[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination

CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine

Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC

This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State

One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Children Born in the United States to Aliens Should Not, by Constitutional Right, Be US Citizens
Source: Law & Freedom .com
URL Source: http://www.lawandfreedom.com/site/constitutional/AlienBirth.pdf
Published: Dec 13, 2005
Author: By WilliamJ. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, an
Post Date: 2007-08-20 21:57:28 by DeaconBenjamin
Keywords: None
Views: 487
Comments: 17

For the whole of the Twentieth Century, it was commonly assumed that children born in the United States to alien parents were constitutionally entitled to be United States citizens. This assumption is based upon a U.S. Supreme Court case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), which held that a child who had been born of alien parents, lawfully in the United States, was entitled to citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment based on its terms that “[a]ll persons born in the United States ... and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States ....”

The Supreme Court’s decision in Wong Kim Ark was based upon an inapplicable British common law rule that an individual, born on British soil, owed allegiance to the British sovereign who not only governed the land, but owned it. Such a rule is wholly unsuitable to America, a nation whose sovereign is the people and whose land is owned by no man.

Not only did the Supreme Court fail to recognize the unsuitability of an old British rule, it failed to apply the original and historical meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. To be born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States is not just to be physically present within the nation’s boundaries. Rather, to be “subject” is to evidence allegiance and fidelity to the American nation. Children of alien parents are not entitled to an irrebuttable constitutional presumption of such loyalty just because they are born on American soil. Indeed, children born to alien parents who defiantly enter or remain illegally in the United States are in no sense “subject” to the jurisdiction of the nation.

To date, no court decision has carefully analyzed and determined that the Wong Kim Ark decision should apply to children born of such illegal aliens. Such an issue is too important never to have been litigated and competently decided. The Wong Kim Ark rule ought either be (i) limited to its facts and applied only to resident aliens lawfully admitted to residence in the United States, or better yet (ii) overruled, leaving it to Congress to determine citizenship of such children by statute pursuant to its constitutional power to establish the nation’s naturalization policy.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#4. To: DeaconBenjamin (#0)

To date, no court decision has carefully analyzed and determined that the Wong Kim Ark decision should apply to children born of such illegal aliens.

This will not happen unless such a child is denied citizenship, AND the illegal parents take it to court, AND the states attorney is willing to bring this argument up AND his superiors allow him to.

I hate to be the incessant pessimistic nagging in the back corner, but I REALLY don't see this happening.

ladybug  posted on  2007-08-21   0:02:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: ladybug (#4)

What if Congress passes a bill denying such citizenship,
the constitutionality of the bill under the 14th Amendment is challenged,
and then this legal argument is presented in support of the statute?

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2007-08-21   18:14:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: DeaconBenjamin (#7)

What if Congress passes a bill denying such citizenship, the constitutionality of the bill under the 14th Amendment is challenged, and then this legal argument is presented in support of the statute?

What if I just right my congressman and tell him to get right on that. That could work if it were implemented. I simply do not see that happening. I have not seen our government actually DO anything to slow down the illegals creeping in, so why would the politicians want to curtail these added citizens? These children get birth certificates, social security cards, grow up in the system and are taught to pay taxes. These taxes are the monopoly money that pay the salaries and retirements of these politicians, stopping this would limit the money they have to play with.

Not to mention that every time a child gets a birth certificate, the certificate goes to the department of commerce, that child then becomes a commodity, and these certificates are then traded around the world.

ladybug  posted on  2007-08-21   18:32:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#9. To: ladybug (#8)

I have not seen our government actually DO anything to slow down the illegals creeping in,

Of course. They are working towards the NAU. It's all part of the plan.

farmfriend  posted on  2007-08-21 18:34:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: ladybug (#8)

I have not seen our government actually DO anything to slow down the illegals creeping in, so why would the politicians want to curtail these added citizens?

Best of both worlds. For people who are hardcore against illegal immigration, the Member can present himself as a champion and national leader on this issue, while to the opposition, he can state (off the record) that it is an empty, quixotic gesture.

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2007-08-21 19:59:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]