[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Teen's Ticket Hinges on GPS Vs. Radar WINDSOR, Calif. (AP) — Given the option of contesting a traffic ticket, most motorists — 19 out of 20 by some estimates — would rather pay up than pit their word against a police officer's in court. A retired sheriff's deputy nevertheless hopes to beat the long odds of the law by setting the performance of a police officer's radar gun against the accuracy of the GPS tracking device he installed in his teenage stepson's car. The retired deputy, Roger Rude, readily admits his 17-year-old stepson, Shaun Malone, enjoys putting the pedal to the metal. That's why he and Shaun's mother insisted on putting a global positioning system that monitors the location and speed of the boy's Toyota Celica. Shaun complained bitterly about his electronic chaperone until it became his new best friend on July 4, when he was pulled over and cited for going 62 mph in a 45 mph zone. Rude encouraged him to fight the ticket after the log he downloaded using software provided by the GPS unit's Colorado-based supplier showed Shaun was going the speed limit within 100 feet of where a Petaluma officer clocked him speeding. "I'm not trying to get a guilty kid off," Rude said. "I've always had faith in our justice system. I would like to see the truth prevail and I would like Shaun to see that the system works." Though traffic courts do not routinely accept GPS readouts as evidence of a vehicle's speed — and many GPS receivers aren't capable of keeping records anyway — some tech-savvy drivers around the world slowly are starting to use the technology to challenge moving violations, according to anecdotal accounts from defense lawyers and law enforcement officials. This summer, for instance, an Australian farmer became a hero to speeders everywhere when he got a ticket dismissed after presenting police with data from his tracking device. While winning a case this way is far from a sure thing, GPS-generated evidence could at least inject an element of doubt into typically one-sided proceedings, said Jim Baxter, president of the National Motorists Association. A Sonoma County traffic commissioner is expected to rule within the next two weeks whether to dismiss Shaun's ticket based on Rude's written argument that the motorcycle officer's radar gun was either improperly calibrated or thrown off by another speeding car. "Radar is a pretty good tool, but it's not an infallible tool," said Rude, who spent 31 years in law enforcement. "With the GPS tracker, there is no doubt about it. There is no human interference." Rude plans to offer scientific data and experts if his challenge doesn't succeed right away. Petaluma police Lt. John Edwards said he could not discuss Shaun's case but disputed Rude's contention that GPS is more accurate than a speed gun. "GPS works on satellite signals, so you have a delay of some type," Edwards said. "Is it a couple-second delay? A 30-second delay? Because in that time people can speed up, slow down." The device in Shaun's car, originally designed for trucking companies, rental car agencies and other businesses with fleets, sends a signal every 30 seconds that records his whereabouts and travel speed. His parents signed up to be automatically notified by e-mail whenever he exceeded 70 mph, and the one time he did he lost his driving privileges for 10 days. Rude said he is talking about the ticket — Shaun has tried to stay out of it — to encourage other parents to keep tabs on their teenage drivers using GPS. He said he has told too many parents their child was killed in a wreck. David W. Brown, a Monterey lawyer and author of "Fight Your Ticket in California," said attacking the reliability of radar guns does not usually get speeders very far, especially if they are unwilling to devote extra time and money to hiring legal experts. Still, among people who do challenge tickets, the proportion who triumph is relatively large, he said. Their technique? Betting the officer who cited them will be unable to make it to court. "Statistically, when people do prevail, that is the most common method," he said. On the Net: National Motorists Association: http://www.motorists.org
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
The system survives because people take the easy way out. If 19 out of 20 people pleaded innocent, and insisted on taking all their appeals (even if eventually found guilty), the system would collapse.
That statement from the article makes the false assumption that oral testimony (each person's ''version'') is all that a case is based on. Couldn't be further from the truth. Most people don't even read the entire text of the vehicle code they're charged with violating. They're usually very long and very easy to beat if you hold the hacks to the very law they're supposedly enforcing. I've beaten 5 of them, with no lawyer; since i learned how to do it, piece of cake. You can subpeana all sorts of shit and if they don't comply, dismissed. if the officer does not meet all the requirements as per the vehicle code, such as the traffic survey in one of my cases (which I took to the county superior court of appeals, and won...)Then the radar evidence is literally, inadmissable. A great site for CA is helpigotaticket.com. free site, just do a little research and they'll never convict you again (IMO). The funniest part was when the court clerks did not even know the appeals process. they had to call the traffic judge to the clerk window to help them when i was filing various paperwork., to make sure they ddi it right. Very few if any people even fight tickets much less appeal the phony verdicts.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||