[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Meet the IRS, the Enemy Within "Document # 100.0.3 # 06 of 37...............- Meet The IRS, America's Enemy From Within... >>>>Disclaimer: This document may be used as you will except: If you change anything in the text, remove my name and other Ident. You may use it without my identification also if you wish...I only ask that people read it and think...think...think. Sources/Ref's if not in the text will be found on the last page of Doc 000.0.0.1 and 000.0.6. CLMsr.<<<< In all of this discussion about income tax, we should be ever mindful of the fact that CONGRESS is the key. CONGRESS votes to spend the money. Congress gives the IRS its power. Congress is elected by the people. The IRS is A DECOY. The IRS is not who you think they are. IRS agents are neither trained nor paid by the United States Government. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the Division of Human Resources United Nations (UN) and the Commissioner (International), by the office of Personnel Management. In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will find Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered into a "Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Department (See Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!) Plan No. 26 and the Agency for International Development. This agency is an international paramilitary operation and according to the Department of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7 (b) & 1-6, Sec.1-10 (7) (c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area." The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 nation pact called the International Criminal Police Organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA 263a. The memorandum of Understanding, (MOU), between the Secretary of Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development), indicated that ****the Attorney General and its associates are soliciting and collecting information for foreign principals; the international organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f . According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, **** these individuals must expatriate their citizenship. ***** They serve no allegiance to the United States of America. The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank." Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that ***** the Internal Revenue Service agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public, gain. The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank." The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under public policy, not Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nations foreign creditors. The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF. The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury." Your tax dollars, all of them, go out of the country. The preceding information has been provided by an independent source which must remain anonymous. The United States is technically and legally in a bankrupt status and has been since FDR declared it so. See my document number 000.0.0.0 Ladies & gentlemen: Two items to report: First, Judicial Watch headed by Larry Klayman, has finally made the IRS admit it uses audits to punish United States government critics. Second, the Supreme Court is now hearing arguments regarding the outrageous IRS position that food service employees are assumed to have received at least 8% tips on the total bill of the meals they serve -- and make them pay taxes on that amount. The first outrage: Quoting an article from Newsmax, "An official with the Internal Revenue Service has admitted that legal opponents of former President Bill Clinton were singled out for tax audits, according to court documents made public this week. "What do you expect when you sue the president?" senior IRS official Paul Breslan told Judicial Watch, the Washington-based legal watchdog group that had filed 50-plus legal actions against the Clinton administration and subsequently found itself in the IRS's cross hairs. Breslan's quote is cited in Judicial Watch's complaint against the tax agency, based on a host of what look to be politically-inspired audits that make the worst abuses of the Nixon administration appear puny by comparison. Talk about a smoking gun!! And now we must question why our current president didn't replace lacky bureaucrat Charles Rossotti as IRS Commissioner. Have Gun Will Serve sounds like it fits. If you've got a menace to free speech, why not continue to use him if he's willing? The second outrage: Did you know the IRS forces restaurant employers to pay the employment FICA tax of 7.65% on that 8% tip the restaurant employees are "assumed" to have earned, and that they do NOT credit that FICA tax to the individual employee's social security fund? No, they apply that money to the general social security fund! And you wonder why concerned citizens began to form Militias in 1993? How many of you worked in a food service job at one time in your life? I sure did. At 13 years-old, I was a busboy and dish washer in a local restaurant near my home in Palo Alto, California. I always tip at least 15% to food service workers, and most often 20%, to make up for all you cheapskates who tip less. But I'm in the minority. This latest outrage is simply ... outrageous! No wonder a restaurant in San Francisco filed suit! How come it didn't happen before? Here's the article from the San Francisco Chronicle: High court hears case over taxes on tips. S.F.'s Fior d'Italia argues it's not liable for IRS assumptions Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer Tuesday, April 23, 2002 . Founded in 1886 to serve the clients of a nearby bordello, San Francisco's Fior d'Italia restaurant is embroiled in a thoroughly modern dispute: how to figure out the tax bite on tips for service workers. The North Beach restaurant survived the rowdy Barbary Coast days and the 1906 earthquake and fire, which drove it into a year long sojourn in a tent. Now it is going head to head with the Internal Revenue Service in a pivotal lawsuit with millions of dollars at stake. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, which could determine how payroll taxes are handled at the nation's 200,000 restaurants, as well as for every worker who earns tips -- from cabdrivers to hairdressers to croupiers. A ruling is expected before the court's session ends in July. A decade ago, the IRS slapped Fior d'Italia with a $23,000 bill for unpaid Social Security taxes on its waiters' tip income, based on its "aggregate estimate" that tips totaled 14 percent of the restaurant's gross receipts. Fior d'Italia countered that it simply used employees' self-reported tip income to calculate the tax bill and that if the IRS disagrees it should audit individual workers rather than go after the restaurant. "We felt we followed the letter of the law," said Gianni Audieri, Fior d'Italia co-owner and executive chef, as he greeted lunchtime diners yesterday standing in front of vintage photographs featuring mustachioed and bow-tied Belle Epoque customers and slightly more recent ones such as Joe DiMaggio and Tommy Lasorda. "We cannot be the auditor for the IRS. I have no idea if a waiter made $10 more than he declared to the IRS. That's the IRS's problem to solve; it's their prerogative to audit." What's more, he said, with the aggregate approach, the 7.65 percent Social Security tax paid by the restaurant went into a general-purpose fund instead of being credited to individual workers' Social Security accounts. "That enraged us so we decided to fight," Audieri said. "Employees do not get any benefit" from the taxes paid. AGENCY DEFENDS CRACKDOWN An IRS spokesman said the agency declined to comment while the case is in litigation. But the Bush administration, which appealed the matter to the high court, said giving too much leeway in calculating tip income will weaken its efforts to beef up tax collection. The Justice Department said in court briefs that stronger enforcement has increased reporting of tip income. Workers reported $14.3 billion in tips in 1999, up from $8.5 billion in 1994. So far, the courts have backed the restaurant over the tax man. The Court of Appeals in San Francisco last year upheld a lower court ruling that the IRS is not authorized by Congress to use estimates in figuring out tip income. But in similar cases elsewhere in the country, judges have sided with the IRS. The restaurant on Washington Square and its waiters say the IRS method is unfair because it overlooks the common practice of tip-sharing among restaurant staff as well as the times that cheapskate diners stiff servers on the tip. "Do I take home 15 percent (of customers' tabs) in tips? Are you crazy?" said Matt Herman, a waiter at Fior d'Italia, darting over to a table at lunchtime yesterday to help a diner pondering the merits of gnocchi versus tagliolini. "Let's say I get $15 (as a tip) on a $100 bill," Herman said. "I give $1.50 to the door (the maitre d'hotel), $1.50 to the bar and $3 to the busboy. That leaves me with $9," or 9 percent. ESTIMATE OF INCOME Mike Casey, president of Local 2 of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union in San Francisco, said he hopes the case will resolve how tip income is handled at tax time. "There are lots of occasions at restaurants or hotels where guests will not leave tips," he said. "Yet servers and bartenders are still expected to pay taxes on money they haven't been paid." The National Restaurant Association is helping Fior d'Italia pay for the case and has filed an amicus brief supporting the restaurant. "The IRS is trying to impose on the employer the obligation to be the tip police for the IRS," said Peter Kilgore, senior vice president and general counsel for the Washington, D.C., association. His point exactly, Audieri said. "The IRS says it doesn't have enough auditors," the chef said. "Whose problem is that? If I don't have enough waiters when I have 300 customers sitting here, whose problem is that? It's mine, not the IRS'." Even a Supreme Court ruling may not be the final chapter in the saga. Whichever side loses is expected to ask Congress to change tax laws to clarify how tips are handled. That's some consolation to workers like Herman who rely on tip income. "Corporate America sets up home offices in (offshore locations) to not have to pay taxes," he said. "But who does the IRS go after? The little guy scratching out a living." E-mail Carolyn Said at csaid@sfchronicle.com Death to the IRS!!!!!! Bring on the federal sales tax! Death to the "Flat Tax" so many people think is just great. Why? You still have to declare income. You are still subject to audit! Tax income as it is spent, not as it is earned. That way you tax all income, even that of the drug lords, prostitutes, house cleaners and gardeners. A federal sales tax [of .7%, that's 7/10ths of one percent] takes the IRS out of our lives. Any questions? Carl F. Worden Subject: RE: It is now illegal to pay Federal Income Taxes! A conversation between a friend (a retired U.S. Navy submarine officer /intelligence officer, college mate (chemistry major), and Christian gentleman), and one of his friends. Some of you will appreciate it. From: "David L. Miner" Dennis - Thanks for the forward. It was great. But the fed govt will not see the humor in it, I promise. As you already know, I do not file tax returns or pay income taxes. And I have helped a couple hundred people over the years fight the IRS. But I have been directly involved in only one income tax court case. Let me tell you his story. Steve was an excellent father and husband, a Christian with wisdom far beyond his years. He was the type of man you just wanted to sit at his feet or follow him around just to learn from him. He was my age and we were friends. But for several years he did not file his tax returns or pay any income tax. I didn't know about this. When I found out about it, I had moved out of state three years earlier and I had been a non-filer for those three years. I told him that the IRS was going to come after him because of his particular situation. And I told him exactly what to say and do to fight the IRS in court. Within a year of my telling him what to say and do, Steve received his summons to fed Civil Court. He was facing a number of charges, with back taxes, penalties and interest amounting to $152,000. Steve showed up in court and defended himself. The District Attorney made his opening statement, using about 20 minutes and leaving the entire courtroom believing that Steve would spend the next several lifetimes in jail. Then Steve stood up to make his opening statement. He followed my recommendation to the letter. This was Steve's opening statement (to the best of my memory): "Your Honor, the District Attorney has claimed that I have not filed tax returns or paid income taxes in several years. Your Honor, he is correct. I have not. And I have not for a reason. It is my understanding, after studying the income tax laws extensively, that the tax laws do not require me, an individual American Citizen not engaged in any revenue-taxable activity, to file a return or to pay income taxes. The District Attorney has claimed that I am required, have not, and therefore owe a large amount of money. Well, Your Honor, Rule 301 of the Rules of Evidence for Federal Courts require that the prosecution prove all points of the indictment, including all assumptions. The district attorney has not proven that I am one required to file a return or to pay income taxes. But, Your Honor, I am willing to give the District Attorney the chance to prove his assumptions." And then Steve sat down and shut up. Six hours later Steve left the court room a free man without paying $152,000 in back taxes, penalties and interest. Over the years I have reviewed many court cases where the individual was challenged by the IRS. Some of these cases have resulted in the IRS winning and some have resulted in the IRS losing. Most of the time where the IRS loses, the judge locks up the records so no one can find out anything about the case. But I have obtained some of these transcripts in spite of the legal black-out. Where the individual's defense had weaknesses resulting in defeat, I reviewed where and why they failed. As a result, I have refined and improved my approach to IRS cases. But it is still a simple 3 step approach -- 1) I have not filed or paid, 2) I am not one required to file or to pay; 3) the prosecution has not proved that I am required to file or to pay. I have challenged the IRS to pursue me as I have not filed or paid since 1990. But, alas, the IRS has drastically reduced the number of cases where they pursue individuals in court. Possibly because they have lost so many cases over the past 5 years. Anyway, here sits a court case just waiting to happen, all alone, without any attention from the IRS at all. If you want to check out an actual transcript from a case where the IRS lost (and the judge locked up all records), you can review the case of Lloyd Long on my web site. There is a summary of the case and then the actual transcript. Both will provide great insight into the workings of the fed govt and its attempt to separate you from your money. If you read it and want my comments, please feel free to ask. Just thought you might want to know. Yours in freedom, Dave Miner. Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:21:46 -0500 >Subject: It is now illegal to pay Federal Income Taxes... Reading the Patriot act revealed a stunning Catch-22. It's a crime, under the Patriot Act, to give funds to any organization which is, or has, given money to a known terrorist or terrorist supporting group, even if you don't know you did it. Well, the Taliban is listed as a Terrorist Supporting group now by our government. And, the U.S. Government has given them millions of dollars, thus making the Feds one of those criminal organizations supporting terrorists. Which means, if you pay your taxes, you're a criminal. Gotta call the IRS about this. What fun. B.Livingston,4-02. "Can you name one government reform that actually improved anything? How many times has Social Security been reformed? How about public education? Health care? Let's not forget the IRS! In Washington, 'reform' always means more spending, more taxes, more regulations, more bureaucrats, and less freedom." ~Rep. Ron Paul~ We have a Constitution and our Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) that makes us free. Right? Then visit: http://www.trimonline.org http://www.getusout.org http://www.thenewamerican.com http://www.givemeliberty.org http://www.jbs.org Http://www.getawarrant.com Then take a look at these sites: http://www.dixierising.com http://www.dixienet.org http://www.palmetto.org http://www.southerncaucus.org http://www.spofga.org http://www.southern-style.com http://www.nca.mybravenet.com NOTE # 1: This is the SIXTH doc in a string of about 37 regarding the Income Tax, **** How it was illegally forced upon us, the collusion of various nation banks, including The Bank of England, the Banks of Europe, the Banks of the USA that make up **** the Non-Government organization known as the Fed and the bankers themselves dedicated to making this a Socialist Nation. **** As David Rockefeller reportedly said in 1973 when he and others formed the Trilateral Commission, "We will have this a Socialist Nation by the end of the year 2000." Well, with the help of our past Communist President, he damned well nearly did it. If Comrade Gore had been elected, it would be now! The last doc in this series is a plan that was presented to President Bush when he visited Florida recently. It was put directly into his hands. He has not acted upon it. We The People must initiate a campaign of letters, faxes, e-mails, and phone calls to him and others in our otherwise corrupt government letting them know of our displeasure. For God and Country, Chet....." Meet the IRS, the Enemy Within http://www.apfn.net/Doc-100_bankruptcy6.htm Subject: .The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303 THIS IS IMPORTANT!!!! Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House: "Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise. **** It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that ***** the United States Federal Government exists today in name only. **** The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as **** a Democracy, being an established **** Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: ***** "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States." Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be "money" in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or "currency." Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not "money." A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not "money?' The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, -gold and silver coin. It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any "money." Most Americans have not been paid any "money" for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are "bankrupt," along with the rest of the country? Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). when ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs. Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank. There is a fundamental difference between "paying" and "discharging" a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of "good & valuable consideration." Un-payable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already. Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations. The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3] The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same. Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle. Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the un-payable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers. Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another. This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed knowledge" of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it's easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt. Why don't more people own their properties outright? Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less? We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this un-payable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it. America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country." [ IS IT ANY WONDER THAT THE "ELITE" ARE OUT TO DESTROY REP TRAFICANT? He is hitting the Socialist CFR/TC and the Communist UN where it hurts! LMsr. ] Image: United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303 Added by: Chester L McWhorter Sr: Forming the Federal Reserve System are the primary Federal Reserve "Banks" of: Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco. These banks are not real banks..you cannot cash a check there, open an account, etc. These "banks" are also holding companies of smaller banks. In all of this discussion about income tax, we should be ever mindful of the fact that CONGRESS is the key. CONGRESS votes to spend the money. Congress gives the IRS its power. Congress gives the IRS its OWN budget. Congress is elected by the people. The IRS is A DECOY......" "....Quote: **** We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we [ the CFR ] need is **** the right major crisis and the nation[s] will accept the New World Order. End Quote. David Rockefeller: Founder and Honorary Chairman, Council of the Americas; Chairman, Americas Society; Founder, Forum of the Americas; Chairman, Emeritus, Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]; Founder and Honorary Chairman, Trilateral Commission [TC]; Chairman, The Bilderbergs. ***** [ How does the 11 Sept 2001 attack upon our country figure into this? CLMsr ]...." http://www.apfn.net/DOC-100_bankruptcy.htm The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3] The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The Admiralty Court Exists Because the US is Under Martial Law "....the admiralty court is the court in which the gold braid goes around the American Flag which indicates the court is under martial law, or under admiralty law, from the martial law since Abraham's Lincoln's executive order putting it under martial law, and in order to continue staying under martial law, the country has to have some kind of war every two years. Thus, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, et cetera, and the admiralty laws are used in the courts in such a way that they are not necessarily tied to the Constitution, although the Constitution is said to be the law of the land......" home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/martiallaw.htm **** The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation! .... Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. ... www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm "....The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury." Your tax dollars, all of them, go out of the country. The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both ***** privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under public policy, not Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nations foreign creditors. .....none of them have ever been audited....AND NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER PAID TAXES! AND HAVE NEVER BEEN BROUGHT TO TRIAL, "DIESELED", IMPRISONED, OR OTHERWISE MADE TO PAY FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY, AND THROUGH US, THE REST OF THE WORLD. [just a reminder...you knew all that]
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#1. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#0)
The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The Admiralty Court Exists Because the US is Under Martial Law "....the admiralty court is the court in which the gold braid goes around the American Flag which indicates the court is under martial law, or under admiralty law, from the martial law since Abraham's Lincoln's executive order putting it under martial law, and in order to continue staying under martial law, the country has to have some kind of war every two years. Thus, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, et cetera, and the admiralty laws are used in the courts in such a way that they are not necessarily tied to the Constitution, although the Constitution is said to be the law of the land......" meant to highlight all of that.
