Title: Ken Burns ("The War") on Bill Maher 9/28/07 Source:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dfWTtYzyPQ&eurl=http%3A%2F%2 URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dfWTtYzyPQ&eurl=http%3A%2F%2F Published:Sep 29, 2007 Author:Burns/Maher Post Date:2007-09-29 13:59:40 by robin Keywords:None Views:265 Comments:20
Interesting interview - aside from his patently transparent glorification of war film, Ken Burns stumbles in some parts in delivering a coherent message to the sheeple...notable example...
Burns said as a paraphrased response to Maher's suggestion that our troops can't find anything important point to fighting in the Iraq War except to continue do so for their brothers, l'esprit de corps:
"Yes, it is amazing to see the flag flying at half-mast at all times at West Point - it goes to show that our troops are willing to fight and sacrifice for necessary as well as unnecessary wars."
But, his documentary shows how astonishingly different this preemptive war business is from WWII.
Not only from what kind of war, what kind of people we were then, but also the incredible amount of manufacturing that took place - jobs for all. What a contrast with today! We couldn't go to war today with China, they make everything we need for war!
It is still a very worthwhile series, the personal storytelling by those who were there, is well done.
It is still a very worthwhile series, the personal storytelling by those who were there, is well done.
My nephew benefits more from having his grand father stay tight lipped about what he did in WWIII except to advise him thusly: "War is government sanctioned murder. War is ugly."
His grand father should know - because unlike Ken Burns, he was a navigator in WWII on bombing missions and he has had to live all these years with a very bad conscience about the people - many civilians - he helped snuff in WWII. The solidarity of Americans post conscription was a good by product I guess but the onus borne by individuals who actually fought this war mano-a- mano was not always happy.
I have not seen The War series, but I suspect that LKen Burns did not bring up the rather uncomfortable aspects of fighting WWII.
First off, American soldiers were fighting and killing family tree related brothers. Americans of German and Italian descent were in high numbers at the time of WWII.
Secondly, though WWII was partly about liberating the Jews and Polish Christians from the NAZII's concentration camps, let's keep in mind that it was the NAZIIS not regular German soldiers who ran these monstrous camps. The German soldiers were fighting for their nation and for the lies their Nazii leaders told them at the time.
Thirdly, when the American troops found Russian POW's they had to release them to Uncle Joe's military. These Russian POW soldiers were shot on the spot - my father's older brother said he was present when this happened and he had to live with that ugly realization - that the Russian communists, our WWII allies, were BARBARIANS. We threw our lot in with arguably a bigger monster than the monster we were fighting in WWII.
Fourthly the primary goal of entering WWII - at least for the Brits - was to "liberate" Poland. What a colossal failure if that was a primary goal of WWII. We only changed the servitude of Poland's peoples from one monster to another.
Ken Burns chose 4 American towns to see how the war impacted them and the people in them (Mobile, Sacramento, LaVerne and Waterbury). Their letters, interviews, and personal stories told with some narration of what is going on gives a real insight into life just before and during the war.
My dad was a B-24 squadron leader over North Africa, up through Italy, then to France on D-Day and finally over Germany - plus 50+ missions to the oil fields in Romania. My mother's brother and cousins were in the South Pacific, Navy and Marines. But, I have learned a lot from Ken Burns' documentary thus far, and it is only about half-way. I think it is even better than his Civil War series.
For example, did you know that while Japanese-Americans were behind barbed wire in camps, some of their draft-age sons were in army units fighting in Europe?
No Generals were interviewed, this is "from the ground up".
And the Italian-American who wrote his mother that everything was just fine (how he ate 6 pork chops and turkey), and no one realized until years later how much he was just lying, in order to protect them and especially his mother, from the realities of war.
Their letters, interviews, and personal stories told with some narration of what is going on gives a real insight into life just before and during the war.
Maybe The War series is more honest and without any particular bias than what I perceived as glorification of war bent on Ken Burns' part in the course of Maher's interview. FYI, I edited my earlier post to you on this thread and added a few points for your consideration.
He did not glorify war, he showed the sacrifices that went into WWII. It is at moments, horrifyingly graphic. There is a warning at the beginning that it contains graphic material. And that was, as he calls it, a necessary war. He shows how young men begin as thinking killing is sinful to within a couple months sitting around talking about perfecting their kraft.
Not long ago some previously classified material revealed that FDR knowingly left 50K Americans with Stalin. I believe Red Jones posted an article that some were later used in Soviet experiments. The Soviet units that entered Berlin and later Hungary were unbelievably barbaric to the citizenry. Poland got it from both the Soviets and the Nazis.
There is a game that must be played to survive Hollywood. I think part of what we saw on Maher, was Burns playing that game.
Here's the more serious "game" that FDR played: How could the U.S. government tell the truth about what happened to American servicemen? To tell the truth would mean exposing American complicity in the murder of over a million innocent Russian people. It would entail a closer examination of the Allied alliance with one of the most brutal political regimes in all of history. And it would expose all the scheming and machinations that resulted in the abandonment of over 50,000 Allied soldiers to our communist "friends."
My grandfather fought in WWII, 16th Armored Div.,He would tell us that at the end of the War, they were told not to wander around outside at nite because of the Soviets, that they were taking American GI as prisoners.
I remember as a child being so thankful that he listened.He seemed more fearful of the Soviets than of the Germans.
The series by Burns is great. A few years ago I researched my grandfathers troop movement it was interesting.
I have not seen The War series, but I suspect that LKen Burns did not bring up the rather uncomfortable aspects of fighting WWII.
First off, American soldiers were fighting and killing family tree related brothers. Americans of German and Italian descent were in high numbers at the time of WWII.
Secondly, though WWII was partly about liberating the Jews and Polish Christians from the NAZII's concentration camps, let's keep in mind that it was the NAZIIS not regular German soldiers who ran these monstrous camps. The German soldiers were fighting for their nation and for the lies their Nazii leaders told them at the time.
He made many of these points. Or rather, the people who fought the war or lived through it made these points. It's a pretty remarkable series. The second part begins Sunday evening.
A year ago I registered my grandfather name at the WWII monument and site in W Washington, is your father registered there its a great memorial.
My Uncle flew a B-52, was shot down in Belguim, thank god he was okay and was able to get back. He continued to fly for the remainder of the War. I have the letter he wrote to my grandparents telling them he was okay and how a Belgian farmer saved him. The Belgian farmer actually cracked open a bottle of wine and they all celebrated, they were so happy that they where being liberated.
I thought it was a B52, I will hav to call my Uncle up and ask him, I know he was a navigator. He just recently went to a reuion in either S.carolina or N. Carolina.
Cyni, what do you thin he flew, I know it was a bomber.
He made many of these points. Or rather, the people who fought the war or lived through it made these points. It's a pretty remarkable series. The second part begins Sunday evening.
Okay you and robin have convinced me. I'll watch part 2 on Sunday. Perhaps I got a bad impression of Ken Burns from Maher's interview with him and associated that with the content of the series. If the series presented war as having complex uncomfortable aspects, then that's good.
Too often the mainstream media's and Hollywood's presentations of WWII has been nothing more than Greatest Generation pro-war aren't we wonderful schtick. For example, I have not seen documentaries about the very real and ugly consequences of allying ourselves with Stalin. I have not seen documentaries regarding the Dresdan bombings or about the wholesale slaughter of Germans by communists after the war was won or about the German scientists we gave a free pass to for their war crimes for immigration to the USA. Those topics need to be shown to Americans - to teach people that we made a bargain with a monster - that we beat the Germans but at great cost to the Eastern Europeans. Does anyone realize that the allies broke the Germans' code due to the efforts of a Polish cryptographer, who escaped from his native Poland? What thanks did we give him re: his family members who were left behind and handed over to Uncle Joe? War is not to be entered into lightly because winning does not mean the winner is perfect and 100% right and unblemished - often winners, as in WWII, have had to make horrible compromises/make deals with the Devil along the way in order to win. That's what our young should learn about the responsibilities and the trade offs and the loss of humanity that comes with going to war.