[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report $200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030 Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis Fooling Us Badly With Psyops The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why) Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them America Is Reaching A Boiling Point The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani Man puts down ABC's The View on air Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But.. Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’ Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics, BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk, Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up! Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Free Sherry Peel Jackson -- my letter to a federal judge
Source: The Fountain of Truth
URL Source: http://www.geocities.com/fountoftruth/freespj.html
Published: Nov 21, 2007
Author: Doug Newman
Post Date: 2007-11-21 09:48:28 by snoopdougg
Keywords: None
Views: 149
Comments: 6

November 2, 2007

Honorable Orinda Evans
United States District Courthouse
75 Spring Street Room 1988
Atlanta, GA 30303

Judge Evans,

I write regarding the case The United States v. Sherry Peel Jackson. (Case No: 1:07-CR-108) All Mrs. Jackson is asking is that someone show her – and, in so doing, the American people – the specific law requiring the American people to pay taxes on their income.

If you cannot present such a law, Mrs. Jackson is thereby not guilty of breaking any law and you must let her go free.

If you cannot present such a law, you have no authority whatsoever to issue any sentence.

If you cannot present such a law, and you deprive Mrs. Jackson of her liberty and/or property anyway, you will thereby show yourself to be a tyrant of the most heinous and un-American sort.

If you cannot present such a law and you punish Mrs. Jackson in any way, you will have perpetrated a judicial travesty and you will deserve to be impeached and removed from office. Article 3, Section 1 of the United States Constitution states that “The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour…” A federal judgeship is not a guaranteed job-for-life.

If, on the other hand, you let Mrs. Jackson go free, you will establish yourself as a true patriot and hero. And I use these words in the noblest “ 1776” sense.

The choice is yours. You have an opportunity here to be a hero or a zero. Make the right choice.

So help you God,

Douglas F. Newman

Learn more about Sherry Peel Jackson

Donate to her legal defense!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: snoopdougg (#0)

A most excellent letter, Doug - pray it gets a good outcome.

Join the Ron Paul Revolution

Lod  posted on  2007-11-21   10:27:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Thanks for taking a stand on what you believe, snoop.

buckeye  posted on  2007-11-21   10:50:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I thought she requested letters that only asked for a light sentence since she has kids and is not a threat to society. Sending this kind of letter has no positive practical effect since she has already been found guilty, and the only issue is how much of a sentence she will receive.

It feels good to tell a judge off, but in this case, I don't think this is doing the kind of service Jackson has requested. In fact in may be doing the opposite.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2007-11-21   10:51:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

All Mrs. Jackson is asking is that someone show her – and, in so doing, the American people – the specific law requiring the American people to pay taxes on their income.

Which is THE reason they WON'T. There IS a law requiring such, BUT if they actually SHOW it, then the population at large will know WHAT to do so they won't fall under the requirement any longer.

You won't find this law in the Income Tax Code. All you'll find there is an incomprehensible jumble of shit so vast that NO ONE can fully decipher it.

The law is to be found in the Social Security Act. I ask you, was/is Mrs Jackson a card-carrying member of Socialism? If so (and I'm betting she is) then she's liable. Hell, even WIKIPEDIA(!!) will tell you as much:
Social Security number
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the United States, a Social Security number (SSN) is a 9-digit number issued to citizens, permanent residents, and temporary (working) residents under section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act, codified as 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(2). The number is issued to an individual by the Social Security Administration, an agency of the U.S. Federal Government. Its primary purpose is to track individuals for taxation purposes. In recent years the SSN has become a de facto national identification number.[1] A social security number may be obtained by applying on Form SS–5, "Application for A Social Security Number Card" (see 20 C.F.R. §422.103(b))[2].

So the issue becomes "Is a person required to obtain a Social Security Account?" I've covered this topic more than once on here, perhaps (in fact I suggest) you'd like to read the most comprehensive one. In fact, you may find the whole thread worth reading.

Mrs Jackson has already been convicted. For the record, I think it sucks like shit! And although the judge in the case has the authority to overrule the jury's verdict, the chances of that happening are about as good as Bush getting on national TV and saying "I've got to come clean. I've committed war crimes, and I must step down as president and turn myself in to the authorities."

I was under the impression Mrs Jackson was asking people to send in letters asking for leniency. I'm sure Becraft is scouring the case thoroughly to find grounds for appeal. At this point, that is the next best chance at acquittal. IMHO letters like this one will only make matters WORSE for her. There IS a time to call a judge a tyrant, BUT this isn't it. That time comes when the judge is him/herself sitting on the other side of the bench, themselves facing criminal charges.

BTW, please don't take this reply personally. I ADMIRE that at least you are concerned enough to take action! That's a helluva lot more than most folks can claim! And YES, the whole "income tax" thing is bullshit! BUT time and time again, the "show me the law" argument has proven futile.

The REAL "skinny" on the WHOLE MATTER is - IF you want to play Monopoly, then there are rules to the game, and everyone playing is expected to follow those rules. But there is NO LAW or RULE saying you have to play Monopoly.

99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
Steven Wright

innieway  posted on  2007-11-21   11:02:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I thought she requested letters that only asked for a light sentence since she has kids and is not a threat to society. Sending this kind of letter has no positive practical effect since she has already been found guilty, and the only issue is how much of a sentence she will receive.

It feels good to tell a judge off, but in this case, I don't think this is doing the kind of service Jackson has requested. In fact in may be doing the opposite.

EXCELLENT SUMMATION!!!

I agree with you 100%. See my reply #4.

99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
Steven Wright

innieway  posted on  2007-11-21   11:05:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This is a link to the request for assistance.

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=65814

I've seen this type of thing before. For purposes of sentencing, arguing innocence is of no value, especially if it's being argued to the judge that presided in the court in which she was convicted. In fact it can give the impression that the defendant has no remorse, which is reason to give a harder sentence. Of course she has no remorse, but that's not what the judge should be hearing about.

Save the "not guilty" and "travasty of justice" arguments for the appeal or the press. To help Sherry at sentencing, focus should be on her character and positive contributions to society, etc. Letters should be polite and professional.

Pinguinite.com EcuadorTreasures.ec

Pinguinite  posted on  2007-11-21   12:18:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]