[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: FBI Puts Antiwar Protesters on Criminal Database; Canada Uses It To Ban Protesters From Entry
Source: http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_rob_kall_071007_fbi_
URL Source: http://www.opednews.com/articles/ge ... 71007_fbi_puts_antiwar_pro.htm
Published: Oct 7, 2007
Author: Rob Kall
Post Date: 2007-10-07 13:47:08 by angle
Keywords: None
Views: 208
Comments: 14

Two well-respected US peace activists, CODEPINK and Global Exchange cofounder Medea Benjamin and retired Colonel and diplomat Ann Wright, were denied entry into Canada On October third. The two women were headed to Toronto to discuss peace and security issues at the invitation of the Toronto Stop the War Coalition. At the Buffalo-Niagara Falls Bridge they were detained, questioned and denied entry.

"In my case, the border guard pulled up a file showing that I had been arrested at the US Mission to the UN where, on International Women's Day, a group of us had tried to deliver a peace petition signed by 152,000 women around the world," says Benjamin. "For this, the Canadians labeled me a criminal and refused to allow me in the country."

"The FBI's placing of peace activists on an international criminal database is blatant political intimidation of US citizens opposed to Bush administration policies," says Colonel Wright, who was also Deputy US Ambassador in four countries. "The Canadian government should certainly not accept this FBI database as the criteria for entering the country." Both Wright and Benjamin plan to request their files from the FBI through the Freedom of Information Act and demand that arrests for peaceful, non-violent actions be expunged from international records. "It's outrageous that Canada is turning away peacemakers protesting a war that does not have the support of either US or Canadian citizens," says Benjamin.

"In the past, Canada has always welcomed peace activists with open arms. This new policy, obviously a creature of the Bush administration, is shocking and we in the US and Canada must insist that it be overturned. Four members of the Canadian Parliament--Peggy Nash, Libby Davies, Paul Dewar and Peter Julian-- expressed outrage that the peace activists were barred from Canada and vow to change this policy.

Ann Wright told OpEdNews that this was the second time the two Code Pink activists had been turned away from the border, the first event ocurring on August 19th.

Wright explained, "We decided to go to Canadian border to push the envelope to see if the Canadian Gov would not let us into Canada again until we had been "criminally rehabilitated."

To be criminally rehabilitated, they would have to do a huge amount of paperwork and state that they were no longer going to commit the "crimes" they were convicted of.

Wright told OpEdNews "We were told (by the canadian border agents) if we tried to enter Canada again, we would be officially deported from the country, which is "big trouble. 'We've warned you not to come back until we are criminally rehabilitated.'

Wright asserted, "We will never be criminally rehabilitated since we intend to continue to engage in non-violent peaceful protest of Bush administration policies, particular the war on Iraq and we intend to peacefully and nonviolently protest all of these until they end. They can lead to arrests for civil disobedience, like refusing to move from the fence in front of the whitehouse or standing up and speaking at congressional hearings."

Wright explained that the Canadians, by their own law, do not allow people in who have been convicted of various kinds of offenses.

If, when you are asked by a Canadian immigration officer if you have been arrested, they check the FBI database and that's how they found we were listed.

Wright added, "The fact that the FBI has put us on this list. The National Crime Information Center Computerized Index is a form of political intimidation. The list is supposed to be for felony and serious misdemeanor offenses.

"We don't qualify-- it's for sex offenders, foreign fugitives, gang violence and terrorist organizations, people who are on parole, a list of eight categories all together.

"It is very disturbing. We've asked our congressional representatives to investigate this."

According to Wright, there was almost no coverage of this in the US, except for an AP release. In Canada, Toronto's Globe and Mail and several other newspapers and three Canadian TV stations covered it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: angle, *Bilderberg and NWO Watch* (#0)

Wright explained, "We decided to go to Canadian border to push the envelope to see if the Canadian Gov would not let us into Canada again until we had been "criminally rehabilitated."

To be criminally rehabilitated, they would have to do a huge amount of paperwork and state that they were no longer going to commit the "crimes" they were convicted of.

Wright told OpEdNews "We were told (by the canadian border agents) if we tried to enter Canada again, we would be officially deported from the country, which is "big trouble. 'We've warned you not to come back until we are criminally rehabilitated.'

