See other History Articles
Title: Did Jews Trick America Into Entering The First World War?
Source:
Useless-Knowledge.com
URL Source: http://www.useless-knowledge.com/1234/apr/article322.html
Published: May 30, 2005
Author: Thomas Keyes
Post Date: 2005-05-30 10:25:50 by Zoroaster
Keywords: Entering, America, Trick
Views: 1032
Comments: 94
Did Jews Trick America Into Entering The First World War? By Thomas Keyes Apr. 23, 2005 Herbert Asquith was the prime minister of England from 1908-1916, midway into the First World War. His chancellor, David Lloyd George, with the support of his confederates, who were critical of Asquith's direction of the British war effort, managed to topple Asquith, succeeding him as prime minister. David Lloyd George, though an evangelical Christian, like his American counterpart, Woodrow Wilson, was also an ardent Zionist, again like Wilson. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), who would be the first president of Israel, was born in Motol, Russia (now in Belarus) and educated in Switzerland, where he received his Ph.D.in chemistry. Later he taught at Manchester University in England, becoming a British subject in 1910. According to most historical accounts, he helped Britain develop a procedure for producing acetone, a strategically important chemical used in manufacturing explosives, from horse chestnuts. Lloyd George claimed in his memoirs that it was in recognition of this contribution that he issued the Balfour Declaration, sometimes called the birth certificate of the state of Israel. However, historian David Fromkin of Boston University and others call this a fiction. Weizmann does not mention it in his autobiography. Here is the text of the the Balfour Declaration. "Foreign Office. November 2nd, 1917. Dear Lord Rothschild. I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet. 'His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.' I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation. Yours sincerely. Arthur James Balfour". If David Lloyd George did not issue the Balfour Declaration to recompense Weizmann's service, as a chemist, to Great Britain, then, why did he issue it? According to some researchers, Lloyd George and Weizmann made a deal. At the time, the war was stalemated. Weizmann agreed, according to this version, to help draw the US into the war on the side of the allies, Britain, France and Russia, tipping the balance in their favor, against Germany, Austria-Hungary (then one country) and Turkey. It will be remembered, for one thing, that Turkey, or the Ottoman Empire, as it was then called, controlled Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and other parts of the Near East. If England could help found a Jewish state in the region, once it had appropriated it from the Turks, it would afford protection for their shipping through the Suez Canal. Weizmann, for his part, preferred Palestine to uninhabited parts of Uganda, where the Jews had already been offered a homeland. Apparently, Weizmann did not know of the existence of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, whereby France and England had already drawn a map of the Middle East that they would implement in the event of victory. England had also made conflicting agreements with the Arabs. Don't let Christianity stop anyone from making contradictory promises! What sparked America's entry into WWI was the Zimmermann telegram, which created a furor in the US, when released to the public on March 1, 1917. This was an encrypted telegram sent on January 16, 1917 by German Foreign Minister, Arthur Zimmermann, to Count von Bernstorff, the German ambassador to the US, to be forwarded to the President of México. Nigel de Grey and William Montgomery, of British intelligence had deciphered the intercepted telegram, according to the official version. The text of the telegram, from "The Zimmermann Telegram" by Barbara Tuchman, published in 1966 by Ballantine Books, follows. "Most Secret. For Your Excellency's personal information and to be handed on to the Imperial Minister in Mexico. We intend to begin unrestricted submarine warfare on the first of February. We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States neutral. In the event of this not succeeding, we make Mexico a proposal of an alliance on the following basis: Make war together, make peace together, generous financial support, and an understanding on our part that Mexico is to reconquer the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The settlement detail is left to you. You will inform the President (of Mexico) of the above most secretly as soon as the outbreak of war with the United States is certain and add the suggestion that he should, on his own initiative, invite Japan to immediate adherence and at the same time mediate between Japan and ourselves. Please call the President's attention to the fact that the unrestricted employment of our submarines now offers the prospect of compelling England to make peace within a few months. Acknowledge receipt. Zimmermann". Firstly, here the Germans were offering the Mexicans an alliance to be effectuated if and only if the US should enter the war, which clearly the Germans were seeking, and had every reason to seek, to avoid, so that barring US's declaring war, the effect of the telegram would have been null and nil. So if the telegram had not been deciphered, the US might not have entered the war and the proffered alliance would never have come into play. Thus the recommendations of the telegram would have been strictly moot and academic, an historical curiosity. Secondly, one wonders if it was intended to be taken seriously. Could México have had even the remotest dream of recovering Texas, New Mexico and Arizona? Venustiano Carranza, the Mexican president, rejected the offer, as attractive as one might imagine he may have considered it. But the question here is how the telegram came to be