[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Ahmadinejad
Source: Future of Freedom Foundation
URL Source: http://www.fff.org/comment/com0710a.asp
Published: Oct 3, 2007
Author: Sheldon Richman
Post Date: 2007-10-03 14:03:45 by Alan Chapman
Keywords: None
Views: 92
Comments: 6

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran is no one to admire, but when was the last time President Bush stood before a critical college audience and fielded tough questions? Bush appears only before handpicked friendly crowds. Even news conferences are barely adversarial because the media has the curious rule that the president -- any president -- deserves to be treated like royalty.

For all his weird statements about freedom, women, and homosexuals in Iran, not to mention his views on the Nazi treatment of Jews, at least Ahmadinejad took on all comers. He even accepted his host's insults with equanimity.

That people panicked about his appearance at the forum only made him look respectable. Too bad Ahmadinejad didn't use his time better. He might have educated the American people about the history of U.S.-Iran relations, of which most Americans are unforgivably ignorant.

He could have told them that in 1953 the CIA conspired with a brutal monarch who had been driven from power to overthrow an elected secular prime minister and restore the monarch to his throne. The shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, proceeded to rule as a dictator for the next quarter century with the help of his secret police, SAVAK, and U.S money and weapons. U.S. presidents often praised him as a great ally of the United States. The Iranian people understood who his patron was.

When they finally dethroned the hated shah in the religious revolution of 1979, and the U.S. embassy and personnel were seized, the American government pretended it was the aggrieved party. It has conducted subtle warfare against Iran ever since.

Ahmadinejad might also have taught the American people that in the 1980s, the U.S. government backed its ally -- Saddam Hussein of Iraq -- in his decade-long war against Iran. It provided Iraq critical economic aid and weapons, as well as intelligence and diplomatic recognition, and placed warships in the Persian Gulf to protect Iraqi oil in Kuwaiti tankers from Iranian attack.

Most interesting, the U.S. government licensed American companies to provide Saddam the means to make chemical and biological weapons. (Chemicals were used on the Iranians and Kurds. For a history of the conflict and U.S.involvement, see my "United States in the Persian Gulf" at http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=912)

During the war the USS Vincennes, while in Iranian waters, shot down an Iranian civilian airliner over the Persian Gulf. All 290 people aboard were killed. American officials claimed -- dubiously -- that the plane was thought to be a military aircraft. No apology was ever issued, though compensation eventually was paid.

Contrast this with an incident about year earlier, when an Iraqi warplane attacked the USS Stark, killing 28 men. The Reagan administration accepted Iraq's apology -- then blamed Iran for the tragedy.

The neoconservatives, who so demonized Saddam Hussein before the 2003 invasion, were his enthusiastic backers against Iran in the 1980s. (The 1986 Iran-Contra arms deal was a glaring exception.)

Ahmadinejad should have also pointed out that the U.S. government has warships in the Persian Gulf threatening Iran to this day and maintains economic sanctions, a form of warfare, against his country. To those who say that Iran is developing nuclear technology and helping to kill Americans in Iraq, he could point out that it's the U.S. government that invaded two of Iran's next-door neighbors and executed "regime change." Why shouldn't Iran be defensive and interested in acquiring a deterrent?

This would have been a useful lesson for Americans. Unfortunately, Ahmadinejad let the opportunity pass.

The American people would have no reason to fear this man if the U.S. government were not provoking him. There's an easy way to ensure that Iranians aren't killing Americans: bring the troops home and stay out of Middle East affairs.

Instead the Bush administration follows a policy that makes Ahmadinejad a hero, even among Arabs: threatening war. As Glenn Greenwald wrote at Salon.com, "Nobody has done more to inflate the importance and power of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (who, just by the way, is not even the leader of Iran, let alone the WorldWide Evil Axis of Hitlerian Dictators) than those who have focused on him obsessively."

Once again, an American president imperils the people by creating an enemy.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Alan Chapman (#0)

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran is no one to admire

Why not?

"I wish for a bright future for all human beings and the dawn of the liberation of and freedom for all humans, and the rule of love and affection all around the world, as well as the elimination of oppression, hatred, and violence, a wish which I expect will be realized in the near future". -- MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

angle  posted on  2007-10-03   14:09:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Alan Chapman (#0)

[…] but when was the last time President Bush stood before a critical college audience and fielded tough questions? Bush appears only before handpicked friendly crowds.

When is the last time Bush visited even a friendly country without being surrounded by an Army division? I’m thinking of Bush’s imperial visit to the Rhine-Main area in Germany, where tens of thousands of workers lost two days pay because of his highness.

karelian  posted on  2007-10-03   16:10:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: angle (#1)

Ahmadinejad is a statist.

Furthermore, Bush has said similar things and it's empty rhetoric. Politicians often say things which sound virtuous but pay attention to what they do.

Alan Chapman  posted on  2007-10-03   16:47:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: angle (#1)

LOL. That was my first thought, too.

rowdee  posted on  2007-10-03   16:48:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Alan Chapman, rowdee (#3)

Ahmadinejad is a statist.

As opposed to an imperialist?

Your point is?

Statism is a term that is used to describe:

The term is often used loosely in a derogative sense to describe an instance in which a country or other political entity is more Statist than the user of the term believes is desirable (in the case of Anarchists, this may include all of the world's countries).

The theory, or its practice, that economic and political power should be controlled by a central government leaving regional government and the individual with relatively little say in political matters.

The term tends to be used most often with respect to economic policies. For instance, Merriam- Webster defines statism as a "concentration of economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government."

"I wish for a bright future for all human beings and the dawn of the liberation of and freedom for all humans, and the rule of love and affection all around the world, as well as the elimination of oppression, hatred, and violence, a wish which I expect will be realized in the near future". -- MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

angle  posted on  2007-10-03   18:57:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: angle (#5)

Both statists and imperialists employ theft and murder to advance their cause. I don't know that one is necessarily worse than the other, or that it even matters.

The State is something to be repudiated. It's inherently immoral.

Politicians (like Ahmadinejad and George Bush) often wax eloquent about freedom but they're just blowing wind. They just say what they think others want to hear. Government never has, and never will, facilitate freedom. The State is the antithesis of freedom.

If Ahmadinejad truly believes what he says then he should begin by dismantling his own government.

Alan Chapman  posted on  2007-10-04   0:09:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]