[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: It is time to speak truth to US power: The Supreme Court needs to rein in Bush's terror tactics
Source: Financial Times
URL Source: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/27acf35c-75d3-11dc-b7cb-0000779fd2ac.html
Published: Oct 9, 2007
Author: Financial Times Editorial Board
Post Date: 2007-10-09 15:28:24 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 124
Comments: 6

It is time to speak truth to US power

The Supreme Court needs to rein in Bush's terror tactics

Published: October 8 2007 20:24 | Last updated: October 8 2007 20:24

Since the attacks of September 11 2001, the administration of President George W. Bush has sought to cast a cloak of legality over the wrongs that it has committed in the name of fighting terrorism.

Mr Bush seems to think that legal sleight of hand can be used to justify almost any tactic to battle terrorists – including, it emerged last week, simulated drowning and other cruel interrogation techniques that Alberto Gonzales, his former attorney-general, appears to have authorised by secret legal memorandum.

Time and again, Mr Bush has twisted the law to serve his own national security goals. He has given the rule of law a bad name, and devalued the US constitution – all in the name of protecting the American people.

But now the US Supreme Court has a chance to pierce this veil of spurious legality, and reveal the constitutional and legal abuses inherent in the anti-terrorism crusade – from the treatment of detainees at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba, to the torture of terrorism suspects in secret prisons overseas, to the unwarranted surveillance of the phone calls and e-mails of US citizens.

Court cases challenging the legality of these policies have finally made their way to the top court, and civil liberties groups are pleading with the justices to take them up. The court has already agreed to hear a case testing the constitutionality of a 2006 law stripping Guantánamo detainees of the right to challenge their detention in federal court.

As soon as Tuesday, the court could announce whether it will also hear a case involving the “renditions” of terrorism suspects in secret prisons overseas. The justices are also being urged to hear a case testing the right of Americans to challenge the government’s secret surveillance programme in court.

In both the renditions and the surveillance case, the administration is refusing to answer the charges against it, claiming the mantle of state secrecy to stay out of court.

These cases give the justices the chance to undertake a comprehensive review of Mr Bush’s post-September 11 national security policies. They should not pass up this opportunity.

The genius of American democracy is that it gives each branch of government – the executive, the legislature and the judiciary – the power to check abuses by every other branch. Mr Bush has abused his power, and Congress has failed to hold him to account; it is time the Supreme Court did so.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

The Financial Times didn't have the subtitle on the Web page. I copied it from my print edition.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-10-09   15:29:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: aristeides (#0)

In both the renditions and the surveillance case, the administration is refusing to answer the charges against it, claiming the mantle of state secrecy to stay out of court.

These cases give the justices the chance to undertake a comprehensive review of Mr Bush’s post-September 11 national security policies. They should not pass up this opportunity.

We'll see.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-10-09   15:34:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: aristeides (#1)

Obviously, the court doesn't take the FT, or read it.

Join the Ron Paul Revolution

Lod  posted on  2007-10-09   15:41:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: aristeides (#0) (Edited)

"It is time to speak truth to US power: The Supreme Court needs to rein in Bush's terror"

I agree with the notion, but do they really think a court controlled by five devout Catholics living in the 19th century will do it?!

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-10-09   15:46:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides (#0)

It is time to speak truth to US power: The Supreme Court needs to rein in Bush's terror tactics

yeah, that'll happen with all the Jews and cryptoJews running the Court.

"....Justice Antonin Scalia. Along with Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, Justice Scalia attended the Kosher dinner held at the Supreme Court building on November 5, 2002, to mark the founding if the Washington-based National Institute for Judaic Law.

In 1993 a death penalty case (Herrera v. Collins) Scalia wrote that a condemned man awaiting execution did not have a right to another trial even if new evidence showed he was actually innocent of the crime. Scalia reasoned that because the condemned man's original trial had been free from procedural error, he'd have to die anyway, guilty or not.

"There is no basis in text, tradition, or even in contemporary practice (if that were enough) for finding in the Constitution a right to demand judicial consideration of newly discovered evidence of innocence brought forward after conviction."

At the very moment Justice Scalia was writing those words, the Supreme Court was giving prisoner Herrera's case a "judicial consideration" that Justice Scalia said the man had no "right to demand." At that point, it was less expensive for the nation to save the man's life than to execute him. But Justice Scalia's decision was more a message to the nation than an exercise in justice: Justice Scalia is telling the nation and the world that in American justice, truth is unimportant in the face of procedure.

The Declaration of Independence — which sets forth the very purposes of our Nation — states, in part: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men … are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life …"

Article V of the Bill of Rights states: "No person shall be … deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law …"

"Judge Scalia is said to be a devout Catholic "with a fascination for Jewish law." Justice Scalia's curiosity about Jewish Law seems to coexist with his lack of interest in American justice....."

www.come-and-hear.com/editor/capunish_4.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2007-10-09   16:44:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Paul Revere (#4)

Popes have resisted tyrants at various points in the Church's history. Not always successfully. But they have tried.

Maybe the Church has too often had a weakness for tyrants who claimed to be defending the Church. But that ain't Bush.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2007-10-09   17:04:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]