small steps” is the campaign’s tagline, and this month’s goal is to buy one pound of locally grown food each week. Future months will encourage people to cold wash their clothes and dishes, reduce their junk mail, and carve out one car-free day a week.

And now, Bon Appetit restaurant company has built on its successful Eat Local Challenge to introduce a low-carbon diet at its 400 cafes at universities and corporate campuses in 28 U.S. states. The chain plans to reduce its use of beef by 25 percent, to source all meat and poultry and nearly all fruits and vegetables from North America, to use seasonal local produce as a first preference and tropical fruits only as “special occasion” ingredients, and to serve only domestic bottled water and reduce waste from the plastic containers.

Perhaps the best evidence of this growing curiosity about how much energy it takes to move our food around is the fact that eating local has even invited a backlash in form of disparaging “don’t buy local” stories from the New York Times and studies from concerned New Zealand shepherds illustrating that, despite the long-distance haul, New Zealand lamb requires less energy to produce than American or European lamb because of the island’s balmy climate and extensive pastures.

According to Rich Pirog of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, “It’s entirely possible that under certain systems or certain constraints the local is going to be less efficient than the national or even global food system in terms of energy and greenhouse gas use.” Pirog pioneered much of the thinking on food miles a few years ago, showing that the mode of conveyance makes a huge difference (potatoes shipped by rail from Idaho to New York might be less polluting than Maine potatoes delivered via 18-wheeler truck). “Food miles are a great indicator of localness, but they aren’t necessarily the best indicator of energy use,” he concludes.

But localness has other advantages even when it isn’t the most energy efficient. Eating local keeps money in the local economy, helps preserve farmland, and usually means tastier food. In the midst of food safety crises, eating local also brings a certain peace of mind because the shopper can get much more information about what they are actually buying.

For those shoppers who are most concerned about energy use, though, here are some simple rules of thumb:

Shop nearby if you can—driving long-distance to a farmers market isn’t doing anyone any favors. Even better, try to get your local supermarket to host a farmers market in its parking lot.

Eat whole, unprocessed foods. The energy use and greenhouse gas emissions skyrocket for canning, freezing, and other processing, and processed foods require more energy to ship.

Eat seasonally. Your local tomato grower might have to drive love apples to market in August, but at least you won’t be getting them flown in from Holland in December.

And, finally, ask questions. Because the more we ask, the better our food seems to get.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#2. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

The press over poisonings and adulteration of Chinese products has helped our cause, man. BEfore, those of us who were for "buy American" were called racists and xenophobes. Now, since the danger and health issues have been well publicized, they can't call us that anymore and we gain legitimacy...and power.

IndieTX  posted on  2007-08-02   18:10:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: IndieTX (#2)

I want food labelled to indicate where ALL components came from. If there is any Chinese wheat guten or any other suspect material, I want to know about it so I can avoid it. The 'New World Order' is killing us with this system that allows criminal states like China to poison us.

Enough is more then enough.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2007-08-02   18:23:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ferret Mike, IndieTX (#3)

I want food labelled to indicate where ALL components came from.

Mike, you have the solution, and it is right in your wallet; if it does not say where it is from, DON'T BUY IT! And, make sure that the stores where you shop know that is one of the prime methods you use to make your decisions.

That is all it takes. When enough people make their wishes known, 'they' snap right into line with what is neccessary. But do not wait for others, Mike; make the decision that is right for you and your family, and tell your friends and family what and why you are doing it.

This is what has been wrong with America for a long time; most everyone went along to get along; don't rock the boat type of non-sense. Well, that is over, and has been for a long time for me.

I have a cardinal rule; if it says, made in China, I do not touch it. And I do not care what the product is or what the price is; I buy something else. And when enough people start acting that way, well, the problem will go away.

richard9151  posted on  2007-08-02   18:38:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: richard9151, Ferret Mike, IndieTX (#4)

The WTO does mot permit country of origin labeling as it might lead to consumer discrimination in favor of locally produced food. The WTO is a treaty and as such automatically amends our U.S. Constitution. As for that company that wants to sell North American food, that definition includes Mexico which can include some highly questionable food but does include some good organic fruits and vegetables.

Horse  posted on  2007-08-02   19:21:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Horse (#10)

The WTO does mot permit country of origin labeling as it might lead to consumer discrimination in favor of locally produced food. The WTO is a treaty and as such automatically amends our U.S. Constitution.

Which is EXACTLY what Chuck Harder and the old Populist movement including Ralph Nader warned us about 20 years ago before it was ratified. Nobody listened. Which is why the noose fits the crime. TheSystem is too rigged to ever get justice any other way but Revolution.

IndieTX  posted on  2007-08-02   20:06:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: IndieTX (#12)

Which is EXACTLY what Chuck Harder

I used to listen to Chuck all the time in early and mid-'90s and was a member of 'For the People.' Joining Ed Miller of the Auto worker's union to promote American products was his downfall. He lost the Telford for several years and had to sue to get it back. After he acquired it again, he couldn't afford to keep it running because he also lost the radio network he was building. It's been said that Miller had ulterior motives because Chuck was always on Clinton and they wanted shut him up.

I could get him on two AM stations, but when the big corporate entities bought up most of the local stations, they removed him from the program list.

InsideJob  posted on  2007-08-03   7:30:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

        There are no replies to Comment # 15.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]