See other Immigration Articles
Title: Proof: Our Founders Wanted A White America
Source:
wsi.matriots.com
URL Source: http://wsi.matriots.com/citizen.html
Published: Nov 27, 2007
Author: matriots.com
Post Date: 2007-11-27 17:45:24 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 264
Comments: 16
Proof: Our Founders Wanted A White America Re: president George W. Bush's guest-worker plan [January 2004] to allow millions of illegal immigrants to remain in America: How did our Founding Fathers feel about the matter of 'who can become a citizen of America?' Let's take a look: Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104): "That any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law court of record, in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good character..." It is clear that our Founders wanted a White America, not an America full of Browns, Blacks, Asians and Jews. In fact, America's 'only-Whites-are-American-citizens-with-full-rights' feature did not end until the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." Notice that the requirement of needing to be White to be a citizen is gone. In other words, up until 1868 only Whites were 'real' citizens of America. If our Founders had wanted America to be a racial melting-pot, why did they insist on Whiteness as a criteria for citizenship? Our media and our popular-culture directors know that America was intended to be a White country, which is why they malign anyone who suggests otherwise.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
“What is the true nature of the evil of the existence of a portion of the African race in our population? It is not that there are some but that there are so many … who can never amalgamate with the great body of our population.” -- Henry Clay
 | Fred: You sure can pick 'em. Lamont: What do you mean pop? Fred: Show about a milkman, with an ugly wife and five daughters, who complains a lot about God. Lamont: It means more than that, pop. Fred: Well it don' mean nuthin' to me, cuz I ain't Jewish. Lamont: It was on broadway for seven weeks pop, what does that mean? Fred: It means there's a whole lotta Jews in New York. |
#2. To: ALL (#0)
That's just fucking ridiculous.
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
#3. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
Hey MV, you like Rooty?
#4. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
Women did not have the right to vote or own land. So maybe they didn't want any women in America?
Ron Paul for President - Join a Ron Paul Meetup group today!
#5. To: robin (#4)
Good point. Sam Francis couldn't have said it better.
| “There are racial considerations too grave to be brushed aside for any sentimental reasons. Biological laws tell us that certain divergent people will not mix or blend. The Nordics propagate themselves successfully. With other races, the outcome shows deterioration on both sides. Quality of mind and body suggests that observance of ethnic law is as great a necessity to a nation as immigration law.” -- Calvin Coolidge, "Whose Country Is This?",Good Housekeeping |
#6. To: robin (#4)
That's not a good idea ;)
So maybe they didn't want any women in America?
"They must find it difficult... Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." ~ Gerald Massey
#7. To: robin (#4)
I knew Chimp's homo streek came from somewhere! ;)
Women did not have the right to vote or own land. So maybe they didn't want any women in America?
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
#8. To: Mind_Virus (#0) (Edited)
TOS was always being hit with junk like this. Seems that TOS being down is having a strange effect on this site. I suspect this is just the first wave.
#9. To: robin (#4)
From what I understand, George Washington especially hated niggers, gooks, spooks, chinks, ragheads, spics, sandniggers, Japs, Wops, Pollocks, Icelanders, kikes and dykes. Oh, and butt pirates.
#10. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
You know, sometimes I think the founders weren't so smart after all. I like the idea of a predominantly white America. Trouble is, when sons-of-bitches who were too lazy to work their own land decided to import slaves -- in large numbers, at that -- they pretty much doomed the idea of a racially homogeneous land. The spiritual descendants of these same shiftless SOBs run corporate America today (along with, of course, both caucuses of the Corporate & War Party), and so they're still importing cheap labor in massive numbers. Not quite slaves, of course, but kind of close in some ways. So, I have to disagree that the founders didn't want lots of "Browns and Blacks" in America. True, they didn't want 'em being citizens ... but they wanted 'em. As so often happens, the sins of the fathers are visited on the descendant generations.
... our Founders wanted a White America, not an America full of Browns, Blacks, Asians and Jews.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. -- H. L. Mencken
#11. To: Enderby (#10) (Edited)
How was anyone supposed to compete with slave-owners, yet alone block them from bringing in slaves? What were they supposed to do, question the slaves in their native language? Only allow Americans to ship to America? Practically everyone looks at the system then through anachronistic stupid PC-TV goggles. Even now the government has some control, what is being done about importing wage-slaves or their products? Nothing! The hypocrisy is abso-effing-lutely astounding.
#12. To: Enderby (#10)
It wasn't so much that the white indentured servants they originally imported to do most of the work were lazy, they were a political threat to the establishment. It was after the indentured servants supported Bacon's Rebellion in Virginia that the plantation owners started importing black slaves in large numbers.
Trouble is, when sons-of-bitches who were too lazy to work their own land decided to import slaves -- in large numbers, at that -- they pretty much doomed the idea of a racially homogeneous land.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
#13. To: aristeides (#12)
It wasn't the indentured servants I'm talking about. It's the landowners. If a man owns so much land that he can't work it himself, then ... he owns too much land, I think. Greed's never been in short supply, though.
It wasn't so much that the white indentured servants they originally imported to do most of the work were lazy,
- - - - - - - - - - -
Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. -- H. L. Mencken
#14. To: nobody (#11)
Maybe they shouldn't have competed with slaveowners. Maybe they should have supported self and family from a homestead-type farm, and not been scrambling to become richer than humanly possible by using slaves to grow cash crops like cotton. My part of the country was settled by immigrant Germans. They seemed to do all right without slaves. Perhaps they didn't have vast plantations and enormous mansions ... but they also didn't screw up the country for us, either. In brief, they knew how to work with their own hands. Wish those southern bastards could have figured that out.
How was anyone supposed to compete with slave-owners ...
- - - - - - - - - - -
Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. -- H. L. Mencken
#15. To: Enderby (#14)
I'm suggesting there was nothing that could've been done to stop what happened.
#16. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
"Thank God we have in America perhaps the largest percentage of any country in the world of the pure, unadulterated Anglo-Saxon stock; certainly the greatest of any nation in the Nordic breed. It is for the preservation of that splendid stock that has characterized us that I would make this not an asylum for the oppressed of all countries, but a country to assimilate and perfect that splendid type of manhood that has made America the foremost Nation in her progress and in her power, and yet the youngest of all the nations. I myself believe that the preservation of her institutions depends upon us now taking counsel with our condition and our experience during the last World War. Without offense, but with regard to the salvation of our own, let us shut the door and assimilate what we have, and let us breed pure American citizens and develop our own American resources. I am more in favor of that than I am of our quota proposition. Of course, it may not meet the approbation of the Senate that we shall shut the door—which I unqualifiedly and unreservedly believe to be our duty—and develop what we have, assimilate and digest what we have into pure Americans, with American aspirations, and thoroughly familiar with the love of American institutions, rather than the importation of any number of men from other countries. If we may not have that, then I am in favor of putting the quota down to the lowest possible point, with every selective element in it that may be." Source: Speech by Ellison DuRant Smith, April 9, 1924, Congressional Record, 68th Congress, 1st Session (Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1924), vol. 65, 5961–5962.
....why did they insist on Whiteness as a criteria for citizenship?
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite." James Madison
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest