[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics Minnesota Shooter's Family Has CIA and DOD ties 42 GANGSTERS DRAGGED From Homes In Midnight FBI & ICE Raids | MS-13 & Trinitarios BUSTED Bill Gates EXPOSED: Secret Operatives Inside the CDC, HHS, and NIH REMOVED by RFK, Jr. Gabriel Ruiz, a man who dresses up as a woman was just arrested for battery (dating violence) "I'm Tired Of Being Trans" - Minneapolis Shooter Confesses "I Wish I Never Brain-Washed Myself" The Chart Baltimore Democrats Hope You Never See Woman with walker, 69, fatally shot in face on New York City street: Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025 FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall? Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies? Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is... Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188 New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!! Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout) How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold) This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’ LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Who is liable for the Income Tax, and, why?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://famguardian.org/Publications ... aradigm/TheGalileoParadigm.pdf
Published: Sep 18, 2007
Author: Adele Weiss
Post Date: 2007-09-18 12:45:35 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 1330
Comments: 118

Societal Presumptions made by lenient minded Aemrican Nationals

Interesting statement, is it not? This; http://famguardian.org/Publications/GalileoParadigm/TheGalileoParadigm.pdf

is a PDF file that I would recommend that you download, print, and study until you 'get it.' And, you should turn first to Chapter 2, Application for SSN and what it means.

If, IF, you will simply read this info, you will never be confused again about what is going on the so-called Tax Protest movement. I guarentee it. And, you will never be swindled into paying for de-taxing material either! Why? Because, probably for the first time in your life, you will understand the basis of the Income Tax, the Social Security program, and, not least of all, socialism. But, that is your choice, to understand or not, so, please, make a wise one.

Click for Full Text! Subscribe to *CAFR*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 76.

#7. To: richard9151 (#0)

you will understand the basis of the Income Tax, the Social Security program

They are as intertwined as a man and his wife in the "throes of passion".

The SS program is voluntary. The IT is mandatory for those that "volunteer" for the SS program. Simple as that. Those that DON'T have a SS# are defined in the IR Code (though not quite so bluntly) as NON TAXPAYERS. NOT "tax protesters", "tax evaders", or any of a plethora of other things - but as a LEGAL Non-Taxpayer. No hassles, just a totally different "class" or "status".

Gee, freedom is wonderful. We're perfectly free to allow our ignorance to bind us in a contract which will forever more cause us misery and a reason to complain...

innieway  posted on  2007-09-24   10:41:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The problem is this fellas.

The banksters and the DOJ/federal judiciary refuses to acknowledge the right to contract our services to any corporation without walking through the looking glass of IRS enclave jurisdiction.

As far as they're concerned there is no legal way to sell my services to a corporation unless I'm an "employee" or a contractor with an ID # that is used to 1099 me at the end of the year.

So, if the govt has in effect outlawed the common law right to work without their jurisdiction, and all of the monies disbursed by a corporation are govt revenues and subject to the tax, then, the coercive nature of this fraud renders any innocent claim that the tax is "a voluntary contract" disingenuous.

According to the IRS a "corporation" can't stop and buy a glass of lemonade or a newspaper with corporate money if the lemonade or news vendor is a bootlegger and has no license to sell to a corporation.

I tried to paint a tax lawyer into a corner by asking her if my kids' lemonade stand was subject to the income tax. She said it was.

In other words any transaction between any two parties of any age or alleged status within the continental US is a taxable event and the IRS has the power to come in, toss the place, line people up and handcuff them while they use a subpoena to determine the amount of the deficiency.

And, nowhere in any IRS, DOJ or federal district, appeals or supreme court literature or decisions will you find your assertion that SS is voluntary and one may go about their life with no involvement in it.

The fact that one may extrapolate that position after hundreds of hours of study does not constitute black letter law that then relieves the govt of any responsibility for the fraud they've perpetrated against the people.

And, the fact that most judges would not allow either of you to assert that position to your own juries in criminal trials is proof enough that your self assuredness on the subject is reckless, and is ample proof that neither of you have ever tried to beat the rap which you seem to think is just a walk in the park.

The whole IRS Code was written to obfuscate the voluntary nature of the income tax (which includes social security in subtitle C) and no judge will allow a defendant to lead a jury through the necessary steps to illuminate that fact.

And when lawyers like Larry Becraft and that feller in Louisiana do win, they do so because they or their clients asked good faith questions which the IRS never answered, not because they were allowed to detail the fraudulent scheme in open court.

Time and time again when jurors ask to see the law they receive replies from judges that read "I have given you the law".

When have you ever heard of a jury deliberating a social security or income tax case while referring to Title 26 in the jury room?

They are not allowed to see the code and they would not be allowed to deliberate about your "theory of operation" regarding the "voluntary" nature of social security. Nor would either of you be permitted to hand the jurors an outline that details the progression of steps used to reach that conclusion.

So, what good is a theory of law if you are never going to be allowed to offer it in evidence?

Usually when I ask these questions I'm told how stoopid I am. This is because armchair experts don't like to be told that their justice only exists in a parallel universe that no jury will ever see....

Now, you may preach it all you like, but the courtroom is where the rubber meets the road and it will not do you a bit of good there.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-09-24   17:40:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And, nowhere in any IRS, DOJ or federal district, appeals or supreme court literature or decisions will you find your assertion that SS is voluntary and one may go about their life with no involvement in it.

I always love someone who comments without reading the material. Tickles me pink, one might say.

As a matter of fact, if you know where to look, there are cases that state exactly what you say is never stated, and no, since you have no interest in reading the material, I am not going to go and look it up for you. If you are interested, log into Family Forums and enjoy. They have a wealth of on-point info that covers about all contingencies.

As to the other part, no, you can not deal with corporations and be free. Just a fact of life. On the other hand, I know, personally, dozens of people who exist quite well, thank you, including myself, without any Social Security number. And have for many years. The problem is that people will not make a decision to be free, so they can not be.

Since the juries that you mention are actually, in any tribunal 'within the U.S.', an advisery panel and ARE NOT A JURY, why would they be allowed to debate the law when all they are doing is advising the judge on the matters before the tribunal, which is, in all cases, contracts? Which, by the way, is all that the tribunal has the authority to address.

This comes down, in the final analysis, to understanding the difference between 'rights' and 'civil' rights, which are as different as day and night. And if you do not understand that difference, then we probably should not be having this conversation.

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   18:33:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I know, personally, dozens of people who exist quite well, thank you, including myself, without any Social Security number

Well duh.....you claim to live in Mexico......

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-24   19:57:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Well duh.....you claim to live in Mexico......

Well duh, Social Security is in 173 nations world wide, oh-so-bright-boy. And here, a very large percentage of the people are smarter than to sign up, which is why most Mèxicans do not pay any income tax. Duh.

But I have only been here 10 years, so you probably know a lot more about it than I do. Oh, and I have paid no SS tax since about 1978. But other than that....... Go ahead and fill me in.

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   22:11:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Social Security is in 173 nations world wide

BS you goofy bastard. Cite the source of your stastics. Besides, Mexicans (you) are to social security benefits like cockroaches are to a stale taco.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2007-09-24   22:33:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

BS you goofy bastard. Cite the source of your stastics.

You never learn, do you Jethro. How many times do I have to make you look like a fool before you stop calling me on things?

http://www.ssa.gov/internatio nal/links.html

Social Security in Other Countries

An ever-increasing number of social security agencies and organizations around the world are publicizing their programs on the World Wide Web. We have listed some of these Web sites below and will be adding to the list as we learn of new sites. Please pass along any additions or corrections using our Feedback form or e-mail to webmaster@ssa.gov.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above link shows about 115 nations THAT ARE ONLINE WITH THEIR SS INFO. This is certainly not all of the nations world wide that are in Social Security, but it is a pretty good start. Now, you go ahead and look all you want, Jethro. Oh, and yes, Mèxico is included in this list.

And think about it, Jethro; this is an official US government site. Should show a reasonably intelligent man that everything is tied together, but hey, that leaves you out, right?

richard9151  posted on  2007-09-24   22:58:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

QUESTION: Both Larry Becraft and Tommy Cryer are lawyers with BAR cards and SS#s. Why were they able to win? Why do some win and most don't?

ANSWER: It's at the total discretion of the blackrobed tyrant on the bench, that's why.

christine  posted on  2007-09-24   23:55:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

QUESTION: Both Larry Becraft and Tommy Cryer are lawyers with BAR cards and SS#s. Why were they able to win? Why do some win and most don't?

They made compelling arguments about the IRS' unwillingness to answer simple, good faith questions.

Neither are permitted to offer complicated legal fiction or SCOTUS decisions, or the words of Thomas Jefferson or any of the things we discuss when educating people.

And, despite what I'm sure were the judges' worst efforts to sabotage their cases and confuse the juries, these lawyers won.

It's beginning to look as if all of the esoteric research and legal theories are not the answer in court, wouldn't you say? ;)

And. these arrogant know-it-all-assholes who berate any and all who don't worship their friggin brilliance (cough cough) are all people who have never tested their theories in a place that matters-a courtroom!

And, everyone I know who believed he was just going to march in there and explain it to the jury found the same thing-it wasn't allowed and the juries never heard it.

So, the trick is to put everything you want the jury to see in your correspondence to the IRS. The IRS will ignore it (of course-their mission is to collect money for the fed banksters) but you aren't writing it for their benefit.

So, if you ask the IRS (actually you're educating your jury) why the code says "There is hereby imposed on every person.....who makes a return....a tax". Where is the code section that reads "There is hereby imposed on the wages of every person who does not make a return....a tax"? In other words does the act of making a return impose the tax? If YES but I didn't file no tax is imposed, right? If NO then where is the code section that imposes a tax on persons who do not file? And, if the act of filing doesn't impose the tax then what is the purpose of the above code section? In other words, COULD YOU PLEASE SHOW ME THE LAW?"

These are the things that jurors who haven't spent a lifetime studying the greatest hoax of the twentieth century are asking themselves, and when they send notes to the judges and ask to see the law and receive notes that read, "You have all the information you need" (I say there's a law so take my word for it!)

Well,

This is why some stout hearted jurors serving on unstacked juries are freeing defendants for "tax crimes" more and more.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-09-25   14:30:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

the trick is to try to stay OUT of THEIR courts to begin with..but we know they'll come and grab you out of your driveway and take you there whenever they want to...and, for pete's sake, don't resist lest you want a beatin' or a tasin'.

christine  posted on  2007-09-25   14:51:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#82. To: christine (#76)

the trick is to try to stay OUT of THEIR courts to begin with..but we know they'll come and grab you out of your driveway and take you there whenever they want to...and, for pete's sake, don't resist lest you want a beatin' or a tasin'.

As I've said before, they succeed in bringing no more than 50 criminal tax trials to fruition each year, or, about one per state.

I'm guessing that they don't prosecute that many now.

The system operates of 90% bluff, and because Irwin Schiff stressed that point he was repeatedly struck by lightning again and again.

I believe that the IRS/DOJ will concentrate on prosecuting their own more and more, because they can still get a conviction when the "criminal" is a low level govt employee. They can be required to file returns as a condition of employment, and if the govt must prosecute someone then let them cannibalize their own.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2007-09-25 15:02:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]