[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Iranian Missiles OBLITERATE Israeli Nuclear Facility — Massive Explosions Rock Tel Aviv!

The Most Environmentalist Woman in the World (Satire)

Trump Rejects Netanyahu's Request To Join War, As Israel Needs Large US Bunker Buster Bombs

Inside the Chaos: Paid Rioters, Fake News & The 2025 Shift Ft. Brandon Tatum

What the Media IsnÂ’t Telling You About IsraelÂ’s Strike on Iran (VIDEO)

'No Kings' Terror? Fake Cop Assassinates Minnesota Democrat Who Blocked Health Care for Illegals

Peter Thiel’s Insane Doomsday Escape Plan

Nigel Farage warns riots will sweep Britain due to decades-long failure to control immigration

School board trains staff that the term family is harmful, racist

Fort Wayne joins in on nationwide ‘No Kings’ protests, honoring veterans and giving back

More than a human can bear

Top Doctor Blows Whistle: Hospitals Boosted Covid Deaths by Euthanizing Patients

The U.S. will very likely fight a 3-front war against Russia, China and Iran, Palantir's Alex Karp says

Middle East War: Next Steps For Israel And Will Iran Blockade The Straits Of Hormuz

Ford forced to shutter factories amid worrying parts shortages: 'Hand-to-mouth right now'

7 Issues On The G7 Agenda: The Big Topics Albanese And Trump Could Discuss

Dark-Money Network Funneled Millions Into 'No Kings' Nationwide Color Revolution Operation

House Republicans Probe China-Based Billionaire Allegedly Bankrolling Anti-ICE Riots

Did Iranian ballistic missiles hit the Dimona nuclear reactor.

Rep. Green Letter to DoD IG Demands Answers On K2 Base Toxins

“Israel is DESTROYING itself by attacking IRAN and millions could die” Col. Douglas Macgregor

How Boeing 787 Whistleblower's Disaster Warning Was Ignored |

Israel Says Another Missile Barrage Launched From Iran Overnight, Casualties Rise

2025 Annotated Bilderberg Members List

Major Iranian Missile Impacts On Israel; IAEA Warns Radioactive Contamination Observed At Natanz

Israeli Strikes On Iran Ongoing Through Friday As Death Toll Surpasses 100

From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel

MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets

Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march

FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters!


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: ROMANS 13 - THE TWO MINUTE REBUTTAL
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://romans13.embassyofheaven.com/2minute.htm
Published: Sep 22, 2007
Author: Embassy of Heaven
Post Date: 2007-09-22 22:15:01 by AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt
Keywords: Christianity, Resistance
Views: 1403
Comments: 69

The Two Minute Rebuttal

Romans 13

Let's say Apostle Paul was telling the Church, "Be subject to the secular government," which at that time was the Roman Empire. And he was also saying, "Rome is not a terror to good works, but to the evil. The Roman centurion does not swing his sword in vain. Therefore, do good and you shall have praise of the same."

I pose only one question, Why was Apostle Paul beheaded by a Roman Centurion if he was preaching, "Be subject to Rome"? The Roman government would have no cause to behead him.

On the other hand, if Paul was beheaded because he was an "evildoer," why is an "evildoer" writing in our Holy Book? We better purge him out of there. We better clean up the Holy Scriptures. We better remove Romans 13 because it was written by an "evildoer."

No, I don't believe for a minute that Paul was telling the Church to be subject to the Roman Empire. Nor do I believe Paul was an evildoer. Paul was beheaded for promoting a rival government. It has to be. The secular authorities killed him because he was establishing another government, the Kingdom of Heaven.

Paul would be a hypocrite if he were saying to obey the secular authorities in Romans 13. It is inconsistent with his other writings. In Romans 12, Paul tells us, "do not be conformed to this world" (Romans 12:2). Obeying the secular authorities certainly means conforming to the world. In 2 Corinthians, Chapter 6:14-17, Paul says, "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers, for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? . . . Come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you." We cannot cut our ties with the world and still be subject to them. "We ought to obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29).

What is the study of the Holy Bible from beginning to end? It is God's people rebelling against Him and seeking to be like the Kingdoms of this world. Again and again, they are brought into harsh slavery because of their disobedience. Chasing after the Kingdoms of this world leads to death. Only the Kingdom of Heaven is an everlasting government.

Christ's government is here right now. It is His government that every soul is to be subject to. Turn away from sin and come out from the governments of the world. "Be subject unto the higher powers within Ecclesia, within Christ's government." (See Hebrews 13:7 and 13:17).

http://romans13.embassyofheaven.com/2minute.htm

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#1. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#0)

Well done - thank you.

Point. Set. Match.

Game Over.

Lod  posted on  2007-09-22   22:25:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: lodwick (#1)

So where does King David and his attitude towards the authority of Saul figure in?

Even though David was picked by God, he didn't lift a hand against Saul-- because Saul was the anointed authority.

IMO, Paul is telling us that regardless of who our leaders are, its all in Gods plan re authority. Looking at Romans 13:7, he's saying pay tribute to who it is owed, pay customs or trade tariffs where due, fear, meaning reverence or awe of those who who should be revered, and honor those to whom honor is due.

Recall that Saul was not what God had in mind for the people--they wanted a king and they wanted it to be Saul and God went along with them. He didn't have to, but it was to make a point to them, I believe.

I believe we make a real mistake, from God's standpoint, when we decide to go against the authorities He's established.

And with that said, I do believe there are instances where we are not to go along with them--and that is in going against Gods' word.

rowdee  posted on  2007-09-22   23:40:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: rowdee. everyone (#7)

Good link for "Give Us A King!" -

http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=354

Lod  posted on  2007-09-23   10:53:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#14. To: lodwick (#8)

Good link for "Give Us A King!" -

http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=354

That IS a good link! Thank you very much! There is a distinct lesson for us in here.

"....Conclusion

I have strongly emphasized the evil and folly of Israel’s demand to have a king. Some may wish to protest by pointing to the text in Deuteronomy 17. Didn’t God say it would be all right for Israel to have a king? If it was prophesied that the Israelites would demand a king, then why does God come down so hard on them when they do so? Let us take a look at this text in Deuteronomy:

14 “When you enter the land which the LORD your God gives you, and you possess it and live in it, and you say, 'I will set a king over me like all the nations who are around me,' 15 you shall surely set a king over you whom the LORD your God chooses, one from among your countrymen you shall set as king over yourselves; you may not put a foreigner over yourselves who is not your countryman. [ http://www.trosch.org/msn/mason-graphics.html ] 16 “Moreover, he shall not multiply horses for himself, nor shall he cause the people to return to Egypt to multiply horses, since the LORD has said to you, 'You shall never again return that way.' 17 “Neither shall he multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away; nor shall he greatly increase silver and gold for himself. [ http://www.mountvernon.org/learn/collections/index.cfm/cfid/8980548/cftoken/67435962 / http://www.blueletterbible.org/tsk_b/Amo/6/6.html ] 18 “Now it shall come about when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself a copy of this law on a scroll in the presence of the Levitical priests. 19 “And it shall be with him, and he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the LORD his God, by carefully observing all the words of this law and these statutes, 20 that his heart may not be lifted up above his countrymen and that he may not turn aside from the commandment, to the right or the left; [ http://nobeliefs.com/Tripoli.htm ] in order that he and his sons may continue long in his kingdom in the midst of Israel” (Deuteronomy 17:14-20). [ http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Eze/Eze017.html#7 / http://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/Eze/Eze017.html#10 / http://www.blueletterbible.org/tsk_b/Mat/15/13.html ].

This text is a prophecy, and we can see that it is exactly fulfilled when the Israelites demanded a king, just like the nations. **** The fact that something is prophesied is not proof that what is foretold is something good and righteous. The betrayal of Judas is foretold, as well as Israel’s rejection of her Messiah. This does not mean that Judas, or the unbelieving Israelites, were right to do what they did. It only means that God wants us to know it was a part of His eternal plan......"

We, the second Israel, got a similar prophecy:

"....Fourteenth. But the promised nationality was to be a republic.

"Their nobles shall be of themselves, and their governor shall proceed from the midst of them. "Jeremiah 30.'21. The people should be "gathered together, and appoint unto themselves one head. "Hosea 1:11. "I will restore thy judges as at the first, and the counselors as at the beginning. "Isaiah 1:26. Observe "one head" -- a chief magistrate appointed by the people -- governors, judges, and counselors, taken from the masses of the people, are particularly promised, but no king.

The political economy of ancient Israel being a theocratic republic, the promise in the passages is that the officers necessary to constitute a republican form of government would be restored, and the elective franchise would be free, and the people would possess the sovereign right of choosing their own rulers and judges. Surely the doctrine of the Divine right of kings find no authority here; for the power invested in the people is entirely inconsistent with any grade of monar­chy, limited or absolute.

