See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Goldi Bans Ron Paul Articles makes up lies as a cover story
Source:
LP
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=206532
Published: Nov 10, 2007
Author: me
Post Date: 2007-11-10 23:34:29 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 16054
Comments: 390
A few months ago, we had a lot of GARBAGE posts on the right sidebar. They were all FRIVOLOUS stories about Ron Paul. Up until today I liked him. But his supporters have come here to spam LP, and now I DON'T like HIM or THEM. I was reasonable in the past and asked that articles be posted here that were NEWSWORTHY ABOUT HIM, WITH A LIMIT OF 2 A DAY. Just this evening, there were 13 posted. THIRTEEN!!! And not ONE of them had anything newsworthy to report. All of them were of the variety: "Alert, Ron Paul just scratched his crotch!!" Or "Ron Paul stepped in dogs**t". The supporters of Ron Paul have PROVEN that they cannot control themselves. "Reasonable" is not a word in their vocabulary. So, due to their IRRESPONSIBLE and IRRATIONAL behavior, their SPAMMING of Liberty Post...I have made a decision: FROM THE TIME THIS IS POSTED...NO RON PAUL ARTICLES ARE TO BE POSTED HERE AT ALL. EVER. (ONE EXCEPTION: IF HE GETS ASSASSINATED OR SOMETHING SIMILAR AND IS 24/7 ON ALL NEWS CHANNELS. [Probability is less than zero on that.]) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Paulites: You did it to yourself. Not me. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Our bandwidth has gone from $240 to $365 for the past two months, and it has depleted our funds to negative zero. Which means I have to pony it up....and will need to run a fundraiser SOONER because of it. Face it folks, they stole it from YOU!! The contributors of LP!! I don't think those who contributed money to keep LP up and running meant for it to be used for some stupid unreasonble spammers to run amok on. So, just to be clear.... NO MORE ARTICLES ABOUT RON PAUL ARE PERMITED ON THIS WEBSITE. VIOLATORS WILL BE BANNED. NOT EVEN ONE NOT EVEN TWO ZERO!!! If this thread gets out of control...it goes to the Biker Bar or will be REPOSTED without the remarks, and the remarks will be removed. Note: For those who feel that they cannot stay on LP due to this decision: Sorry, but that's the way it is. Find or FUND someplace that is all Paul all the time. The abuse of LP ends today. I don't care who likes it or not. You've made your bed, now you get to sleep in it. This decision is NOT open for discussion. This is a "command decision" or what ever you choose to call it: Edict; directive; command, whatever. It is what it is. A RULE. And I don't care if you hate me or not.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-133) not displayed.
.
.
.
#134. To: farmfriend (#131)
Cash Wakefield/ALS has long posted on FR and other venues on the Internet. He doesn't have much choice if he wants to do so, Conservababes.com is a rathole of a forum that does nothing and goes nowhere. Naturally the boy gets out to places that might be sick, but still have a pulse to them.
I use it when I ~snip~ articles. Many forums will not let you post in their entirety.
Nice to see ya back on 4.
No that wasn't byteshredder. Worst he did was steal griphix and post hangman's nooses to me. I remember one guy left the forum because of it but can't recall who did it. Give me a few and I might come up with it. Maybe percy remembers.
Thanks, nice to be here.
Point taken, and I there's obviously a level of excitement about Ron Paul from freedom lovers that's unprecedented. Cult-like? Okay, I'll concede that. But in this case, it's warranted. And it's not about Ron Paul. It's about his candidacy. He mentioned on one of his interviews that it wasn't him that people were excited about, but his ideas of freedom. And given the state of the nation, the long train of presidents sold to special interests and being clueless about the Constitution and so many other things, I think we can permit ourselves a cult-like excitement over the possibility of a President Paul.
Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec
Agreed. This line is a lie.
Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec
They do. All that posting on the thread is taking bandwidth though.
Paul mentioned that today with Shifty Schieffer, it is the message not him. Some people that drag out that cult BS either are to dense to understand or are trying to undermine Paul. Paul has exactly NOTHING going for him as far as a cult is concerned, bad voice, too often poor delivery and no physical attraction, he has a message and that is why people donate money.
Whats pathetic are those posters who are as they've depicted themselves .. refugees from FR.. and went to LP thinking they were going to a place that would permit free speech.. and they also are mistaken in thinking they're going to get a straight honest truthful answer as to the 'why' just believing that she has lost her temper or has gotten worn out with the 'spammers' .. they cant see the truth is in front of them.. they read the words and cant see what has happened.. yet they stay .. make sense of that.. the frog in the hot water analogy.
Both were just great. Maybe they should be a separate thread.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
Bump that!
