[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Children Born in the United States to Aliens Should Not, by Constitutional Right, Be US Citizens
Source: Law & Freedom .com
URL Source: http://www.lawandfreedom.com/site/constitutional/AlienBirth.pdf
Published: Dec 13, 2005
Author: By WilliamJ. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, an
Post Date: 2007-08-20 21:57:28 by DeaconBenjamin
Keywords: None
Views: 511
Comments: 17

For the whole of the Twentieth Century, it was commonly assumed that children born in the United States to alien parents were constitutionally entitled to be United States citizens. This assumption is based upon a U.S. Supreme Court case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), which held that a child who had been born of alien parents, lawfully in the United States, was entitled to citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment based on its terms that “[a]ll persons born in the United States ... and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States ....”

The Supreme Court’s decision in Wong Kim Ark was based upon an inapplicable British common law rule that an individual, born on British soil, owed allegiance to the British sovereign who not only governed the land, but owned it. Such a rule is wholly unsuitable to America, a nation whose sovereign is the people and whose land is owned by no man.

Not only did the Supreme Court fail to recognize the unsuitability of an old British rule, it failed to apply the original and historical meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. To be born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States is not just to be physically present within the nation’s boundaries. Rather, to be “subject” is to evidence allegiance and fidelity to the American nation. Children of alien parents are not entitled to an irrebuttable constitutional presumption of such loyalty just because they are born on American soil. Indeed, children born to alien parents who defiantly enter or remain illegally in the United States are in no sense “subject” to the jurisdiction of the nation.

To date, no court decision has carefully analyzed and determined that the Wong Kim Ark decision should apply to children born of such illegal aliens. Such an issue is too important never to have been litigated and competently decided. The Wong Kim Ark rule ought either be (i) limited to its facts and applied only to resident aliens lawfully admitted to residence in the United States, or better yet (ii) overruled, leaving it to Congress to determine citizenship of such children by statute pursuant to its constitutional power to establish the nation’s naturalization policy.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#4. To: DeaconBenjamin (#0)

To date, no court decision has carefully analyzed and determined that the Wong Kim Ark decision should apply to children born of such illegal aliens.

This will not happen unless such a child is denied citizenship, AND the illegal parents take it to court, AND the states attorney is willing to bring this argument up AND his superiors allow him to.

I hate to be the incessant pessimistic nagging in the back corner, but I REALLY don't see this happening.

ladybug  posted on  2007-08-21   0:02:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: ladybug (#4)

What if Congress passes a bill denying such citizenship,
the constitutionality of the bill under the 14th Amendment is challenged,
and then this legal argument is presented in support of the statute?

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2007-08-21   18:14:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: DeaconBenjamin (#7)

What if Congress passes a bill denying such citizenship, the constitutionality of the bill under the 14th Amendment is challenged, and then this legal argument is presented in support of the statute?

What if I just right my congressman and tell him to get right on that. That could work if it were implemented. I simply do not see that happening. I have not seen our government actually DO anything to slow down the illegals creeping in, so why would the politicians want to curtail these added citizens? These children get birth certificates, social security cards, grow up in the system and are taught to pay taxes. These taxes are the monopoly money that pay the salaries and retirements of these politicians, stopping this would limit the money they have to play with.

Not to mention that every time a child gets a birth certificate, the certificate goes to the department of commerce, that child then becomes a commodity, and these certificates are then traded around the world.

ladybug  posted on  2007-08-21   18:32:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: ladybug (#8)

I have not seen our government actually DO anything to slow down the illegals creeping in, so why would the politicians want to curtail these added citizens?

Best of both worlds. For people who are hardcore against illegal immigration, the Member can present himself as a champion and national leader on this issue, while to the opposition, he can state (off the record) that it is an empty, quixotic gesture.

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2007-08-21   19:59:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

        There are no replies to Comment # 13.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]