The simplicity instituted by the framers regarding taxation has been obfuscated through implementation of a plethora of double-speak legalese. One would have to be very thick skulled to presume that the recently freed colonists would simply substitute one royal tyrant (King) that with some difficulty could be held accountable, for a more numerous one (congress) that couldn't be held accountable.
consider the source... ".....For the sake of continuity at this juncture, let us repeat two earlier quotes; the first from Protocol No. 9: "Above the existing laws without substantially altering them, and by merely twisting them into contradictions of interpretations, we have erected something grandiose in the way of results. These results found expression first in the fact that the interpretations masked the laws; afterwards they entirely hid them from the eyes of the governments owing to the impossibility of making anything out of the tangled web of legislation" And from Brian Kennedy's Freemasonic Destruction of Western Civilization: "The U.S. legal system enshrined the Talmudic practice of building up 'case law' on fine distinctions, and hairsplitting nuances. Black can be made white or vice-versa, under such a system. It is a made-to-order recipe for tyranny and manipulation by unseen authority... Of course, this was the intention from the very beginning. Jews have been controlled by their rabbis for two thousand years under the pernicious system." Here's what the law students in the U.S. are learning today. A book from Penn State University, written by Benjamin Henszey, Barry Myers and Reed Phalan titled Introduction to Basic Legal Principles states: "The law can be defined, therefore, as a body of rules for human conduct, enforced by a governing power, as the means by which the control of society is achieved. The term society includes the neighborhood, town, state, nation and to the extent control among nations is achieved through law, the world. The rules of law that exist today are the result of a process of gradual evolution over centuries of social progress, a process which continues unabated." Is there more than one book of law that has survived throughout centuries and is being used globally, including in the U.S. Supreme Court? The people of said 'book' are scattered to the ends of the earth and are bound to obey the laws contained therein. As we've also learned, the elite among the people of the Talmud are advisors to those who occupy - or they themselves occupy - positions of the highest political, economic and judicial power in this country and across the face of this earth. According to a document from Georgetown University titled the "Law of the Shitar" - being Jewish commercial law as early as 1060 AD in Europe - the Uniform Commercial Code is based on that law of the Shitar. With its adoption by all fifty states, the UCC has become national in nature. This explains the harmonization of Americas' laws with other nations, for the UCC is international law. For its application in the U.S., the UCC was constructed by a group of lawyers from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws - a permanent standing sub-committee created by the American Bar Association - which claims the UCC is the single most important document since the Constitution. The NCCUSL is also known as the 'Uniform Law Commission'. From its history on the ULC website we read that: "Most significant was the 1940 Conference decision to attack major commercial problems with comprehensive legal solutions -- a decision that set in motion the project to produce the Uniform Commercial Code in partnership with the American Law Institute. The Code took ten years to complete and another 14 years before it was enacted across the country. It remains the signature product of the Conference. . . " So, one by one, state legislatures adopted the Uniform Commercial Code. Courts of Justice become courts of commerce, and Americans wonder why their 'Constitutional rights' are being trampled in those seemingly foreign courts. We found confirmation regarding the Law of the Shitar in a most unusual source - the Harper Collins' Atlas Of World History. On pages 102 and 103, titled: The Jewish diaspora - AD 70 to 1497 - we read that: "For over 2000 years the history of the Jews has been a story of external dispersion and internal cohesion. From about the 6th century... Jews became identified with international and regional trade." 'International and regional trade' is regulated under the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and GATT/WTO (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization). These agreements control commerce between nations. Recall the speech of Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, in 1941 proclaiming the end of nationalism and the imperialism of industry and free trade to be commenced after the defeat of Germany. Recall the main points agreed upon by the gathering of churchmen in 1942 declaring a world monetary system, open borders, etc. Some of the people of the Talmud -- not all mentioned previously -- who wielded control of the U.S. Government, therefore its foreign policy since the early 1900s , under Wilson (WWI) and Roosevelt (WWII) are Supreme Court Justices Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, Samuel Untermeyer, Col. Edward Mandel House, Bernard Baruch, and the whole gang of international bankers. When international agreements made by the U.S. Congress prove to be nothing more than instruments of destruction to the manufacturing base, the jobs base, and therefore the very economic structure of our society... state legislators have an oath-bound duty to opt out of those agreements. NAFTA and GATT/WTO are often referred to as 'treaties'. They are not treaties. Both were passed in Congress by a simple majority of both chambers. Treaties are ratified only by the U.S. Senate by two/thirds of those present and consenting. As for the Uniform Commercial Code, the same above mentioned World Atlas has this to say, of the Jews: "Internal and external factors, including the widespread dispersal of Jews both in Islamic lands and throughout Christian Europe, Jewish group solidarity, facility of linguistic communication, and a uniform system of commercial law based on the Talmud accounted for the changes . . ." 