The truth is, the fifth great commonwealth that the God of heaven was to "set up" was so utterly repugnant to monarchy, in all its forms and phases, that it should destroy it from the face of the earth. And we have every assurance that if the Almighty designed to bless a people by conferring upon them a particular form of political government, such form could not possibly be a monarchy.

A most memorable instance of Divine disapprobation of the establishment of an earthly king among men is recorded at the coronation of the first monarch of Israel. Said Almighty God to Samuel the prophet, "Protest solemnly, unto them, and show unto them the manner of the king that shall reign over them. He will take your sons, and appoint them for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots. And he win take your daughters to be confectionaries, and to be cooks, and to be bakers. And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your olive yards, even the best of them, and give them to his servants. And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give them to his officers, and to his servants.

"And he win take your men-servants, and your maid­servants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put them to work. He will take the tenth of your sheep; and ye shall be his servants. And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king, and the Lord will not hear you in that day" I Samuel 8:9-18.

Such is the solemn protestation of the God of heaven against an earthly monarchy; and faithfully has the history of earthly kings confirmed the truth of the Divine prediction. Then it is absolutely certain that a political government, selected and "set up" for the sons of men by Jehovah, would not be a monarchy. But this very fifth government was to be "set up" by the God of heaven; therefore the fifth govern­ment, not being in any possible case a monarchy in any grade, ***** must be a republic......"

The United States Of America Foretold In The Holy Scriptures

by Rev. F. E. Pitts

Feb. 22 and 23, 1857

http://www.originofnations.org/old_bi_literature/Pitts.htm

"must be a republic".....IF YOU CAN KEEP IT, SAID THE SLY BEN FRANKLIN.

"The Constitution is just a G-D piece of paper", says our "Unitary Executive", i.e. greedy and ruthless KING, just as God and Patrick Henry predicted:

"....This Constitution is said to have beautiful features; but when I come to examine these features, sir, they appear to me horribly frightful. Among other deformities, it has an awful squinting; it squints toward monarchy, and does not this raise indignation in the breast of every true American? Your president may easily become king. Your Senate is so imperfectly constructed that your dearest rights may be sacrificed to what may be a small minority; and a very small minority may continue for ever unchangeably this government, altho horridly defective. Where are your checks in this government? Your strongholds will be in the hands of your enemies. It is on a supposition that your American governors shall be honest that all the good qualities of this government are founded; but its defective and imperfect construction puts it in their power to perpetrate the worst of mischiefs should they be bad men; and, sir, would not all the world, blame our distracted folly in resting our rights upon the contingency of our rulers being good or bad? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men without a consequent loss of liberty! I say that the loss of that dearest privilege has ever followed, with absolute certainty, every such mad attempt.

If your American chief be a man of ambition and abilities, how easy is it for him to render himself absolute! The army is in his hands, and if he be a man of address, it will be attached to him, and it will be the subject of long meditation with him to seize the first auspicious moment to accomplish his design, and, sir, will the American spirit solely relieve you when this happens? I would rather infinitely--and I am sure most of this Convention are of the same opinion--have a king, lords, and commons, than a government so replete with such insupportable evils. If we make a king we may prescribe the rules by which he shall rule his people, and interpose such checks as shall prevent him from infringing them; but the president, in the field, at the head of his army, can prescribe the terms on which he shall reign master, so far that it will puzzle any American ever to get his neck from under the galling yoke. I can not with patience think of this idea. If ever he violate the laws, one of two things will happen: he will come at the head of the army to carry everything before him, or he will give bail, or do what Mr. Chief Justice will order him. If he be guilty, will not the recollection of his crimes teach him to make one bold push for the American throne? Will not the immense difference between being master of everything and being ignominiously tried and punished powerfully excite him to make this bold push? But, sir, where is the existing force to punish him? Can he not, at the head of his army, beat down every opposition? Away with your president! we shall have a king: the army will salute him monarch; your militia will leave you, and assist in making him king, and fight against you: and what have you to oppose this force? What will then become of you and your rights? Will not absolute despotism ensue?

SOURCE: The World's Famous Orations, Vol.1 Pg.67-76

Patrick Henry's fears about the inadequacies and defects in the Constitution have been realized now in the 21st century -1681 years later. It has been a good run, but what will our children and grandchildren have to live with? "

Shall Liberty or Empire be Sought? Patrick Henry, 1788

[From a speech made on June 5, 1788, in the Virginia Convention, called to ratify the Constitution of the United States.]

http://www.barefootsworld.net/liberty_empire.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-09-23 12:37:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: lodwick (#8)

"Give Us A King!"

..how very dominionist :P

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-23 15:36:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]