All your databases are ours.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-10-07   13:55:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: angle (#0)

My local NPR station carries a newscast from the CBC every night (late) and I hear it fairly often. The other night they had a fairly long report about this, and the Liberal Party plans to make life very tough for Martin this coming week. As you may know, the Prime Minister can't hide out like our so-called president does. He has a seat in parliament like every other member, and they can go after him with meat hooks.

The VAST majority of Canadians not only support peace, they're totally fed up with the relationship with the United States. To put it less politely, they feel like they're George Bush's bitch.

This is just the sort of thing that can end a Prime Minister's career and put a new government in place there. And the next guy (actually, a woman, I think) ain't gonna play nice with us.

I don't know how many people know this, but Canada is our largest trading partner. We've screwed them over and over for the last 7 years. They took us to the World Court over our ban on softwood imports and won. We owe them billions in damages. Know what Bush said? "We're not paying. Deal with it." Period.

Honi soit qui mal y pense

Mekons4  posted on  2007-10-07   14:57:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Mekons4 (#2) (Edited)

This is just the sort of thing that can end a Prime Minister's career and put a new government in place there. And the next guy (actually, a woman, I think) ain't gonna play nice with us.

Harper is running on empty these days. Each time there is a vote in Parliament, it could end up being a vote of "no confidence" and Harper's gov't can be brought down like a ton of bricks.

The Liberals and Conservatives are in a dead heat re: recent popularity polls. The Liberals are like our Dems and apart from the Chretien/Trudeau days are not adverse to war or to dictates from the US gov't. Recall that it was Paul Martin - a Liberal PM - who signed up Canada to the 3-some NAU.

However, in a close federal election, the support of the NDP ( socialists) would be required to form a majority govt - and the NDP are anti-war involvement and anti-US gov't's influence on Canada.

ca.news.ya hoo.com/s/capre...1003/national/tories_poll

"Liberals still even with Tories after weeks of bad news"

P.S. I don't think there's a female leader in the 3 party mix.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-10-07   15:28:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: scrapper2 (#3)

Martin. Harper. Who can keep these names straight? Just kidding, I wasn't thinking.

According to the CBC report I heard, the liberal party may not be all that popular, partly because of a massive corruption scandal and some pretty lousy governing the last time around, but Harper has worn out his welcome. There have been huge scandals involving the RCMP investigating anti-war Canadians and stuff like that, and the Conservative party's strong support in the midwest and rockies is dwindling.

Honi soit qui mal y pense

Mekons4  posted on  2007-10-07   15:55:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Mekons4 (#4)

Martin. Harper. Who can keep these names straight? Just kidding, I wasn't thinking.

There is hardly any difference between the leaders or the 2 parties - and I'm not kidding.

The conservatives are almost as left as the liberals in terms of pro- entitlement positioning and the liberals are almost as right as the conservatives in terms of pro-corporate positioning.

The NDP party can be the King maker in the next federal election. In this past Harper government term, Harper was able to win over support fairly consistently from the Bloque Quebecois but that has been an uneasy alliance.

The Canadians are definitely anti-war and especially so in Quebec. If the NDP plays on that anti-war sentiment ( both the Conservatives and Liberals voted to extend the Cdn. troop assignment in Afghanistan) the NDP can gain even more votes.

Like Americans, Canadians have been lulled into sticking with the 2 Fraud Party paradigmn over time. The Afghanistan War committment though is exceedingly unpopular and getting more so daily. It could be a wedge issue to spring board the NDP into greater prominence in Parliament.

But getting back to the article at hand, Canadians are not specifically guaranteed all the "freedoms" we have, so I'm not sure that the denial of entry to the leaders of Code Pink and Global Entry is going to be a headline in Cdn. newspapers for long. I might be wrong but I don't think Canadians have freedom of speech and association guaranteed so they may not see that as a big issue to grumble about if it's denied to others.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-10-07   16:21:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: scrapper2 (#5)

The Canadian Charter guarantees freedom of expression. It's kind of a mush-mouthed section, but the courts there have actually broadened the right to free speech regularly over the past 20 years. It's really only lately, during the Bush years, that the RCMP and other law enforcement agencies, have been cracking down on demonstrations and so on. And they routinely lose in court.

I'm not sure how big a deal this will be, but it is certainly another drip-drip moment.

The problem, like here, is that the Liberals have to come up with someone who will oppose the Conservatives, not just offer a more acceptable face to bad policy. I don't know if they have it in them.

The U.S. has threatened to play economic hardball with Canada if they cross us in foreign relations. Given the incredible amount of Canada owned or controlled by U.S. companies, that's not an idle threat.

