[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt. You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge Jewish Land Grab Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own. Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human' Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago! Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain? Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish' Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Was Jesus Christ crucified on a cross?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 18, 2007
Author: Bible
Post Date: 2007-10-18 13:09:07 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 2630
Comments: 195

I find it curious that so many people have so much faith in men. And, in what men say, and this is esp. true when what the men says flys directly in the face of what they claim to represent/say.

I hold to this firmly; A man is known by his actions, and not by his words.

And this leads me directly to what is wrong with America; the churches. And specifically those churches which claim to be Christian churches. And to the men who serve in those churches, and who know that they lie. After all, such men do, supposedly, read the Bible. Well, they have at least one time in their lives I think it is fair to assume. More than that? Pretty doubtful actually.

So this brings me to the question I posed in the title of this post; Was Jesus Christ crucified on a cross?

The only acceptable answer to this comes from the Bible. I assume that everyone who claims to be Christian will agree with this.

My first Bible (that I read extensively) was The King James Study Bible. I have continued to use it, although I have more than a dozen different Bibles now. In the King James;

Galatians 3:13; Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, CURSED is EVERYONE THAT HANGETH ON A TREE.

Second witness; "...for it is written ... " ; Deutronomy 22:22; And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him from a tree; (23) His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shall in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) ...

Now, this may come as a surprise to many of you, but a tree ain't a cross; it is a post. In the Spanish translation of the King James, it is clearer, for they use the term madero, which means board, or, post.

In addition, if you have read anything about the Roman Empire, one of the notable facts about the Romans was their efficiency in killing people. And it is not efficient to use two pieces of wood, i.e., a cross, when a single piece of wood, a post, will suffice. And, in fact, this is how the Romans did hang those who they wished to make examples out of; on a post. (Yeah, yeah, I know; all the movies use crosses. And, your point is?)

There is another point that must be made here; when a man is hung on a post, or, for that matter, if he were to be hung on a cross, with nails, YOU CAN NOT DRIVE THE NAILS THROUGH THE PALMS OF HIS HAND. It will not work, because when the post/cross is lifted up and dropped into the hole prepared for it, the nails will rip out of the hands and the man will drop to the ground. The Romans knew this from, I am sure, experience, and the nails were ALWAYS driven into the wrists of the victim, between the two bones of the arm. This is the only location which offers enough strength to be usuable is such a manner.

The best depiction of Jesus being executed that I have seen is contained in the Watchtower book; What Does The Bible Really Teach? on page 52.

What does this mean: If you are attending a so-called Christian church, which uses the cross as a part of their worship, and protrays Jesus on that cross with nails through the palms of his hand, then you are participating in a deliberate lie. And, you are in a church properly described in Revelations a one of the daughters of the whore of Babylon. (I paraphrase; not going to look it up today.)

Now, let's look at a couple of other Bibles and see what is said;

New American Standard Bible; Galatians 3:13; Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us -- for it is writte, "CUESED IS EVERY ONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE" --

Second Witness; Deuteronomy 21:22; And if a man has committed a sin worthy of death, and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, (23) his corpse shall not hang all night on the tree, but you shall surely bury him on the same day (for he who is hanged is accursed of God), ...

Pretty good. Not far off, but.... let's take a quick look at another Bible.

Holy Bible From the Ancient Eastern Text (George M. Lamsa's Translation from the Aramaic of the Peshitta); Galatians 3:13; Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming accursed for our sakes (for it is writtenm Crused is everyone who hangs on a cross).

OOPS! WOW! Boy, do we need that second witness now!

Second Witness; Deuteronomy 21:22; And if any man has committed a sin worthy of death, and he is crucified on a tree, and thus put to death; (23) His body shall not remain all night upon the tree but you shall bury him the same day (for he who shall revile God shall be crucified), ...

Gotta a problem here, because the second witness does not confirm what was written in Galatians. That means that there is an error in this Bible, and brings into question any quotes taken from it, unless they be confirmed by a second witness. And this problem probably stems from the translator wanting to believe what he had been taught about the cross. And rather than translate directly, he transposed his beliefs into the translation.

I am a Christian; I freely and happily and contentedly proclaim this to be true. Chritianity is NOT a religion; it is a way of life, attempting to follow in the footsteps of The Christ.

As a Christian, I have a responsibility to study His Word, that I not be lead into error. I accept that responsibility. I also accept the responsibility to help others to learn as well, that any errors that I or they hold may be revealed and corrected jointly.