decoded. The Germans, whom four years of wartime intelligence and espionage had made experts in cryptology, had encoded the telegram in a recently created code, Code 7500. According to some authorities, there had not been enough messages transmitted in Code 7500 for the British to have been able to decipher the telegram. These same authorities see the hand of Chaim Weizmann in this piece of treachery. Weizmann had connections in Germany in high places. Some authorities think that Weizmann may have been instrumental in getting one of the influential Jews in Germany to obtain Code 7500 from the German Foreign Ministry and to betray it to the British, which, of course, would have been a treasonable act. Anyway, the decipherment did accomplish the desired result of drawing the US needlessly into the war, thereby assuring an allied victory. Thus, the Ottoman Empire, including Palestine, came into Anglo-French hands, and the British were able to fulfill the promise made in the Balfour Declaration, in spite of their contradictory promises to the Arabs. Later the Balfour Declaration was introduced in US Congress by Hamilton Fish of New York and adopted. With Jewish control of the US media and publishing industry, this view of the events leading to American's entry into WWI has been played down or silenced for decades, but certainly provides a believable explanation. Winston Churchill later only vaguely alluded to such a deal, and was reluctant to abide by it. When asked by William Yale, of the US State Department what the Jews would do if the British failed to live up to their agreement, Chaim Weizmann retorted, "If they don’t, we’ll smash the British Empire like we smashed the Russian Empire.” ------------
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Zoroaster (#0)
Ridiculous. The British did it. No need to Jew obsess over what was obviously an Anglo-plot.
No- Anglophile banking elites lead us into WWI. Jews were still rag pickers and garment workers in 1917 for the most part in America.
I tend to agree, however a handful of Jews were among the banking plutocrats. The U.S. even argued for a bit, which side we should support. England had to do a sales job, to secure us to their side. WWI was a complete waste of an entire generation of men in the UK and Europe and of course, paved the way for WWII. If it was a conspiracy, it was very well done.
Remember, Burkeman1, the Rothschild family are the leaders of the banking elites. And you're right, the international bankers of the time pushed for America's entry into the war because they'd made enormous loans to England and France; loans that never would have been re-paid had Germany won the war. I always suspected the Jews had something to do with de-coding the Zimmerman telegram. Keyes confirms my suspicion. Here's the rest of the story: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Benjamin Freedman Speaks: A Jewish Defector Warns America by Benjamin H. Freedman Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S. Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co- religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep. What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria- Hungary, and Turkey. Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed. Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it - - the United States, which was almost totally pro- German, entered the war as Britain's ally. I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany. The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I. After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that. That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout." It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth." Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat. And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that? There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations. Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything. The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that. The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat. After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do? In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self- defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing. Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous. The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth. Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world. For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have. What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world. What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going. Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony. What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were. They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith. These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world. Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble- rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.
Whoa. Downloaded for later reading. Donka.
For a comprehenisve history of WWI, how we got into it, how it was fought, and how it increased DC power and how it actually brought about the first real political terror in this country I suggest the work of paleocon historian Thomas Flemming and his book "The Illusion of Victory" and follow that up with his "The New Dealers' War, FDR and the war within World War II." Germany never had a chance. On the second day of the war in 1914- the British dredged up the two cable connections from Emden Germany on the North Sea to New York and cut them. Soon after a subsidiary line from Liberia to Brazil- American owned- was also cut by the British. Hence forth the British controlled all war news to the United States. That was just the first step of a well coordinated, sustained, heavily financed, propganda effort to get the US into the war on the part of the Brits and their blood brother Wasp elite in the US.
Oh man. More erroneous Jew-hating spam posted to support your original Jew- hating spam. For some balance, here's what the Jewish Encyclopedia says about "Kol Nidre": Use by Anti-Semites. The "Kol Nidre" has been one of the means widely used by Jewish apostates and by enemies of the Jews to cast suspicion on the trustworthiness of an oath taken by a Jew (Wagenseil, "Tela Ignea, Disputatio R. Jechielis," p. 23; Eisenmenger, "Entdecktes Judenthum," vol. ii., ch. ix., pp. 489 et seq., Königsberg, 1711; Bodenschatz, "Kirchliche Verfassung der Heutigen Juden," part ii., ch. v., § 10, Frankfort and Leipsic, 1748; Rohling, "Der Talmudjude," pp. 80 et seq., Münster, 1877); so that many legislators considered it necessary to have a special form of oath administered to Jews ("Jew's oath"), and many judges refused to allow them to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this prayer (Zunz, "G. S." ii. 244; comp. pp. 246, 251). As early as 1240 Jehiel of Paris was obliged to defend the "Kol Nidre" against these charges. It can not be denied that, according to the usual wording of the formula, an unscrupulous man might think that it offers a means of escape from the obligations and promises which he had assumed and made in regard to others. Refers Only to Individual Vows. The teachers of the synagogues, however, have never failed to point out to their cobelievers that the dispensation from vows in the "Kol Nidre" refers only to those which an individual voluntarily assumes for himself alone (see RoSH to Ned. 23b) and in which no other persons or their interests are involved. In other words, the formula is restricted to those vows which concern only the relation of man to his conscience or to his Heavenly Judge (see especially Tos. to Ned. 23b). In the opinion of Jewish teachers, therefore, the object of the "Kol Nidre" in declaring oaths null and void is to give protection from divine punishment in case of violation of the vow. No vow, promise, or oath, however, which concerns another person, a court of justice, or a community is implied in the "Kol Nidre." It must be remembered, moreover, that five geonim were against while only one was in favor of reciting the prayer (Zunz, "G. V." p. 390, note a), and furthermore that even so early an authority as Saadia wished to restrict it to those vows which were extorted from the congregation in the synagogue in times of persecution ("Kol Bo," l.c.); and he declared explicitly that the "Kol Nidre" gave no absolution from oaths which an individual had taken during the year. Judah ben Barzillai, a Spanish author of the twelfth century, in his halakic work "Sefer ha- 'Ittim," declares that the custom of reciting the "Kol Nidre" was unjustifiable and misleading, since many ignorant persons believe that all their vows and oaths are annulled through this formula, and consequently they take such obligations on themselves carelessly ("Or7;ot 6;ayyim," p. 106a).
Don't fall for posts/writings by ignorant Jew-obsessors, JT.
I haven't fallen for anything A. I haven't read it. I plan to and see if it makes sense.
Jesus H. Christ.... If anything, our own fucking lying pricks got us into WWI. A lot of people were happy as hell to avoid a war, considering we just had a Civil War not 30 or so years before. The only people who decide to wage war, are the people who have the money and desire to do so. Every veteran after the American Revolution has died for some rich prick's desires for power, and NOT for freedom, or peace in our time. For anyone to make that claim, even the veterans who fought, would be ludicrous. Of course, they'd be right in saying they fought to keep themselves, and their fellow soldiers alive, and that would be truthful. However, every person who has died in war, has done so at the whim of a netherworldly cabal of bankers, lawyers, and politicians who are so removed from the common man it can't even be comprehended. This is why when our nation was founded the Constitution was explicitly written so that the common man of that time could understand it, PLAINLY. Now, we have people telling us lies about what phrases, and sentences mean, as a way to subjugate us further, oppress us, and take away our rights and freedom of choice. But hey, don't let me stop you and other people from blaming everything on the Jews. The Middle Eastern Conflict currently, I'd say is definitely an Israeli thing, but could I blame it all on just the Jews? Hell no. There's plenty of Goyim who are just as culpable for tyranny, and treachery.
