[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Poverty Myth EXPOSED! New Census Report Is Shocking Capitol Hill

August layoffs soared to 15-year high, marking a 193% increase from July.

NYPD Faces Uncertain Future Amid New York's Growing Political Crisis

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Loss of Arctic ice leaves experts stunned
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/
URL Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/sep/04/climatechange
Published: Sep 5, 2007
Author: David Adam, environment correspondent
Post Date: 2007-09-05 01:51:48 by robin
Ping List: *Global Climate Change*     Subscribe to *Global Climate Change*
Keywords: None
Views: 239
Comments: 17

The Arctic ice cap has collapsed at an unprecedented rate this summer and levels of sea ice in the region now stand at record lows, scientists have announced.

Experts say they are "stunned" by the loss of ice, with an area almost twice as big as the UK disappearing in the last week alone.

So much ice has melted this summer that the Northwest passage across the top of Canada is fully navigable, and observers say the Northeast passage along Russia's Arctic coast could open later this month.

If the increased rate of melting continues, the summertime Arctic could be totally free of ice by 2030.

Mark Serreze, an Arctic specialist at the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre at Colorado University in Denver, said: "It's amazing. It's simply fallen off a cliff and we're still losing ice."

The Arctic has now lost about a third of its ice since satellite measurements began thirty years ago, and the rate of loss has accelerated sharply since 2002.

Dr Serreze said: "If you asked me a couple of years ago when the Arctic could lose all of its ice then I would have said 2100, or 2070 maybe. But now I think that 2030 is a reasonable estimate. It seems that the Arctic is going to be a very different place within our lifetimes, and certainly within our childrens' lifetimes."

The new figures show that sea ice extent is currently down to 4.4m square kilometres (1.7m square miles) and still falling.

The previous record low was 5.3m square kilometres in September 2005. From 1979 to 2000 the average sea ice extent was 7.7m square kilometres.

The sea ice usually melts in the Arctic summer and freezes again in the winter. But Dr Serreze said that would be difficult this year.

"This summer we've got all this open water and added heat going into the ocean. That is going to make it much harder for the ice to grow back."

Changes in wind and ocean circulation patterns can help reduce sea ice extent, but Dr Serreze said the main culprit was man-made global warming.

"The rules are starting to change and what's changing the rules is the input of greenhouse gases." Subscribe to *Global Climate Change*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: robin, *Agriculture-Environment* (#0)

"The rules are starting to change and what's changing the rules is the input of greenhouse gases."

Bullshit! There are no sun spots, it's going to be a cold winter with an early fall.


"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul

farmfriend  posted on  2007-09-05   2:10:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: robin (#0)

...and at the same time, the Eastern Ice Shelf of Antarctica has gained 45 billion tons of ice...

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-09-05   3:30:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: robin (#0)

For the last 100 years, the "experts," at 20-year intervals, have howled global cooling, global warming, global cooling, global warming.

"Ex-pert" means "has-been" and "drip under pressure." That's "expert."

"Life is short, break the rules, forgive quickly, kiss slowly, love truly, laugh uncontrollably and never regret anything that made you smile."

YertleTurtle  posted on  2007-09-05   7:28:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin (#0)

Loss of Arctic ice leaves experts stunned

Was it stolen???

Maybe the Ruskies took it, can't trust them.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-09-05   7:32:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: farmfriend (#1)

My worming measurement is this:

I measure the date when I open the swimming pool in the Spring (April). Then I measure the date when I close it, hopefully in October. I had a good 100-lap swim yesterday and I expect to do the same today.

Gosh... don't I HATE this worming thing? (NOT!!!!)

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-09-05   8:19:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: YertleTurtle (#3) (Edited)

For the last 100 years, the "experts," at 20-year intervals, have howled global cooling, global warming, global cooling, global warming.

When the anomolies were first detected some scientists thought they represented global cooling. This is because an ice age was the only variation believed possible at that time. Also remember that 1 degree average change doesn't warm the entire earth, some parts like the UK and parts of Europe, are actually cooled by a small average increase in temperature.

Misinterpreting this early research does provide spin to counter facts such as huge loss of Antartic ice over the past 15 years and the current loss of artic ice, but it's so transparent that even Rush has stopped using it. Rush is now telling the goobs that global warming is real, but it just isn't man mande. The corporate interests who would be hurt by warming legislation have given up on the "it doesn't exist" argument.

.

...  posted on  2007-09-05   8:20:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: ... (#6)

What should we be cheering for? Global worming or global cooling?

Somehow, I don't like cold. I bet that the Eskimos don't like cold either or they would not be wearing those furry coats if they did.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-09-05   8:24:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: ..., YertleTurtle, *Agriculture-Environment* (#6)

Most of the warming took place before the 1950s. Also they use ice core proxies to determine past temperature except that the water isotopes distort in the ice. A prime example of this is the younger dryas. They claim it was cold during this period but the plant material and pollen present around preserved mammoths as well as lake sediments prove without a doubt that the climate was warm.

There is a lot of science to counter the global warming spin and that's what it is, spin.

Did you know that they are doing a photo study on the thermometers they use to measure the current temperature? Most of the ones I've seen are located near blacktop, air conditioner vents or on roof tops. Gosh I wonder why they are measuring higher temperatures.


"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul

farmfriend  posted on  2007-09-05   8:53:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: farmfriend (#8)

I really hope it's getting warmer and, I believe that it is. I hope to be able to grow my own figs in the Poconos, at 1500 ft. elevation. I hope this becomes possible soon. Until then... at least we can get our zucchini and tomatoes. We could not have those for long if we were globally cooling.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-09-05   9:17:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: robin (#0)

Interesting ancillary trivia.

March Of The Penguins was filmed near the French research facility in Antarctica, Dumont d'Urville Station, which is named after the French Naval Officer who also had the presence of mind to recognize the value of the Venus De Milo, and he is the reason she is at The Louvre today.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-09-05   10:08:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: farmfriend (#1)

Carbon dioxide levels are substantially higher now than at any time in the last 800,000 years, the latest study of ice drilled out of Antarctica confirms.

The in-depth analysis of air bubbles trapped in a 3.2km-long core of frozen snow shows current greenhouse gas concentrations are unprecedented.

The East Antarctic core is the longest, deepest ice column yet extracted.

Project scientists say its contents indicate humans could be bringing about dangerous climate changes.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5314592.stm

I find the ice core samples data to be most revealing.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-05   11:18:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: robin (#11)

And it's not going to get any better with China and India revving up the CO2.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2007-09-05   17:33:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: robin, *Agriculture-Environment* (#11)

I find the ice core samples data to be most revealing.

It's erroneous data! Ice cores are not good proxies for past climate.

Link

CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time

by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc.

The Truth About Ice Cores
Because carbon dioxide ice core records are regarded as a foundation of the man-made global warming hypothesis, let us dwell on them for a while.

The basic assumption behind the CO2 glaciology is a tacit view that air inclusions in ice are a closed system, which permanently preserves the original chemical and isotopic composition of gas, and thus that the inclusions are a suitable matrix for reliable reconstruction of the pre-industrial and ancient atmosphere. This assumption is in conflict with ample evidence from numerous earlier CO2 studies, indicating the opposite (see review in Jaworowski et al. 1992b).

Proxy determinations of the atmospheric CO2 level by analysis of ice cores, reported since 1985, have been generally lower than the levels measured recently in the atmosphere. But, before 1985, the ice cores were showing values much higher than the current atmospheric concentrations (Jaworo- wski et al. 1992b). These recent proxy ice core values re- mained low during the entire past 650,000 years (Siegenthaler et al. 2005)—even during the six former interglacial warm periods, when the global temperature was as much as 5°C warmer than in our current interglacial!

This means that either atmospheric CO2 levels have no discernible influence on climate (which is true), or that the proxy ice core reconstructions of the chemical composition of the ancient atmosphere are false (which is also true, as shown below).

It was never experimentally demonstrated that ice core records reliably represent the original atmospheric composi- tion. Other proxies demonstrated that many millions of years ago, CO2 levels in the atmosphere reached, at various times, 377, 450, and even 3,500 ppmv (Kurschner et al. 1996, Royer et al. 2001), and that during the past 10,000 years these levels were, as a rule, higher than 300 ppmv, fluctuating up to 348 ppmv (Kurschner et al. 1996, Royer et al. 2001, Wagner et al. 1999, Wagner et al. 2002). The results of these last studies prove false the assertion of stabilized Holocene CO2 con- centrations of 270 ppmv to 280 ppmv until the industrial revolution.

The results of the cited pre-1985 studies are strongly sup- ported by direct CO2 measurements, carried out in the pre- industrial and 20th-Century atmosphere (see below). About 2 billion years ago, the CO2 atmospheric level was 100 or perhaps even 1,000 times higher than today. According to today’s climate models, the Earth would have been too hot for life at that time (Ohmoto et al. 2004). However, geologic evidence suggests there was not a Venus-style, “runaway warming.” Instead, life flourished then in the oceans and land, with such enormously high levels of this “gas of life,” from which our bodies and all living creatures are built (Godlewski 1873). Yet, Greens now call this gas a dangerous “pollutant.”

There is part of the paper. I recommend reading the whole thing.


"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul

farmfriend  posted on  2007-09-05   18:16:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: farmfriend (#13)

There seems to be some disagreement among scientists about global warming, but not much about the value of and the data from the ice core samples.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/warnings/stories/

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Paleoclimatology_IceCores/

http://www.wri.org/climate/pubs_content_text.cfm?ContentID=3912

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-05   18:28:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: robin (#14)

There seems to be some disagreement among scientists about global warming, but not much about the value of and the data from the ice core samples.

You didn't read that paper I linked did you? There are numerous studies, cited in that paper, that disprove the ice cores as proxies. I'm currently helping with a soon to be peer reviewed paper showing that the ice cores are bad proxies. BTW, that paper I linked was written by a physicist. He is also an MD.


"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul

farmfriend  posted on  2007-09-05   18:33:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: farmfriend (#15)

I can find numerous scientists from both sides of the global warming issue, but very few that deny the ice core samples data. You have presented one. I do not feel qualified to judge, and prefer to see who supports which studies and who does not.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-05   18:47:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: robin (#16)

Oh that's a cop out.


"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul

farmfriend  posted on  2007-09-05   19:06:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]