[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
History See other History Articles Title: Did Jews Trick America Into Entering The First World War? Did Jews Trick America Into Entering The First World War? By Thomas Keyes Apr. 23, 2005 Herbert Asquith was the prime minister of England from 1908-1916, midway into the First World War. His chancellor, David Lloyd George, with the support of his confederates, who were critical of Asquith's direction of the British war effort, managed to topple Asquith, succeeding him as prime minister. David Lloyd George, though an evangelical Christian, like his American counterpart, Woodrow Wilson, was also an ardent Zionist, again like Wilson. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), who would be the first president of Israel, was born in Motol, Russia (now in Belarus) and educated in Switzerland, where he received his Ph.D.in chemistry. Later he taught at Manchester University in England, becoming a British subject in 1910. According to most historical accounts, he helped Britain develop a procedure for producing acetone, a strategically important chemical used in manufacturing explosives, from horse chestnuts. Lloyd George claimed in his memoirs that it was in recognition of this contribution that he issued the Balfour Declaration, sometimes called the birth certificate of the state of Israel. However, historian David Fromkin of Boston University and others call this a fiction. Weizmann does not mention it in his autobiography. Here is the text of the the Balfour Declaration. "Foreign Office. November 2nd, 1917. Dear Lord Rothschild. I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet. 'His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.' I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation. Yours sincerely. Arthur James Balfour". If David Lloyd George did not issue the Balfour Declaration to recompense Weizmann's service, as a chemist, to Great Britain, then, why did he issue it? According to some researchers, Lloyd George and Weizmann made a deal. At the time, the war was stalemated. Weizmann agreed, according to this version, to help draw the US into the war on the side of the allies, Britain, France and Russia, tipping the balance in their favor, against Germany, Austria-Hungary (then one country) and Turkey. It will be remembered, for one thing, that Turkey, or the Ottoman Empire, as it was then called, controlled Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and other parts of the Near East. If England could help found a Jewish state in the region, once it had appropriated it from the Turks, it would afford protection for their shipping through the Suez Canal. Weizmann, for his part, preferred Palestine to uninhabited parts of Uganda, where the Jews had already been offered a homeland. Apparently, Weizmann did not know of the existence of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, whereby France and England had already drawn a map of the Middle East that they would implement in the event of victory. England had also made conflicting agreements with the Arabs. Don't let Christianity stop anyone from making contradictory promises! What sparked America's entry into WWI was the Zimmermann telegram, which created a furor in the US, when released to the public on March 1, 1917. This was an encrypted telegram sent on January 16, 1917 by German Foreign Minister, Arthur Zimmermann, to Count von Bernstorff, the German ambassador to the US, to be forwarded to the President of México. Nigel de Grey and William Montgomery, of British intelligence had deciphered the intercepted telegram, according to the official version. The text of the telegram, from "The Zimmermann Telegram" by Barbara Tuchman, published in 1966 by Ballantine Books, follows. "Most Secret. For Your Excellency's personal information and to be handed on to the Imperial Minister in Mexico. We intend to begin unrestricted submarine warfare on the first of February. We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States neutral. In the event of this not succeeding, we make Mexico a proposal of an alliance on the following basis: Make war together, make peace together, generous financial support, and an understanding on our part that Mexico is to reconquer the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The settlement detail is left to you. You will inform the President (of Mexico) of the above most secretly as soon as the outbreak of war with the United States is certain and add the suggestion that he should, on his own initiative, invite Japan to immediate adherence and at the same time mediate between Japan and ourselves. Please call the President's attention to the fact that the unrestricted employment of our submarines now offers the prospect of compelling England to make peace within a few months. Acknowledge receipt. Zimmermann". Firstly, here the Germans were offering the Mexicans an alliance to be effectuated if and only if the US should enter the war, which clearly the Germans were seeking, and had every reason to seek, to avoid, so that barring US's declaring war, the effect of the telegram would have been null and nil. So if the telegram had not been deciphered, the US might not have entered the war and the proffered alliance would never have come into play. Thus the recommendations of the telegram would have been strictly moot and academic, an historical curiosity. Secondly, one wonders if it was intended to be taken seriously. Could México have had even the remotest dream of recovering Texas, New Mexico and Arizona? Venustiano Carranza, the Mexican president, rejected the offer, as attractive as one might imagine he may have considered it. But the question here is how the telegram came to be decoded. The Germans, whom four years of wartime intelligence and espionage had made experts in cryptology, had encoded the telegram in a recently created code, Code 7500. According to some authorities, there had not been enough messages transmitted in Code 7500 for the British to have been able to decipher the telegram. These same authorities see the hand of Chaim Weizmann in this piece of treachery. Weizmann had connections in Germany in high places. Some authorities think that Weizmann may have been instrumental in getting one of the influential Jews in Germany to obtain Code 7500 from the German Foreign Ministry and to betray it to the British, which, of course, would have been a treasonable act. Anyway, the decipherment did accomplish the desired result of drawing the US needlessly into the war, thereby assuring an allied victory. Thus, the Ottoman Empire, including Palestine, came into Anglo-French hands, and the British were able to fulfill the promise made in the Balfour Declaration, in spite of their contradictory promises to the Arabs. Later the Balfour Declaration was introduced in US Congress by Hamilton Fish of New York and adopted. With Jewish control of the US media and publishing industry, this view of the events leading to American's entry into WWI has been played down or silenced for decades, but certainly provides a believable explanation. Winston Churchill later only vaguely alluded to such a deal, and was reluctant to abide by it. When asked by William Yale, of the US State Department what the Jews would do if the British failed to live up to their agreement, Chaim Weizmann retorted, "If they don’t, we’ll smash the British Empire like we smashed the Russian Empire.” ------------
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 58.
