See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: American Spy Satellites To Snoop On U.S.; Chertoff, McConnell OKs Expanded Domestic Use Of Spies In The Sky
Source:
CBS News
URL Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007 ... ml?source=RSSattr=HOME_3168959
Published: Aug 15, 2007
Author: CBS News
Post Date: 2007-08-15 11:18:40 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 67
Comments: 3
The Wall Street Journal reports that the Department of Homeland Security has approved a measure to allow federal civilian agencies and law enforcement to turn American spy satellites on their own citizens for the first time. Until now, the highly sensitive satellites were aimed mostly at other countries, usually ones we didn't really trust. Occasionally, geologists and NASA scientists got to use them to make things like topographical maps. Letting domestic security folks use them to spy is, the Journal says, "uncharted territory." Officials have been mulling the plan for a couple years, but often bumped up against questions about whether this kind of snooping would violate the Posse Comitatus Act, which bars military for engaging in law-enforcement activity within the U.S., since the satellites are built for and owned by the Defense Department. The decision was made three months ago by Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell, and OKed in May by DHS chief Michael Chertoff. Access to the satellite will be controlled by a new Homeland Security branch, the National Applications Office. As Charles Allen, the DHS's chief intelligence officer who will head up the new program, summed up cryptically, "It is an idea whose time has come." Naturally, privacy groups are freaking out. Sentences like this one probably don't help. "The full capabilities of these systems are unknown outside the intelligence community, because they are among the most closely held secrets in government." One privacy advocate complained that it was this secrecy that was the real problem. "You are talking about enormous power," said Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel and director of the Project on Freedom, Security and Technology for the Center for Democracy and Technology, a nonprofit group advocating privacy rights in the digital age. "Not only is the surveillance they are contemplating intrusive and omnipresent, it's also invisible. And that's what makes this so dangerous."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
Oh but according to shills and traitors like Mr Clean we should just face the fact that we deserve no privacy in public. In other words, the right to privacy only exists...where? On the toilet? The fact that the rule of law and that the PC act has been clearly violated makes no difference to shills and StateInc whores.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Prove where he's done used the word terlet. Dare ya! :)
" Junk is the ideal product... the ultimate merchandise. No sales talk necessary. The client will crawl through a sewer and beg to buy." - William S Burroughs
police state bump
#2. To: Brian S, LODWICK, MR CCCPkleen (#0)
"You are talking about enormous power," said Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel and director of the Project on Freedom, Security and Technology for the Center for Democracy and Technology, a nonprofit group advocating privacy rights in the digital age. "Not only is the surveillance they are contemplating intrusive and omnipresent, it's also invisible. And that's what makes this so dangerous."
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
#3. To: IndieTX (#2)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest