See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Goldi Couldn't Take The Heat
Source:
4um
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 15, 2007
Author: Original_Intent
Post Date: 2007-11-15 03:37:33 by Original_Intent
Keywords: None
Views: 6641
Comments: 507
Confronted with discontent over her Censorship, her clear and apparent hypocrisy, and an insurgency among the more spirited Postership of The Jim Robinson style of the “night of the long knives” has struck deep by eliminating some of While she is trying to fob this off as “necessary” for the health of the site and bandwidth usage what it actually is, is nothing more than a purge of those who not remain silent let her freely engage in Censorship contrary to the alleged rationale for Following is her Public Relations attempt to justify her silencing of dissenting views. My juxtaposed comments are in blue. Translation: Those of you who would not roll over kiss my ass and remain silent in the face of obvious Stalinesque censorship have been summarily booted for no offense greater than pointing out that I am a flaming hypocrite. It's a shame that those people felt it was more important to create disruption than to try to adhere to some new rules in order to get control of an unwieldy situation. It's impacting the site performance, bandwidth, and our costs. It was my obligation and duty to FIX the situation. Translation: It's a shame that you people would not shut up and forced me to falsely assert you were a disruption thus forcing me take another obvious hypocritical action on top of my previous hypocritical action. I hope that all the suckers will believe my rationale that this is affecting site performance – despite the fact that the people posting are posting no more than they normally do if not less – since most of their posting is on this one thread. So, I took the necessary action to shut up those who had the flaming gall to point out that I am flaming hypocrite. I am hoping that this action will save what little credibility I have left and silence any further dissent by metaphorically chopping off the heads of those were pointing out and underscoring my dishonesty and hypocrisy. Since I did not say Ron Paul could not be discussed, I have not removed commentary about him. I would not do that. That would be censorship. However, if you RE READ my original post on this tread, I only banned THREADS. Because too many were balling up the sidebars, and we were losing the news content. Translation: I hope you remaining sheep will gladly toe the line and not bring up any uncomfortable references to my hypocritical actions and betrayal of all the standards of open discussion that I falsely proclaim as my standard. Also I hope that you morons will believe that by allowing you to continue to talk out of public view about Ron Paul that it really isn't censorship. There were a lot of complaints. And the point is to make everyone or almost everyone satisfied. The Ron Paul threads had become a disruption. Translation: Since Ron Paul refuses to suck up to the Israel Lobby and will not put Israel first I want to do what little I can to hamper discussion and the possibility that he might gain sufficient widespread popularity to threaten Israel's Welfare Check and it's ability to commit genocide at will. This is first and foremost a NEWS DISCUSSION FORUM. Translation: First and foremost what I say is news is news and what I don't like isn't news and I don't like Ron Paul because he is not beholden to the Israel Lobby. It's not a cheerleading site for anyone. And no advertising is permitted. Translation: I will not allow enthusiasm to be expressed for any candidate that does not do what the Israel Lobby tells them to do. Considerations of Liberty and Decency are totally secondary and subordinated to whatever Israel wants and to hell with liberty or the United States. Today, I have pulled several articles - some of them contained ads. Translation: This is a “fig leaf” comment to cover up the fact that I just purged all of the posters who were calmly and politely pointing out that I am a flaming hypocrite. Posting of ANY future ads will cause the poster to be banned. I've stated that often. I'm just reminding you. This is nothing new. Translation: Additional gratuitous commentary to try to cover over the fact that I am silencing anyone who dares to point out that I am violating my own alleged standards and am a traitor to the United States. Have a good discussion...and that includes Ron Paul. But NO threads please. Translation: Anyone who dares to post something not in keeping with my hypocritical standards based upon a hidden agenda, Israel First, will be silenced. I don't want to have to ban anyone else. Translation: This is a warning you cretins do not dare to try to hold me accountable to my own professed standards. I do not want to hear anything else about that damned Ron Paul or his damned non-interventionist America Centric American Foreign Policy. It's Israel First! Get It! ==== Note: I realize that every time I make one of these decisions, some of you will find it intolerable, and leave. I would like you to stay...but you have to follow your heart, and if one forum doesn't fit you, perhaps another one will. I will only wish you good luck in your cyber travels, and maybe you'll pass this way again. Translation: I realize some of you are intelligent enough to know that I am lying through my teeth and am a flaming hypocrite who just silenced a big embarassment by banning everyone who would not let the matter of high handed censorship rest. I don't really want you real Conservatives and Libertarians to stay because sooner or later you are going to oppose the primary purpose of this forum which is CONTROLLED Opposition. Nevertheless, I don't want my site to drop to a ranking below ten million overnight so some of you can stay as long as you don't really expect me to live up to the standards I claim.
