Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: A Feeling I'm Being Had [Dilbert on Ahmedinajad - must read]
Source: The Dilbert Blog
URL Source: http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_ ... g/2007/09/a-feeling-im-be.html
Published: Sep 23, 2007
Author: Scott Adams
Post Date: 2007-09-23 09:12:01 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 448
Comments: 40

A Feeling I'm Being Had

I was happy to hear that NYC didn't allow Iranian President Ahmadinejad to place a wreath at the WTC site. And I was happy that Columbia University is rescinding the offer to let him speak. If you let a guy like that express his views, before long the entire world will want freedom of speech.

I hate Ahmadinejad for all the same reasons you do. For one thing, he said he wants to "wipe Israel off the map." Scholars tell us the correct translation is more along the lines of wanting a change in Israel's government toward something more democratic, with less gerrymandering. What an ass-muncher!

Ahmadinejad also called the holocaust a "myth." Fuck him! A myth is something a society uses to frame their understanding of their world, and act accordingly. It's not as if the world created a whole new country because of holocaust guilt and gives it a free pass no matter what it does. That's Iranian crazy talk. Ahmadinejad can blow me.

Most insulting is the fact that "myth" implies the holocaust didn't happen. Fuck him for saying that! He also says he won't dispute the historical claims of European scientists. That is obviously the opposite of saying the holocaust didn't happen, which I assume is his way of confusing me. God-damned fucker.

Furthermore, why does an Iranian guy give a speech in his own language except for using the English word "myth"? Aren't there any Iranian words for saying a set of historical facts has achieved an unhealthy level of influence on a specific set of decisions in the present? He's just being an asshole.

Ahmadinejad believes his role is to pave the way for the coming of the Twelfth Imam. That's a primitive apocalyptic belief! I thank Jesus I do not live in a country led by a man who believes in that sort of bullshit. Imagine how dangerous that would be, especially if that man had the launch codes for nuclear weapons.

The worst of the worst is that Ahmadinejad's country is helping the Iraqis kill American soldiers. If Iran ever invades Canada, I think we'd agree the best course of action for the United States is to be constructive and let things sort themselves out. Otherwise we'd be just as evil as the Iranians. Those fuckers.

Those Iranians need to learn from the American example. In this country, if the clear majority of the public opposes the continuation of a war, our leaders will tell us we're terrorist-humping idiots and do whatever they damn well please. They might even increase our taxes to do it. That's called leadership.

If Ahmadinejad thinks he can be our friend by honoring our heroes and opening a dialog, he underestimates our ability to misinterpret him. Fucking idiot. I hate him.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Ahmadinejad believes his role is to pave the way for the coming of the Twelfth Imam. That's a primitive apocalyptic belief! I thank Jesus I do not live in a country led by a man who believes in that sort of bullshit.

Hilarious satire.. And even more hilarious are the replies to this blog .. quite a few didnt realize it was satire..

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-23   9:25:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Zipporah (#1)

Many of the replies are almost as funny as the original post.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-09-23   9:29:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Zipporah (#1)

Hilarious satire.

Bad language and all.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-09-23   9:29:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Zipporah (#1)

quite a few didnt realize it was satire..

I deal with the dense every day.

"He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." - G.K. Chesterton

YertleTurtle  posted on  2007-09-23   9:32:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: YertleTurtle (#4)

I deal with the dense every day.

..as do I.

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-23   9:56:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0) (Edited)

Re the replies:

I knew some satanicly-lying zionist-9/11-inside-job-denying psycho would pull out the old "moral equivalence" shtick.

Stick a fork in it.....

nobody  posted on  2007-09-23   11:27:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Dakmar, Critter, Tauzero (#0)

That's delicious humor, worthy of a Dilbert blogger.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-23   11:32:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0) (Edited)

In one reply there: "Remember Theo van Gogh."

