[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Bush Fingered in Plame Leak Deceit
Source: Military.com
URL Source: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,156768,00.html?wh=wh
Published: Nov 21, 2007
Author: Associated Press
Post Date: 2007-11-21 13:32:04 by robin
Ping List: *Plamegate*     Subscribe to *Plamegate*
Keywords: None
Views: 386
Comments: 29

Bush Fingered in Plame Leak Deceit
Associated Press | November 21, 2007

WASHINGTON - Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan blames President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for efforts to mislead the public about the role of White House aides in leaking the identity of a CIA operative.

In an excerpt from his forthcoming book, McClellan recounts the 2003 news conference in which he told reporters that aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in the leak involving operative Valerie Plame.

"There was one problem. It was not true," McClellan writes, according to a brief excerpt released Nov. 20. "I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest-ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice president, the president's chief of staff and the president himself."

Bush's chief of staff at the time was Andrew Card.

The excerpt, posted on the Web site of publisher PublicAffairs, renews questions about what went on in the West Wing and how much Bush and Cheney knew about the leak. For years, it was McClellan's job to field - and often duck - those types of questions.

Now that he's spurring them, answers are equally hard to come by.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said it wasn't clear what McClellan meant in the excerpt. "The president has not and would not ask his spokespeople to pass on false information," she said.

McClellan turned down interview requests Nov. 20.

Plame maintains the White House quietly outed her to reporters. Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, said the leak was retribution for his public criticism of the Iraq war. The accusation dogged the administration and made Plame a cause celebre among many Democrats.

McClellan's book, "What Happened," isn't due out until April, and the released excerpt was merely a teaser. It doesn't get into detail about how Bush and Cheney were involved or reveal what happened behind the scenes.

In the fall of 2003, after authorities began investigating the leak, McClellan told reporters that he'd personally spoken to Rove, who was Bush's top political adviser, and Libby, who was Cheney's chief of staff.

"They're good individuals, they're important members of our White House team, and that's why I spoke with them, so that I could come back to you and say that they were not involved," McClellan said at the time.

Both men, however, were involved. Rove was one of the original sources for the newspaper column that identified Plame. Libby also spoke to reporters about the CIA officer and was convicted of lying about those discussions. He is the only person to be charged in the case.

Since that news conference, however, the official White House stance has shifted and it has been difficult to get a clear picture of what happened behind closed doors around the time of the leak.

McClellan's flat denials gave way to a steady drumbeat of "no comment." And Bush's original pledge to fire anyone involved in the leak became a promise to fire anyone who "committed a crime."

In a CNN interview earlier this year, McClellan made no suggestion that Bush knew either Libby or Rove was involved in the leak. McClellan said his statements to reporters were what he and the president "believed to be true at the time based on assurances that we were both given."

Bush most recently addressed the issue in July after commuting Libby's 30-month prison term. He acknowledged that some in the White House were involved in the leak. Then, after repeatedly declining to discuss the ongoing investigation, he said the case was closed and it was time to move on.

Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion.


Poster Comment:

Armitage Says He Was Foolish in CIA Leak (Plame)
posted 10 days ago by Brian S Subscribe to *Plamegate*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: robin, TwentyTwelve, Original_Intent (#0)

Bush Fingered

Oh great, another Gannon/Guckert thread...

What North American Union?

Don't wait - send Ron Paul 2008 some FRNs right NOW!

Tea Party '07

Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-11-21   13:34:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: robin (#0)

I don't believe that McClellan is now admitting he lied in his grand jury testimony.

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-21   13:36:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: longnose gar (#2) (Edited)

"The most powerful leader in the world had called upon me to speak on his behalf and help restore credibility he lost amid the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So I stood at the White house briefing room podium in front of the glare of the klieg lights for the better part of two weeks and publicly exonerated two of the senior-most aides in the White House: Karl Rove and Scooter Libby.

"There was one problem. It was not true.