Honi soit qui mal y pense

Mekons4  posted on  2007-10-07   16:42:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Mekons4 (#6)

The U.S. has threatened to play economic hardball with Canada if they cross us in foreign relations. Given the incredible amount of Canada owned or controlled by U.S. companies, that's not an idle threat.

That may have been a threat in the past but with the Cdn dollar reaching parity with the US green back, I'd imagine that trade will be slowing down anyways - Cdn. goods are too expensive now. But Cdn tourists - shoppers - are probably becoming more important to us now.

Furthermore, Alberta's petroleum resources are also fairly important to the US government - Canada has become the #1 country for our domestic source of gas and oil - water is probably going to be gaining in prominence as an imported Cdn. resource in the near future.

The power shoe is on the other foot these days but most Canadians don't realize the power their nation has over ours. Their gov't reps are still playing the diminuative role in public.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-10-07   16:54:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: scrapper2 (#7)

Yes, they've never had the population to really exploit their natural resources. With their immigration policy, they do now. Water, wood, pork, cattle, etc. are all big businesses, and now with corn and wheat prices way up, grains will be next. But, U.S. companies own or operate a lot of the companies that harvest this stuff. And, they're dependent on a lot of our products, although they've made strides in that area.

The native industries have been trying, with middling success, to diversify their export customer base, since well over half of what they sell goes to the U.S., which leaves them very vulnerable to a change in U.S. law (or attitude). For instance, the beef industry nearly went broke and many cattle ranchers DID go bankrupt when we closed the border to live cattle. The pork industry is in terrible shape because we have manipulated our quotas, leaving them stuck with live pigs they can't sell or feed.

Half my family lives in Ontario, and they're pretty aware that things are changing. There's a lot of resentment there over the way they've been treated over the years economically.

I've been there twice in the last two years, and the war is just wildly unpopular, even though they're mainly limited to Afghanistan (they have about five guys in Iraq, IIRC).

It's going to be interesting to watch. I'm considering moving there in a couple of years, and there are certainly more jobs in my field open there than here.

Honi soit qui mal y pense

Mekons4  posted on  2007-10-07   18:00:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Mekons4 (#8)

I'm considering moving there in a couple of years, and there are certainly more jobs in my field open there than here.

Yep - try to get on with CBC - the perks are great I've heard.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-10-07   18:04:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Mekons4 (#8)

the war is just wildly unpopular

Interesting. When up vacationing '02-'05 around North Bay in the summer, I was under the impression that Bush was popular and supported as was the war and the global policies. Perhaps it was just the few families I talked politics with.

angle  posted on  2007-10-07   18:12:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: robin (#1)

All your databases are ours.

All your base are belong to us.


I've already said too much.

MUDDOG  posted on  2007-10-07   19:07:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: angle (#10)

Interesting. When up vacationing '02-'05 around North Bay in the summer, I was under the impression that Bush was popular and supported as was the war and the global policies. Perhaps it was just the few families I talked politics with.

I can think of only 2 reasons for those sentiments.

a. Canadians are known to be polite to a fault. Perhps because the families you spoke with knew you were American, they were reluctant to say anything that might be interpreted as being anti-American.

b. The Canadian media is even more controlled than US media. The Izzy Asper Family ( huge pro-ME war proponents for obvious reasons)controls about 65% of Canadian newspapers. CBC is a state controlled agency. Both Liberal and Conservative party leaders are/were pro-war and CBC's corporate officers are sensitive to Majority Power in Ottawa will. Only the past year or two have we heard about the war for lies and profiteering scandals and AIPAC influence on foreign policy so I'd imagine Canadians in 2002-2005 were as fooled or more so then we were then.

scrapper2  posted on  2007-10-07   19:40:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: angle (#0)

"In my case, the border guard pulled up a file showing that I had been arrested at the US Mission

She never indicated whether or not she was convicted however, we have had articles on this forum discussing Canada's refusal to allow entry of anyone convicted of crimes, misdemeanor or felony unless prior arrangements and clearance have been granted.

IIRC, the articles I reference involved drunk driving and minor marijuana convictions going back 10 years or so.

Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!

Brian S  posted on  2007-10-07   20:25:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: MUDDOG (#11)

All your databases are ours.

All your base are belong to us.

darn it, I knew it wasn't quite right

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-10-07   20:39:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]