Paid a gay "muslim" to kill him, IIRC. I'm just running here with my impression of the sort of constantly-murderously-lying zionist mentality that is capable of carrying-out and covering-up the zionist 9/11 inside job.

nobody  posted on  2007-09-23   11:46:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Jeeeze, the zionist spin machine is going into hyper-drive in the comments over there. Cognitive dissonance galore. Everything is up for grabs.

nobody  posted on  2007-09-23   12:08:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: nobody (#9)

Scott, you're a genius and i love your post. Too bad a lot of your readers don't get it at all.... Maybe put up some subtitles for all those morons here!!

At least this guy gets it.

Dilbert must get a lot of traffic to have earned so much notice by the all too common CyberNazis.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-23   12:15:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

In one comment from a zionist there who "gets it":

"It is not subtle.

It is not original.

It is not well-crafted.

It is not effective satire.

And worst of all, it is not funny."

Notice how zionists can never laugh at their own severe expense?

nobody  posted on  2007-09-23   12:22:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: robin (#10)

Anyone want to wager on how long it stays there?

.... kidding.

nobody  posted on  2007-09-23   12:24:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: nobody (#11)

Wow! This Dilbert is even better than I first realized.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-23   12:30:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: robin (#13)

Haha, this is brilliant! You have enough dancing puppets here to make a sesame street musical!

Posted by: Vidar | September 23, 2007 at 07:29 AM

That's about right.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.

Esso  posted on  2007-09-23   12:43:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: robin (#13)

Wow! This Dilbert is even better than I first realized.

I agree.

What I can't figure out is how quickly such a great number of Zios can be marshalled to overwhelm the comment section with their enraged remarks. Sheesh - does foxyloxyabe have every single Zionist's name on speed dial or something? Not just the Dilbert column - I've watched programs on C-Span and it's so predictable - anything to do with foreign policy brings out all the zios in great numbers to phone in their IsraelFirst agenda.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   13:20:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: scrapper2 (#15)

oh yes, they are organized if nothing else

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-23   13:33:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

That was great. I gotta go read the blog. I am so sick of the deliberate mistranslation of the guy's comments. There was some right wing sock puppet on Hardball Friday night (perhaps the LAST black Republican apart from Keyes) SCREAMING about Columbia and talking over anyone (Ed Schultz and Matthews) who suggested free speech is sorta an American value and it might be a good idea to actually ask the guy what he said and what he meant. Wingnuts don't like free speech; they are not interested in debate or rational discourse, they simply want to spew talking points and shout down anyone on the other side. I remember FRetard City members seemed to end every freaking post with some shit like "nuff said" or "Eagles up," which is a real clue to their stunted, ignorant mentality.

I don't for a minute think the Iranian leaders are nice people. They're not. But it's pretty hard to find a country where the leaders ARE. Right now, we have an embassy in Burma, one of the worst human-rights offenders in the world, a brutal military dictatorship that uses slave labor and mass murder to enforce its defense of a tiny but very wealthy group of plutocrats who actually run the country. Yes, we have diplomatic relations with them. Iran, which happens to be the leading power in the Middle East apart from a certain non-Muslim country, might be someone worth talking to every now and then. When we needed them to help topple the Taliban, they helped us out, quietly. They're not insane, most of the country is pro-Western, and it might be a good idea to talk with them. And this Columbia thing could be a good starting point. I hope Columbia doesn't cave to the enormous pressure the right wing is dumping on them.

Mekons4  posted on  2007-09-23   14:39:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Mekons4, All (#17)

I don't for a minute think the Iranian leaders are nice people. They're not. But it's pretty hard to find a country where the leaders ARE...Iran, which happens to be the leading power in the Middle East apart from a certain non-Muslim country, might be someone worth talking to every now and then. When we needed them to help topple the Taliban, they helped us out, quietly. They're not insane, most of the country is pro-Western, and it might be a good idea to talk with them. And this Columbia thing could be a good starting point.

Well said! Hear, hear! I agree with you 1000%.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   14:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Mekons4 (#17)

Not to mention that, unlike all those kingdoms, sheikdoms, caliphates and hereditary presidencies that are our 'trusted allies', Iran IS following some democratic process when selecting its government and, yes, women DO vote there. Unlike the Israeli president, Iran's was never found guilty of raping anyone and, unlike Israel's prime minister, there are no corruption allegations against him.

One thing that we can see with our own eyes is that Mr. Ahma.... is a gutsy person. He will now be in New York for the second time, with no armed-to-the-teeth body guards to protect him, and asking to be allowed to drive around the city to talk to people and to see places. Bush would be sh_tting his panties only at the thought of he going to Tehran on his own.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-09-23   14:52:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#19)

One thing that we can see with our own eyes is that Mr. Ahma.... is a gutsy person. He will now be in New York for the second time, with no armed-to-the-teeth body guards to protect him, and asking to be allowed to drive around the city to talk to people and to see places. Bush would be sh_tting his panties only at the thought of he going to Tehran on his own.

Nevermind dubya soiling his undies at the thought of visiting Tehren...dubya is scared to visit American cities without heavy artillery and military batallions and mercenaries guarding him 24/7 as he waves to pre-selected groups of "ordinary" US citizens. As for Cheney - when was the last time Darthdick left his underground bunker to "risk" an opportunity to see natural sunlight?

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   15:01:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)

Mr. Adams misses one crucial point.

Freedom of speech does not create a requirement that you be heard or granted an audience.

Many people make that critical error.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-09-23   15:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: mirage (#21)

Mr. Adams misses one crucial point.

Freedom of speech does not create a requirement that you be heard or granted an audience.

Many people make that critical error.

That is true. Therefore, all the neozios who do not wish to attend the Columbia event should stay home but show respect to others' freedom to associate and to hear what the Iranian Head of State says. After all, this is not communist Russia; this is America 2007, and in this nation at this time there are guarantees in place re: certain basic freedoms including speech and association.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   16:02:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: mirage (#21)

Freedom of speech does not create a requirement that you be heard or granted an audience.

My understanding is that he was invited to speak there.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2007-09-23   17:59:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#23)

My understanding is that he was invited to speak there.

As such, the invitation can be canceled. Standing on a street corner, as is the current plan, cannot be canceled.

Such is how things work.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-09-23   18:26:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, All (#23)

Slightly off topic but Ahmadinejad will be interviewed on 60 Minutes tonight. I intend to tune in.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2007-09-23   18:29:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: mirage, a vast rightwing conspirator, Fred Mertz (#24)

As such, the invitation can be canceled. Standing on a street corner, as is the current plan, cannot be canceled.

Such is how things work.

If the invitation to a Head of State is rescinded - a second time - due to pressure from a small but powerful monied special interest group is that how things are supposed to work in a democracy?

If the invitation is rescinded, then I sincerely hope that Iran's Head of State goes to a street corner adjacent to Columbia University and that he continue with the program that he had been led to believe would take place on campus.

I have no doubt President Ahmadinejad would attract the same audience numbers as he would if he were at the campus auditorium because intellectual curiosity will not be denied by a self-serving AmericaLast/IsraelFirst group of repressive goons.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   18:43:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: scrapper2 (#26)

If the invitation to a Head of State is rescinded - a second time - due to pressure from a small but powerful monied special interest group is that how things are supposed to work in a democracy?

You asked the right question.

In a DEMOCRACY, that is how things work.
In a REPUBLIC, it would not necessarily work that way.

What is the difference between the two? Find that answer and you'll know why we have problems in the USA these days.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-09-23   18:56:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: mirage (#27)

In a DEMOCRACY, that is how things work. In a REPUBLIC, it would not necessarily work that way.

Fyi, I used the word democracy generically to represent "free and open society."

Our being a republic applies to the type of government we have and its powers. But the Columbia event has nothing to do with government. It has to do with the basic concepts that define Western liberalism, pluristic societies. A minority group - albeit a politically influential and monied one - should not have the right to restrict the freedoms ( association and speech) of the majority just because they the minority don't want to attend the event or listen to the guest speaker. This is a ridiculous situation and I'm somewhat surprised that this minority group would risk bringing such negative publicity to themselves especially at a time when Mearsheimer and Walt's book has just been released. Their current behavior/antics regarding Columbia's event shows them to be "controlling" - an adjective they normally try to disavow.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   19:17:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: scrapper2 (#28)

You're asking the wrong question.

Is Columbia a private institution or not? If they are, then they have the right to restrict access to whomever they want.

The answer is: Columbia is not a public institution. They can do as they wish.

This has nothing to do with speech and everything to do with private property rights.

The only question to ask is -- why did Columbia's management cave in? They have every right to revoke the invitation as it is a private institution -- unless you think that people have the right to stage a protest in your living room?

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-09-23   22:13:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Mekons4 (#17)

Right now, we have an embassy in Burma, one of the worst human-rights offenders in the world, a brutal military dictatorship that uses slave labor and mass murder to enforce its defense of a tiny but very wealthy group of plutocrats who actually run the country.

..very much in the news .. did you see where the monks led a huge protest in Burma in the last couple of days?

Zipporah  posted on  2007-09-23   22:18:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: mirage (#29) (Edited)

The only question to ask is -- why did Columbia's management cave in? They have every right to revoke the invitation as it is a private institution -- unless you think that people have the right to stage a protest in your living room?

What voices do you hear that no one else hears? What visions do you see that no one else sees? Enough of these silly games of parsing words and phrases.

If wishes were horses...

Fyi, Columbia's "management" ( ie. President Lee Bollinger) has NOT cancelled the speaking engagement invitation to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. For your perusal and to help you get a grip on reality, go to the following link:

http://www.columbia.edu/

Eat your heart out.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   22:27:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: scrapper2 (#31)

Why do you wish to censor a 'small and vocal minority' and make them not be heard?

Certainly in a 'free and open society' they should have the same rights you wish to let others have, correct?

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-09-23   23:00:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: mirage (#32)

Why do you wish to censor a 'small and vocal minority' and make them not be heard?

Certainly in a 'free and open society' they should have the same rights you wish to let others have, correct?

Your amateurish neocon attempts at inverting reality are feeble.

You're late for your Yom Kipper services. Now run along.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-23   23:06:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: robin (#10)

He's looking regretful in his next blog entry. Looks like he got it pretty bad. Figures. Newspaper-comic boy.

nobody  posted on  2007-09-24   0:37:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: nobody (#34) (Edited)

He's looking regretful in his next blog entry. Looks like he got it pretty bad. Figures. Newspaper-comic boy.

Wow - you're right - definite groveling. Although he tries to redeem himself from genuflecting and slobbering in the face of the might of the Zios in the last paragraph of his piece. Sigh, too little too late. I guess money does not buy insulation from the zios ability to destroy. So much for Dilbert as my free speech foible exposing hero. Back to reading Superman comics.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-09-24   0:53:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: scrapper2 (#35)

If Dilbert had super powers, he'd quit his day job and live on the beach, the bum.

nobody  posted on  2007-09-24   1:13:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: robin (#7)

But what does Dogbert say?

You see, I claim that the Swiss Navy is bigger than the Irish Navy, but that the Jewish Navy is bigger than both of them put together!

Tauzero  posted on  2007-09-24   11:22:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: scrapper2 (#15)

What I can't figure out is how quickly such a great number of Zios can be marshalled to overwhelm the comment section with their enraged remarks.

Pheromone trails.

You see, I claim that the Swiss Navy is bigger than the Irish Navy, but that the Jewish Navy is bigger than both of them put together!

Tauzero  posted on  2007-09-24   11:24:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Tauzero (#37)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y42/GilGrissomCSI/dogbert.gif

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-09-24   11:24:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: mirage (#32)

Why do you wish to censor a 'small and vocal minority' and make them not be heard?

Certainly in a 'free and open society' they should have the same rights you wish to let others have, correct?

Uh oh. Now you've done it...

As Bob warned, the new cult mutation might be "Everybody's exactly the same dammit -- except for that goddamned small vocal minority."

You see, I claim that the Swiss Navy is bigger than the Irish Navy, but that the Jewish Navy is bigger than both of them put together!

Tauzero  posted on  2007-09-24   11:31:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest