See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Debunking the Truthers Again
Source:
environmentalrepublican
URL Source: http://environmentalrepublican.blog ... /debunking-truthers-again.html
Published: Nov 18, 2007
Author: environmentalrepublican
Post Date: 2007-11-18 15:21:04 by longnose gar
Keywords: twoofers, cue spooky music, the joos did it
Views: 1100
Comments: 35
We've all read the Popular Mechanics study on the collapse of the Twin Towers, they painstakingly explained in plain English how the towers fell floor upon floor. That's not been enough for the "Truthers" who still are fixated on the collapse of both towers and WT 7. Another magazine--Structure (link in PDF)-- has joined in the debunking and shows in perfect detail the "kinking" of the penthouse on the north side and the subsequent dropping of the penthouse that started the entire collapse. I'm no engineer but the explanation makes sense as to why the buildings collapsed inward and down and didn't fall over or fall in some other manner. Of course the idiot Truthers will not buy into this because, just as global warming zealots have done, they've developed a cottage industry and they aren't about to agree with any rational explanation that would be presented. Is it any surprise that these morons and Ron Paul supporters have united?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#6. To: all (#0)
Written, as all know by now, Ben Chertoff, the cousin of Fatherland Security Czar, Michael Chertoff. I wonder if Mike's office edited the final release.
What's really amusing is how he tried to deny any relationship at first.
#11. To: robin (#10)
Truthers need a saliva test... Just kiddin, stop throwing things.
Alex Jones Responds To Ben Chertoff, Popular Mechanics 9/11 Debunking Campaign Alex Jones responds to the Popular Mechanics 9/11 debunking exercise. Popular Mechanics featured a so-called 'serious analysis' of alternative explanations behind 9/11 in their March issue. In actual fact, the entire article was a straw man exercise. Popular Mechanics attributed false arguments to researchers and then attacked them. On top of that they lied outright by claiming that there was only one intercept of errant aircraft before 9/11. Alex also addresses the issue of Ben Chertoff, the chief editor of the piece, being cousins with Michael Chertoff, the new Secretery of Homeland Security, an agency which owes its very existence to the establishment version of the 9/11 attack. http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/090305alexresponds.mp3 p>
Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11
Debunking Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies - Looking Glass News
Kinda told the story right there.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWe've all read the Popular Mechanics study on the collapse of the Twin Towers, they painstakingly explained in plain English how the towers fell floor upon floor.
#9. To: angle, FormerLurker, FOH (#6)
Written, as all know by now, Ben Chertoff, the cousin of Fatherland Security Czar, Michael Chertoff.
#10. To: TwentyTwelve, angle (#9)
Replies to Comment # 10.
#12. To: robin, angle (#10)
What's really amusing is how he tried to deny any relationship at first.
#14. To: robin, FormerLurker (#10)
A rebuttal of attempts by Popular Mechanics to defend the official 9/11 story.
www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/
#15. To: robin, FormerLurker (#10)
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media....
www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=6880 - 34k -
#31. To: robin (#10)
What's really amusing is how he tried to deny any relationship at first.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.