"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration "were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice President, the President's chief of staff, and the president himself."

link here

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-11-21   13:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: FOH (#1)

The President chuckled. "Well, you got a pretty face," he told the surprised Mr. Reid. He wasn't done. "You got a pretty face," he said again. "You're a good-looking guy. Better looking than my Scott [McClellan] anyway." http://www.rense.com/general47/bushsmitten.htm

President Bush said yesterday that he will fire anyone in the administration found to have committed a crime in the leaking of a CIA operative's name, creating a higher threshold than he did one year ago for holding aides accountable in the unmasking of Valerie Plame.

After originally saying anyone involved in leaking the name of the covert CIA operative would be fired, Bush told reporters: "If somebody committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration."

Smirk should fire himself.

www.washingtonpost.com/wp...7/18/AR2005071800157.html

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-11-21   13:47:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: robin (#4)

"It's just a GD piece of paper..." ~Jorge

What North American Union?

Don't wait - send Ron Paul 2008 some FRNs right NOW!

Tea Party '07

Have you seen THIS yet? Pass it around...

FOH  posted on  2007-11-21   13:50:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: longnose gar (#2)

Did he say zionists were insanely stupid?

nobody  posted on  2007-11-21   13:51:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: robin (#3)

McClellan appeared before the grand jury and implicated no one. I doubt he is now implicating those mentioned, because to do so would mean he perjured himself. He's just spouting crap to sell a book.

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-21   13:54:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: longnose gar (#7) (Edited)

Plus, he's also disagreeing with the all the leading neocons.

Must be a coincidence.

nobody  posted on  2007-11-21   14:01:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: longnose gar (#7)

McClellan appeared before the grand jury and implicated no one.

How would you know, as grand jury testimony is secret?


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-11-21   14:01:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: FormerLurker (#9)

No one was indicted.

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-21   14:03:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: longnose gar (#10)

No one was indicted.

That's not necessarily an indication of whether or not McClellan had implicated anyone. There are other factors involved, many of them political.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-11-21   14:07:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: longnose gar (#7)

McClellan appeared before the grand jury and implicated no one. I doubt he is now implicating those mentioned, because to do so would mean he perjured himself. He's just spouting crap to sell a book.

You heard McClellan's testimony before the grand jury?

What he is retracting is the following:

"The most powerful leader in the world had called upon me to speak on his behalf and help restore credibility he lost amid the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So I stood at the White house briefing room podium in front of the glare of the klieg lights for the better part of two weeks and publicly exonerated two of the senior-most aides in the White House: Karl Rove and Scooter Libby.

"There was one problem. It was not true.

"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration "were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice President, the President's chief of staff, and the president himself."

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-11-21   14:11:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: robin (#0)

Bush Fingered in Plame Leak Deceit

Not surprising.

I used to think republicans were different.

Obviously not.

Especially this JO

Stop foreign welfare NOW!

WhiteGuy  posted on  2007-11-21   14:12:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker (#11)

It is not plausible that he went to the grand jury and testified that Bush, Cheney etc. were involved in deception and coverup then nothing happened. The moonbats will ponder about this for a while, McClellan will sell some books and nothing more will come of this

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-21   14:13:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: robin (#0)

Oh hells bells..........they're all a bunch of liars. We all know the liar in chief lies......exactly who has he gotten rid of? Hmmm.........les see.........dere be the scotter.......nah, he dun got hiself a pardoner. Dat dirty rat rove..........oh no, he be allowed to ride off into the sunset to sit with his wife and try ta make more babies, or sumthin.

Well, then Raggedy Andy! Nope..........he dun got the hell outta Dodge.

Not the so-pretty face Scotty.............he's too busy makin up stuff to put in a book hopin ta make a buck off the high livin at the WH.

Ari who? Nah.......he was long gone.

The vice liar in chief.........oh no......he's needed to manipulate the strings ont he liar in chief dummy.

We won't even git started with WMD, or who is the better truth teller between the liar in chief and Saddam!!!!

rowdee  posted on  2007-11-21   14:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: robin (#12)

What he is retracting is the following:

He doesn't say what he's retracting. It's assumed he's talking about the Plame case, but that's not explicit. It's not known if what he's referring to is anything that is at all of a criminal nature, and it probably isn't. He's just selling books.

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-21   14:16:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: longnose gar (#14)

moonbats

Only zionists talk like that, and zionists are shits-for-brains who pulled the 9/11 inside job.

nobody  posted on  2007-11-21   14:17:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: longnose gar (#14)

It is not plausible that he went to the grand jury and testified that Bush, Cheney etc. were involved in deception and coverup then nothing happened.

It is HIGHLY plausible. A sitting president or vice-president cannot be indicted for a crime, they need to be impeached first.

There were many rumors flying around as to what Fitzgerald was looking into, including the pre-war intelligence. None of it panned out, although not necessarily because there was not enough evidence, but because of political pressure, or perhaps other reasons, such as "an offer that can't be refused".


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-11-21   14:17:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: longnose gar (#14)

The moonbats will ponder about this for a while

To you a "moonbat" is anyone that is a critical thinker and doesn't swallow everything they're told by the news media.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-11-21   14:18:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: FormerLurker (#18)

Rove was not indicted either.

If Fizzy had information implicating Bush and Cheney , it most certainly would have been presented to Congress.

As in your twoofer BS, you're just making stuff up that doesn't exist.

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-21   14:56:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: longnose gar (#16)

In an excerpt from his forthcoming book, McClellan recounts the 2003 news conference in which he told reporters that aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in the leak involving operative Valerie Plame.

The context is Plame.

Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!

robin  posted on  2007-11-21   16:49:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: longnose gar (#20)

Thank goodness lying dinosaurs of the zionist mob such as yourself are on this site to let us all know what braindead zionist war criminals think.

nobody  posted on  2007-11-21   18:15:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: longnose gar (#20)

As in your twoofer BS, you're just making stuff up that doesn't exist.

Hey asshole, I'm not the ex White House press secretary that made the statement. It is a fact that Scott McClellan made the statement, and it is a well known fact that there are not many in Congress that wish to pursue an impeachment of either Bush OR Cheney, even IF evidence had been presented.

Hell, there ARE Articles of Impeachment sitting in the Judiciary Committee right now against Cheney, where they've sat for the past six months collecting dust.

You like to pretend that things which DO exist don't, and call people "twoofers" when they aren't drinking the kool-aid that you'd like them to swallow.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-11-21   20:28:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: longnose gar (#20)

I don't think anyone noticed you snuck back on LP as fourth and three. Keep it quiet or its going to look like we are coordinating your propaganda.

It's not terrorism when the Israelis do it.

Goldi-Licks  posted on  2007-11-21   21:17:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: FormerLurker (#23)

Hell, there ARE Articles of Impeachment sitting in the Judiciary Committee right now against Cheney

Please. Kucinich was thrown overboard by his own Party for that nonsense.

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-22   14:01:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: longnose gar (#25)

Kucinich was thrown overboard by his own Party for that nonsense.

And that's because the majority of those in his "party" AND the "other party" are a bunch of spineless cowards. Many are also either susceptable to blackmail or in league with those that benefit directly or indirectly from the neocon/NWO agenda.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2007-11-22   15:13:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: longnose gar (#25)

Please. Kucinich was thrown overboard by his own Party for that nonsense.

That's just more proof that on issues that count, the Democrats and Republicans are in bed together. Those who get worked up over whether you get a "D" or an "R" are no different from those who root for one WWF wrestler over another. The opposition is completely phony.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2007-11-22   15:17:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: longnose gar (#20)

Is that also how Jeff Gannon pronounces it, as "twoofer?"

Figured you might know.

nobody  posted on  2007-11-22   15:25:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: FormerLurker, Robin (#23)

Publisher: McClellan doesn't believe Bush lied

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21917188/

longnose gar  posted on  2007-11-22   17:43:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]