See other 9/11 Articles
Title: History Channel to Air 9/11 Conspiracies Special
Source:
History Channel
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 3, 2007
Author: History Channel
Post Date: 2007-08-03 10:31:04 by Ringo Blankenship
Keywords: None
Views: 12429
Comments: 246
UPCOMING SHOWS Sunday, August 12 08:00 PM Monday, August13 12:00 PM An Internet search for "9/11 conspiracy theories" yields nearly two million hits. Were the attacks on 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration to advance its own interests? Could a government missile have hit the Pentagon? As outrageous as these ideas may sound, many people believe them. Why do these theories arise in the first place? An interview with James Miegs, Editor-in-Chief of Popular Mechanics, who refutes many of these theories. Watch as experts in the fields of aeronautics, engineering and the military put these theories to the test. Rating: TVPG Running Time: 120 minutes
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-74) not displayed.
.
.
.
#75. To: Flintlock (#71)
What part of Sid Vicious, towelhead closet do you not underst...you're getting sleepy, yes, that's it...All together now, ALL TOGETHER NOW! ALL TOGETHER NOW!
oh my beloved ice cream bar, how I love to lick your creamy center "A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs
That depends If you double up my weekly brain-gravy injections, I'll be his daddy.
I cant promise anything of the sort. Dont ever tell anyone about fight club.
"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs
That explains A LOT about you blokes; bonkers, twits, twats, wankers, punk shockers, lamers and losers, cabbage-patch, GI Joe and Berbie doll molesters, that mingle there in some disgusting orgy of idiocy ... ... I stole that line by the way; credit must to to: http://aepalizage.blogspot.com/
I stole that line by the way; credit must to to: http://aepalizage.blogspot.com/ Oh now that's a good one, Buck...
Hi Ed, Have you given any more thought to the idea that Operation Mockingbird was a real CIA program? Hearst came before OpMock (my abbreviatiation), so I'm not going to argue about Popular Mechanics, but I believe National Review was started by CIA. I'm not going to look up anything for you, you've acted in bad faith. I'll smile as two or three others search internet for this information, that I've capitalized, hint, hint.
"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs
How's it going, cracker?
In 1963 after the Kennedy assassination Life magazine published 3 photos from the Zapruder film in reverse order so that the general public would believe the "official theory" of a lone assassin. When people with actual brains began saying and proving that WTC Towers 1, 2 and 7 were taken down by controlled demolitions, Popular Mecahnics published a piece of trash by Michael Chertoff's cousin saying that the buidlings collapsed by spontaneous combustion or some such nonsense. Popular Mechanics and Life magazine are guilty of conspiring to cover up treason and murder. William Pepper who represented the MLK family in their wrongful death lawsuit against Loyd Jowers said that the media should all be considered as unindicted conspirators.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
The Dallas Police that day - along with many other law officers - had no doubt in their minds that they had the right guy. Even Lee Harvey's OWN BROTHER, who had a chance to talk to LHO while in DPD custody knew his nutty brother did it. On another note - - have you ever seen the affidavit from the guy who was one floor below Oswald in the Texas School Book Depository building and heard everything? The guy heard the shots, heard the bolt action being worked, and heard the spent brass shell casings hit the wooden (yes, wooden) floors of the TSBDB.
Question: What is the decrease in tensile strength for 'typical' structural steel at 600 degrees C? Folow-up: What is the purpose of sprayed-on fire resistant/fire retardant?
1) The greatest living sniper in the Marines, Carlos Hathcock, tried several times at Quantico to re-create the shooting of JFK from the Texas School Book Depository window that Oswald was alleged to have made. Not one of the best snipers in the MArine Corps could re-create the shots the Warren Commission claimed were made. 2) Go to http://www.WTC7.net and look at the collapse videos. Before a fire gets to 6,000 or even 4,000 degrees it must go past 900 degrees at which point the windows would have popped out and melted as steel is more resistant than glass. The only way you can get to 4,000 without going past 900 degrees is with a cutting agent, such as, thermite and thermate. Placed at a 45 degree angle, the thermite would cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. But you would still need explosives charges to speed the collapse. The 47 story WTC Tower 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds even though we see no evidence of either damaged windows from a 900 degree fire or any structural damage from being struck by an airliner. To collapse at nearly the speed of a body in free fall is impossible except in a controlled demolition. Look at it mathematically, all of the many points of contact on each floor had to reach the same temperature 4,000 degrees at the same time (i.e. within 2 seconds of eah other.) Now what is that probability? One in a hundred, one in a thousand? But that happened on all 47 floors at the same time. Whar is that probability? 1/100 or 1/1,000 times itself 47 times. That by definition is a controlled demolition. Please look at the collapse videos of WTC 7 before responding. They should also have something about the 24 story steel girdered office building in Madrid that burned for 36 hours without the steel frame collapsing.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
Go to http://www.WTC7.net and look at the No ... I asked a simple question that any first year civil engineering and many high-school students could answer ... that that was: how much tensile strength does structural-grade steel lose at 600 deg. C?
The greatest living sniper in the Marines, Carlos So, does that mean you are unaware of the affidavit from the guy who was one floor below Oswald in the Texas School Book Depository building and heard everything? You know, the one I explained where the guy heard the shots, heard the bolt action being worked, and heard the spent brass shell casings hit the wooden (yes, wooden) floors of the TSBDB. It is okay to admit that you don't know these things, that is why we are here, on these forums, as this is not 'real life' ...
How about a remedial course in mech enginnering - 2.002 Mechanics and Materials II Course Description This course provides Mechanical Engineering students with an awareness of various responses exhibited by solid engineering materials when subjected to mechanical and thermal loadings; an introduction to the physical mechanisms associated with design-limiting behavior of engineering materials, especially stiffness, strength, toughness, and durability; an understanding of basic mechanical properties of engineering materials, testing procedures used to quantify these properties, and ways in which these properties characterize material response; quantitative skills to deal with materials-limiting problems in engineering design; and a basis for materials selection in mechanical design.
How about listening to the Truth instead of people on the dole from the government and the CFR-AIPAC controlled Foundations? Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth! http://www.ae911truth.org/ You probably didn't bother looking at the www.WTC7 collapse videos. Please don't waste my time any more.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
Why? Does their steel have different properties than someone elses? That's the question I think needs to be addressed. And it's kinda telling that you can't answer a simple question a high-school kid could answer ...
Blah blah- Turkish built high rise apartment blocks- built in the most shoddy manner with sub standard material don't collapse in 9.0 earthquakes as completely as those towers did after being hit by basically big aluminum tubes and small fires burning for 40 minutes. Then of course there is building seven- enough said. Towers don't explode like that and come tumbling down - all three in the same manner despite being hit in different areas and one not hit all. ITS ABUSRD ON ITS FACE.
Paid shill alert! http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
Ron Paul for President
The internet wasn't around during the JFK assassination, but it is now helping to get important questions out. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3967677791931129793 Black Ops and PsyOps just aren't working as well as they once did. But the truth rings clear. It's why Ron Paul's momentum is from the grassroots efforts of ordinary folks on the internet.
Ron Paul for President
Uncle Ed, you'd be better off collecting boys soiled underwear.
The purpose of this documentary is to make sure that wacko 9/11 conspiracy theories remain wacko 9/11 conspiracy theories. And that's a good thing.
Do you think they will show/analyze WTC 7 coming down?
Then of course there is building seven- enough said. Towers don't explode like that and come tumbling down - all three in the same manner despite being hit in different areas and one not hit all. ITS ABUSRD ON ITS FACE. good lord, can you believe there's anyone with two working brain cells who cannot see that?
I like people looking into the 911 stuff. There are many unexplained things in the official story. These problems could be innocent or they could range all the way to a dark conspiracy. I can't say, and for that reason I think the more eyes on the subject the better. And I don't see any harm coming out of the informal investigations. What's wrong with trying to fact check a government story? Especially if the government is telling the truth. What makes me suspicious is the angry and hostile reaction that some people have to a study of this matter - and the determined effort I see to stop people from asking questions. I have to wonder where this is coming from. I've noticed that goobs and Freepers rarely form opinions on their own.
.
Yep - it's the Fruit of the Forbidden Tree phenomenon. It's like when a raunchy rap cd isn't selling too great and then they slap on a "Warning: Parental Advisory is Advised" label and the thing starts selling like hotcakes.
It will probably get some attention but nowhere near enough to please the typical conspiracy theorist.
If they even show video of WTC 7 coming down, I will be greatly surprised.
One thing is for sure, the documentary won't change anything. The 9/11 "truth" movement has peaked.
Yes, it might be risky to show/analyze the collapse of WTC 7 to a national audience. I doubt History Channel will be allowed to do so. They probably don't want a repeat of the Larry Silverstein "pull it" PBS fiasco.
There was no "fiasco" involved in Silverstein making that comment.
You don't have to be an engineer or an architect. Anyone who has stacked toy blocks smells a rat. Look, I don't even suffer the deniers anymore. They are one of two things- shill trolling liars or stupid dopes who don't trust their own eyes and common effing sense. It really is too obvious to even discuss.
It really is too obvious to even discuss. well said. i'm going to do the same. their lack of shame irks me though.
Well, they have to be shameless when advancing absurdity. This song basically sums up what they are doing- denying the plainly obvious with a straight face while hoping we accept it because we just can't believe anyone would lie so plainly to our faces: Honey came in and she caught me red-handed Creeping with the girl next door Picture this we were both butt naked Banging on the bathroom floor How could I forget that I had Given her an extra key All this time she was standing there she never Took her eyes off me How you fi give the woman access to your villa Trespass and a witness all the hackling of the pilla You better watch your back before she turn into a killer Let’s review the situation that you’re caught up inna Now to be a true player you got to know how to play If she even say a night convince her say a day Never admit to a word weh she say And if she claim a you tell her baby no way But she caught me on the counter¡ wasn’t me She saw me bangin’ on the sofa¡ wasn’t me I even had her in the shower¡ wasn’t me She even caught me on camera¡ wasn’t me She saw the marks on my shoulder¡ wasn’t me Heard the words that I told her¡ wasn’t me Heard the screams getting louder¡ wasn’t me She stayed until it was over Honey came in and she caught me red-handed Creeping with the girl next door Picture this we were both butt naked Banging on the bathroom floor I had tried to keep her from what She was about to see Why should she believe me when i Told her it wasn’t me Mek she know say that she really nah no right fi vex A never you she see a mek de gigolo flex A smaddi else whe favor you inna de complex Seeing is believing so ya betta change ya specs You know whe a go bring hole heap of thing from in de past All the little evidence you better know fi mask Quick pon you answer and know how fi talk And if she pack the gun you better know fi run fast But she caught me on the counter¡ wasn’t me She saw me bagin’ on the sofa¡ wasn’t me I even had her in the shower¡ wasn’t me She even caught me on camera¡ wasn’t me She saw the marks on my shoulder¡ wasn’t me Heard the words that I told her¡ wasn’t me Heard the screams getting louder¡ wasn’t me She stayed until it was over Honey came in and she caught me red-handed Creeping with the girl next door Picture this we were both butt naked Banging on the bathroom floor How could I forget that I had Given her an extra key All this time she was standing there she never Took her eyes off me Want to tell her that I’m sorry for the Pain that I’ve caused I’ve been listening to your reason It makes no sense at all Need to tell her that I’m sorry for the Pain that I’ve caused You may think that you’re a player But you’re completely lost Cause I say¡ Honey came in and she caught me red-handed Creeping with the girl next door Picture this we were both butt naked Banging on the bathroom floor How could I forget that I had Given her an extra key All this time she was standing there she never Took her eyes off me
"You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." --------------------------------------- Words have meaning. Note the words, "decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." Clearly Silverstein was associating the decision to pull with the result, the collapse. Note Siverstein did not say, they made that decision to pull and then the firemen were evacuated and then hours later we watched the building collapse. "Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
There was no "fiasco" involved in Silverstein making that comment. But your only agenda is your lunch of salmon and spinach? No one believes that. Not with absurd replies like this one about Lucky Larry.
Ron Paul for President
He's probably hoping 'lurkers' believe that...
Here's some of the best evidence showing what Silverstein's words meant. "You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
Israel backed by army of cyber-soldiers
"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs
Shaggadelic, man...
86% of Americans doubt the official tale while 63% believe absolutely it was an inside job.
Comments (116 - 246) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNow that you've been outed, does that mean I'll be free from your hideous mind-control techniques?
#76. To: Ringo Blankenship (#75)
#77. To: Dakmar (#73)
Are you Ed Condom?
#78. To: Flintlock (#77)
#79. To: Flintlock, Dakmire (#77)
If you double up my weekly brain-gravy injections
#80. To: EdCondon (#79)
That explains A LOT about you blokes; bonkers, twits, twats, wankers, punk shockers, lamers and losers, cabbage-patch, GI Joe and Berbie doll molesters, that mingle there in some disgusting orgy of idiocy ... ...
#81. To: EdCondon (#79)
#82. To: Flintlock (#77)
#83. To: EdCondon (#11)
#84. To: Horse (#83)
In 1963 after the Kennedy assassination Life magazine published 3 photos from the Zapruder film in reverse order so that the general public would believe the "official theory" of a lone assassin.
#85. To: Horse (#83)
... proving that WTC Towers ... Popular Mecahnics published a
#86. To: EdCondon (#84)
#87. To: Horse (#86)
#88. To: Horse (#86)
#89. To: Horse (#86)
#90. To: EdCondon (#89)
#91. To: Horse (#90)
How about listening to the Truth
#92. To: Horse (#90)
#93. To: , *9-11* (#87)
#94. To: Horse (#86)
1) The greatest living sniper in the Marines, Carlos Hathcock, tried several times at Quantico to re-create the shooting of JFK from the Texas School Book Depository window that Oswald was alleged to have made. Not one of the best snipers in the Marine Corps could re-create the shots the Warren Commission claimed were made.
#95. To: EdCondon (#91)
a simple question a high-school kid could answer ...
“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"
#96. To: Ringo Blankenship (#0)
An Internet search for "9/11 conspiracy theories" yields nearly two million hits. Were the attacks on 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration to advance its own interests? Could a government missile have hit the Pentagon? As outrageous as these ideas may sound, many people believe them. Why do these theories arise in the first place? An interview with James Miegs, Editor-in-Chief of Popular Mechanics, who refutes many of these theories. Watch as experts in the fields of aeronautics, engineering and the military put these theories to the test.
#97. To: Mister Clean (#96)
#98. To: Burkeman1, Mr. Clean, EdCondon (#92)
Blah blah- Turkish built high rise apartment blocks- built in the most shoddy manner with sub standard material don't collapse in 9.0 earthquakes as completely as those towers did after being hit by basically big aluminum tubes and small fires burning for 40 minutes.
#99. To: Ringo Blankenship (#97)
#100. To: ... (#99)
What makes me suspicious is the angry and hostile reaction that some people have to a study of this matter - and the determined effort I see to stop people from asking questions. I have to wonder where this is coming from.
#101. To: Ringo Blankenship (#97)
Do you think they will show/analyze WTC 7 coming down?
#102. To: Mister Clean (#101)
#103. To: Ringo Blankenship (#102)
If they even show video of WTC 7 coming down, I will be greatly surprised.
#104. To: Mister Clean (#103)
#105. To: Ringo Blankenship (#104)
They probably don't want a repeat of the Larry Silverstein "pull it" PBS fiasco.
#106. To: christine (#98)
#107. To: Burkeman1 (#106)
Look, I don't even suffer the deniers anymore. They are one of two things- shill trolling liars or stupid dopes who don't trust their own eyes and common effing sense.
#108. To: christine (#107)
their lack of shame irks me though.
#109. To: Mister Clean (#105)
There was no "fiasco" involved in Silverstein making that comment.
#110. To: Mister Clean (#105)
They probably don't want a repeat of the Larry Silverstein "pull it" PBS fiasco.
#111. To: robin (#110)
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#112. To: All (#109)
There was no "fiasco" involved in Silverstein making that comment.
#113. To: robin (#110)
#114. To: Burkeman1 (#108)
#115. To: who knows what evil, robin, Burkeman1 (#111)
He's probably hoping 'lurkers' believe that...
.
.
.