[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

CNN doctor urges neurological testing for Biden

Nashville Trans Shooter Left Over 100 GB Of Evidence, All To Be Kept Secret

Who Turned Off The Gaslight?

Head Of Chase Bank Warns Customers: Era Of Free Checking Is Likely Over

Bob Dylan - Hurricane [Scotty mar10]

Replacing Biden Won't Solve Democrats' Problems - Look Who Will Inherit His Campaign War Chest

Who Died: Late June/Early July 2024 | News

A top Russian banker says Russia's payment methods should be a 'state secret' because the West keeps shutting them down so fast

Viral Biden Brain Freeze During Debate Sparks Major Question: Who’s Really Running the Country?

Disney Heiress, Other Major Dem Donors: Dump Biden

LAWYER: 5 NEW Tricks Cops Are Using During DWI Stops

10 Signs That Global War Is Rapidly Approaching

Horse Back At Library.

This Video Needs To Be Seen By Every Cop In America

'It's time to give peace another chance': Thousands rally in Tel Aviv to end the war

Biden's leaked bedtime request puts White House on damage control

Smith: It's Damned Hard To Be Proud Of America

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi slams ‘deranged rant’ calling for assassination of Trump

Stalin, The Red Terror | Full Documentary

Russia, Soviet Union and The Cold War: Stalin's Legacy | Russia's Wars Ep.2 | Documentary

Battle and Liberation: The End of World War II | Countdown to Surrender – The Last 100 Days | Ep. 4

Ethereum ETFs In 'Window-Dressing' Stage, Approval Within Weeks; Galaxy

Americans Are More Likely To Go To War With The Government Than Submit To The Draft

Rudy Giuliani has just been disbarred in New York

Israeli Generals Want Truce in Gaza,

Joe Biden's felon son Hunter is joining White House meetings

The only Democrat who could beat Trump

Ukraine is too CORRUPT to join NATO, US says, in major blow to Zelensky and boost for Putin

CNN Erin Burnett Admits Joe Biden knew the Debate questions..

Affirmative Action Suit Details How Law School Blackballed Accomplished White Men, Opted For Unqualified Black Women


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: History Channel to Air 9/11 Conspiracies Special
Source: History Channel
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 3, 2007
Author: History Channel
Post Date: 2007-08-03 10:31:04 by Ringo Blankenship
Keywords: None
Views: 13306
Comments: 246

UPCOMING SHOWS

Sunday, August 12 08:00 PM Monday, August13 12:00 PM


An Internet search for "9/11 conspiracy theories" yields nearly two million hits. Were the attacks on 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration to advance its own interests? Could a government missile have hit the Pentagon? As outrageous as these ideas may sound, many people believe them. Why do these theories arise in the first place? An interview with James Miegs, Editor-in-Chief of Popular Mechanics, who refutes many of these theories. Watch as experts in the fields of aeronautics, engineering and the military put these theories to the test.

Rating: TVPG Running Time: 120 minutes

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-4) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#5. To: Ringo Blankenship (#0)

If their expert is from Popular Mechanics, a known CIA asset, and they want to talk about missiles hitting the Pentagon, then I won't waste my time though I might look at it for a few minutes.

I would love to see someone cover the bomb that went off in the Pentagon 3 1/2 minutes before the plane hit the building. The bomb killed the auditors who were trying to track down the 2.3 trillion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld said on 9-10-2001 that he could not trace. The primary witness was Robert Andrews the Asst Secretary of the DOD in charge of Special Operations. He was a former Green Beret so he knows what a bomb is.

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2007-08-03   12:40:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Horse (#5)

bomb that went off in the Pentagon 3 1/2 minutes before the plane hit

got a link?

the 2.3 trillion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld said on 9-10-2001 that he could not trace.

would have gone a long way toward repairing that bridge over the Mississippi.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-08-03   15:34:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Horse (#5)

found it..

....On 9-10-2001 Donald Rumsfeld admitted to CBS News that he was unable to trace 2.3 trillion dollars in Department of Defense (DOD) spending. On 9-11-2001 Robert Andrews, the Acting Asst. Director of the DOD went to the Counter Terrorism Center (CTC) after the Twin Towers had been attacked in New York. The CTC was destroyed by a bomb that also killed 40 of 41 military officers who were auditing the DOD books attempting to recover public taxpayer monies lost by what appears to be intentionally bad record keeping by the Pentagon. Robert Andrews is a former Green Beret and was in charge of Special Operations for the military on 9-11. He knows what a bomb is. He smelled the cordite. He also tells us that this bomb was detonated 3 1/2 minutes before the plane struck the building. Flight 77 was the plane alleged by the Bush administration and the bi-partisan 9-11 Commission to have hit the Pentagon on 9-11.....

http://openingmind.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-08-03   18:13:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Horse (#5)

If their expert is from Popular Mechanics,

I wonder if they'll trot out Chertoff's cousin, whom Chertoff wasn't sure was his cousin or not at first.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   18:16:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Ringo Blankenship, *9-11* (#0)

Thanks Ringo!

Ron Paul for President

robin  posted on  2007-08-03   19:08:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, Dakmar, Ringo Blankenship (#7)

You will never understand why the Dems on the 9-11 Commission eagerly covered up treason and murder by the Bush admin until you take alook at Catherine Austin Fitts' website. She goes into details on the 2.3 trillion dollars missing from the DOD spending that Rumsfeld admitted to on 9-10-2001 to CBS News. http://www.solari.c om/learn/articles_missingmoney.htm

For more on the bomb went off 3 1/2 minutes before the plane hit the Pentagon and that killed the auditors looking for the missing 2.3 trillion dollars go here: http://johnmccarthy90066.t ripod.com/id206.html

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2007-08-03   20:46:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Horse (#5)

Popular Mechanics, a known CIA asset

No kidding?

Are you saying this with a straight face?

Since when did they 'cross over' to be CIA assets?

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   21:47:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Ringo Blankenship (#0)

Why do these theories arise in the first place?

I'm not sure, but I would look at the dumbing down of America as a major cause, and the over-running of the internet by more or less common John's who are products of that failed education system.

Take for instance the proliferation of the co-called "Credit River Case" involving Jerome Daley and 'Justice' (of the Peace) Mahoney

The case is variously known as "The Mahoney Credit River Decision" and the "First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly".

The 'case' was as bogus as a 3-dollar bill BUT it is all posted all over the internet!

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   21:54:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: EdCondon (#12)

Why do these theories arise in the first place?

Or even sillier, why does the History Channel feel the need to run a two hour special debunking them?

Ringo Blankenship  posted on  2007-08-03   22:09:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: EdCondon (#11)

Since when did they 'cross over' to be CIA assets?

Not sure about Popular Mechanics specifically, but do a search on "Operation Mockingbird" sometime. Unless you have already made up your mind you'll see that the CIA has a deeper footprint in mainstream media than most people I know feel comfortable with.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   22:12:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Ringo Blankenship (#13)

why does the History Channel feel the need to run a two hour special debunking them?

Because the American People deserve The Truth, you filthy Saddam Lover! :)

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   22:15:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Dakmar (#14)

you'll see that the CIA has a deeper footprint in mainstream media than most people I know feel comfortable with.

Did they used to have a newsletter they sent out to al the news people?

I'll bet there are still a few 'old copies' floating around - ever see any scanned and posted on websites?

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   22:22:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: EdCondon (#16)

Just do the search first, smarty-pants.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   22:26:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Dakmar (#17)

Geez - what a smart alecky answer.

I asked because you look like you might know, maybe not?

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   22:28:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: EdCondon (#18)

You thought the CIA sent out a newsletter informing people of their covert activities? Right.....

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   22:29:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Dakmar (#19)

u thought the CIA sent out a newsletter informing people of their covert activities?

Well no.

If they are in the media they are definely not covert, the word is 'overt' (opposite of covert see).

The newsletter is to organize activities; everybody has newsletters, companies have newslettes, police depts have newsleters, attornies have newsletters.

Think of them more as corporate info or 'propaganda' from the head office ...

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   22:34:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: EdCondom (#20)

I don't care about you

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   22:36:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Dakmar (#21)

Oh no - more slow video from Utub.

I don't know that I trust them, video drivers have to be installed on one's PC to watch that so-called 'free stuff' ... maybe Utub is trying to 'hook' us on their system and they are all the while just biting their time ... that's my conspiracy theory anyway.

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   22:42:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: EdCondon (#22)

Too fucking stupid to get it to play, eh?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   22:57:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Dakmar (#8)

I wonder if they'll trot out Chertoff's cousin, whom Chertoff wasn't sure was his cousin or not at first.

Yes I would be interested in that as well.

"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men" Plato

tom007  posted on  2007-08-03   23:05:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: tom007 (#24)

have at it

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:08:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Dakmar, tom007 (#25)

have at it

i don't know why, but that me laugh. :P

christine  posted on  2007-08-03   23:11:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: christine (#26)

That me laugh too. )

"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men" Plato

tom007  posted on  2007-08-03   23:14:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: christine (#26)

I'm a slacker, no need to staple lace on a pig.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:15:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: tom007 (#27)

hahahahahahaha

good one, tom. me forgot made. :P

christine  posted on  2007-08-03   23:25:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Dakmar (#23)

Too fucking stupid to get it to play, eh?

Was that comment really neccessary?

Do you even know what happens when you click on a UTub download - and you are the guy touting all kinds of CIA and media interaction conspriacies?

Me, personally, I think you are CIA, and you want me to play your 'stupid' little video to invade my machine, and I won't play along so you call me names.

See, I can be a little nasty too, but I did not have to become vulgar or call you a wanker or a twit.

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   23:38:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: EdCondon (#30) (Edited)

Was that comment really neccessary?

Wouldn't have been if you had looked up Operation Mockingbird, but you didn't, I could tell you didn't, you weren't sincere at all Ed.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: EdCondon (#30)

Me, personally, I think you are CIA,

Caught me, I'm really Sid Vicious, come to haunt your towel closet.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:43:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Dakmar (#15)

Because the American People deserve The Truth, you filthy Saddam Lover! :)

Eat sand Towelhead apologist!

Ringo Blankenship  posted on  2007-08-03   23:51:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Dakmar (#31)

Wouldn't have been if you had looked up Operation Mockingbird

Well hello Mr Assume.

I did a Google - and GEESH the conspiracy meter pegged ...

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   23:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: EdCondon (#34)

So you only believe centralized GOP sources, and not us "fringe" republicans?

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:53:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: EdCondon (#30)

but I did not have to become vulgar or call you a wanker or a twit.

lol

christine  posted on  2007-08-03   23:53:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Ringo Blankenship (#33)

Herbie's mother was a stripped down mule cart!

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:54:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Dakmar (#32)

Caught me, I'm really Sid Vicious, come to haunt your towel closet.

I think I read somewhere that that is exactly what a CIA operative who was trying to 'push' something on another would do it.

So, my suspicians are really aroused (no jokes now).

I have a side question: Why are some of you, like you, so ill-tempered and nasty?

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   23:55:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: EdCondon (#38)

Why are some of you, like you, so ill-tempered and nasty?

Perception is paramount, my dear, I am but a broken mirror.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-03   23:57:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Dakmar (#35)

So you only believe centralized GOP sources, and not us "fringe" republicans?

So it is "submit or get the lash" here too huh (WA, CP, DC, TOS/FR)?

Nice to know if I ever 'want the lash' anyway.

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-03   23:58:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: EdCondon (#40)

You think I run these people? That's craziest kookshit I've heard yet.

"A functioning police state needs no police." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2007-08-04   0:00:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Dakmar, Ed Condon (#37)

Ringo Blankenship  posted on  2007-08-04   0:02:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Dakmar (#39)

Perception is paramount, my dear, I am but a broken mirror.

Uh uh.

You come across as, arrogant and cocky and you assumed a lot (ties in with arrogant) too.

I asked questions, you responded with vulgarity.

Would your mom be proud of your actions and manner of speech or writing?

(Surely you're weren't hatched by solar heating of 'crap' on a log ...)

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-04   0:02:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Dakmar (#41)

You think I run these people?

No -

"are like."

EdCondon  posted on  2007-08-04   0:04:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (45 - 246) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]