[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief

SCOTUS asked to review if Illinois can keep counting mail-in ballots 2 weeks after election day

The Real Reason Government Workers Are Panicking About ElonÂ’s New Tracking System

THEY DON'T CARE ANYMORE!

Young Americans Are Turning Off The TV

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice

"Terminator" Robot Dog Now Equipped With Amphibious Capabilities

Trump Plans To Use Impoundment To Cut Spending - What Is It?

Mass job losses as major factory owner moves business overseas

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Can You Trust the Bible?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 30, 2007
Author: Various
Post Date: 2007-11-30 12:50:27 by richard9151
Keywords: Bible, law, trustworthy
Views: 1611
Comments: 100

Proverbs 14:15; A fool will believe anything; smart people watch their step. Today's English Version.

The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going. The King James Study Bible

The simple believes every word : but the prudent man betakes himself to after-thought. The Septuagint from the Original Greek and including the English translation.

Anyone inexperienced puts faith in every word, but the shrewd one considers his steps. New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures.

I have mentioned that I have 12 Bibles, and the above is a good example of why. The meanings of the words become much clearer after reading three or more translations. Each translation is complete within itself, but..... so much clearer when several are used. Not to mention the errors that show up.


I find it curious as to how many people talk about the Bible, and their opinions of it, when they have not read it. Yet, they talk as if the opinions that they have, which came from others and not from their own research and understanding, somehow mean something.

Nothing could be further from the Truth, and, most opinions about the Bible are the same; nothing could be further from the Truth. That, my friends, is a shame.

Why? Because of all of the books ever written, only the Bible has stood the test of time, and, it has done so because it has proven to be trustworthy.

How so?

Because only a fool would go through life blindly accepting everything he hears, basing his decisoins and actions on frivolous advice or baseless teachings. If you think about it, this is exactly what has happened to America.

Get yer new credit card here and enjoy the American lifestyle to the fullest!

Get yer second mortgage here and deduct that interest from your taxes so you can have all the things you crave!

Get yer drugs here!

Get yer fast food here!

Send yer kids here (school-movies-whatever) so you are not bothered!

Get yer new cable channels here!

Subscribe to ------------ so you can learn all about the world!

And on and on endlessly.... and most Americans buy into the programs. Why? Because they no longer have a moral base by which to judge right from wrong. Instead, they have been programmed to accept the non-sense that comes from the widely distributed (garbage) books, the telly, and the government controlled education system.

Yet, in most homes, unopened, is the answer to their problems.

The Bible.

BUT.... the Bible is not what you have been told that it is, which is why so much of it is banned from what YOU think of as Christian churches. Why do you permit that?

The Bible is the most widely distributed book in history, The World Book Encyclopedia.

From Awake, November, 2007;

Over 500 years ago, the German inventor Johannes Gutenberg began printing with movable type. The first major book to come off his press was a Bible. Since then, billions upon billions of books on every subject imaginable have been printed. The Bible, however, is by far the most exceptional of them all.

It is estimated that more than 4.7 billion Bibles (in whole or in part) have been printed. That is more than five times the number of copies of the next most widely distributed publication; Quotations from Chairman Mao.

More than 50 million copies of the Bible or portions of it were distributed recently in one year alone. "The Bible is the best-selling book of the year, every year," says a report in The New Yorker magazine.

In whole or in part, the Bible has been translated into more than 2,400 languages. At least some of the Bible is available in the languages spoken by over 90 percent of the human family.

About half of the Bible writers finished their writings before the birth of both Confucius, the renowned Chinese sage, and Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism.

The Bible has endured bans by governments, vurnings by religious opposers, and attacks by critics. No other bookn in history has faced greater opposition -- and survived.

The above facts are ourstanding, but impressive details and statistics alone do not prove that the Bible is trustworthy. Here are five reasons why millions of people are convinced that the Bible is worthy of trust.


1. Historical Soundness. No one has ever successfully challenged the historical accuracy of the Bible. It refers to real people and real events.

2. Candor and Honesty. The Bible writers were honest men who wrote with openness of heart. Their candor gives their writing the clear ring of truth.

My note; the above is particularly important. The historical record confirms that, as today, ancient rules NEVER permitted a record made of their defeats or shortcomings. We learn of such only form their enemies. However, the Bible writers openly admit their errors and misgivings. This is really an important and refreshing difference.

3. Internal Harmony. Imagine asking 40 men from varied backgounds to write a book, each writing a section. The writers live in a number of lands and do not all know one another. Some do not know what the others have written. Would you expect a book thus produced to be harmonious?

The Bible is such a book. (The Bible is a collection of 66 books, or subdivions, starting with Genesis and ending with Revelation.) Written under even more unusual conditions than those described above, its internal harmony is nothing less than profound.

Uniqe Circumstances. The Bible was written over a span of some 1,600 uyears, from 1513 B.C.E. to about 98C.E. Many of the approxiamately 40 writers thus lived centuries apart. Their occupations were varied. some were fishermen, others were shepherds or kings, and one was a physician.

A harmonious message. The Bible penmen developed one central theme; the vindication of God's right to rule mankind and fulfillment of his purpose by means of his heavenly Kingdom, a world government.

Agreement on details. The Bible writers agreed on even minute details, but often this harmony was clearly unintentional.

4. Scientific Accuracy. Science has made great strides in modern times. As a result, old theories have given way to new ones. What was once accepted as fact may now be seen as myth. Science testbooks often need revision.

The Bible is not a science textbook. Yet, when it comes to scientific matters, the Bible is noteworthy not only for what it says but also for what it does not say.

Free of unscientific views. Many mistaken beliefs gained wide acceptance in ancient times. Views about the earth ranged from the idea that it was flat to the notion that tangible substances or objects held it aloft. Long before science learned about the spread and prevention of disease, physicians employed some pratices that were ineffective at best, lethal at worst. But not once in its more than 1,100 chapters does the Bible endorse any unscientific views or harmful practices.

Scientifically sound statements. Some 3,500 years ago, the Bible stated that the earth is hanging "upon nothing." (Job 26:7) In the eighth century B.C.E., Isaigh clearly referred to "the circle [or, sphere] of the earth." (Isaiah 40:22) A spherical earth held in empty space without anyt visible or physical means of support -- does not that sound remarkably modern?

Written about 1500 B.C.E., the Mosaic Law (found in the first five books of the Bible) contained sound laws regarding quarentining of the sick, treatment of dead bodies, and disposal of waste. -- Leviticus 13:1-5; Numbers 19:1-13; Deuteronomy 23:13, 14.

Even though it is an acient book and touches on many subjects, the Bible contains no scientific inaccuracies.

5. Fulfilled Prophecy. The Bible is filled with predictions, or prophecies. Its record, as documented by history, is clear. Bible prophecy is always right.

Distinguishing features. Bible prophecies are often specific and have been fulfilled down to the smallest of details. They usually involve matters of great importance and predict the opposite of what those living at the time of the writing might have been expecting.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The above details came from a Special Issue of the Awake! This issue is titled, Can You Trust the Bible? If you wish a copy, it is probably available, as it is freely printed and distributed by www.watchtower.org. On average, each issue of Awake is printed in 80 languages in 34,267,000 copies.

I have stated before that I am not a Jehovah's Witness. However, from what I have read, they, BY FAR, come closest to my understanding of the Bible, BASED on my own research and reading. And I find that many of their tracts are very accurate and Scriptually correct.

Now, the question that I have for you is.... are you reading the Bible, or, is the non-sense of the United States really that much more important?

As I have stated before, I have no debt. Why? Because I read the Bible. Pretty well sums it all up for me. Subscribe to *Bible facts*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 66.

#2. To: richard9151 (#0)

Why? Because of all of the books ever written, only the Bible has stood the test of time, and, it has done so because it has proven to be trustworthy.

This is not true, my friend. There are preserved texts in Hinduism and Buddhism that you could spend an entire life time reading and never finish. Have you not read the Bagavad Gita? It's the cream of the Upanishads.

The story of Gilgamesh endured centuries prior to the great transformation into Noah in the Bible. It is one of the oldest preserved stories on earth, trustworthy enough to make an appearance in the Bible.

Explore theology a bit more and you will find that many of your most trusted Biblical stories have much older roots. Your understanding will blossom like a flower if you take the time to delve deeper.

However, I agree that much is lost in Bible translations, along with a reader comprehension. Dumbing down of the Bible is a fascinating topic. Thanks for sharing.

abraxas  posted on  2007-11-30   13:06:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: abraxas (#2)

This is not true, my friend. There are preserved texts in Hinduism and Buddhism that you could spend an entire life time reading and never finish. Have you not read the Bagavad Gita? It's the cream of the Upanishads.

The story of Gilgamesh endured centuries prior to the great transformation into Noah in the Bible. It is one of the oldest preserved stories on earth, trustworthy enough to make an appearance in the Bible.

Explore theology a bit more and you will find that many of your most trusted Biblical stories have much older roots. Your understanding will blossom like a flower if you take the time to delve deeper.

The curse of humankind is the inability of most to see the simple truths you have stated.

The Bible contains some truths, some wisdoms. It also contains fables, myths, tortured histories and fairy tales that craft some kind of message that may have been lost in time.

No book is the word of God, for books are written by men, some of whom have some insights into God, and many of whom do not.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-11-30   13:31:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Paul Revere (#4)

It also contains fables, myths, tortured histories and fairy tales

Care to be more specific, such as naming names and quoting Scriptures? Rather than just repeating what you have heard elsewhere?

N0?! Thought not.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:18:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: richard9151 (#8)

Care to be more specific, such as naming names and quoting Scriptures? Rather than just repeating what you have heard elsewhere?

No, because you're an idiot who thinks most of the stories in the Bible are true, and arguing with such a tard is a complete waste of time.

Fuck off, Bible boy.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-11-30   14:43:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Paul Revere (#12)

No, because you're an idiot who thinks most of the stories in the Bible are true, and arguing with such a tard is a complete waste of time.

Well, since no one has been able to prove that such stories are false, that means I am in pretty good company; the company of those who believe that which has been proven, unlike others, such as, oh, for instance, attorneys, who believe whatever they are told to believe, such as in the goddess of justice.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:52:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: richard9151 (#15)

Well, since no one has been able to prove that such stories are false, that means I am in pretty good company

The burden of proof is on YOU, not me, to establish the stories are true. You can't, but the burden is on you, nevertheless. You maintain they are true. You have the duty to prove that.

You fail to recognize that ALL your beliefs about the Bible are merely yours. They're beliefs. They're not facts, and they'll never be facts.

You live in a mythical world that exists only in your head, but you think it's the world God created. It's not. It's your fabrication.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-12-01   0:30:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: All (#43)

This thread demonstrates clearly what we all know: that the most ignorant among is the one most convinced of the rightness of his own religious beliefs. This is common. Religion thrives on ignorance and lack of intelligence, and this thread is a clinic in that topic. Most hard core Bible thumpers are ignorant rubes who know only the things other zealots have told them. They use the Bible and ignore anything that predates it. They don't even know how it was written, or more importantly, how it was edited.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-12-01   0:42:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Paul Revere (#44)

They don't even know how it was written, or more importantly, how it was edited.

Many of them of them even try to deny that they got it from the Catholic Church since they hate the Vatican so much. The complete and utter ignorance of history is incredible among most so-called "Bible Christians" and a gross number of so-called "apologetics" works are utter hogwash and easily refuted with a Funk and Wagnalls.

The most recent one I was handed said that the Orthodox Church came into being at the Reformation in the 1500s.....and that the Catholic Church came into being in 800AD....but that this particular group of Baptists had been around since 33AD. Never mind that the Baptists came into being post-Reformation as any Enyclopedia will tell you.

Quite honestly, in regards to the Bible, it really does seem that a lot of them think it fell from the sky already translated into English for them and that an argument for the "King James" version is that it has no copyright! Jeez!

mirage  posted on  2007-12-01   6:05:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: mirage (#45)

Many of them of them even try to deny that they got it from the Catholic Church

The Catholic church has its own Bible. The errors in the King James Bible are readily admitted by most Christains.

I have very good source books which show where translations come from, and what they are based on; i.e., the most trusted sources dating from before the year 200.

As I have stated, I have 12 Bibles, and check versus to verify, not trusting to any one translation. Works pretty well, and, I have identified errors in several Bibles doing that.

The fact is that most copies of the Bible that I use DID NOT come from the Roman church. That being said, I do still use my King James Study Bible.

richard9151  posted on  2007-12-02   2:19:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: richard9151 (#62)

The fact is that most copies of the Bible that I use DID NOT come from the Roman church.

The table of contents did -- after being edited by Martin Luther.

mirage  posted on  2007-12-02   2:29:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: mirage (#64)

The table of contents did -- after being edited by Martin Luther.

And...... your point is?

There have been a lot of men involved in deciding what books to include in the Bible, and not just those of the Roman church. This includes Jesus Christ who quoted from the Old Testament.

And not every one of my Bible follows the Roman church's formula. Not even close.

richard9151  posted on  2007-12-02   2:53:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 66.

#68. To: richard9151 (#66)

And...... your point is?

My point is that you got your Bible from the Catholic Church. Like it or not, the Councils determined the canon that went into it.

That's history.
That's how it is.

You got your Bible from the Catholic Church. Period.

Here's a nice book for you to read about all of this. Written by a Protestant of all things:

mirage  posted on  2007-12-02 04:11:50 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 66.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]