Liberty Post Goldi-Lox went into severe psychodrama and conducted a Jim Robinson style purge of LP Posters who were not remaining silent in the face of her clearly hypocritical and blatant attempt to silence discussion of Ron Paul by a censorial fiat forbidding the posting of articles about Ron Paul by any of Ron Paul's numerous supporters on Liberty Post. This was done also to eliminate Ron Paul from the public view of lurkers and visitors to Liberty Post. Liberty Post's best posters of long standing. I think we can safely rename Liberty Post as “Israel First” Post and know that the loyalty of the Site Administrator is NOT first to the United States and most assuredly not Liberty. Confronted by a group of liberty minded posters calling her to account for her high handed CENSORSHIP she chose the avenue which I expected and instituted a Fraud Republic style purge of anyone who was not acquiescing silently to her censorship and pointing out the arrant hypocrisy of her actions. Liberty Post's existence. Those who raised their voice to point out the hypocrisy and even offer compromise solutions were eliminated in one fell swoop.
I've given you some time to settle down. Most of you have. Those few of you who have NOT will find that posting PRIVILEGES on LP have been revoked.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-41) not displayed.
.
.
.
#42. To: longnose gar, christine, *You Gotta Be Shitting Me* (#37)
Oh, and what made you want to bring up the so called Stormfronters? Are you one of those people who sees racists around every corner who thinks that anyone who supports Ron Paul is a racist? I think we have one of those baiter posters who jumped off the rat infested ship known as LP.
Dying for old bastards, and their old money, isn't my idea of freedom.
It's not "Hagee" it's just distaste for anti-Semitism. I, for one, can't stand Zionists. They are more racist than Boers, more self-righteous than Baptists, more hypocritical than Catholic Priests and more annoying than PETA partisans. That said, I have no animosity against Jews just for being Jewish. So goes the cliche, "some of my best friends, etc, etc." As for Israeli-firsters, I don't mind them. I just think they should stay in fucking Israel.
The illegal we do immediately. The Unconstitutional takes a little longer. - Henry Kissinger.
I think you have to be very careful. The globalists are ruthless.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
FreedomForum's Newswatcher?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
A simple search of "stormfront" and "Ron Paul" http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%2Bstormfront+%2B%22ron+paul%22&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8 You do the math.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Not true as was documented very early in Goldi's meltdown thread.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Compare that to the insanity of the so called 2 party system where every 4 years people who are just as retarded expect a different outctome, and nothing changes. So, who's more retarded? People who want something new, or the morons who expect change by voting for the same old 2 parties that continue to betray them, and America? You must be what your buddy Rush calls one of those Seminar Callers. You didn't respond to my other question. Must be because you have no answers.
Dying for old bastards, and their old money, isn't my idea of freedom.
Other than hating the US and wanting to see the destruction and downfall of this country, there is no reason for the leftards to be enamored with the Paultards anyway. Of course, the mentioned reason is a pretty strong bond.
