[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics Minnesota Shooter's Family Has CIA and DOD ties 42 GANGSTERS DRAGGED From Homes In Midnight FBI & ICE Raids | MS-13 & Trinitarios BUSTED Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr. Gabriel Ruiz, a man who dresses up as a woman was just arrested for battery (dating violence) "I'm Tired Of Being Trans" - Minneapolis Shooter Confesses "I Wish I Never Brain-Washed Myself" The Chart Baltimore Democrats Hope You Never See Woman with walker, 69, fatally shot in face on New York City street: Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025 FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall? Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies? Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is... Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188 New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!! Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout) How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold) This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’ LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Who is liable for the Income Tax, and, why?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://famguardian.org/Publications ... aradigm/TheGalileoParadigm.pdf
Published: Sep 18, 2007
Author: Adele Weiss
Post Date: 2007-09-18 12:45:35 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 1241
Comments: 118

Societal Presumptions made by lenient minded Aemrican Nationals

Interesting statement, is it not? This; http://famguardian.org/Publications/GalileoParadigm/TheGalileoParadigm.pdf

is a PDF file that I would recommend that you download, print, and study until you 'get it.' And, you should turn first to Chapter 2, Application for SSN and what it means.

If, IF, you will simply read this info, you will never be confused again about what is going on the so-called Tax Protest movement. I guarentee it. And, you will never be swindled into paying for de-taxing material either! Why? Because, probably for the first time in your life, you will understand the basis of the Income Tax, the Social Security program, and, not least of all, socialism. But, that is your choice, to understand or not, so, please, make a wise one.

Click for Full Text! Subscribe to *CAFR*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

#7. To: richard9151 (#0)

you will understand the basis of the Income Tax, the Social Security program

They are as intertwined as a man and his wife in the "throes of passion".

The SS program is voluntary. The IT is mandatory for those that "volunteer" for the SS program. Simple as that. Those that DON'T have a SS# are defined in the IR Code (though not quite so bluntly) as NON TAXPAYERS. NOT "tax protesters", "tax evaders", or any of a plethora of other things - but as a LEGAL Non-Taxpayer. No hassles, just a totally different "class" or "status".

Gee, freedom is wonderful. We're perfectly free to allow our ignorance to bind us in a contract which will forever more cause us misery and a reason to complain...

innieway  posted on  2007-09-24   10:41:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The problem is this fellas.

The banksters and the DOJ/federal judiciary refuses to acknowledge the right to contract our services to any corporation without walking through the looking glass of IRS enclave jurisdiction.

As far as they're concerned there is no legal way to sell my services to a corporation unless I'm an "employee" or a contractor with an ID # that is used to 1099 me at the end of the year.

So, if the govt has in effect outlawed the common law right to work without their jurisdiction, and all of the monies disbursed by a corporation are govt revenues and subject to the tax, then, the coercive nature of this fraud renders any innocent claim that the tax is "a voluntary contract" disingenuous.

According to the IRS a "corporation" can't stop and buy a glass of lemonade or a newspaper with corporate money if the lemonade or news vendor is a bootlegger and has no license to sell to a corporation.

I tried to paint a tax lawyer into a corner by asking her if my kids' lemonade stand was subject to the income tax. She said it was.

In other words any transaction between any two parties of any age or alleged status within the continental US is a taxable event and the IRS has the power to come in, toss the place, line people up and handcuff them while they use a subpoena to determine the amount of the deficiency.

And, nowhere in any IRS, DOJ or federal district, appeals or supreme court literature or decisions will you find your assertion that SS is voluntary and one may go about their life with no involvement in it.

The fact that one may extrapolate that position after hundreds of hours of study does not constitute black letter law that then relieves the govt of any responsibility for the fraud they've perpetrated against the people.

And, the fact that most judges would not allow either of you to assert that position to your own juries in criminal trials is proof enough that your self assuredness on the subject is reckless, and is ample proof that neither of you have ever tried to beat the rap which you seem to think is just a walk in the park.

The whole IRS Code was written to obfuscate the voluntary nature of the income tax (which includes social security in subtitle C) and no judge will allow a defendant to lead a jury through the necessary steps to illuminate that fact.

