See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: 4um Fundraiser for a Ron Paul Campaign Ad in a NH Newspaper (Creative input requested!)
Source:
4um
URL Source: http://4um
Published: Nov 20, 2007
Author: 4um
Post Date: 2007-11-20 11:57:11 by robin
Ping List: *Ron Paul for President 2008* Subscribe to *Ron Paul for President 2008*
Keywords: None
Views: 59225
Comments: 615
We need ideas and people who are willing to create a great Ron Paul advertisement that we all pay for and place in a New Hampshire newspaper, ASAP!
More info will follow as to how to make your donations to pay for the advertisement. If you are interested in helping with the actual creative work involved please contribute your ideas on this thread.
This will be a joint effort for anyone who wishes to be involved.
This thread will serve as the story board to create the advertisement.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-359) not displayed.
.
.
.
#360. To: Critter, ALL (#359)
Very nice ad, anyway!
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
Critter, it's great!
That is excellent.
Voted against the Patriot Acts. Patriot Acts or Patriot Act? ...who can beat her, according to the polls. Maybe this can be improved/changed? If you can address the above two changes, And a couple more ideas: --Perhaps consider using his Toll Free number 1-877-Ron-2008 --You could reword/reduce a little text here, Ad sponsored by Freedom4um.com. It looks good to go!!! Thanks Critter, good job !
You must be registered with the correct party to vote for Ron Paul in states with CLOSED PRIMARIES. Click Primarily Paul and scroll down to the State by State chart. Correct me if I am technically wrong, but isn't there a Patriot Act and Patriot Act II or is it just referred to act Patriot Act II? I've tried a few ways, and none looked great. lol If someone is a better wordsmith, please, help! I thought he had one, but I didn't know what it was, and the contact page on his site doesn't show it. Thanks! I will change it. I wanted to give 4um a good long plug, and let it be known that there is a thriving community here. :) Thanks for some good feedback.
Please see post 365. I thought those were all peppa's comments. I saw his post first.
There are two. Maybe say, Voted against Patriot Act I & II? (It's nitpicky time, huh? So sorry Critter, not personal) ...who can beat her, according to the polls. I've tried a few ways, and none looked great. lol If someone is a better wordsmith, please, help! PLEASE SOMEONE!! hELP HERE!! ;) As for the plug for the forum, it's great, just a little busy. It's only my 2cents. LOL!
You must be registered with the correct party to vote for Ron Paul in states with CLOSED PRIMARIES. Click Primarily Paul and scroll down to the State by State chart. Please don't call me wudiditz, LOL!!! (It's kinda hard on my fragile self-esteem ;)
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
Just trying to help. You want nit-picky? Talk to me. LOL I'll give you nit-picky 'til the freegin' cows come home... ;)
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
You want nit-picky? Talk to me. LOL nitpicky is good. Lets get it right the first time. :)
Some suggested changes implemented: (It's kinda hard on my fragile self-esteem ;) whoops! Sorry about that.
You must be registered with the correct party to vote for Ron Paul in states with CLOSED PRIMARIES. Click Primarily Paul and scroll down to the State by State chart. Can you fit all the dashes in the phone number? 1-877-Ron-2008 BTW, I called the number to make sure I could reach from my area, it did go through but hit a recording. So I tried their 'regular' number 703-248-9115 , which went to the same recording. SO, I'm assuming that the recorder is on because it's a weekend. (It does give you an opportunity to leave a message if you like) THAT'S ALL CRITTER !!!! GOOD JOB!! Thank you !
You must be registered with the correct party to vote for Ron Paul in states with CLOSED PRIMARIES. Click Primarily Paul and scroll down to the State by State chart. I think it's perfect!
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
RE: The ad imo, the most effective ads/ movements don't begin with a negative. hillery is a negative. Something like: "On January 8th, let us nominate the man who can restore our country to truth, principle and freedom." is better.
My personal feeling is that people don't read newspaper ads unless something grabs their attention. I think the Hillary reference does that. Once we have their attention, she is never mentioned again, only positives about RP. However, I am not an expert.
Critter, About the "calling the campaign" suggestion, is the national campaign really equiped to handle lots of incoming calls at that number? And, might the number for the Ron Paul Headquarters in New Hampshire be better, since that is probably where the actual on the ground campaign organizing in NH is taking place?
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
Help us nominate Ron Paul! Personally, I think this part is too busy. Perhaps simplify/streamline it? Maybe delete 'according to the polls'? (not really necessary?) Also, 'nominate' shouldn't be used twice in two sentences, imho. Using two colors, say, red and blue on the white background could improve it's appeal? I dunno, I might be wrong, but those are my thoughts. Otherwise, it still looks great!
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
The Hillary reference is genius. RP will take up residence in the average GOP Partybot's head with that hook. It's the only true thing about Paul that could possibly persuade a hidebound Republican party hack to do the right thing.
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
i agree. it grabs my attention and makes me think, yes, RP is the only republican who can beat hillary. i think that will resonate with GOP voters because that is their biggest fear.
lmao! Maybe I should add a "why waste your vote on someone who can't win? Like Giuliani, or Romney, etc..."
You're perfect.
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
Paul said, "The statement earlier made that we all went to Washington to change Washington, Washington changed us. I don't think that applies to me. Washington did not change me. I would have liked to have changed Washington." Paul eventually answered a question from Emily in Los Angeles who asked specifically which federal programs the candidates would cut in order to reduce spending. "By cutting three programs such as the Department of Education, Ronald Reagan used to talk about that, Department of Energy. Department of Homeland Security is the biggest bureaucracy we ever had," Paul said. Wonder if we say, Let's help Ron Paul change Washington.
You must be registered with the correct party to vote for Ron Paul in states with CLOSED PRIMARIES. Click Primarily Paul and scroll down to the State by State chart. (blush) You're too kind ;) (and also possibly somewhat senile, blind and deaf, but never mind)
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
Will you two just go get a room please... hehehe
Only if it leads to the impeachment of Smirk. Do check out this week's Deek, posted by angle.
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
I was just looking at that. :)
Also, 'nominate' shouldn't be used twice in two sentences, imho. I disagree. "According to the polls" provides a foundation for and strengthens the claim. As for the parallel sentence structure of "Help us nominate", that makes emphatic that RP and the "only candidate who can defeat her, according to the polls" are, indeed, one and the same. So, I don't mind it. I also think the Freedom4um part stood out more when it was the only unbolded text. Maybe bolding Freedom4um.com only would be better (if you want it bolded). Finally, there is a capital "C" in the second "Freedom4um.Com".
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
Please ping me when the shooting begins :)
We're dealing in black and white newsprint, right? I was operating under that assumption. I think color costs more. I could asterisk the claim, and put "*according to polls blah blah blah" at the bottom somewhere.
I think you're right. I was just tinkering, will go back to old way.
BANG
Critter I believe was in color. May I say you have done very well with this.
A new version: Great job!
more color
There are now two sample version I have whipped up: and We can use either, or parts of either, colorize the first, etc. We need a "decider". I know, GWB is the decider, but... Seriously though, we need someone to officially approve a copy, because everyone has an opinion, we could be here for a year trying to accommodate them all.
Are you shooting at bucks from your front porch again?
BTTT
Comments (401 - 615) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#361. To: Critter (#308)
#362. To: angle, Tauzero, scrapper2, Peppa, Jethro Tull, abraxas, lodwick (#308)
#363. To: christine, critter (#362)
#364. To: christine, critter, wudiditz (#362)
re:
#365. To: Peppa (#364)
Voted against the Patriot Acts.
...who can beat her, according to the polls.
--Perhaps consider using his Toll Free number 1-877-Ron-2008
--You could reword/reduce a little text here, Ad sponsored by Freedom4um.com.
#366. To: wudidiz (#359)
#367. To: Critter (#365)
Voted against the Patriot Acts. Correct me if I am technically wrong, but isn't there a Patriot Act and Patriot Act II or is it just referred to act Patriot Act II?
#368. To: Peppa (#364)
#369. To: Critter (#366)
#370. To: wudidiz, Peppa (#369)
(It's nitpicky time, huh? So sorry Critter, not personal)
#371. To: wudidiz, Peppa, Christine, hammerdown, Robin, all (#369)
#372. To: wudidiz (#368)
Please don't call me wudiditz, LOL!!!
#373. To: Critter (#371)
One last thing.
#374. To: Critter, Cynicom, Zipporah, christine, Peppa, TwentyTwelve, Original_Intent, *Ron Paul for President 2008* (#371)
#375. To: christine (#362)
"Who do you want for our next president?"
#376. To: angle (#375)
#377. To: Critter (#366)
(Edited)
#378. To: Critter, Peppa, Christine, hammerdown, Robin, Original_Intent, TwentyTwelve, all (#371)
the only Republican candidate who can
beat her, according to the polls.
#379. To: Critter (#376)
I think the Hillary reference does that.
#380. To: Critter, angle (#376)
#381. To: Arator (#379)
It's the only true thing about Paul that could possibly persuade a hidebound Republican party hack to do the right thing.
#382. To: robin (#374)
I think it's perfect!
#383. To: Arator (#379)
November 28, 2007 Paul: 'Washington did not change me' (CNN) - Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) prefaced his answer to a question about cutting federal spending by responding to a previous statement by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ,) that in 1994, Republicans took control of Congress to change Washington, but instead Washington changed Republicans and spending got "out of control."
#384. To: wudidiz (#382)
#385. To: robin, wudidiz (#384)
#386. To: Critter, wudidiz (#385)
#387. To: robin (#386)
#388. To: wudidiz, Critter (#378)
(Edited)
Maybe delete 'according to the polls'? (not really necessary?)
#389. To: christine (#362)
#390. To: wudidiz, christine (#378)
#391. To: Arator (#388)
I also think the Freedom4um part stood out more when it was the only unbolded text.
#392. To: Jethro Tull (#389)
#393. To: Arator (#388)
#394. To: Critter (#390)
#395. To: Cynicom (#394)
#396. To: Critter (#395)
A new version
#397. To: TwentyTwelve (#396)
#398. To: All (#397)
#399. To: Cynicom (#392)
BANG
#400. To: Critter, ALL, Concensus needed on 2 ad choices (#398)
.
.
.