See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Freedom4um Republic
Source:
Mister Clean
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 16, 2007
Author: Mister Clean
Post Date: 2007-08-16 14:54:36 by Mister Clean
Keywords: FreeRepublic, idiots
Views: 7826
Comments: 212
When a poster at FreeRepublic posts something negative about Bush they are often labeled a Democrat or a liberal or al-Qaeda or traitor. Over here at Freedom4um, if I say something negative about 9/11 "truth" or the North American Union conspiracy, I am labeled a Republican, neocon, Bush shill or traitor. (Freepers, LP'ers and people who post on this site love to sling the word "traitor" around.) Fundamentally, there is really no difference between the typical Bush supporting Freeper and some posters on this site as the example above illustrates. There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter! That is EXACTLY the same kind of stupidity found on FreeRepublic. There are posters here who are just as stupid and lazy as Freepers. They cling to their beliefs just as fiercely as Freepers and go into attack mode whenever those beliefs are challenged. They are as defensive and as juvenile and as self-righteous as Freepers. They behave exactly like Freepers. This site should be renamed to Freedom4um Republic.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-141) not displayed.
.
.
.
#142. To: who knows what evil (#138)
Fantasy Amero coins. Funny stuff. I gotta figure out a way to profit off the conspiracy believers.
"black magic (remote-controlled airplanes, explosives in towers.." I hate to break it to you, but those are not examples of any kind of "magic." "hundreds of brilliant psychopaths" Again, I hate to break it to you, but the "psychopaths" are not any kind of "magic," nor are they "brilliant." "unlimited funds" Again, I hate to break it to you, but the "funds" are not any kind of "magic," nor are they "unlimited."
Do you know Destro?
Only when the owners start grifting HAH! Damn good shot!
Thanks!
Care to read your vanity post on this thread???
Point: 117 People should try to debate with those they disagree with in a mature manner without resorting to calling the other poster asshole, shill and such but that's probably too much to expect. Counterpoint: 118 You suck the cock!
Bi-I-Bi, Bi-O-Bo, Bi-I-Biddi-Bi Bi-O-Bo, Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi Boop-Boo-Waa The Don Juans had a get together, the gathering was large There are posters here who are just as stupid and lazy as Freepers. True. There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter! Why should it stop them? That is EXACTLY the same kind of stupidity found on FreeRepublic. It is similar, but neither behavior is necessarily stupid. Your other posting behavior positively correlates with people the folks here prefer to avoid, like Bush supporters. Whether this correlation is sufficient to justify the response you have received depends on what kinds of classification errors one is willing to accept. A high threshold -- like a requirement of actual posts in support of Bush -- will reduce false positives but increase false negatives. There is no objective answer to the question of what the threshold -- the tradeoff boundary -- should be. The issue is no different than racial or ethnic discrimination. At least some discrimination is necessary for survival.
Bi-I-Bi, Bi-O-Bo, Bi-I-Biddi-Bi Bi-O-Bo, Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi Boop-Boo-Waa The Don Juans had a get together, the gathering was large Mister Clean likes to have unfair advantage. He comes here to criticize but has never stated just what he does believe and who he does support. He has stated who he opposes but gets real cagey when asked to make affirmative statements that would immediately expose what he is. Like all neocons and garden variety Pubs (who reduce every opponent to ugly stereotypes) he too has dirty little secrets, and he operates only from the safety of a cleverly camo'ed sniper's hide. Thank G_d for Larry Flynt. In a short while there won't be a Republican Party anymore. It'll be nothing but a punchline and an insult. And, this anonymous individual (whose questions and comments bear a suspicious resemblance to Jeff Gannon's White House press conference style-you know, rank political advocacy without revealing his fondness for sodomy with hypocrites) will go the way of diehard Nixon supporters. Btw, have you seen any of them lately? Mee neether.
" But they don't know better than me. I wash, every day... almost.
there is not much point is there?
Gee, I guess you can't get along with anyone.
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... There are all different types of people, everywhere. What is your goal, for everyone to be like yourself?
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... Son, it's a joke.
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... YYEAH! This guy is as dry as a __________(fill in the blank)
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... Oh trust me, you are. You are all alone.
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... For someone who hates Alex Jones, you sure keep track of him. I'm lucky if I remember to check out his site every other week, but BOY, I bet you are on there every day, with a towel close by, right? Work it, baby, work it good!
Swimming around in my bourbon highball..... Destro posts at LP, I believe.
A picture of the Kool-Aid cartoon character proves nothing. Again, there is NO official statement from the government declaring any intention to create a NAU.
Why should it stop them? Because it's stupid to accuse someone of something without any evidence.
Oh look, another moron who just proves my point.
No, idiot I don't "hate" Alex Jones. In fact, I've stated that I listen to his show and find him quite entertaining. I just don't take him seriously and your little brain interprets that as "hate."
Counterpoint: 118 You suck the c***! Naw, Diana is a sweet kid and she's prolly never even seen one of those before! I'm lucky if I remember to check out his site every other week, but BOY, I bet you are on there every day, with a towel close by, right? Work it, baby, work it good! Now you really have his(?) number and that is sure to piss Miss(ter) Queen off! Hey, why don't you do what I do? Just write some ignorant shit about him(?) and never read his(?) replies! That'll really frost his/her ass! I can envision a day when everyone has Miss(ter) Queen so stressed that even a practiced neocon Sodomite can't penetrate his/her well used butt, and yet no one reads his(?) replies. That'll spare the forum's admin from having to retire his(?) account, which is as inevitable as another Republican with a fondness for little boys' asses being exposed before the year is out. You know that he is probably Jeff Gannon, don't you? And, like Larry Flynt I don't care if he and his fellow neocons enjoy a nice adult stiffy now and then. But, their rank hypocrisy and thirst for the blood of innocents makes them goddam evil in my book.
But there is evidence.
Bi-I-Bi, Bi-O-Bo, Bi-I-Biddi-Bi Bi-O-Bo, Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi Boop-Boo-Waa The Don Juans had a get together, the gathering was large No, there is not. There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration. No posts from me supporting the Iraq war, no posts supporting Bush's domestic spying program. No posts supporting Bush cabinet officials. No posts supporting the GOP. Nothing.
That is your threshold of evidence. Why should anyone else agree to it? It is perfectly rational to say "Given this person's posting behavior, there is a chance ~ say 10% ~ that they are a Bush supporter. Given my intense dislike for and danger presented by Bush supporters, this is sufficient for me to classify this person as one, and treat them accordingly."
Bi-I-Bi, Bi-O-Bo, Bi-I-Biddi-Bi Bi-O-Bo, Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi Boop-Boo-Waa The Don Juans had a get together, the gathering was large It's not rational at all, it's mildly paranoid. There is nothing in my posting history that could lead a rational person to conclude that there is a 10% chance I'm a Bush supporter.
No posts from me supporting the Iraq war, no posts supporting Bush's domestic spying program. No posts supporting Bush cabinet officials. No posts supporting the GOP. Nothing. You're right. There's not a single post from you supporting anything at all. You conceal your own views and are here as an attention whore and attack dog. Anybody can backseat quarterback. It takes skill to throw the ball. You're a coward, a waste of bandwidth and you dodge every direct question thrown at you. You are now bozod. Don't bother responding. I won't see it. Time to go back to your LogCabin picnic, Kleenex boy. Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Wrong. My posts indicate I support globalization, foreign investment particularly in China, I support drunk driving laws, I support surveillance cameras, I support banning trans-fat. I've even posted on LP that I would support Michael Bloomberg for president.
Well, not a Bush supporter today perhaps. But why should anyone agree to somebody else's estimate, of whatever percent? There are no absolute musts in the universe, only contingent musts. If you want a different reception here -- and there's no objective reason why you must want one -- you will need to conform to standards closer to those whose reception you seek. End of story.
Bi-I-Bi, Bi-O-Bo, Bi-I-Biddi-Bi Bi-O-Bo, Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi-Bo-Bi Boop-Boo-Waa The Don Juans had a get together, the gathering was large My posts indicate I support globalization, foreign investment particularly in China, I support drunk driving laws, I support surveillance cameras, I support banning trans-fat. I've even posted on LP that I would support Michael Bloomberg for president. "Communist"
End of story. I just wanted to point out the similarities between idiot Freepers and people on this site who display the exact same behavior. End of story.
Are you one of those people still fighting the Cold War? Look, there isn't a Communist around every corner, okay?
Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????
China and Russia are not out to get you, okay?
Sink, DID you READ your own vanity???? You entrapped yourself Sink.
I'm well aware of what I've posted.
Comments (183 - 212) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestGet them while they're cheap!
#143. To: YertleTurtle (#56)
#144. To: Mister Clean (#142)
#145. To: farmfriend (#40)
This site should be renamed to Freedom4um Republic.
#146. To: Mister Clean (#130)
There has never, ever been an official statement from the US government declaring the intention to form a North American Union.
#147. To: HOUNDDAWG (#145)
Damn good shot!
#148. To: Mister Clean (#77)
That's a neat trick considering I never posted there.
#149. To: Diana, Dakmar (#117)
But things got duller than the weather 'till Donna Wood took charge
She went to the piano, and took her D (for Donna)
putting it to music in a major key
#150. To: Mister Clean (#0)
But things got duller than the weather 'till Donna Wood took charge
She went to the piano, and took her D (for Donna)
putting it to music in a major key
#151. To: christine (#139)
#152. To: Mister Clean (#68)
"Able Danger" was a lot of hot air.
Able Danger" Mister Clean was is a lot of hot air.
Enemies of the Republic
#153. To: farmfriend (#81)
And I'm sure that government elites believe they know better than the great unwashed.
Enemies of the Republic
#154. To: Fred Mertz (#140)
I think this will be my last reply to you,
#155. To: Critter (#153)
But they don't know better than me. I wash, every day... almost.
#156. To: Mister Clean (#0)
#157. To: Mister Clean (#6)
The point is, there are people on this site who are just as stupid as Freepers. People who behave just like Freepers.
#158. To: Mister Clean (#24)
#159. To: Dakmar (#37)
Buy a fucking joke book loser, they can be had for like a quarter at Salvation Army store.
#160. To: Mister Clean (#84)
Since I don't indulge in the typical American pastime of blowing things out of proportion, I sometimes feel like a foreigner.
#161. To: Mister Clean (#121)
#162. To: nobody (#144)
Do you know Destro?
#163. To: farmfriend (#146)
#164. To: Tauzero (#150)
There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter!
#165. To: HOUNDDAWG (#151)
Like all neocons and garden variety Pubs
#166. To: PercyDovetonsils (#161)
For someone who hates Alex Jones, you sure keep track of him.
#167. To: Tauzero, Diana (#149)
)
#168. To: PercyDovetonsils, christine (#161)
(Edited)
For someone who hates Alex Jones, you sure keep track of him.
#169. To: Mister Clean (#164)
Because it's stupid to accuse someone of something without any evidence.
But things got duller than the weather 'till Donna Wood took charge
She went to the piano, and took her D (for Donna)
putting it to music in a major key
#170. To: Tauzero (#169)
But there is evidence.
#171. To: Mister Clean (#170)
There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration.
But things got duller than the weather 'till Donna Wood took charge
She went to the piano, and took her D (for Donna)
putting it to music in a major key
#172. To: Tauzero (#171)
It is perfectly rational to say "Given this person's posting behavior, there is a chance ~ say 10% ~ that they are a Bush supporter.
#173. To: Mister Clean (#170)
There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration.
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
#174. To: IndieTX (#173)
There's not a single post from you supporting anything at all.
#175. To: Mister Clean (#172)
There is nothing in my posting history that could lead a rational person to conclude that there is a 10% chance I'm a Bush supporter.
But things got duller than the weather 'till Donna Wood took charge
She went to the piano, and took her D (for Donna)
putting it to music in a major key
#176. To: Mister Clean (#174)
Wrong.
#177. To: Tauzero (#175)
If you want a different reception here -- and there's no objective reason why you must want one -- you will need to conform to standards closer to those whose reception you seek.
#178. To: Cynicom (#176)
"Communist"
#179. To: Mister Clean (#178)
Look, there isn't a Communist around every corner, okay?
#180. To: Cynicom (#179)
Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????
#181. To: Mister Clean (#180)
Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????
#182. To: Cynicom (#181)
Sink, DID you READ your own vanity????
.
.
.