See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Freedom4um Republic
Source:
Mister Clean
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 16, 2007
Author: Mister Clean
Post Date: 2007-08-16 14:54:36 by Mister Clean
Keywords: FreeRepublic, idiots
Views: 9255
Comments: 212
When a poster at FreeRepublic posts something negative about Bush they are often labeled a Democrat or a liberal or al-Qaeda or traitor. Over here at Freedom4um, if I say something negative about 9/11 "truth" or the North American Union conspiracy, I am labeled a Republican, neocon, Bush shill or traitor. (Freepers, LP'ers and people who post on this site love to sling the word "traitor" around.) Fundamentally, there is really no difference between the typical Bush supporting Freeper and some posters on this site as the example above illustrates. There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter! That is EXACTLY the same kind of stupidity found on FreeRepublic. There are posters here who are just as stupid and lazy as Freepers. They cling to their beliefs just as fiercely as Freepers and go into attack mode whenever those beliefs are challenged. They are as defensive and as juvenile and as self-righteous as Freepers. They behave exactly like Freepers. This site should be renamed to Freedom4um Republic.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 184.
#150. To: Mister Clean (#0)
There are posters here who are just as stupid and lazy as Freepers. True. There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter! Why should it stop them? That is EXACTLY the same kind of stupidity found on FreeRepublic. It is similar, but neither behavior is necessarily stupid. Your other posting behavior positively correlates with people the folks here prefer to avoid, like Bush supporters. Whether this correlation is sufficient to justify the response you have received depends on what kinds of classification errors one is willing to accept. A high threshold -- like a requirement of actual posts in support of Bush -- will reduce false positives but increase false negatives. There is no objective answer to the question of what the threshold -- the tradeoff boundary -- should be. The issue is no different than racial or ethnic discrimination. At least some discrimination is necessary for survival.
Why should it stop them? Because it's stupid to accuse someone of something without any evidence.
But there is evidence.
No, there is not. There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration. No posts from me supporting the Iraq war, no posts supporting Bush's domestic spying program. No posts supporting Bush cabinet officials. No posts supporting the GOP. Nothing.
No posts from me supporting the Iraq war, no posts supporting Bush's domestic spying program. No posts supporting Bush cabinet officials. No posts supporting the GOP. Nothing. You're right. There's not a single post from you supporting anything at all. You conceal your own views and are here as an attention whore and attack dog. Anybody can backseat quarterback. It takes skill to throw the ball. You're a coward, a waste of bandwidth and you dodge every direct question thrown at you. You are now bozod. Don't bother responding. I won't see it. Time to go back to your LogCabin picnic, Kleenex boy.
Wrong. My posts indicate I support globalization, foreign investment particularly in China, I support drunk driving laws, I support surveillance cameras, I support banning trans-fat. I've even posted on LP that I would support Michael Bloomberg for president.
My posts indicate I support globalization, foreign investment particularly in China, I support drunk driving laws, I support surveillance cameras, I support banning trans-fat. I've even posted on LP that I would support Michael Bloomberg for president. "Communist"
Are you one of those people still fighting the Cold War? Look, there isn't a Communist around every corner, okay?
Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????
China and Russia are not out to get you, okay?
Sink, DID you READ your own vanity???? You entrapped yourself Sink.
I'm well aware of what I've posted.
Being aware does not mean you read it. Sink, you have not changed one bit. Your outing at Freakville taught you nothing, not a thing, nada, zero, zilch.
Sink, you have not changed one bit. Your outing at Freakville taught you nothing, not a thing, nada, zero, zilch. Are you trying to make a point? Because if you are, you're failing miserably.
#186. To: Mister Clean (#184)
Yes and obviously you cannot find it even if stares you in the face. Your vanity and subsequent posts all indict you as a fraud.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#164. To: Tauzero (#150)
There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter!
#169. To: Mister Clean (#164)
Because it's stupid to accuse someone of something without any evidence.
#170. To: Tauzero (#169)
But there is evidence.
#173. To: Mister Clean (#170)
There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration.
#174. To: IndieTX (#173)
There's not a single post from you supporting anything at all.
#176. To: Mister Clean (#174)
Wrong.
#178. To: Cynicom (#176)
"Communist"
#179. To: Mister Clean (#178)
Look, there isn't a Communist around every corner, okay?
#180. To: Cynicom (#179)
Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????
#181. To: Mister Clean (#180)
Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????
#182. To: Cynicom (#181)
Sink, DID you READ your own vanity????
#183. To: Mister Clean (#182)
I'm well aware of what I've posted.
#184. To: Cynicom (#183)
Being aware does not mean you read it.
Replies to Comment # 184. Are you trying to make a point?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 184.