See other Editorial Articles
Title: Put up or shut up on global warming
Source:
The Detroit News
URL Source: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dl ... 70809/OPINION01/708090308/1008
Published: Aug 9, 2007
Author: not attributed
Post Date: 2007-08-09 22:13:39 by farmfriend
Ping List: *Agriculture-Environment* Subscribe to *Agriculture-Environment*
Keywords: None
Views: 136
Comments: 3
Dingell puts a fair price tag on the high cost of saving energy Fighting global warming isn't so much fun now, is it? When the battle targeted almost exclusively Detroit's auto industry, volunteers were falling all over themselves to sign up. But now it's about to hit closer to home for most Americans. U.S. Rep. John Dingell, the Dearborn Democrat who chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee, is proposing a 50-cent tax on a gallon of gasoline and suspension of mortgage deductions for what he calls McMansions -- homes over 3,000 square feet. Dingell continues to press the point that if we believe global warming is so serious a threat that it's worth destroying the automobile industry, then it's also worth spreading the pain to as many other places as possible. His proposal is aimed at the Hollywood hypocrites who testify before Congress about the evils of the auto industry and then fly private jets back to their 30,000-square-foot hillside palaces. If the smug global warming warriors who park their Priuses in four-car garages want to cram everyone else into wheeled shoe boxes, then they should be willing to bed down in cracker boxes. Heating and cooling giant houses produces as much carbon as driving a sport utility vehicle. And Dingell is right in reminding consumers that they can't keep crying for Detroit to develop more fuel-efficient cars while demanding cheap gasoline and vehicles large enough to haul a soccer team. If Americans are serious about combatting global warming, then they must be made to understand it will require sacrifice. Smaller cars won't be enough to get the job done. Smaller houses will be part of the equation, too, as will be much larger energy bills. We aren't so thrilled with the idea of penalizing those who own big homes, or about raising the cost of gasoline, heating fuel and electricity. But neither are we crazy about driving automakers into bankruptcy in the name of fighting a phenomenon we don't yet fully understand or are certain we can control. But we do like Dingell's idea of putting a clear price tag on the global warming war and making consumers understand they'll be the ones to pay it.
Put up or shut up on global warming
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: farmfriend (#0)
Okay, let's try to understand this: the global is worming, therefore the gobmint should take more money from the people? How does this work? The wormer it gets, the more money the gobmint should take? Unless the global is cooling. In which case, the cooler it gets, the more money the gobmint should take. Did I get it right?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I know the government makes more money on cigarettes than the cig companies do. It's about to get that way with gas too.
In Pennsylvania, there's a tax for having a job. It works like this: if you work, you pay this tax. Because you work. It's very logical. Like, the gobmint taxes the tobaccer to discourage smoking they say, right? And they tax people who work because... Whatever... it's very sophisticated and the gobmint ends up with the money.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
U.S. Rep. John Dingell, the Dearborn Democrat who chairs the Energy and Commerce Committee, is proposing a 50-cent tax on a gallon of gasoline
#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#1)
#3. To: farmfriend (#2)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest