See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Wolfowitz and his 1992 Strategy of World Dominance: “The Defense Planning Guidance”
Source:
Crooks and Liars
URL Source: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/ ... the-defense-planning-guidance/
Published: Sep 23, 2007
Author: Crooks and Liars
Post Date: 2007-09-23 22:23:48 by Zipporah
Keywords: None
Views: 1280
Comments: 3
These scenarios, issued separately to the military services on Feb. 4, were detailed in a New York Times article last month. They postulated regional wars against Iraq and North Korea, as well as a Russian assault on Lithuania and smaller military contingencies that United States forces might confront in the future. These hypothetical conflicts, coupled with the policy guidance document, are meant to give military leaders specific information about the kinds of military threats they should be prepared to meet as they train and equip their forces. It is also intended to give them a coherent strategy framework in which to evaluate various force and training options…read on Here it is. The PNAC’ers plan right in front of our media. And you’d think the NY Times would have taken the lead on this since they actually published it. Oh, that’s right. Judy Miller and Michael Gordon had other ideas. When the administration turned its attention to Iraq—-flashing red lights should have gone off…
Nicole linked this article up once before, but I think it merits its own post. This document that was leaked to the NY Times back in 1992, explains in detail the Neocon wet dream of world domination. One wonders if the media would have looked at the cabinet Bush put together when he took office and then asked some real questions about Wolfie’s plan of world domination. I guess they had other things to do.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Zipporah (#0)
They screwed it up royally on these two.
a. I would have greatly appreciated a warning about scary photos attached to the article. Now I have aged 10 years due to the lack of an appropriate "Ugly" alert. Where's my anti-wrinkle cream when I need it? b. Why in heavens would anyone expect the NYT to display red lights about Wolfie and other zioneos desire to attack Iraq? Just because some "little person" slipped up and published the neocons' world domination plans, come on, in addition to the actions of war shills like Gordon and Miller, my gosh, the NYT's CEO, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., is a bigtime IsraelFirster Zionist. Pat Buchanon called the NYT Israel's version of the Pravda. Hello - what does that tell us?
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
It is also intended to give them a coherent strategy framework in which to evaluate various force and training options…
#2. To: Zipporah (#0)
And you’d think the NY Times would have taken the lead on this since they actually published it. Oh, that’s right. Judy Miller and Michael Gordon had other ideas. When the administration turned its attention to Iraq—-flashing red lights should have gone off…
#3. To: Zipporah, *US is Proxy State For Israel* (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest