[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats Texas Flood Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ? Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia 329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive Which Countries Invest In The US The Most? The History of Barbecue ‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher! They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: History Channel to Air 9/11 Conspiracies Special
Source: History Channel
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 3, 2007
Author: History Channel
Post Date: 2007-08-03 10:31:04 by Ringo Blankenship
Keywords: None
Views: 22122
Comments: 246

UPCOMING SHOWS

Sunday, August 12 08:00 PM Monday, August13 12:00 PM

An Internet search for "9/11 conspiracy theories" yields nearly two million hits. Were the attacks on 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration to advance its own interests? Could a government missile have hit the Pentagon? As outrageous as these ideas may sound, many people believe them. Why do these theories arise in the first place? An interview with James Miegs, Editor-in-Chief of Popular Mechanics, who refutes many of these theories. Watch as experts in the fields of aeronautics, engineering and the military put these theories to the test.

Rating: TVPG Running Time: 120 minutes

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Are you calling me a liar? That's hilarious.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   10:36:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I just gave you two pieces of evidence.

No, you haven't.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:38:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Your claim is not evidence.

It's just a claim.

It certainly is. We just polled one person and got some evidence.

You are just arguing about the quality of the evidence now. But you, as a dishonest propagandist know this.

And this evidence he presented is a hell of a lot better than any evidence that you have presented to back up your claim - which is nothing.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   10:38:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Are you calling me a liar?

Do you have reading comprehension issues?

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:38:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

When pressed on this, you try to change the subject.

Gotta love the arguing the specific when a general observation is claims, and vice-versa. Classic propaganda technique, wouldn't hold up two seconds in a Jr High debate.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   10:38:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Answer the question or leave. Are you calling me a liar?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   10:39:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And this evidence he presented is a hell of a lot better than any evidence that you have presented to back up your claim - which is nothing.

If you want to believe that 911 kookery influenced the 2006 election, go right ahead.

I don't believe it.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:40:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

just gave you two pieces of evidence.

No, you haven't.

You are telling a deliberate lie here, but you know that.

I gave you the Percy and Dakmar accounts on the thread above. But you know this.

You are simply quibbling about the quality of the evidence. But you, as a dishonest shill, already know that.

I gave you evidence to contradict you idiotic assertion of fact that 911 had no effect on the 2005 elections. Now back up your asserion or admit that you tried to lie to us.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   10:40:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Answer the question or leave. Are you calling me a liar?

Did I use the word liar?

Read my posts slowly. Let the words sink in.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:41:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

If you want to believe that 911 kookery influenced the 2006 election, go right ahead.

I don't believe it.

This isn't the subject under discussion here. But you know that.

What you are trying to do is wiggle out from your lie by changing the subject. But you know that.

Anyone who would try this cheap tactic - such as yourself - is a dishonest shill. But you know that already.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   10:42:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

What you are trying to do is wiggle out from your lie by changing the subject.

I've told no lies. I've only stated my beliefs.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:43:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Your claim is not evidence.

It's just a claim.

Yep, you are calling me a liar. Since you refuse to answer even the simplest of questions I see no reason to engage you for any purpose beyond my own amusement.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   10:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Did I use the word liar?

Read my posts slowly. Let the words sink in.

You called him a liar.

Specifically, you disparaged his assertion as follows:

Your claim is not evidence.

It's just a claim.

He claimed he gave you evidence to contradict your dishonest assertion and you implied that what he said wasn't true.

You now try to escape this by playing word games: I never said it was an animal, I said it was a dog.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   10:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He claimed he gave you evidence to contradict your dishonest assertion and you implied that what he said wasn't true.

No, I said that a claim is not evidence.

I could claim right now to really be Brad Pitt but without evidence to prove that I am Brad Pitt, it's nothing more than a claim.

I'm sure you can't grasp that very basic concept.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:49:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I've told no lies. I've only stated my beliefs.

Ok, you wiggle for half a dozen posts and then - when you realize you are trapped - you try to change what you originally said.

You are a liar.

You didn't express your claim about 911 and the election as an opinion, you expressed it as an absolute fact. You did this more than one time on the thread above. I called you on it and you failed to clarify the statement - instead, you tried to change the subject and leave you dishonest statement intact.

You are a lying propagandist.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   10:50:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are a lying propagandist.

Clean is either olde Sinkspur or his bastard child.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-08   10:51:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Clean is either olde Sinkspur or his bastard child.

If that were true I would be posting my support and defense of Bush.

But there is not one single post where I even come close to doing that.

Interesting.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:54:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No, I said that a claim is not evidence.

He claimed to have evidence that contradicted you. He gave his statement as the evidence. And evidence is precisely what his statement was.

You called him a liar by implying that his statement wasn't evidence.

You then denied calling him a liar.

You are a real piece of work. If you are going to be dishonest in this manner, you need to be much more careful than you have been on this thread.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   10:55:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I could claim right now to really be Brad Pitt but without evidence to prove that I am Brad Pitt, it's nothing more than a claim.

Just as it's a claim that the WTC and Pentagon were attacked by al qaeda. So why should you care what anyone thinks if you have no rational standard of objectivity?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   10:55:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

If that were true I would be posting my support and defense of Bush.

No, you just attack anyone critical of him, as if that were not support.

My advice to you is to use the reality you are given, you are lousy at creating it.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   10:57:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

He gave his statement as the evidence.

I am Brad Pitt and I'm posting poolside from our villa in south France.

Angelina is skinnydipping right now.

Prove my claim is false.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:57:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No, you just attack anyone critical of him

I don't attack myself.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   10:58:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Interesting.

Interesting?

Not really.

Sinkspur was never interesting, he was just a sick person, and he was outed as a huffing, puffing liar.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-08   11:00:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Interesting?

Not really.

It is very interesting that you would suggest I am a rabid Bush supporter yet there is not a single post from me expressing support for Bush.

It also reflects extreme laziness on your part.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I am Brad Pitt and I'm posting poolside from our villa in south France.

Angelina is skinnydipping right now.

Prove my claim is false.

Complete and utter Red Herring tossed out by a dishonest shill to save face.

To be relevant, you should ask me to prove that your statement isn't evidence of the fact that you are Brad Pitt.

I can't do this. You statement is evidnece of this fact. It's shitty evidence, but it is still evidence.

Instead, you play word games and ask me to prove the statement false. Which has nothing to do with the discussion above. I said Dakmar's statement was evidence and I said nothing about it being true of false.

But you know this.

This new dishonesty proves up you lack of integrity.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   11:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It is in fact evidence that you are Brad Pitt, it just happens to be unreliable, as is any claim you make.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   11:04:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You statement is evidnece of this fact. It's shitty evidence, but it is still evidence.

Wrong.

A claim made by some guy on an Internet message board is not evidence.

But since you'll obviously believe whatever somebody posts, Angelina is sitting in my lap right now feeding me grapes.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:05:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

But back to the point.

You said that the 911 theories had no effect on the 2006 elections.

You put this out as an assertion of fact. There were no qualifiers on this bullshit claim. You made the claim more than once and when called on it, you tried to change the subject.

Now ... Back up your bullshit or admit that you tried to lie to us.

Post the article or study that supports your claim that the 911 theories had NO effect on the 2006 elections.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   11:07:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A claim made by some guy on an Internet message board is not evidence.

It will do for the purposes of your blanket claim that 911 was not a factor in anyone's vote in 2006. Unless you are calling me a liar.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   11:07:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It also reflects extreme laziness on your part.

Sinkspur you is....

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-08   11:08:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It is in fact evidence that you are Brad Pitt, it just happens to be unreliable, as is any claim you make.

My claims are as unreliable as yours.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:08:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Now ... Back up your bullshit or admit that you tried to lie to us.

Wound up pretty tight, huh?

I suggest you have a couple beers with lunch or go smoke a bowl.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:09:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Sinkspur you is....

Where are all of my pro-Bush posts?

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:09:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A claim made by some guy on an Internet message board is not evidence.

You are lying again.

But you know that.

Evidence is anything that tends to prove the assertion under question.

You are trying to wiggle out of you lie by confusing evidence with the quality of the evidence. Two different things entierly - but you know that.

This new dishonesty further proves your lack of integrity.

.

...  posted on  2007-08-08   11:10:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I voted Libertarian in part because I thought the GOP was covering up several details of 911.

The same reason I didn't vote for Bush the second time, although I did the first time (forgive me, everyone). I smelled a big, stinking RAT after watching those buildings fall, and then listening to all the BS stories being spewed by the controlled media.

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2007-08-08   11:10:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are the only one calling me a liar, whereas you are called a liar hundreds of times a day, by dozens of different individuals. Who would an objective observer be more likely to believe?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   11:11:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Since you said 2004 I'm guessing MC will use that to try to prove his case.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   11:12:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Evidence is anything that tends to prove the assertion under question.

Angelina just went to fetch me a scotch.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:12:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And you just gave your father a blow job.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-08   11:13:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are the only one calling me a liar,

I have not called you a liar.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-08   11:14:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (223 - 246) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]