[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Goldi Bans Ron Paul Articles makes up lies as a cover story
Source: LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=206532
Published: Nov 10, 2007
Author: me
Post Date: 2007-11-10 23:34:29 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 27939
Comments: 390

A few months ago, we had a lot of GARBAGE posts on the right sidebar. They were all FRIVOLOUS stories about Ron Paul.

Up until today I liked him.

But his supporters have come here to spam LP, and now I DON'T like HIM or THEM.

I was reasonable in the past and asked that articles be posted here that were NEWSWORTHY ABOUT HIM, WITH A LIMIT OF 2 A DAY.

Just this evening, there were 13 posted. THIRTEEN!!! And not ONE of them had anything newsworthy to report.

All of them were of the variety: "Alert, Ron Paul just scratched his crotch!!" Or "Ron Paul stepped in dogs**t".

The supporters of Ron Paul have PROVEN that they cannot control themselves. "Reasonable" is not a word in their vocabulary.

So, due to their IRRESPONSIBLE and IRRATIONAL behavior, their SPAMMING of Liberty Post...I have made a decision:

FROM THE TIME THIS IS POSTED...NO RON PAUL ARTICLES ARE TO BE POSTED HERE AT ALL. EVER. (ONE EXCEPTION: IF HE GETS ASSASSINATED OR SOMETHING SIMILAR AND IS 24/7 ON ALL NEWS CHANNELS. [Probability is less than zero on that.]) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Paulites: You did it to yourself. Not me.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Our bandwidth has gone from $240 to $365 for the past two months, and it has depleted our funds to negative zero. Which means I have to pony it up....and will need to run a fundraiser SOONER because of it.

Face it folks, they stole it from YOU!! The contributors of LP!!

I don't think those who contributed money to keep LP up and running meant for it to be used for some stupid unreasonble spammers to run amok on.

So, just to be clear....

NO MORE ARTICLES ABOUT RON PAUL ARE PERMITED ON THIS WEBSITE. VIOLATORS WILL BE BANNED.

NOT EVEN ONE

NOT EVEN TWO

ZERO!!!


If this thread gets out of control...it goes to the Biker Bar or will be REPOSTED without the remarks, and the remarks will be removed.


Note: For those who feel that they cannot stay on LP due to this decision: Sorry, but that's the way it is. Find or FUND someplace that is all Paul all the time. The abuse of LP ends today. I don't care who likes it or not. You've made your bed, now you get to sleep in it. This decision is NOT open for discussion. This is a "command decision" or what ever you choose to call it: Edict; directive; command, whatever. It is what it is. A RULE. And I don't care if you hate me or not.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 154.

#9. To: Hayek Fan (#0)

I have to admit that a lot of Ron Paul articles are trivial and deal with minutia. I have no desire to see Ron Paul turned into an object of veneration like Bush is at Freakerland. He is a man. Yes- I am excited by his candidacy. Yes- I think he is right on most of the issues. But he is a man. One man. I don't need to know about every online poll. I don't need to know about his every appearence. General news forums shouldn't be clogged up with the daily doings of Ron Paul. Neither should they be clogged up with idiotic anti Paul posts and vanities (which is most of what is posted on LP by the way).

I used to visit the Lew Rockwell blog several times a day- but 90 percent of what they blog about is Ron Paul now- non effing stop- nearly every post. Snoooooze. I visit less now.

Look, Ron Paul is an exciting outside the Beltway candidate who is principled and refreshing. I am glad he is running. But frankly- our Mega DC government is way past the point where any one man can do much to reform it, reel it in, or even effect it that much. There is something a bit off- about a bunch of libertarians and old rightists who don't think the Presidency should have that much power- who constantly complain about how that branch has grown outside of all proportion- who bitch about people looking at the Presidency as some sort of Savior God King seat- cheering on a man night and day running for that seat- like any BOT or Demhead does for their two party fraud candidate.

Burkeman1  posted on  2007-11-10   23:54:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Burkeman1 (#9) (Edited)

There is something a bit off- about a bunch of libertarians and old rightists who don't think the Presidency should have that much power- who constantly complain about how that branch has grown outside of all proportion- who bitch about people looking at the Presidency as some sort of Savior God King seat- cheering on a man night and day running for that seat- like any BOT or Demhead does for their two party fraud candidate.

You've lost me, Burke. Paul is not running like any BOT or Demhead does. He's "running" (I put "running" in quotes, because he's not really running anything) the most incredible campaign of my lifetime. Incredible, because it perfectly embodies the principles of Libertarianism. What we are witnessing, is spontaneous order created by free men with free minds coming together, bringing their individual creativity and energies to bear like never before in the modern political arena, creaming the top-down, centrally-planned old-style campaigns of the would-be tyrants of the DemGOP Establishment party.

Don't ya get it, Burke? This campaign is not about one man. It's about we, the American people, rising up to take our government back. It is a new chapter in the history of freedom beginning to be written. Why are you so negative about this? Are you afraid we might...actually...WIN?

Arator  posted on  2007-11-11   0:04:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Arator, Burkeman1 (#12)

Don't ya get it, Burke? This campaign is not about one man. It's about we, the American people, rising up to take our government back. It is a new chapter in the history of freedom beginning to be written. Why are you so negative about this? Are you afraid we might...actually...WIN?

I don't see him as being negative, but I've also noticed a certain cult-like adoration for this one man that I find disturbing, because it is the same mentality of the bots, just the other side of the coin. I will most likely vote for Ron Paul, but I'm not going to become obsessed with him.

Diana  posted on  2007-11-11   3:03:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#139. To: Diana (#51)

but I've also noticed a certain cult-like adoration for this one man that I find disturbing, because it is the same mentality of the bots, just the other side of the coin. I will most likely vote for Ron Paul, but I'm not going to become obsessed with him.

Point taken, and I there's obviously a level of excitement about Ron Paul from freedom lovers that's unprecedented. Cult-like? Okay, I'll concede that.

But in this case, it's warranted. And it's not about Ron Paul. It's about his candidacy. He mentioned on one of his interviews that it wasn't him that people were excited about, but his ideas of freedom.

And given the state of the nation, the long train of presidents sold to special interests and being clueless about the Constitution and so many other things, I think we can permit ourselves a cult-like excitement over the possibility of a President Paul.

Pinguinite  posted on  2007-11-11   11:59:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#142. To: Pinguinite (#139)

He mentioned on one of his interviews that it wasn't him that people were excited about, but his ideas of freedom.

Paul mentioned that today with Shifty Schieffer, it is the message not him.

Some people that drag out that cult BS either are to dense to understand or are trying to undermine Paul.

Paul has exactly NOTHING going for him as far as a cult is concerned, bad voice, too often poor delivery and no physical attraction, he has a message and that is why people donate money.

Cynicom  posted on  2007-11-11   12:05:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#149. To: Peppa (#142)

FCOL

what does that mean?

christine  posted on  2007-11-11   12:16:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#154. To: christine (#149)

FCOL what does that mean?

For Cryin Out Loud.

Peppa  posted on  2007-11-11   12:19:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 154.

#172. To: ALL, mehitable to Goldi (#154)

597. To: Goldi-Lox, malador, ALL here - pro or anti Ron Paul (#0)

First off to everyone, I've been doing a new job so I don't have much time to post, alas, so please excuse me if I haven't been responding.

Now to the issue. While I understand and can appreciate your money concerns, Goldi, this appears to be more about censorship and silencing the Ron Paul campaign than about bandwidth concerns. I have seen countless anti-Ron Paul threads posted repeatedly, sometimes several in a day, by posters like sardine. If you don't want "frivolous" postings in favor of Ron Paul, you should not allow "frivolous" postings against him either.

Whether you like him or not, Ron Paul is a genuine phenomenon in our current political climate, and he is the ONLY candidate who is not business per usual. The rest ON BOTH SIDES are just egomaniacal pirates who want their turn at the taxpayers trough. Or they want to seize power and control the mass of people. Money and power - that is LITERALLY all the main candidates in this race are about. Ron Paul (and some of the other lesser candidates like Tancredo and Hunter), offers something different. WE NEED SOMETHING DIFFERENT RIGHT NOW. If we continue in the next election with business as usual, it will result in the destruction of the country. We are THAT close to the edge of the abyss.

For you to attempt to quell support for Ron Paul makes you the equivalent on this site of Jim Robinson on FR. I know it's your site and you can do what you want, but you want to impose this type of censorship, you really can't any longer wave a banner of freedom and liberty when in practice, you want to deny it.

I think all discussions of ALL candidates should be allowed, certainly in this next CRUCIAL, election. Otherwise you should simply disband the site and call it a day, as it will be pointless if we can only discuss "approved" candidates.

mehitable

christine  posted on  2007-11-11 12:37:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 154.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]