Title: The Elephant In The Room:We Are Change UK: Richard Dearlove Source:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gk9sABtJxM URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gk9sABtJxM Published:Nov 3, 2007 Author:Sir Richard Dearlove head of MI6 from 19 Post Date:2007-11-03 11:57:52 by robin Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:97 Comments:5
Didn't a lot of the Bilderbergers oppose Bush's little Iraq adventure?
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
I'm shocked that the British government allowed this to happen AND be filmed. Can you imagine what would happen in the US if someone got into the face of one of the supposed elite and started screaming that they were a liar and a war criminal? At the very least he would have been tasered three or four times and then dragged away to jail, where he would then be beaten behind closed doors.
What gets me is that people like Dearlove are allowed to not answer pertinent questions like those asked. If there was any real justice in this world, he's be dragged before a public court and required to answer these questions under oath on threat of prison if the refused to answer them.
"...According to a banking source in the City of London connected to Versailles, what has transpired from the 2003 meeting is that American and European Bilderbergers have not exactly managed to control their split over the American invasion and occupation of Iraq, as well as over Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's hardline policy against the Palestinians..."
"...CHANTILLY. Va.'Bilderberg luminaries battered their American counterparts over U.S Middle East policy, which they blamed for causing the need for a 'war on terrorism' which could lead to bloody military misadventures...Rumsfeld is known to have been summoned to reassure the Europeans there would be 'no immediate' U.S. invasion of Iraq as had been planned by the White House (American Free Press, June 10). He was pressed, but refused to say, that the United States had no plans for future wars.
...But on the issues of war and America's Middle East policy, Americans faced three days of chastisement, both in formal sessions and during glass-tinkling between sessions. A grim-faced Henry Kissinger and others had to take it as Europeans denounced U.S. policy.
Also,
...CHANTILLY, Va. The issue of America going to war in Iraq has been delayed, with the White House agreeing to wait at least until next year, instead of late summer or early fall, but many issues simmer at this year's secret Bilderberg meeting.
President Bush lied when he said there were no plans for war on Iraq or anywhere else 'on his desk' the plans were piled high. But military brass in the Pentagon warned the president that the United States is unprepared for war. European leaders were opposed. Only civilians at Defense and State wanted war.
...But the warmongers aren't satisfied. In the May 29 Wall Street Journal, Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, made a strong plea for an invasion of Iraq in a commentary that amounted to an in-house memo..."