The cost to have a web server co-located in an internet facility runs into the low 3 digits. Since the server presumably hosts only LP, then yes, LP donors would be footing that whole bill. But I am a bit puzzled that LP costs would actually rise due to increased bandwidth usage. I'm not familiar with their ISP of course, but 4um is the heaviest website on this server (by far), and we're no where near exceeding existing limits. I'm sure LP gets more postings than 4um, but if they are breaking bandwidth limits, then they are either getting visits very much out of proportion to their postings or they don't have the best deal in hosting. I suspect the latter. That's another thing though. What makes her think that Ron Paul is the reason for her increased bandwidth? LP doesn't have view counts on threads like we do here, and it would not be easy to tell what subject on LP is generating any spike in traffic.
Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec
..or perhaps she is lying.
Big hint, she doesn't think, she is a reactionary and a manipulative player who has no use for free speech except as an inaccurate sales pitch for the Kool Aid her forum has become.
what does that mean?
The campaign has now raised 7.923+M since the 5th - amazing.
A rug doesn't lie better than that one.
I dont know why thats not absolutely plain.. its NOT true.. end of story.. they're focusing on her supposed reasons.. rather than peeling back ONE simple layer.. she was told to get dump the Paul threads .. would she tell her posters that?? I think not..
I think Dr.Paul's got a lot going on the 'looks' department. He's fit, he looks you in the eye, and doesn't seem like he waiting for an opportunity to skin you. All things considered, I find him a very good-looking man.
For Cryin Out Loud.
The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries. James Madison (1751-1836),Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
Now you are getting into the business end of LP.
Yeah...and I picked up most of the last 2 months bandwidth payments out of my own pocket...because I haven't had time to put a fundraiser together. RUN A DAMN FUNDRAISER! Goldi,nobody sane expects you to finance this thing out of your own pocket. Especially not now when you are out of work. If you are too busy to run one,why not get Bad Joe to run one for you? Isn't he still around? sneakypete She's out of work? I thought Goldi supposedly worked for some business to do with the military industrial complex.. if any business is booming its that..
FR Annex :P
That's from the beginning of the quarter...
lod Stand Paul side by side with Romney, let the ladies make their choice.
Who worries about looks? Give us a competent and intelligent human being as POTUS. It's sad how little it would take to put someone better in the White House then the Chimperor.
Stand Paul side by side with Romney, let the ladies make their choice. Paul doesnt have that type of appeal.. Romney is I suppose some would say good looking but hes not the type I was ever attracted to.. then he opens his mouth.. gack.
Okay, where's the math on that? ;) It's for the benefit of this country. Salvation does not lie in the 2-party system. That's where political damnation emanates. You are right, but Independents are ignored. So, why build another hill to climb? Right now, as it is, he's taking them on square in the face. And I am enjoying the hell out of it.
The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries. James Madison (1751-1836),Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
Many years ago I watched Robert Kennedy when he ran for Senator from NY. Most of the crowd at the airport were women. As they were leaving I asked one what Kennedy had to say that she liked. She paused and then said, "I dont know what he said, but he said it well."
The ewes best start making their choices based on the message, not the hair.
lod... Read my 163
I think the ladies are fibbing to you. If Hillary were a ten, I could well vote for her and forget all else.
No doubt RFK had the Kennedy looks and charm, what I don't understand is how The Swimmer was ever elected to anything. We really are a nation of mullets.
Okay, where's the math on that? Here's the math: 70% of the Independents (THAT'S WHY HE NEEDS TO RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT), 10-15% of the GOPs and Demos. That should add up to more than 35% which, in a 3-way race, wins the race if the remainder is evenly distributed between the other 2 and within the states. RP may be able to get more than 70% of the Indies and I expect him to get more than 15% of the GOPs because the pro-lifers will have nowhere else to go and more than 15% of the Demos because the anti-wars won't have anywhere else to go if they had Rudy and Hillary as their parties candidates.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Too funny.. I honestly have never been swayed..( well at least politically )..by looks.. it's all about intelligence and sense of humor for me..
Maybe only blind folks should be allowed to vote...I guess that they'd go for whoever had the best voice though. Mullets are us.
One thing the web has done for me is show me how irrelevant looks are. I've found a lot of men whose pictures do not stand up to just how attractive they really are.
597. To: Goldi-Lox, malador, ALL here - pro or anti Ron Paul (#0) First off to everyone, I've been doing a new job so I don't have much time to post, alas, so please excuse me if I haven't been responding. Now to the issue. While I understand and can appreciate your money concerns, Goldi, this appears to be more about censorship and silencing the Ron Paul campaign than about bandwidth concerns. I have seen countless anti-Ron Paul threads posted repeatedly, sometimes several in a day, by posters like sardine. If you don't want "frivolous" postings in favor of Ron Paul, you should not allow "frivolous" postings against him either. Whether you like him or not, Ron Paul is a genuine phenomenon in our current political climate, and he is the ONLY candidate who is not business per usual. The rest ON BOTH SIDES are just egomaniacal pirates who want their turn at the taxpayers trough. Or they want to seize power and control the mass of people. Money and power - that is LITERALLY all the main candidates in this race are about. Ron Paul (and some of the other lesser candidates like Tancredo and Hunter), offers something different. WE NEED SOMETHING DIFFERENT RIGHT NOW. If we continue in the next election with business as usual, it will result in the destruction of the country. We are THAT close to the edge of the abyss. For you to attempt to quell support for Ron Paul makes you the equivalent on this site of Jim Robinson on FR. I know it's your site and you can do what you want, but you want to impose this type of censorship, you really can't any longer wave a banner of freedom and liberty when in practice, you want to deny it. I think all discussions of ALL candidates should be allowed, certainly in this next CRUCIAL, election. Otherwise you should simply disband the site and call it a day, as it will be pointless if we can only discuss "approved" candidates. mehitable
Apparently you didn't hear the pro-life woman on Hannity the other day that said she was voting for Giuliani. Why? She said she had to put her feelings about abortion on the back-burner because NATIONAL SECURITY was more important, and Rudy would do a better job with that than Hillary. I almost ran off the damn road...
Comments (174 - 390) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#135. To: lodwick (#95)
I'd never noticed it...
"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul
"I see the Constitution as being written precisely for one purpose -- to restrain the power of government; never to restrain the people" - Ron Paul
#136. To: farmfriend (#135)
#137. To: ..., percy dovetonsils (#97)
Didn't Byteshredder get busted for fishing IPs last year sometime?
"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul
"I see the Constitution as being written precisely for one purpose -- to restrain the power of government; never to restrain the people" - Ron Paul
#138. To: lodwick (#136)
Nice to see ya back on 4.
"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul
"I see the Constitution as being written precisely for one purpose -- to restrain the power of government; never to restrain the people" - Ron Paul
#139. To: Diana (#51)
but I've also noticed a certain cult-like adoration for this one man that I find disturbing, because it is the same mentality of the bots, just the other side of the coin. I will most likely vote for Ron Paul, but I'm not going to become obsessed with him.
#140. To: Zipporah (#54)
But his supporters have come here to spam LP, and now I DON'T like HIM or THEM.
#141. To: Hayek Fan (#110)
I always thought that posting pictures took up the bandwidth of the site they were posting to, plus disk space.
"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul
"I see the Constitution as being written precisely for one purpose -- to restrain the power of government; never to restrain the people" - Ron Paul
#142. To: Pinguinite (#139)
He mentioned on one of his interviews that it wasn't him that people were excited about, but his ideas of freedom.
#143. To: Pinguinite (#140)
#144. To: who knows what evil (#127)
#145. To: Pinguinite (#139)
And given the state of the nation, the long train of presidents sold to special interests and being clueless about the Constitution and so many other things, I think we can permit ourselves a cult-like excitement over the possibility of a President Paul.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#146. To: Kamala (#56)
Would those bandwidth prices be correct? I've heard so many conflicting prices depending on the site and layout.
#147. To: Pinguinite (#146)
I suspect the latter.
#148. To: Pinguinite (#146)
What makes her think that Ron Paul is the reason for her increased bandwidth?
#149. To: Peppa (#142)
FCOL
#150. To: Pinguinite. RP friends (#139)
#151. To: Zipporah (#147)
"..or perhaps she is lying."
#152. To: Ferret Mike (#151)
#153. To: Cynicom (#142)
#154. To: christine (#149)
FCOL what does that mean?
#155. To: Zipporah (#152)
was told to ,,, dump the Paul threads .. would she tell her posters that?? I think not..
#156. To: Ferret Mike (#151)
Goldi-Lox (#378)
#157. To: Cynicom (#155)
Now you are getting into the business end of LP.
#158. To: lodwick (#150)
The campaign has now raised 7.923+M since the 5th - amazing.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#159. To: lodwick (#153)
I think Dr.Paul's got a lot going on the 'looks' department. He's fit, he looks you in the eye, and doesn't seem like he waiting for an opportunity to skin you.
#160. To: lodwick (#153)
#161. To: Cynicom (#159)
lod
#162. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#114)
No, I said that he CAN win as an independent.
#163. To: Zipporah (#161)
Paul doesnt have that type of appeal.. Romney is I suppose some would say good looking but hes not the type I was ever attracted to.. then he opens his mouth.. gack.
#164. To: Cynicom (#159)
Stand Paul side by side with Romney, let the ladies make their choice.
#165. To: lodwick (#164)
#166. To: lodwick (#164)
The ewes best start making their choices based on the message, not the hair.
#167. To: Cynicom (#165)
#168. To: Peppa (#162)
No, I said that he CAN win as an independent.
#169. To: Cynicom (#163)
"I dont know what he said, but he said it well."
#170. To: Cynicom (#166)
#171. To: Cynicom, Zipporah (#163)
"every time government grows it is at the expense of personal liberty" - Ron Paul
"I see the Constitution as being written precisely for one purpose -- to restrain the power of government; never to restrain the people" - Ron Paul
#172. To: ALL, mehitable to Goldi (#154)
#173. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#168)
and I expect him to get more than 15% of the GOPs because the pro-lifers will have nowhere else to go...
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
.
.
.