[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation

CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser

Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead'

DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election!

Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks?

Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack'

This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities…

Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs

White House Fears Iranian Response To An Attack Could Overwhelm Israel's Air Defenses

The Money and Power Behind the Riots: This is No Grass-Roots Movement

D.C. Judge Sides With Trump In Lawsuit Over Control Of Corrupt Foreign Aid Agency

Israel Iran Double Standard

Soros Funneled $8.3M into Leftist Group Trying to Turn Lone Star State Blue

California Democrats Under Fire for Buying Bricks During Protests

ICE Launches Campaign to Crack Down on Marriage Fraud Could Ilhan Omar Finally Face Justice?

Joe Rogan's podcast predicted violent LA riots two years ago leaving viewers stunned

Anti-migrant rioters shouting 'f*** off foreigners!'

Amazing things happen when you actually cut government spending.

25 Vaccine Death Stories To Share In Social Media

The White House just posted this:

US Anticipating Potential Israeli Attack on Iran

Grok Is Using a Far-Left Fact Check website to Smear and Censor Conservative Outlets on X

Over 300 UK Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree with government's Gaza policy

Jimmy Dore: Here’s How Israel’s Massacres At Aid Sites Work!

Iran successfully tests missile with 2-ton warhead

Liberal Teachers Union Presidents Rally Behind LA Rioters

Ilhan Omars Daughter Applauds Anti-ICE Riots, Urges Death to Colonial Empire: U.S. and Israel One Oppressor

California Leaders Want United Nations Blue Helmets to Expel Federal Forces from the State

Tulsi Gabbard Warns of “Nuclear Holocaust” in Chilling 3-Minute Plea

LBMA Silver Short Position Now 2nd Largest In History


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Freedom4um Republic
Source: Mister Clean
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 16, 2007
Author: Mister Clean
Post Date: 2007-08-16 14:54:36 by Mister Clean
Keywords: FreeRepublic, idiots
Views: 9255
Comments: 212

When a poster at FreeRepublic posts something negative about Bush they are often labeled a Democrat or a liberal or al-Qaeda or traitor.

Over here at Freedom4um, if I say something negative about 9/11 "truth" or the North American Union conspiracy, I am labeled a Republican, neocon, Bush shill or traitor. (Freepers, LP'ers and people who post on this site love to sling the word "traitor" around.)

Fundamentally, there is really no difference between the typical Bush supporting Freeper and some posters on this site as the example above illustrates.

There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter! That is EXACTLY the same kind of stupidity found on FreeRepublic.

There are posters here who are just as stupid and lazy as Freepers. They cling to their beliefs just as fiercely as Freepers and go into attack mode whenever those beliefs are challenged. They are as defensive and as juvenile and as self-righteous as Freepers. They behave exactly like Freepers.

This site should be renamed to Freedom4um Republic.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 184.

#150. To: Mister Clean (#0)

There are posters here who are just as stupid and lazy as Freepers.

True.

There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter!

Why should it stop them?

That is EXACTLY the same kind of stupidity found on FreeRepublic.

It is similar, but neither behavior is necessarily stupid.

Your other posting behavior positively correlates with people the folks here prefer to avoid, like Bush supporters. Whether this correlation is sufficient to justify the response you have received depends on what kinds of classification errors one is willing to accept. A high threshold -- like a requirement of actual posts in support of Bush -- will reduce false positives but increase false negatives.

There is no objective answer to the question of what the threshold -- the tradeoff boundary -- should be.

The issue is no different than racial or ethnic discrimination. At least some discrimination is necessary for survival.

Tauzero  posted on  2007-08-16   23:54:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#164. To: Tauzero (#150)

There is not one post from me anywhere in support of Bush or Bush policy but that doesn't stop certain people from calling me a Bush supporter!

Why should it stop them?

Because it's stupid to accuse someone of something without any evidence.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   7:32:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#169. To: Mister Clean (#164)

Because it's stupid to accuse someone of something without any evidence.

But there is evidence.

Tauzero  posted on  2007-08-17   11:16:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#170. To: Tauzero (#169)

But there is evidence.

No, there is not.

There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration.

No posts from me supporting the Iraq war, no posts supporting Bush's domestic spying program. No posts supporting Bush cabinet officials. No posts supporting the GOP.

Nothing.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   11:21:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#173. To: Mister Clean (#170)

There is not a single post from me supporting Bush or the policies of his administration.

No posts from me supporting the Iraq war, no posts supporting Bush's domestic spying program. No posts supporting Bush cabinet officials. No posts supporting the GOP.

Nothing.

You're right. There's not a single post from you supporting anything at all. You conceal your own views and are here as an attention whore and attack dog. Anybody can backseat quarterback. It takes skill to throw the ball. You're a coward, a waste of bandwidth and you dodge every direct question thrown at you. You are now bozod. Don't bother responding. I won't see it. Time to go back to your LogCabin picnic, Kleenex boy.

IndieTX  posted on  2007-08-17   11:41:59 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#174. To: IndieTX (#173)

There's not a single post from you supporting anything at all.

Wrong.

My posts indicate I support globalization, foreign investment particularly in China, I support drunk driving laws, I support surveillance cameras, I support banning trans-fat.

I've even posted on LP that I would support Michael Bloomberg for president.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   11:49:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#176. To: Mister Clean (#174)

Wrong.

My posts indicate I support globalization, foreign investment particularly in China, I support drunk driving laws, I support surveillance cameras, I support banning trans-fat.

I've even posted on LP that I would support Michael Bloomberg for president.

"Communist"

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-17   11:55:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#178. To: Cynicom (#176)

"Communist"

Are you one of those people still fighting the Cold War?

Look, there isn't a Communist around every corner, okay?

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   11:59:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#179. To: Mister Clean (#178)

Look, there isn't a Communist around every corner, okay?

Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-17   12:02:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#180. To: Cynicom (#179)

Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????

China and Russia are not out to get you, okay?

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   12:09:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#181. To: Mister Clean (#180)

Sink, did you bother to go back and read your vanity????

Sink, DID you READ your own vanity????

You entrapped yourself Sink.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-17   12:10:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#182. To: Cynicom (#181)

Sink, DID you READ your own vanity????

I'm well aware of what I've posted.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   12:15:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#183. To: Mister Clean (#182)

I'm well aware of what I've posted.

Being aware does not mean you read it.

Sink, you have not changed one bit. Your outing at Freakville taught you nothing, not a thing, nada, zero, zilch.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-17   12:19:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#184. To: Cynicom (#183)

Being aware does not mean you read it.

Sink, you have not changed one bit. Your outing at Freakville taught you nothing, not a thing, nada, zero, zilch.

Are you trying to make a point?

Because if you are, you're failing miserably.

Mister Clean  posted on  2007-08-17   12:21:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 184.

#186. To: Mister Clean (#184)

Are you trying to make a point?

Yes and obviously you cannot find it even if stares you in the face.

Your vanity and subsequent posts all indict you as a fraud.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-08-17 12:24:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 184.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]