True, I lurk there and have seen for myself this double standard. Besides, what credibility do you have, when you are afraid to ID who you are in the account name most of us probably know you as? The only thing you are working on this morning is damage control.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
I find the timing of Goldi's latest menstrual meltdown a bit convenient. Rudy Giuliani is going to be out of the race soon, as is Fred Thompson, and a few other loser candidates. Ron Paul is a very serious threat to the bought and paid for GOP'ers. He's even better liked than Hillary. Which is why all the nonsense spilling over here on to Freedom4um seems to be an almost pre-meditated plan to fill our site full of shit that nobody should really be talking about to take the focus away from real news.
Dying for old bastards, and their old money, isn't my idea of freedom.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Yeah I figured it was yet another tard refugee. I'm sick of this forum being the dumping grounds for this sort of nonsense.
Dying for old bastards, and their old money, isn't my idea of freedom.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Shoot the cop. See Goldi-Lox, this is an example of the malcontent of these Paultards and their complete disrespect and lack of reverance for authority. I'm telling you, once the domestic terrorism laws are passed, people like this are going down. Best purge them now and keep only those who love and appreciate their government, to include the heroes in law enforcement., Madeye Moody you have been reported to the appropriate authorities. With any luck you will be watched carefully. I'm betting odds you're a criminal because law-abiding Americans have no reason to hate the hard working men and women in law enforcement. Now that they will be watching you your criminal days are nearing an end! Bush Fan posted on 2007-11-15 07:54:09 ET Reply Trace Bush Fan sure is feeling his/her oats to be so openly playing the 'I am a snitch to law enforcement' cards. (from http://libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=207023&Disp=16#C4)
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
yeah, but he's such a goofy bot, he's merely short term entertainment with each of his incarnations.
She was never concerned about threads which were disparaging toward certain ethnic groups from filling up the news bar or creating a disruption.
Hi OI, I've been following all the excitement over at ElPee.org recently. It's good to see you guys stood up to the old witch. She must be off her meds again, and/or she must have gotten a call from the Tel Aviv office to quash discussion of Ron Paul and smite his supporters. Oh well, nice to see you found your way back here, where you don't have to worry about censorship. This site is becoming more and more popular, and will probably eclipse ElPee in the not so distant future, especially if Goldi continues to toss people overboard that dare attempt to post an article about the next president of the United States, Ron Paul..
Well, there's also Kucinich and Gravel, but they have much less chance of getting anywhere. In any event, it was interesting how they eliminated Gravel from the debates right after that interview on the PBS News Hour where he accused AIPAC of being behind the march to war with Iran.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
It's obvious that BushFan is trolling ElPee. LOL
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It's a small world after all. It's a small world after all. It's a small world after all, it's a small world after all." (Nice ride at Disney for the kids, BTW.) Says a lot, IMO. I never looked back, myself. I think they're wired different.
#43. To: Jethro Tull (#8)
Some still have a touch of Hagee in them.
#44. To: christine (#22)
what happened at FR or LP will NEVER happen here. you can take that to the bank.
#45. To: Original_Intent (#3)
#46. To: christine (#27)
that's so assinine, i'm thinking Bush Fan is a fake.
#47. To: gengis gandhi (#9)
#48. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#42)
Oh, and what made you want to bring up the so called Stormfronters?
#49. To: ... (#10)
#50. To: Ferret Mike (#39)
Except that it has been pointed out - many times in fact - that anti- Ron Paul people have been spamming in their attacks and character assasination posts and threads at a far greater level then any commentary and support posted by those who support Ron Paul.
#51. To: wbales (#11)
#52. To: longnose gar (#48)
Why am I retarded for wanting Ron Paul as a president?
#53. To: ... (#10)
There is even an anti Ron Paul patrol on Kos
#54. To: longnose gar (#50)
"Not true as was documented very early in Goldi's meltdown thread."
#55. To: longnose gar, happytobebushballed, squirrelnuts, eatacumsamwich, domer, pukon, whateverthehellyournameis (#26)
#56. To: Ferret Mike (#28)
#57. To: ghostdogtxn (#55)
#58. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#31)
#59. To: longnose gar (#34)
#60. To: irontank (#35)
#61. To: longnose gar (#37)
#62. To: Fred Mertz (#41)
#63. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#42)
#64. To: ghostdogtxn (#63)
#65. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#57)
#66. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#64)
#67. To: ghostdogtxn (#62)
(Edited)
4. To: Madeye Moody, Goldi-Lox (#2)
#68. To: Ferret Mike (#67)
#69. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#42)
I think we have one of those baiter posters who jumped off the rat infested ship known as LP.
#70. To: Original_Intent (#1)
#71. To: Original_Intent (#3)
(Edited)
I have joined you among the few, the proud, the banned from
Liberty Post.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#72. To: ghostdogtxn (#65)
He's the ONLY candidate who isn't beholden to the MIC/ZIO/ENRG folks, and he scares the hell out of them.
#73. To: Fred Mertz (#41)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#74. To: aristeides (#72)
#75. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#31)
Why are the politics of Liberty Post so fucking important to THIS website?
 | Experts attribute lower investment rates to poor instruction on financial topics in public schools and misconceptions about the risk of stocks within parts of the black community. Employers also have been urged to tailor their messages on retirement savings to account for what some black and Latino executives say are important cultural differences. |
#76. To: Fred Mertz (#41)
Wow. #6! I'm flattered. I'm not banned as of right now though.
1. Fasttalker 2. Buckeye 3. Strenchedmind 4. Pern 5. bluedogtxn 6. duckhunter
#77. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#31)
All it does is make THIS site look like another Clown Posse website, or worse. I comprehend, empathize and sympathize with what you say. But, hey, its fun and entertaining (to some). There is, also and in any case, a foundation of relevent political discourse/commentary in the exercise.
Why are the politics of Liberty Post so fucking important to THIS website?
Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.
#78. To: duckhunter (#76)
In the interest of your future mental health, you should ban yourself. There is no charge for this advice.
I'm not banned as of right now though.
Register to vote for Ron Paul NOW.
#79. To: wbales (#78)
I read this site for information. I mostly lurk because, with a few notable exception, I agree with most of the folks here and the posted articles are great. I read LP for entertainment and to argue with those I disagree with. I take none of it seriously enough to cause me ill effects in either situation.
In the interest of your future mental health, you should ban yourself.
#80. To: longnose gar (#34)
Psst! Hey, twinkboy...yeah...you in the corner with your thumb up your butt. There is a reason for that. Come closer and I'll tell you. No, closer... That's right. It won't hurt...much. Just a little bit more... ITS BECAUSE THERE IS REAL SUPPORT FOR PAUL! Now, that wasn't so bad....in time, you'll learn to think for yourself too. Come back tomorrow for more freedom-shock therapy. In the meantime, may your chains clink lightly and your masters smile at you often.
The Paultard articles still exist and still continue to be posted.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.
#81. To: bluedogtxn (#43)
I could count on one hand those I've met during my lifetime that don't put their homeland first before America. They never have a problem w/the goy as long as they know their place and agree with their odd political proclivities. That said, I buy Chinese food from Chinamen, pizza from Italians and lawyerly advice from Tribesmen. Mamma didn’t raise a shmuck :)
That said, I have no animosity against Jews just for being Jewish.
#82. To: Jethro Tull (#81)
I get the sense that most American Jews are not really all that concerned with Israel. In fact, they seem annoyed that someone might rock their pretty boats. They have it good here, nepotism is at its flowery peak for them; most Jews in America are living quite well. For the ZioCrazies to awaken the ugly specter of antisemitism and possibly spoil their fun in some way, they find disconcerting. Not enough to actually say or do anything about it of course. Not yet.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
.
.
.
Comments (83 - 507) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest