[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

In Case you miss Bad Journalism

Bobby K Jr was Exiled For Saying This:

Quantum Meets AI: Morgan Stanley Maps Out Next Tech Frontier

670,000+ Swept Away as Dams Burst in Canton China, Triggering Deadly Flood!

Senate Version Of Trump Tax Bill Adds $3.3 Trillion To Deficit, $500BN More Than The House; Debt Ceiling Raised By $5 Trillion

Iran Disables GPS, Joins China’s Beidou — The End of U.S. Satellite Dominance?

Ukraine's Withdrawal From Anti-Personnel Landmine Treaty Could Haunt Generations

71 killed in Israeli attack on Iran's Evin Prison

Practice Small, Daily Acts Of Sabotage Against The Imperial Machine

"EVERYONE'S BEEN SHOT UP HERE": Arsonists Set Wildfire In Northern Idaho, Open Fire On Firefighters, Police In Ambush

Trump has Putin trapped, and the Kremlin knows it

Kamala's comeback bid sparks Democrat donor meltdown amid fears she'll sink party in California

Russia's New Grom-A1 100 KM Range Guided Bomb- 600 Kilo

UKRAINIAN CONSULATE IN ITALY CAUGHT TRAFFICKING WEAPONS, ORGANS & CHILDREN WITH THE MAFIA

Andrew Cuomo to stay on ballot for NYC mayor in November general election

The life of the half-immortal who advised CCP (End of CCP in 2026?)

Millions Flee China’s Top Cities

Violence begets violence: IDF troops beaten, choked, rammed by Jewish settlers in West Bank

Netanyahu Says It's Antisemitic For Israeli Soldiers To Describe Their Own Atrocities

China's Economy Spirals With No End In Sight, Says Kyle Bass

American Bread Cannot Be Sold in Most Countries

Woman Spent Her Life To Prove 796 Babies were buried under Catholic Home

Japan Got Rich Without Getting Fat

US Spent $495.3 million to fire 39 THAAD Missiles

Private Mail Back Online

Senior Israeli officials tell Israeli media that they intend to attack Iran after ceasefire.

Palestinian Woman Nails Israeli

Tucker Carlson: Marjorie Taylor Greene:

Diverse Coney Island in New York looks unrecognizable after third world invasion

Corbett Report: Palantir at the Heart of Iran


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Bush still refuses to admit he was wrong
Source: McClatchy Newspapers
URL Source: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/19708.html
Published: Sep 14, 2007
Author: By Joseph L. Galloway | McClatchy Newspa
Post Date: 2007-09-14 19:36:19 by Zipporah
Keywords: None
Views: 192
Comments: 16

Well, now we’ve heard from General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker and President George W. Bush, and it appears that the Surge has succeeded — succeeded in guaranteeing that the Iraq War will drag on for the last 16 months of the Bush presidency at a cost of another 1,600 American dead and $13 billion a month.

Extending the war, kicking that can down the road, was President Bush’s only strategic objective last January when he came up with the idea of escalating the number of American troops in Iraq from 130,000 to today’s 170,000. Put simply, the Decider wants to hand off the decision to pull the plug on his unwinnable war to someone else, anyone else.

Four and a half years after this president ordered the invasion of Iraq in a gross act of arrogance and ignorance based on faulty, bogus and politically twisted intelligence — and after repeatedly changing the rationales and objectives of the war as each has failed in turn — we’re going to continue this war because George W. Bush is incapable of admitting that he was wrong, wrong, wrong.

Leaving aside all the happy talk we heard this week about how much better the security picture is in Baghdad, the fact is that the escalation or surge has failed utterly. The stated purpose of this exercise was to buy breathing room for the faltering government of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki and the paralyzed Iraqi parliament to make progress toward national reconciliation.

The Iraqi government’s job was to use this breathing room, bought at the cost of American lives and American treasure, to step back from sectarian murder and civil war, which it’s failed to do, may be totally incapable of doing and may not even be interested in doing.

Every American commander in Iraq has stated the obvious from Day One: This war cannot be won militarily. It cannot be won by American troops. It cannot be won by wishful thinking. It can only be won by the Iraqis themselves, and their definition of victory is built on dreams of bloody revenge and the slaughter of innocents.