'Facility of linguistic communication' - Hebrew school, so no matter where they live or what the language of their host country, they can always communicate. 'Jewish group solidarity' - a nation within nations. 'A uniform system of commercial law based on the Talmud' - the UCC. Before we leave the Uniform Commercial Code, let us see what the code itself reveals, again, from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) website: U.C.C. - ARTICLE 1- GENERAL PROVISIONS PART 1. SHORT TITLE, CONSTRUCTION, APPLICATION AND SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ACT ------------------------------------------------------------------- § 1-102. Purposes; Rules of Construction; Variation by Agreement. (1) This Act shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies. 'Liberally construed' like the Talmud, to give the courts broad leeway in their interpretations, to promote its underlying purposes and policies? Think about it. Earlier we quoted from Ted Pike's book, which transcribed a statement from the Jewish Encyclopedia, to wit: ". . . the Talmud adds that He [Jehovah] had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence He decided to outlaw them [the Gentile nations]'. Baba Kama (38a) Before we leave the subject of Talmudic Law, we need to take a serious look at the 'seven moral Noachian precepts', also known as the Noahide (or Noachide) Law. . . from the Talmud, for the Goyim only. " http://www.sweetliberty.org/pers...e/jewishpersecution11.htm "....Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems, but they too are for the most part also slaves. Jewish Law does however govern the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: "Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher." We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure"). Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how **** the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code which is private international law. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all of the property in the world. The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the Baking system. We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the various religions ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law, which is commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as persons. A person is a fictional entity at law, not a living being. See UCC 1-201. Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, *** you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. **** "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples: "The primary control and custody of infants is with the government" Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62 "Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146. "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called 'ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. "The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481 Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. See APFN web page http://www.apfn.org/apfn/irstax.htm All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a. These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.? Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to it's udders ? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money, which is debt. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves. You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope. Now the picture will become much clearer after reading the next few paragraphs. We will now show the Popes involvement in the scheme of things. "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822) If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world? The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims to be the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1492. Don't let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free, You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions. THE END" THE ULTIMATE DELUSION BY STEPHEN AMES www.theforbiddenknowledge...uth/ultimate_delusion.htm Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.? Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. 1040 is when the Jews came out of Babylon, and started sticking it to everyone else, I guess. Mat 23:4 — For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay [them] on men's shoulders; but they [themselves] will not move them with one of their fingers...... http://www.blueletterbible.org/tsk_b/Mat/23/4.html So there you have it. The laws are the way they are because they are written by the same people who worship the Talmud. One would have to be very thick skulled to presume that the recently freed colonists would simply substitute one royal tyrant (King) that with some difficulty could be held accountable, for a more numerous one (congress) that couldn't be held accountable. It's been argued the COLONISTS were never given the choice, and that the Constitution was illegally "ratified". RATified, now there's an interesting word....Patrick Henry was one of the few who smelled a rat. They shoulda stuck with the King they had.....
Stephen Ames was taken into custody and drugged by the feds some years ago. He lived in Pennsylvania at the time. I'd like to know where he is today if he's even alive.
#15. To: All (#14)
BTTT
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||