[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: URGENT: Senate Vote Could Block Mexican Truck Program - Take Action
Source: Daily Kos
URL Source: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/9/10/133239/604
Published: Sep 10, 2007
Author: Teamster Power
Post Date: 2007-09-10 19:18:21 by Zipporah
Keywords: None
Views: 92
Comments: 4

URGENT: Senate Vote Could Block Mexican Truck Program - Take Action

by TeamsterPower

Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 12:19:21 PM PDT

The Senate is expected to take up the 2008 transportation appropriations bill soon. And as early as this evening, Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-ND, will introduce an amendment that would block funding for Bush's illegal Mexican Truck pilot program.

Tell your senators to support the Dorgan amendment now.

The House passed a similar measure in May that passed by the overwhelming margin of 411-3.

This is a bi-partisan, commen-sense, grass-roots issue. Americans of all political persuasions are outraged that the Bush administration would disregard the will of Congress and the majority of citizens who do not want this plan to move forward.

Americans can see through the Bush smokescreen. They see the potential danger, environmental and economic impacts to our nation if this so-called pilot project moves forward.

Everthing about this program has been done under the radar. Just weeks before the pilot program was announced, the DOT denied it was even being considered. There was no public record, no public comment period. Nothing.

Two weeks ago, the DOT was planning to unlock our borders over Labor Day weekend. The Teamsters, Sierra Club and others filed a lawsuit to block that move. The lawsuit continues, as does our pressure on Congress.

The green light to give Mexican trucks open access to U.S. roads and higways was given under the cover of darkness. The first Mexican truck given access to our nation's highways rolled across the border shortly before 1 a.m. Saturday.

One dangerous truck on our highways is too many. And it may very well be that no truck in this pilot project will cross the border uninspected. But what happens in September 2008, when George Bush is months away from leaving the Oval Office? Will he approve the full-scale opening of our borders?

Fewer than 10% of the trucks coming into our country from Mexico are being inspected now. An anticipated 30,000 Mexican trucks are expected to one day get full access to our highways. How many of them do you think the DOT will actually inspect?

Even today, the DOT's own inspector general says the agency, the Mexican Government and state agencies are not 100% ready to handle the anticipated traffic from the pilot program.

According to the AP:

The inspector general's report to Congress said the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Association had made progress in addressing Congress' requirements.

But it also said the administration had no coordinated plans for checking trucks and drivers participating in the test program, and that the motor carrier safety group needed to do more to help enforce the English requirements for drivers.

Five states told the inspector general's office they were not ready to enforce the safety rules for the trucks during the pilot project. Twenty-six states raised one or more concerns.

There is still time to act. Here is a list of senators that the Teamsters are targeting for this action:

Brownback (KS)
Bunning (KY)
Burr (NC)
Cantwell (WA)
Coleman (MN)
Collins (ME)


Corker (TN)
Cornyn (TX)
Dole (NC)
Ensign (NV)
Graham (SC)
Grassley (IA)


Gregg (NH)
Hagel (NE)
Hutchison (TX)
Lincoln (AR)
Lugar (IN)
Martinez (FL)
Murkowski (AK)
Nelson (NE)
Nelson (FL)


Pryor (AR)
Roberts (KS)
Salazar (CO)
Shelby (AL)

If your senator is on this list, and even if he or she is not, send them an email now.

UPDATE: Reid says Dorgan-Specter amendment will be introduced tomorrow morning.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zipporah (#0)

done!

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2007-09-10   19:40:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: IndieTX (#1)

..this does answer the question about the Teamsters.. I was mistaken in believing that they were not behind their members on this issue..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-10   19:43:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Zipporah, *Agriculture-Environment*, *libertarians*, *North American Union* (#0)

Time for action.


"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul

farmfriend  posted on  2007-09-10   19:46:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Zipporah (#0) (Edited)

Back in 1977 when I was in the fledgling microcomputer biz, I went to an industry expo in Chicago and set up a display booth.

At the loading dock I was informed by two Teamsters (wearing leather vests and no shirts) that I was only allowed to carry in one box of supplies and the rest of our equipment was going to be moved by The Teamsters, or else.

I hate those fucking goons, and I'm going to laff my ass of when that mob-run conspiracy finally collapses.

If we really want to make America better, we should let the Mexican truckers break the Teamsters, then boot the alien truckers out.

I mean, suppose some competitor to the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK was moving in and threatening the FED's power. Would you help the FED boot the competition and maintain their criminal monopoly?

Why would any American want to protect the artificially high wages of the Teamsters gained through violence and extortion?

These goons would rather intimidate everyone than explain why we should support them, and it's only now that they are politely asking for help from the majority.

And, the hypocrisy of union labor is stark for anyone who cares to look. If for instance a union trucker is on layoff or on strike, he isn't allowed to drive for a non union company to feed his family (assuming the strike fund is depleted) But, he can work as a non union electrician or plumber and compete with AFL-CIO mechanics in another field, with no danger of crossing the goons that run his union.

The same goes for union workers in every other trade. They can't work in their own field but they can work non union and compete with union labor in others, even though they're supposed to show solidarity with all AFL-CIO affiliates that are fighting labor grievances.

But if I want to drive a "scab" truck to feed my family then I can expect a rifle bullet through my windshield and the shooter to get clean away with it.

As I said before, every time there's a strike, bullets pierce non union trucks and buses, and if the target was a bus load of civil rights agitators from "up Nawth" the FBI would go door to door to find that rifle.

But they have never found a single shooter who fired on rolling stock during a Teamsters strike. Nor have they ever threatened to de-certify the union if the goons didn't give up the shooter.

Fuck the goddam Teamsters.

Q: "How many Teamsters does it take to change a light bulb?"

A: "Three, you wanna make something of it???"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-09-11   8:37:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]