And when lawyers like Larry Becraft and that feller in Louisiana do win, they do so because they or their clients asked good faith questions which the IRS never answered, not because they were allowed to detail the fraudulent scheme in open court.

Time and time again when jurors ask to see the law they receive replies from judges that read "I have given you the law".

When have you ever heard of a jury deliberating a social security or income tax case while referring to Title 26 in the jury room?

They are not allowed to see the code and they would not be allowed to deliberate about your "theory of operation" regarding the "voluntary" nature of social security. Nor would either of you be permitted to hand the jurors an outline that details the progression of steps used to reach that conclusion.

So, what good is a theory of law if you are never going to be allowed to offer it in evidence?

Usually when I ask these questions I'm told how stoopid I am. This is because armchair experts don't like to be told that their justice only exists in a parallel universe that no jury will ever see....

Now, you may preach it all you like, but the courtroom is where the rubber meets the road and it will not do you a bit of good there.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-09-24   17:40:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And, nowhere in any IRS, DOJ or federal district, appeals or supreme court literature or decisions will you find your assertion that SS is voluntary and one may go about their life with no involvement in it.

I always love someone who comments without reading the material. Tickles me pink, one might say.

As a matter of fact, if you know where to look, there are cases that state exactly what you say is never stated, and no, since you have no interest in reading the material, I am not going to go and look it up for you. If you are interested, log into Family Forums and enjoy. They have a wealth of on-point info that covers about all contingencies.

As to the other part, no, you can not deal with corporations and be free. Just a fact of life. On the other hand, I know, personally, dozens of people who exist quite well, thank you, including myself, without any Social Security number. And have for many years. The problem is that people will not make a decision to be free, so they can not be.

Since the juries that you mention are actually, in any tribunal 'within the U.S.', an advisery panel and ARE NOT A JURY, why would they be allowed to debate the law when all they are doing is advising the judge on the matters before the tribunal, which is, in all cases, contracts? Which, by the way, is all that the tribunal has the authority to address.

This comes down, in the final analysis, to understanding the difference between 'rights' and 'civil' rights, which are as different as day and night. And if you do not understand that difference, then we probably should not be having this conversation.

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   18:33:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I know, personally, dozens of people who exist quite well, thank you, including myself, without any Social Security number

Well duh.....you claim to live in Mexico......

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-24   19:57:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Well duh.....you claim to live in Mexico......

Well duh, Social Security is in 173 nations world wide, oh-so-bright-boy. And here, a very large percentage of the people are smarter than to sign up, which is why most Mèxicans do not pay any income tax. Duh.

But I have only been here 10 years, so you probably know a lot more about it than I do. Oh, and I have paid no SS tax since about 1978. But other than that....... Go ahead and fill me in.

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   22:11:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Social Security is in 173 nations world wide

BS you goofy bastard. Cite the source of your stastics. Besides, Mexicans (you) are to social security benefits like cockroaches are to a stale taco.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-24   22:33:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

BS you goofy bastard. Cite the source of your stastics.

You never learn, do you Jethro. How many times do I have to make you look like a fool before you stop calling me on things?

http://www.ssa.gov/internatio nal/links.html

Social Security in Other Countries

An ever-increasing number of social security agencies and organizations around the world are publicizing their programs on the World Wide Web. We have listed some of these Web sites below and will be adding to the list as we learn of new sites. Please pass along any additions or corrections using our Feedback form or e-mail to webmaster@ssa.gov.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above link shows about 115 nations THAT ARE ONLINE WITH THEIR SS INFO. This is certainly not all of the nations world wide that are in Social Security, but it is a pretty good start. Now, you go ahead and look all you want, Jethro. Oh, and yes, Mèxico is included in this list.

And think about it, Jethro; this is an official US government site. Should show a reasonably intelligent man that everything is tied together, but hey, that leaves you out, right?

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   22:58:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Goofy-boy. Is reading comprehension still a problem? Your material says "social security agencies and organizations" not social security as we know here in the states. That said, it’s time for you to scramble back into your tin roofed hovel and snuggle up next to your mule. The hour, it grows late.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-24   23:07:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your material says "social security agencies and organizations" not social security as we know here in the states.

This is what is shown on that site; Other Countries' Social Security Agencies

I know this is going to come as a shock, Jethro, esp. to someone who obviously does not read much, but the Social Security Agency within the United States is an AGENCY.

And if you ever bother to study the subject, you would find that everyone of those agencies collect a tax, and that in conjunction with that social security tax, there is also an income tax in everyone of those nations. Each of them promise to pay a retirement benefit, so, where is the difference?

Oh, yeah, I forgot, each of those agencies are NOT in one of the Axis of Evil nations, and, each of them pays a percentage of what they collect to the Crown of England.

Try again, Jethro. Oh, and when you look at the info again, please not that neither Iran nor Iraq have a social security agency in it.

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   23:26:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The site you reference is a government source, specifically the social security administration. They have a vested interest is making people believe that 173 nations have similar social security agencies as ours. I don’t believe their statistics for a second, after all they also claim those presently paying into the system will receive benefits when they become eligible. Can you can tell us what a citizen of Haiti or Zimbabwe receive from their social security administration? If not it's likely your reference is gold- plated BS. It’s curious a non-American such as yourself would use an American government document as a source, but then again nothing you say should come as a shock. Your purpose here is to offer crack-pot, patriot remedies, all of which have a strong potential to separate decent people from their property and savings. Unfortunately for some, your swill has an audience, albeit small. You personally might have nothing to lose, but others do and it’s they who need to be wary of your zany theories. Richard my friend, you’ve not only crossed over the border, you’ve crossed over the threshold of sanity and it’s there you have relevance, not here.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-25   8:14:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your purpose here is to offer crack-pot, patriot remedies, all of which have a strong potential to separate decent people from their property and savings.

Please, explain your reasoning for excluding the governments own statements from their website while at the same time you admit that you comply and admonish others to comply with legalities promoted in exactly the same forum. In other words when Richard supplies the evidence supporting his contention, you deny the legitimacy of the information off-handedly, but bow down and worship the same documentation when you comply with the requirements proclaimed by the same informants, ie., the government.

Are you bi-polar ?

noone222  posted on  2007-09-25   8:26:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Are you bi-polar ?

Another patriot, Bible-driven savior crawls out of the wood work....

When Richard (or you) can prove to me the govt. contention that 173 nations participate in a social security scheme, I'll take him (you) seriously. Until then, I pray you both enjoy life in realm of Kookdom.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-25   8:39:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Please, explain your reasoning for excluding the governments own statements from their website while at the same time you admit that you comply and admonish others to comply with legalities promoted in exactly the same forum.

Ad hominem attacks are perceived as such by the intelligent members of this forum.

Why don't you answer the question ?

noone222  posted on  2007-09-25   8:53:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

while at the same time you admit that you comply and admonish others to comply with legalities promoted in exactly the same forum

That the social security administration, or any other govt. agency would put out faulty data is a given. I doubt even your band of kooks would disagree. AFA you choosing to ignore the IRS or any other licensing agency, I say go for it. I don’t think you have anything to lose unlike others here.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-25   9:51:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

That the social security administration, or any other govt. agency would put out faulty data is a given.

Your propensity to insult others is only surpassed by your double mindedness. You say that the govt. is capable of putting forth bad info yet you turn around and admonish others to just do it anyways because you might lose your stuff.

I don’t think you have anything to lose unlike others here.

The first three words sum you up in toto.

And, the fact that you are willing to say the govt. provides disinformation regarding the SS System but you choose to continue making contributions is indicative of either your dependence upon the system or lack of self-respect.

noone222  posted on  2007-09-25   10:02:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your propensity to insult others

Wasn't it you who called me bi-polar this morning?

Lighten up pony-boy. The reality we live in is simple; when they want you they'll beat and cage you. No bible, no research nor any faux Mexican amigo will be there to help you out.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-25   10:34:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#51. To: Jethro Tull (#50) (Edited)

Wasn't it you who called me bi-polar this morning?

I asked if you were bi-polar ... (I might have to admit an insinuation existed in the question)

The fact of the matter is that they're coming for us whether we comply or don't comply. Ultimately this must result in some form of disruption.

noone222  posted on  2007-09-25 10:41:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]