I'll look into these books and bookmarking Z's post and info for later checking/reading. The Lusitania incident is a good picture of the whole conflict perhaps.
Amen, brother.
True, Tommy, the rich and powerful are the only winners in war. The Rothschild family, for example, funded the wars of the British empire. Jewish bankers, as well as their goyim counterparts, have been making money over Christians killing themselves since the Thirty Years War. Today it's Christians and Muslims killing themselves amid cries of the "eternally innocent" Jews.
So, why do you obsess over the mere war-funders and completely ignore the inbred Anglo elite war-wagers? Why obsess over the tail and ignore the dog?
The American/Anglo dog is killing Israel's enemies in the Mideast. The tail is wagging the dog.
I disagree.
Zionists have always been a tail, and when the Anglo dog is done using them, it
with turn it's attention to its tail and chew it up... Just look at what
Anglo treachery has done "for" Israel... Bush the father forced a PLO-lead
terror state into their midst and we've actively trained the PLO "security"
forces... And now, thanks to our invasion of the ME, Israel is even more
isolated and a pariah nation than ever before, thanks to their linkage with us.
The Anglo dog is setting the Israeli tail up for a terrible fall. They
are just one more pawn on the chessboard to be sacrificed when need be to
further the globe- wide Anglo-imperial-machine. Nothing more.
America circa 1914 was nearly fully under the control of about 4 wealthy men- all Anglophiles and not Jewish. The Mellon family alone had such political and economic power concentrated in their hands that it was said he picked the Presidents. I am more than a little tired of the Jew obssession. The funny thing about Jews- is that you can't get any three of them to agree where to go to lunch without an argument for 20 minutes but yet they have lead what? A two or three thoasand year ongoing anti Earth conspiracy to kill all the birdies and flowers and babies? So annoying.
This dog/tail Zionist/Anglo plutocrats argument is really very interesting. I'll check back later and see who's on first, who's on second, and where it stands ;)
Unlike Zionist, Christian Zionist asnd Noahide propagandists, I ignore posts that annoy me.
I think its a I'll scratch your back and vice versa.. I'm basing what I'm saying on this document: A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm Written: Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser participated.
So annoying. LOL. They sure are a convenient scapegoat. What a great shield for evil elite Gentiles to wield. Just procure a few Jewish lackeys, then their ill- used subjects will obsess on and blame them for the evils THEY do, while they sit back and laugh all the way to the bank. Pretty neat trick, eh? Jew-obsessors, you all have been played!
More than 1,600 American soldiers have been played to death fighting Israel's enemies in Iraq.
Anglo-American elitists are profiting more from their deaths than Israel ever will.
There is obviously a certain segment of Jews in America who place their allegiance to Israel ahead of the US despite all their feet stomping that they don't. That this segment has powerful members in this administration is not in dispute. But one has to realize something about Israel. It provides a great excuse for the Beltway to be in the ME up to it's neck. It is a mutally beneficial relationship and the neotratiors, many of whom are Jewish, are just one element of why we are in the ME. Do you want to argue about what reason is more responsible for our current policies, the actions of some Israel firster traitors or just the natural benefit the Beltway elites have from being inconflict with something, anything? Fine, we can do that. But I am not going to entertian tired old tripe about the Rothschilds or Jew bankers behind massive world conspiracies or protocols or how the black plauge was a jew plot or whatever. In the words of Bush One as portrayed on SNL- "Nahgannadonit".
The Anglo dog is setting the Israeli tail up for a terrible fall. Uh, the tails operatives are currently under investigation for meddling in the dogs foreign policy. The tails lobby group is one of the most powerful in the dogs kennel. The dog indiscriminantly forks over billions of ducats a year to a fully capable and intelligent tail only to have that tail whipping other dogs and causing them to bite both tail and dog. What color is the sky in your world?
America had no enemies in the Mideast until the establishment of the Zionist entity there.
"Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East, I can't help but think that before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle East."
Click here:This aggression will not stand"
In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.
LMAO.
This is totally ridiculous!
LOL!
Israel is a major factor to why the ME is the chosen "enemy". But if Israel didn't exist it may just of well have been chosen anyway- or whomever- China- as the "enemy" to scare the sissie soccerdads with, make them "feel a part of something larger than themselves" in some grand "Fight" they can root for like a football game. I actually had an otherwise non BOT rational poster lament that the Draft was not going on nowadays because young people "need to belong to something." Is that not just state programmed drivel or what? How about raising your son to feel like he "belongs" to a family that has dreams and goals and purpose and direction? What kind of father wants the Mega State to give his son a sense of "belonging" to something? ANd how pathetic is it if that "sense of belonging" is to a standing army of a collosal empire that in the end doesn't give a shit if you live or die?
That must be why they failed so miserably in Hollywood and the main-stream media.
Yeah- where their agenda was what exactly? Making movies like "Moses" and all sorts of bible stories that Christians loved? Geesus if the Jews had somehow ended up running the postal service you would blame them for the same things. Doesn't a Jew just ever want to make money? Can't they just make money and not have some grand conspiracy around them? A lot of Jews in the Hollywood? Gee- that's funny- it was friggin founded by Jews. And gee- they help each other out. What a surprise. I suppose the Armenians don't or Italians? You know what upsets people about the Jews? Is that they still have a sense of themselves wherever they go and they stick together.
Doesn't a Jew just ever want to make money? Can't they just make money and not have some grand conspiracy around them? The ones in power over the Western Media sure know how to pitch the same cultural indoctrination: Multiculturalism, Tolerance, Filth, subordination of Whites. It's like clockwork anywhere they control media. From Scandinavia to Sacremento, they whistle the same tune. You don't think people won't notice? You know what upsets people about the Jews? Yep. Because they place themselves at odds with the world and make themselves an supremely difficult burden to bear. Is that they still have a sense of themselves wherever they go and they stick together. Nope. Many foreigners the world over do these very things and no one is relentlessly hassling them. OTH, the record shows that one group specifically that is keen on remaking others in their fashion. And for them the bill always comes due.
Put themselves "at odds with the world". Well, how does one go about doing that? That is pretty tall order. And as for other ethnic groups going around the world not being targeted you are laughably woefully wrong. There are dozens of examples of high achieving groups going to other countries, quickly overtaking the locals in all professions and business and being despised for it. I suggest you read a book. Migrations and Cultures, by Thomas Sowell. In it he examines the experiences of high achieving ethnic groups in foreign lands they emmigrated too and in each case the sort of baloney BS against the Jews that has been created by a resentful local populace and exploited by opportunists and fantasists was created on these lessor known groups as well- like the Chineese in Malayasia and Indonesia or the Indians in Africa or even the Tutsi over the Hutu.
While we're recommending books to each other, might I suggest reading "The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements" by Dr. Kevin MacDonald. I think you'll find it very interesting, and also answer a lot of questions you might have about why a lot of people are becoming rather concerned about Israel and Zionism. You might also want to read "By Way of Deception" by Victor Ostrovsky. Again, I think you'll find it interesting, and it might also help to answer some of the questions you might have about why so many people are getting very concerned about Israel and Zionism.
And as for other ethnic groups going around the world not being targeted you are laughably woefully wrong. There are dozens of examples of high achieving groups going to other countries, quickly overtaking the locals in all professions and business and being despised for it. There's a difference between being a distrusted foreigner in a strange land and being universally despised and ejected from most every land you've ever set foot in. It's not a tall order really, simply insist on always having a moral hegemony over others, teach their impressionable youth to adopt destructive behavior, loose hordes of swarthy peasants upon them, replace their financial and governmental systems with ones favorable to you and inundate their legal system with your tricky nuances. A people born of the ancient Middle Eastern Bazaars who are experienced in fighting for nothing except their own interests should find it a cakewalk, except for the occasional ass-whoopin which their own forebearers have warned them about. Between the two of us, I'm really not passionate about the subject I'm just telling you how the educated world sees it. You're acting like Trace21230 on the subject, which is sad because I always thought you were cool.
That is surely something the MSM will never allow the sheeple to know.
Excellent article.
Comments (42 - 94) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Zoroaster (#0)
#3. To: Burkeman1, Arator, Zoroaster (#2)
No- Anglophile banking elites lead us into WWI. Jews were still rag pickers and garment workers in 1917 for the most part in America.
#4. To: Burkeman1 (#2)
#5. To: Zoroaster (#4)
#6. To: robin (#3)
#7. To: Zoroaster (#4)
Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble- rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void.
#8. To: Jethro Tull (#5)
Whoa. Downloaded for later reading. Donka.
#9. To: Arator (#8)
#10. To: Zoroaster (#0)
#11. To: Burkeman1, Zoroaster (#6)
It was a passenger ship, it was later proven to carry exactly what the Germans said it was carrying, weaponry. Outrageous to expose civilians this way, it was a legitmate target because of what it carried, but bad judgement on the part of Germany. The Germans perhaps do not play the PR game as well as other cultures?
#12. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#10)
Hell no. There's plenty of Goyim who are just as culpable for tyranny, and treachery.
#13. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#10)
#14. To: Zoroaster (#13)
The Rothschild family, for example, funded the wars of the British empire.
#15. To: Arator (#14)
#16. To: Zoroaster (#15)
The American/Anglo dog is killing Israel's enemies in the
Mideast. The tail is wagging the dog.
#17. To: Arator (#14)
#18. To: Burkeman1, Arator, Zoroaster, Zipporah, All (#17)
#19. To: Burkeman1 (#17)
#20. To: Arator (#14)
#21. To: Burkeman1, Zoroaster, Jethro Tull, Zipporah, robin (#17)
The funny thing about Jews- is that you can't get any three of them to agree where to go to lunch without an argument for 20 minutes but yet they have lead what? A two or three thoasand year ongoing anti Earth conspiracy to kill all the birdies and flowers and babies?
#22. To: Arator (#21)
#23. To: Zoroaster (#22)
More than 1,600 American soldiers have been played to death fighting Israel's enemies in Iraq.
#24. To: Arator (#21)
#25. To: Arator, Zoroaster (#16)
And now, thanks to our invasion of the ME, Israel is even more isolated and a pariah nation than ever before, thanks to their
linkage with us. own nefarious workings. fixed
#26. To: Burkeman1 (#24)
#27. To: Zoroaster, robin (#26)
America had no enemies in the Mideast until the establishment of the Zionist entity there.
John Sheehan, S.J. (a Jesuit priest)
#28. To: Dude Lebowski (#25)
#29. To: Dude Lebowski (#25)
The United States (will become) a welfare state with a planned economy.Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars.
#30. To: Zipporah (#28)
This aggression will not stand, man!
#31. To: robin (#3)
If it was a conspiracy, it was very well done.
Next thing they will tell us is that they were able to overthrow the Czar and establish their Bolshevik regime in 1917.
There ought to be a law to silence these people just like in France, Germany, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere.
Free Speech is fine, but needs to be severely restricted.
#32. To: Dude Lebowski (#30)
#33. To: Zoroaster (#26)
#34. To: Burkeman1 (#17)
The funny thing about Jews- is that you can't get any three of them to agree where to go to lunch without an argument for 20 minutes
#35. To: Indrid Cold (#34)
#36. To: Burkeman1 (#35)
#37. To: Dude Lebowski (#36)
#38. To: Burkeman1 (#37)
#39. To: Burkeman1 (#37)
Put themselves "at odds with the world". Well, how does one go about doing that? That is pretty tall order.
#40. To: Zoroaster (#22)
More than 1,600 American soldiers have been played to death fighting Israel's enemies in Iraq.
#41. To: 1776 (#40)
NOT OIL BUT ISRAEL
.
.
.