I have stated this before; I ask for correction in anything that I am in error on. And I have been corrected, and I thank those who help me to learn, and, (this is a big one!) change.

I hope you find this post helpful, and that it helps to bring all of us to a wider understanding of what is being, deliberately, done to America, through what is supposed to be His church (people).

Next post, in a day or so; Is Jesus Christ God?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 188.

#182. To: PnbC, Jethro Tull, robin, Christine, aristeides, gengis gandhi, Alan Chapman, innieway, lodwick, Rupert_Pupkin, mirage, rowdee, Paul Revere, SmokinOPs, Dakmar, tom007, randge, Hayek Fan, Minerva, Critter, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, FormerLurker (#0)

And this leads me directly to what is wrong with America; the churches.

I began this tread to start people thinking and talking. Seems to have worked. I am, frankly, pleased at the very well thought out comments, and not at all suprised at the ignorance displayed as well. Esp. by those who have never read the Bible, but who put forth comments as if they have some knowledge on the subject.

There is a very interesting book; Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament, by Jason David BeDuhn, an Associate Professor of Religious Studies at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. He makes a very important quote in Chapter 10; "... and make sure that the translations come out in accordance with their beliefs."

The point about the Bible is that when such things are done, mistranslations, the Bible ceases to confirm itself. I showed this in how a mistranslation in one Bible came about because the beliefs of the translator did not permit him to quote correctly from the original in the Old Testament. Still, someone argued with me, not accepting that a quote is a quote; no changes permitted.

But overall, perhaps Critter made the best statement; "Does it matter?" Referring to a post or to a cross having been used.

Well, yes, and no. The act occurred. The actual instrument is not an issue. The issue is how so-called Christians permit themselves to be led astray from the real issues. For instance, making an item of worship out of the cross.

Please permit me to digress for a moment.

I have found a couple of written descriptions of how men were put to death by the Romans. I will just give you a brief report.

First off, this was always a sentance of death, and it was a death that was designed to be long and very, very painful; i.e., the men were tortured to death on the post.

Unless someone was famous or his crime was well known, there was no parade of the victim supporting the post on the way to the execution. Everything was prepared in advance, with the hole ready for the post and the post laid out beside the hole.

Generally, there were four soldiers/jailers, who always had very firm control of the victim. When they arrived at the post, one of the s/j kicked the victims feet out from under him and he was slammed down onto the post by the two s/j who had his arms, driving all of the air out of his lungs and making him helpless for a short period of time. The kicker used the nails and the maul, with two of the s/j strecthing out his legs, and one holding his arms crossed over the post above his head. Generally, within just a few seconds of arriving at the post, the nails would have been driven through his wrists, and this pain would further disable the victim, making it easier to continue with the feet. The legs were stretched out and the feet pulled flat against the pole, and the nails were driven trough the arch of the foot. Ready to ahng the victim.... except....

Sometimes the court which condemned the victim would issue a death sentance with mercy; i.e., so the victim would die faster. When this happened, the maul was used to smash one leg (the shin bone; you want to think about what that would feel like) and one arm. The final death on the tourture post was by asphyxiation; when the full weight of the body hangs only by the arms, this constricts the chest and slowly slowly slowly the victim dies from a lack of oxygen. When the victim can no longer, despite the great pain caused by the movement, pull himself up by his arms, or push himself up from his legs to take a breath, asphyxiation occurs. Smashing one leg and one arm generally meant that the victim died in a day or so rather than lastin for two or three days.

By now, the post is ready to be dropped into the hole. The accounts that I have read make the point that by the time the post was upright, blood was generally freely flowing from the mouths of the victims, who generally bit through their tongues during the process. Victims were even known to have bit the ends of their tongues off.

Also, unless the sentancing court said differently, the bodies were left to rot on the post. No burial.

As related in this thread, there were a couple of other systems used, always efficient methods of putting people to death. Included in this were the H, which was two posts on which a cross bar, with the victim nailed to that cross bar, was placed. The problem with such systems is that victim died much faster because they could not use their legs for support for breathing. The Romans were into efficiency and slow deaths.

Overall, the point that I was heading for was a question; I have never understood how so-called Christians could make an item of worship out of something such as an instument of torture & death; esp. when that object of worship, the cross, is promoted by the same churches that promote easter and Xmas.

And please, do not tell me about how the cross is only a symbol; I have watched people pray to crosses all of my life, and I find it... well, lacking in taste for a better way to put it.

The object of this discussion, and those to follow, is to begin to learn how all of us have been seriously misled about what is true in history. And, about how we have been mislead to the enrichment of the so-called churches.

And, does someone find that this last comment is also off-base?

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-26   10:51:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Overall, the point that I was heading for was a question; I have never understood how so-called Christians could make an item of worship out of something such as an instument of torture & death; esp. when that object of worship, the cross, is promoted by the same churches that promote easter and Xmas.

And please, do not tell me about how the cross is only a symbol; I have watched people pray to crosses all of my life, and I find it... well, lacking in taste for a better way to put it.

My "2¢" on the matter:

Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, Christian churches (or certainly all modern mainstream ones) definitely are "patterned" off of the Roman Catholic "model". Thus, perhaps we should look at what we're REALLY dealing with here.

By and large, Christians DON'T follow even the 10 Commandments - in particular the 2^nd.
The Roman Catholic "model" very effectively CHANGED the 10 Commandments, resulting in nearly ALL of "Christiandom" being led astray. The 2^nd Commandment which forbids the making of, and bowing down to images, was completely OMITTED; while the 10^th (which forbid coveting) was split in two - thus giving the false appearance of still having "10 Commandments". The 2^nd Commandment ACTUALLY says:
Exodus 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth: 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me; 6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
The 10^th Commandment ACTUALLY says:
Exodus 20:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that [is] thy neighbour's.

Christiandom has as the 9^th Commandment "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife"; and, as the 10^th "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's goods" - AND (as mentioned) has the 2^nd "bumped" off altogether.

SO, in light of this, just the ACT of MAKING those crosses that adorn very nearly EVERY "Christian" home (right along with those statues of the Messiah and all the others too) in itself is a violation of the 2^nd Commandment - let alone WORSHIP of such!!!

It appears to me rather amazing that Christians come up with all sorts of things to "defend" their various positions on something like whether there was a crossbar on the Messiah's "instrument of death", and all the while completely IGNORE the MUCH bigger issue at hand in the first place!

For those that KNOW me, they KNOW I am a believer in the Messiah; BUT I refuse to be called a Christian. I do NOT want to be "clumped" into that "category", and for several reasons; but, first and foremost, because by and large Christians simply do NOT follow Scripture. They follow "feed good" ideas.
Secondly (which may be an off-spin of the first and is at least related), I'm not at all "keen" on the idea of allowing myself to be judged by perceptions associated with a "title" - at least not a common one. While it may be possible to defend my religious beliefs prohibiting me from vaccinations and licenses AND be termed "Christian" at the same time; it is considerably more difficult, as everyone KNOWS that these things are not something which violate the Christian mantra. Christian isn't a title which the Apostles used in describing themselves, why should I? The words Jesus Christ are used as a TITLE for the Messiah, it was not His name. I firmly believe that Christiandom is a tool which has been used as part of the means by which the whole world has been deceived.

innieway  posted on  2007-11-26   12:36:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

For those that KNOW me, they KNOW I am a believer in the Messiah; BUT I refuse to be called a Christian. I do NOT want to be "clumped" into that "category", and for several reasons; but, first and foremost, because by and large Christians simply do NOT follow Scripture. They follow "feed good" ideas.

Me too. When someone asks me if I'm a Christian, I hesitate to answer yes or no, because I don't agree with alot of 'Christians'.

I do agree with most everything Jesus supposedly said especially the Lord's Prayer. The Bible has an immeasurable wealth of wisdom in it.

I'm much more likely to accept an invitation to Church if there's food to be eaten afterward.

Mmmmm... food.

wudidiz  posted on  2007-11-26   13:05:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#191. To: wudidiz (#188)

Me too. When someone asks me if I'm a Christian, I hesitate to answer yes or no, because I don't agree with alot of 'Christians'.

I edited my post to reflect what you point out here AFTER you had made this reply.

But, this reply DOES point out something very important, IMHO - that the very term Christian invokes an "image" in everyone's mind, and by accepting that "title" there is a preconceived notion of your beliefs.

I don't hesitate. I let it be known straight up I'm NOT a Christian. I don't care to even walk in the doors (and just don't do it) of a "den of lies" or "place of pagan practices" - food or not...

BTW, I wasn't "born and raised" this way - quite the contrary. Perhaps if more people would take a stance of "everything I've ever learned might be based upon lies" and take an honest look at things for themselves with an open mind (and perhaps listen to what some "kooks" say and weigh the evidence), they may find that INDEED everything they HAD been taught WAS a pack of lies...

innieway  posted on  2007-11-26 13:29:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]