#10. To: Zoroaster (#0)
Jesus H. Christ.... If anything, our own fucking lying pricks got us into WWI. A lot of people were happy as hell to avoid a war, considering we just had a Civil War not 30 or so years before. The only people who decide to wage war, are the people who have the money and desire to do so. Every veteran after the American Revolution has died for some rich prick's desires for power, and NOT for freedom, or peace in our time. For anyone to make that claim, even the veterans who fought, would be ludicrous. Of course, they'd be right in saying they fought to keep themselves, and their fellow soldiers alive, and that would be truthful. However, every person who has died in war, has done so at the whim of a netherworldly cabal of bankers, lawyers, and politicians who are so removed from the common man it can't even be comprehended. This is why when our nation was founded the Constitution was explicitly written so that the common man of that time could understand it, PLAINLY. Now, we have people telling us lies about what phrases, and sentences mean, as a way to subjugate us further, oppress us, and take away our rights and freedom of choice. But hey, don't let me stop you and other people from blaming everything on the Jews. The Middle Eastern Conflict currently, I'd say is definitely an Israeli thing, but could I blame it all on just the Jews? Hell no. There's plenty of Goyim who are just as culpable for tyranny, and treachery.
True, Tommy, the rich and powerful are the only winners in war. The Rothschild family, for example, funded the wars of the British empire. Jewish bankers, as well as their goyim counterparts, have been making money over Christians killing themselves since the Thirty Years War. Today it's Christians and Muslims killing themselves amid cries of the "eternally innocent" Jews.
So, why do you obsess over the mere war-funders and completely ignore the inbred Anglo elite war-wagers? Why obsess over the tail and ignore the dog?
America circa 1914 was nearly fully under the control of about 4 wealthy men- all Anglophiles and not Jewish. The Mellon family alone had such political and economic power concentrated in their hands that it was said he picked the Presidents. I am more than a little tired of the Jew obssession. The funny thing about Jews- is that you can't get any three of them to agree where to go to lunch without an argument for 20 minutes but yet they have lead what? A two or three thoasand year ongoing anti Earth conspiracy to kill all the birdies and flowers and babies? So annoying.
That must be why they failed so miserably in Hollywood and the main-stream media.
Yeah- where their agenda was what exactly? Making movies like "Moses" and all sorts of bible stories that Christians loved? Geesus if the Jews had somehow ended up running the postal service you would blame them for the same things. Doesn't a Jew just ever want to make money? Can't they just make money and not have some grand conspiracy around them? A lot of Jews in the Hollywood? Gee- that's funny- it was friggin founded by Jews. And gee- they help each other out. What a surprise. I suppose the Armenians don't or Italians? You know what upsets people about the Jews? Is that they still have a sense of themselves wherever they go and they stick together.
Moses was a Jew. An "Old Testament Jew", who was non-threatening to Christians, certainly, but a Jew nonetheless. It's not like they made a movie about Ganesh or Vishnu.
#59. To: Indrid Cold (#58)
Moses was an Israelite/Hebrew ... and NEVER WAS HE A JEW ... There were NO CHRISTIANS at the time of Moses ... The people calling themselves Jews today (90%) are in actuallity not at all ethnically related to Moses or Abraham or Jesus. They are Eastern European Mongols that adopted the religion of Judaism in the mid 8th Century AD.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||