See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Goldi Couldn't Take The Heat
Source:
4um
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 15, 2007
Author: Original_Intent
Post Date: 2007-11-15 03:37:33 by Original_Intent
Keywords: None
Views: 8408
Comments: 507
Confronted with discontent over her Censorship, her clear and apparent hypocrisy, and an insurgency among the more spirited Postership of The Jim Robinson style of the “night of the long knives” has struck deep by eliminating some of While she is trying to fob this off as “necessary” for the health of the site and bandwidth usage what it actually is, is nothing more than a purge of those who not remain silent let her freely engage in Censorship contrary to the alleged rationale for Following is her Public Relations attempt to justify her silencing of dissenting views. My juxtaposed comments are in blue. Translation: Those of you who would not roll over kiss my ass and remain silent in the face of obvious Stalinesque censorship have been summarily booted for no offense greater than pointing out that I am a flaming hypocrite. It's a shame that those people felt it was more important to create disruption than to try to adhere to some new rules in order to get control of an unwieldy situation. It's impacting the site performance, bandwidth, and our costs. It was my obligation and duty to FIX the situation. Translation: It's a shame that you people would not shut up and forced me to falsely assert you were a disruption thus forcing me take another obvious hypocritical action on top of my previous hypocritical action. I hope that all the suckers will believe my rationale that this is affecting site performance – despite the fact that the people posting are posting no more than they normally do if not less – since most of their posting is on this one thread. So, I took the necessary action to shut up those who had the flaming gall to point out that I am flaming hypocrite. I am hoping that this action will save what little credibility I have left and silence any further dissent by metaphorically chopping off the heads of those were pointing out and underscoring my dishonesty and hypocrisy. Since I did not say Ron Paul could not be discussed, I have not removed commentary about him. I would not do that. That would be censorship. However, if you RE READ my original post on this tread, I only banned THREADS. Because too many were balling up the sidebars, and we were losing the news content. Translation: I hope you remaining sheep will gladly toe the line and not bring up any uncomfortable references to my hypocritical actions and betrayal of all the standards of open discussion that I falsely proclaim as my standard. Also I hope that you morons will believe that by allowing you to continue to talk out of public view about Ron Paul that it really isn't censorship. There were a lot of complaints. And the point is to make everyone or almost everyone satisfied. The Ron Paul threads had become a disruption. Translation: Since Ron Paul refuses to suck up to the Israel Lobby and will not put Israel first I want to do what little I can to hamper discussion and the possibility that he might gain sufficient widespread popularity to threaten Israel's Welfare Check and it's ability to commit genocide at will. This is first and foremost a NEWS DISCUSSION FORUM. Translation: First and foremost what I say is news is news and what I don't like isn't news and I don't like Ron Paul because he is not beholden to the Israel Lobby. It's not a cheerleading site for anyone. And no advertising is permitted. Translation: I will not allow enthusiasm to be expressed for any candidate that does not do what the Israel Lobby tells them to do. Considerations of Liberty and Decency are totally secondary and subordinated to whatever Israel wants and to hell with liberty or the United States. Today, I have pulled several articles - some of them contained ads. Translation: This is a “fig leaf” comment to cover up the fact that I just purged all of the posters who were calmly and politely pointing out that I am a flaming hypocrite. Posting of ANY future ads will cause the poster to be banned. I've stated that often. I'm just reminding you. This is nothing new. Translation: Additional gratuitous commentary to try to cover over the fact that I am silencing anyone who dares to point out that I am violating my own alleged standards and am a traitor to the United States. Have a good discussion...and that includes Ron Paul. But NO threads please. Translation: Anyone who dares to post something not in keeping with my hypocritical standards based upon a hidden agenda, Israel First, will be silenced. I don't want to have to ban anyone else. Translation: This is a warning you cretins do not dare to try to hold me accountable to my own professed standards. I do not want to hear anything else about that damned Ron Paul or his damned non-interventionist America Centric American Foreign Policy. It's Israel First! Get It! ==== Note: I realize that every time I make one of these decisions, some of you will find it intolerable, and leave. I would like you to stay...but you have to follow your heart, and if one forum doesn't fit you, perhaps another one will. I will only wish you good luck in your cyber travels, and maybe you'll pass this way again. Translation: I realize some of you are intelligent enough to know that I am lying through my teeth and am a flaming hypocrite who just silenced a big embarassment by banning everyone who would not let the matter of high handed censorship rest. I don't really want you real Conservatives and Libertarians to stay because sooner or later you are going to oppose the primary purpose of this forum which is CONTROLLED Opposition. Nevertheless, I don't want my site to drop to a ranking below ten million overnight so some of you can stay as long as you don't really expect me to live up to the standards I claim.
Liberty Post Goldi-Lox went into severe psychodrama and conducted a Jim Robinson style purge of LP Posters who were not remaining silent in the face of her clearly hypocritical and blatant attempt to silence discussion of Ron Paul by a censorial fiat forbidding the posting of articles about Ron Paul by any of Ron Paul's numerous supporters on Liberty Post. This was done also to eliminate Ron Paul from the public view of lurkers and visitors to Liberty Post. Liberty Post's best posters of long standing. I think we can safely rename Liberty Post as “Israel First” Post and know that the loyalty of the Site Administrator is NOT first to the United States and most assuredly not Liberty. Confronted by a group of liberty minded posters calling her to account for her high handed CENSORSHIP she chose the avenue which I expected and instituted a Fraud Republic style purge of anyone who was not acquiescing silently to her censorship and pointing out the arrant hypocrisy of her actions. Liberty Post's existence. Those who raised their voice to point out the hypocrisy and even offer compromise solutions were eliminated in one fell swoop.
I've given you some time to settle down. Most of you have. Those few of you who have NOT will find that posting PRIVILEGES on LP have been revoked.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 84.
#8. To: Original_Intent (#0)
It's about time she has finally been exposed. I thought her motives were clear enough when she imported all the pro-Israel freaks to the forum just prior to the Iraqi mess. It took this to finally show people where her loyalty is. The sad part is political correctness and tailored religious indoctrination will still prevent otherwise aware people not to post here. Some still have a touch of Hagee in them.
It's not "Hagee" it's just distaste for anti-Semitism. I, for one, can't stand Zionists. They are more racist than Boers, more self-righteous than Baptists, more hypocritical than Catholic Priests and more annoying than PETA partisans. That said, I have no animosity against Jews just for being Jewish. So goes the cliche, "some of my best friends, etc, etc." As for Israeli-firsters, I don't mind them. I just think they should stay in fucking Israel.
I could count on one hand those I've met during my lifetime that don't put their homeland first before America. They never have a problem w/the goy as long as they know their place and agree with their odd political proclivities. That said, I buy Chinese food from Chinamen, pizza from Italians and lawyerly advice from Tribesmen. Mamma didn’t raise a shmuck :)
I get the sense that most American Jews are not really all that concerned with Israel. In fact, they seem annoyed that someone might rock their pretty boats. They have it good here, nepotism is at its flowery peak for them; most Jews in America are living quite well. For the ZioCrazies to awaken the ugly specter of antisemitism and possibly spoil their fun in some way, they find disconcerting. Not enough to actually say or do anything about it of course. Not yet.
I really think being born and raised in NYC offered me a special perspective to THEM. Even my wife, a full blown sheeple and truly a sweet person, cringes at THEIR arrogance. The above picture is from today's NY Post. Despite Spitzer's failed attempt to shove DLs into the pockets of illegals, life is good. He (they) need street justice ASAP.
In my L.A. suburb, my best friend in elementary school was a rabbi's daughter. Every classroom I was in from 1st grade through college always included about a dozen Jews.
There are no replies to Comment # 84. End Trace Mode for Comment # 84.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#43. To: Jethro Tull (#8)
Some still have a touch of Hagee in them.
#81. To: bluedogtxn (#43)
That said, I have no animosity against Jews just for being Jewish.
#82. To: Jethro Tull (#81)
#83. To: robin (#82)
#84. To: Jethro Tull (#83)
Later I picked up on some arrogance, after they became more financially successful and moved to a better neighborhood. When they were new to the neighborhood and just as poor, it was different. Financial standing is everything to them.
I see the same thing, only more so, now with most Asians in Orange county; very humble while it suits them in the beginning, then only to people economically above them. They also usually choose to live in segregated neighborhoods.
This is not as true of the Latinos, and perhaps not so true of the Vietnamese. Whites do not pay the kind of tribute to financial success that these other groups do. I'm guessing it's cultural. We tend to care how someone made their money, many immigrants only care that someone has money.
Replies to Comment # 84.