[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: US State Department to require some diplomats to work in Iraq because of lack of volunteers US State Department to require some diplomats to work in Iraq because of lack of volunteers The Associated Press Published: October 26, 2007 E-Mail Article Listen to Article Printer-Friendly 3-Column Format Translate Share Article Text Size WASHINGTON: The State Department said Friday it will begin ordering diplomats to serve in Iraq because of a lack of volunteers to work at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, the first such large-scale call-up since the Vietnam War. Beginning Monday, 200 to 300 diplomats will be notified that they have been identified as "prime candidates" to fill 40 to 50 vacancies that will open next year at the embassy, said Harry Thomas, director general of the U.S. Foreign Service. Those notified that they have been selected for one-year postings will have 10 days to accept or reject the position. If not enough say yes, some will be ordered to go to Iraq and face dismissal if they refuse, Thomas said. "Starting Nov. 12, our assignments panel will assign people to Iraq," he told reporters in a conference call. "Under our system we have all taken an oath to serve our country, we have all signed (up for) worldwide availability. "If someone decides ... they do not want to go, we will then consider appropriate action," Thomas said. "We have many options, including dismissal from the Foreign Service." Today in Americas Homes still at risk on sixth day of fires Torture claim is filed against Rumsfeld in France Georgia court orders man freed in sex case Only those with compelling reasons, such as medical problems or extreme personal hardships, will be exempt from disciplinary action, Thomas said. He said the process of deciding who will go to Iraq should be complete by the end of November. Diplomats who are forced into service in Iraq will receive the same extra hardship pay, vacation time and choice of future assignments as those who have volunteered since early this year when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice ordered Baghdad positions to be filled before all others around the world. Currently about 200 foreign service officers work in Iraq, enough to meet the current staffing requirements, but about 50 more will be needed by the summer of 2008. The decision was announced in a cable that Thomas sent to the U.S. diplomatic corps on Friday. It is certain to be unpopular due to serious security problems in Iraq and uncertainty over the status of the private contractors who protect U.S. diplomats there, particularly after a deadly Sept. 16 shooting in which guards from Blackwater USA protecting an embassy convoy are accused of killing 17 Iraqi civilians. The union that represents U.S. diplomats, the American Foreign Service Association, has expressed deep misgivings in the past about a possible move to so-called "directed assignments." Officials with the union could not be reached for comment late Friday. The move to directed assignments is rare but not unprecedented. In 1969, an entire class of entry-level diplomats was sent to Vietnam, and on a smaller scale, diplomats were required to work at various embassies in West Africa in the 1970s and 1980s. More than 1,200 of the department's 11,500 foreign service officers have served in Iraq since 2003, but the generous incentives have not persuaded enough diplomats to volunteer for duty in Baghdad or with the State Department's provincial reconstruction teams. When she ordered that Baghdad be given staffing priority in the summer, Rice had warned that unless more volunteers could be found, the department would have to implement directed assignments. "It is my fervent hope that we will continue to see sufficient numbers ... volunteering for Iraq service, but we must be prepared to meet our requirements in any eventuality," she said in an unclassified cable sent to all diplomatic missions abroad on June 19. That directive followed an earlier offer for diplomats wanting to learn Arabic to leave their current posts immediately for two years of language training and onward posting to Iraq. Also, the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, Ryan Crocker, asked that the urgency of the Iraq operation to be made clear to all diplomats. Crocker has appealed to the State Department headquarters repeatedly for more and better-trained personnel to staff the embassy, which had been due to move into a vast new compound last month but has been indefinitely delayed due to logistical and construction problems. Iraq is an extremely dangerous hardship post, with near daily insurgent mortar attacks on the fortified Green Zone where the embassy is. The U.S. military has quietly but repeatedly complained that its forces and other Defense Department personnel have been pressed into service in jobs that should have been filled by State Department personnel. In particular, Defense Department employees and service members were forced to fill spots on Provincial Reconstruction Teams for months because the State Department could not get personnel there. Military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they did not want to criticize another federal agency openly, have consistently said that other federal agencies — including State, Commerce and Agriculture — were not moving quickly or forcefully enough to fill critical needs in Iraq. Those agencies, they argued, had the expertise to help Iraqi business people and farmers do what they needed most: get back to their jobs and improve the economy. Terms of Use Back to top Home > Americas
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#2. To: tom007 (#0)
Eating their own.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||