When our president talks of peace returning to the streets of Baghdad, he mistakes the silence of empty, abandoned homes and sectarian cleansing for progress. He confuses the segregation of Shia and Sunni, each in their own ghettos behind tall concrete walls, for progress. More than 3 million Iraqis have been driven from their homes and neighborhoods into exile, internal or external, and this he calls success.

He and the two yes-men, Petraeus and Crocker, crowed about victory in Anbar province as though American tactics and strategy had something to do with a revolutionary turnaround among Sunni tribal sheiks who, long after even the U.S. Marines were admitting defeat in Anbar, acted in their own self-interest and struck against the al Qaeda in Iraq operatives who were killing their people, their own children.

This week, one of the key authors of that change, a man President Bush singled out on his secret fly-by-night visit to Anbar, was blown apart by the enemy near his own home.

All the while, Prime Minister Maliki and his majority Shia government grit their teeth at the spectacle of their American allies supporting and financing and even recruiting the hated Sunnis into the army and police forces, thus making them a harder nut to crack when the night of the long knives, the dark night of Shia revenge, eventually arrives.

The president announced that he was taking Gen. Petraeus’ advice and ordering the beginning of 10-month gradual drawdown of the extra 30,000 troops of the surge — a drawdown that everyone knew was inevitable simply because our Army and Marine Corps cannot sustain that level of troops in Iraq beyond next March.

On the schedule the president laid down this week, we’ll still have some 138,000 troops on the ground in Iraq next July, and 100,000 on January 20, 2009, when Bush’s successor will take office, and he made it clear that he hopes to have agreements in place to ensure an American military presence there for many years to come.

Will Bush get away with this? From all the evidence at hand, the answer, sadly, is yes. Only the Democrats in Congress stand in his way, and they have yet to find their spines, or a semblance of moral courage, or even a sufficient understanding of the Constitution and its clauses on war making and war-financing, to override The Decider.

It’s a long journey from now to January 20, 2009, and the blood of many Americans and even more Iraqis will flow freely and stain the hands of those who allow this insane war to continue at the behest of a stubborn, unseeing, unthinking man from Crawford, Texas.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zipporah (#0)

we’re going to continue this war because George W. Bush is incapable of admitting that he was wrong, wrong, wrong.

Bush is not wrong. He is merely doing what he set out to do.

This has not been an error, a miscalculation nor a misstep, he knew what he wanted to do from day one and he has done it.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-09-14   19:41:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Oh I totally agree,.. so many think Iraq is a string of missteps .. I dont see it that way at all..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-14   19:45:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Zipporah (#2)

I dont see it that way at all..

Zip...

Further, if you think about it, Bush never was the architect of this affair, rather he has been the carpenter. Doing what was decided long ago by others.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-09-14   20:01:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#3)

Bush never was the architect of this affair, rather he has been the carpenter.

Amen..long planned.. till they found someone to carry it out.. IMO thats the reason Clinton had to go.. they found his 'weakness' and used it to oust him.. remember Hillary speaking of the Lewinsky issue? "Vast rightwing conspiracy".. yep sure was IMO.

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-14   20:04:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Zipporah (#0)

Bush has never been able to admit a mistake. Ever. When he finally admitted he got a DUI, he claimed he got pulled over for driving too slow. In reality, he drove off the road and a cop came along while he was trying to get the car back on the road. Then he claimed he never was arrested. He was.

But I agree that the Iraq mess was more or less planned (I still think they screwed up, but all that "we'll be home in six months" crap was just crap. They never planned to leave. They've just turned it into a total mess, but even if all had gone well, we'd still be there. It's the centerpiece of their foreign policy, to dominate the Middle East. The centerpiece of their domestic policy is to bankrupt the middle class and redistribute the wealth to the plutocrats.)

Mekons4  posted on  2007-09-14   23:02:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Mekons4 (#5)

Bush has never been able to admit a mistake. Ever. When he finally admitted he got a DUI, he claimed he got pulled over for driving too slow. In reality, he drove off the road and a cop came along while he was trying to get the car back on the road. Then he claimed he never was arrested. He was.

..this reminds me of something I read about this:

I wish I could find the article for it was quite interesting.. the author said that this wasnt a gaff but rather it was the fact Bush was absolutely is unable to get the words out that he had been 'fooled'..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-14   23:16:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Zipporah (#6)

Remember when he was asked to cite one mistake he had made, on national TV, and he stood there for a full minute and said he couldn't think of anything?

Mekons4  posted on  2007-09-14   23:32:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Mekons4 (#7)

..no I dont recall that..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-14   23:32:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Zipporah (#6)

I like this version...........

kiki  posted on  2007-09-14   23:40:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Mekons4 (#7)

Remember when he was asked to cite one mistake he had made, on national TV, and he stood there for a full minute and said he couldn't think of anything?

if I remember correctly, he finally said maybe he appointed some of the wrong people. in other words, *they* screwed up after he trusted them.

kiki  posted on  2007-09-14   23:42:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: kiki (#9)

ROFL! OMG .. too too funny.. love it!

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-14   23:44:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Zipporah (#8)

Here's a reference to it. I wish I could find the transcript, with about a minute of uh, uh, it's hard when you get asked..., um, er, no, I can't think of anything at the moment. It was in April, 2004.

Several reporters asked if he had made any errors or had any regrets. None that he could think of. Once he paused for a long time, but just couldn't come up with anything. Occasionally the camera cut to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, who looked desperate. I imagined her thinking, "This is the guy I praised and defended in my public testimony to the 9-11 Commission last week. Now everybody knows that I am truly full of shit." http://www.counterpunch.org/jackson04162004.html

Mekons4  posted on  2007-09-14   23:52:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Mekons4 (#12)

.thanks.. I dont recall this at all.. most people if asked this ..would hesitate not b/c they couldnt think of anything but more likely where to begin..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-14   23:54:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Mekons4 (#12)

what I was thinking of was actually in a 2004 debate with kerry:

GRABEL: President Bush, during the last four years, you have made thousands of decisions that have affected millions of lives. Please give three instances in which you came to realize you had made a wrong decision, and what you did to correct it. Thank you.

BUSH: I have made a lot of decisions, and some of them little, like appointments to boards you never heard of, and some of them big.

And in a war, there's a lot of -- there's a lot of tactical decisions that historians will look back and say: He shouldn't have done that. He shouldn't have made that decision. And I'll take responsibility for them. I'm human.

But on the big questions, about whether or not we should have gone into Afghanistan, the big question about whether we should have removed somebody in Iraq, I'll stand by those decisions, because I think they're right.

That's really what you're -- when they ask about the mistakes, that's what they're talking about. They're trying to say, "Did you make a mistake going into Iraq?" And the answer is, "Absolutely not." It was the right decision.

The Duelfer report confirmed that decision today, because what Saddam Hussein was doing was trying to get rid of sanctions so he could reconstitute a weapons program. And the biggest threat facing America is terrorists with weapons of mass destruction.

We knew he hated us. We knew he'd been -- invaded other countries. We knew he tortured his own people.

On the tax cut, it's a big decision. I did the right decision. Our recession was one of the shallowest in modern history.

Now, you asked what mistakes. I made some mistakes in appointing people, but I'm not going to name them. I don't want to hurt their feelings on national TV.

(LAUGHTER)

kiki  posted on  2007-09-15   0:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: kiki (#14)

I remember that one now. But the press conference, where he couldn't thinks of ANYTHING he had EVER done wrong, always stood out for me. He looked so genuinely puzzled. And pissed.

Later, he came up with some lame little error and said he should have answered with that. The main thing is, he just can't conceive that he could ever be wrong about anything. He's the Dictatertot.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-09-15   0:08:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Mekons4 (#15)

I've heard he gets really ugly if anyone challenges him on anything. this is why cheney has been such a 'success' - he frames issues in a way that bush actually thinks he's making a decision, never realizing how cheney limits his choices.

stupid + arrogant is a bad combination.

kiki  posted on  2007-09-15   0:14:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]