[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Joe Rogan expressed deep concern that Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Zelensky will start World War III

Fury in Memphis after attempted murder suspect who ambushed FedEx employee walks free without bail

Tehran preparing for attack against Israel: Ayatollah Khamenei's aide

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Can You Trust the Bible?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 30, 2007
Author: Various
Post Date: 2007-11-30 12:50:27 by richard9151
Keywords: Bible, law, trustworthy
Views: 1831
Comments: 100

Proverbs 14:15; A fool will believe anything; smart people watch their step. Today's English Version.

The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going. The King James Study Bible

The simple believes every word : but the prudent man betakes himself to after-thought. The Septuagint from the Original Greek and including the English translation.

Anyone inexperienced puts faith in every word, but the shrewd one considers his steps. New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures.

I have mentioned that I have 12 Bibles, and the above is a good example of why. The meanings of the words become much clearer after reading three or more translations. Each translation is complete within itself, but..... so much clearer when several are used. Not to mention the errors that show up.


I find it curious as to how many people talk about the Bible, and their opinions of it, when they have not read it. Yet, they talk as if the opinions that they have, which came from others and not from their own research and understanding, somehow mean something.

Nothing could be further from the Truth, and, most opinions about the Bible are the same; nothing could be further from the Truth. That, my friends, is a shame.

Why? Because of all of the books ever written, only the Bible has stood the test of time, and, it has done so because it has proven to be trustworthy.

How so?

Because only a fool would go through life blindly accepting everything he hears, basing his decisoins and actions on frivolous advice or baseless teachings. If you think about it, this is exactly what has happened to America.

Get yer new credit card here and enjoy the American lifestyle to the fullest!

Get yer second mortgage here and deduct that interest from your taxes so you can have all the things you crave!

Get yer drugs here!

Get yer fast food here!

Send yer kids here (school-movies-whatever) so you are not bothered!

Get yer new cable channels here!

Subscribe to ------------ so you can learn all about the world!

And on and on endlessly.... and most Americans buy into the programs. Why? Because they no longer have a moral base by which to judge right from wrong. Instead, they have been programmed to accept the non-sense that comes from the widely distributed (garbage) books, the telly, and the government controlled education system.

Yet, in most homes, unopened, is the answer to their problems.

The Bible.

BUT.... the Bible is not what you have been told that it is, which is why so much of it is banned from what YOU think of as Christian churches. Why do you permit that?

The Bible is the most widely distributed book in history, The World Book Encyclopedia.

From Awake, November, 2007;

Over 500 years ago, the German inventor Johannes Gutenberg began printing with movable type. The first major book to come off his press was a Bible. Since then, billions upon billions of books on every subject imaginable have been printed. The Bible, however, is by far the most exceptional of them all.

It is estimated that more than 4.7 billion Bibles (in whole or in part) have been printed. That is more than five times the number of copies of the next most widely distributed publication; Quotations from Chairman Mao.

More than 50 million copies of the Bible or portions of it were distributed recently in one year alone. "The Bible is the best-selling book of the year, every year," says a report in The New Yorker magazine.

In whole or in part, the Bible has been translated into more than 2,400 languages. At least some of the Bible is available in the languages spoken by over 90 percent of the human family.

About half of the Bible writers finished their writings before the birth of both Confucius, the renowned Chinese sage, and Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism.

The Bible has endured bans by governments, vurnings by religious opposers, and attacks by critics. No other bookn in history has faced greater opposition -- and survived.

The above facts are ourstanding, but impressive details and statistics alone do not prove that the Bible is trustworthy. Here are five reasons why millions of people are convinced that the Bible is worthy of trust.


1. Historical Soundness. No one has ever successfully challenged the historical accuracy of the Bible. It refers to real people and real events.

2. Candor and Honesty. The Bible writers were honest men who wrote with openness of heart. Their candor gives their writing the clear ring of truth.

My note; the above is particularly important. The historical record confirms that, as today, ancient rules NEVER permitted a record made of their defeats or shortcomings. We learn of such only form their enemies. However, the Bible writers openly admit their errors and misgivings. This is really an important and refreshing difference.

3. Internal Harmony. Imagine asking 40 men from varied backgounds to write a book, each writing a section. The writers live in a number of lands and do not all know one another. Some do not know what the others have written. Would you expect a book thus produced to be harmonious?

The Bible is such a book. (The Bible is a collection of 66 books, or subdivions, starting with Genesis and ending with Revelation.) Written under even more unusual conditions than those described above, its internal harmony is nothing less than profound.

Uniqe Circumstances. The Bible was written over a span of some 1,600 uyears, from 1513 B.C.E. to about 98C.E. Many of the approxiamately 40 writers thus lived centuries apart. Their occupations were varied. some were fishermen, others were shepherds or kings, and one was a physician.

A harmonious message. The Bible penmen developed one central theme; the vindication of God's right to rule mankind and fulfillment of his purpose by means of his heavenly Kingdom, a world government.

Agreement on details. The Bible writers agreed on even minute details, but often this harmony was clearly unintentional.

4. Scientific Accuracy. Science has made great strides in modern times. As a result, old theories have given way to new ones. What was once accepted as fact may now be seen as myth. Science testbooks often need revision.

The Bible is not a science textbook. Yet, when it comes to scientific matters, the Bible is noteworthy not only for what it says but also for what it does not say.

Free of unscientific views. Many mistaken beliefs gained wide acceptance in ancient times. Views about the earth ranged from the idea that it was flat to the notion that tangible substances or objects held it aloft. Long before science learned about the spread and prevention of disease, physicians employed some pratices that were ineffective at best, lethal at worst. But not once in its more than 1,100 chapters does the Bible endorse any unscientific views or harmful practices.

Scientifically sound statements. Some 3,500 years ago, the Bible stated that the earth is hanging "upon nothing." (Job 26:7) In the eighth century B.C.E., Isaigh clearly referred to "the circle [or, sphere] of the earth." (Isaiah 40:22) A spherical earth held in empty space without anyt visible or physical means of support -- does not that sound remarkably modern?

Written about 1500 B.C.E., the Mosaic Law (found in the first five books of the Bible) contained sound laws regarding quarentining of the sick, treatment of dead bodies, and disposal of waste. -- Leviticus 13:1-5; Numbers 19:1-13; Deuteronomy 23:13, 14.

Even though it is an acient book and touches on many subjects, the Bible contains no scientific inaccuracies.

5. Fulfilled Prophecy. The Bible is filled with predictions, or prophecies. Its record, as documented by history, is clear. Bible prophecy is always right.

Distinguishing features. Bible prophecies are often specific and have been fulfilled down to the smallest of details. They usually involve matters of great importance and predict the opposite of what those living at the time of the writing might have been expecting.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The above details came from a Special Issue of the Awake! This issue is titled, Can You Trust the Bible? If you wish a copy, it is probably available, as it is freely printed and distributed by www.watchtower.org. On average, each issue of Awake is printed in 80 languages in 34,267,000 copies.

I have stated before that I am not a Jehovah's Witness. However, from what I have read, they, BY FAR, come closest to my understanding of the Bible, BASED on my own research and reading. And I find that many of their tracts are very accurate and Scriptually correct.

Now, the question that I have for you is.... are you reading the Bible, or, is the non-sense of the United States really that much more important?

As I have stated before, I have no debt. Why? Because I read the Bible. Pretty well sums it all up for me. Subscribe to *Bible facts*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All, *Big Pharma*, *Old Wives Tales*, *Agriculture-Environment*, *CAFR* (#0)

PING!!

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   12:51:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: richard9151 (#0)

Why? Because of all of the books ever written, only the Bible has stood the test of time, and, it has done so because it has proven to be trustworthy.

This is not true, my friend. There are preserved texts in Hinduism and Buddhism that you could spend an entire life time reading and never finish. Have you not read the Bagavad Gita? It's the cream of the Upanishads.

The story of Gilgamesh endured centuries prior to the great transformation into Noah in the Bible. It is one of the oldest preserved stories on earth, trustworthy enough to make an appearance in the Bible.

Explore theology a bit more and you will find that many of your most trusted Biblical stories have much older roots. Your understanding will blossom like a flower if you take the time to delve deeper.

However, I agree that much is lost in Bible translations, along with a reader comprehension. Dumbing down of the Bible is a fascinating topic. Thanks for sharing.

abraxas  posted on  2007-11-30   13:06:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: abraxas (#2)

This is not true, my friend. There are preserved texts in Hinduism and Buddhism that you could spend an entire life time reading and never finish. Have you not read the Bagavad Gita? It's the cream of the Upanishads.

Please try the book, The Two Babylons.

Find it free here; http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/2babindx.htm

All of the world's religions trace back to Babylon, and all of them begin with a single Supreme Being.

As is stated above, much of the Bible was written long before Buddhism began.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   13:24:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: abraxas (#2)

This is not true, my friend. There are preserved texts in Hinduism and Buddhism that you could spend an entire life time reading and never finish. Have you not read the Bagavad Gita? It's the cream of the Upanishads.

The story of Gilgamesh endured centuries prior to the great transformation into Noah in the Bible. It is one of the oldest preserved stories on earth, trustworthy enough to make an appearance in the Bible.

Explore theology a bit more and you will find that many of your most trusted Biblical stories have much older roots. Your understanding will blossom like a flower if you take the time to delve deeper.

The curse of humankind is the inability of most to see the simple truths you have stated.

The Bible contains some truths, some wisdoms. It also contains fables, myths, tortured histories and fairy tales that craft some kind of message that may have been lost in time.

No book is the word of God, for books are written by men, some of whom have some insights into God, and many of whom do not.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-11-30   13:31:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Paul Revere (#4)

books are written by men,

Yep. And my personal favorite is "Ice Brothers" by Sloan Wilson. It's a classic.

Sodie Pop  posted on  2007-11-30   14:01:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: richard9151 (#0)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2007-11-30   14:07:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: ghostdogtxn (#6)

Other than that whole "seizures are caused by demons" thing.

Care to quote the specifics? I am sure you must have read them. Right? Cause I can not find them.

Since nearly all of the world's histories contain info concerning a great flood, which is wrong and, which is right?

Ever read the part about swallowed by a fish? Ummm, thought not.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:16:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Paul Revere (#4)

It also contains fables, myths, tortured histories and fairy tales

Care to be more specific, such as naming names and quoting Scriptures? Rather than just repeating what you have heard elsewhere?

N0?! Thought not.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:18:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: richard9151 (#0)

I respect the Bible much as I do the Torah or Koran as the valued writings of important major religions, but I have no particular use for it.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2007-11-30   14:19:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Ferret Mike (#9)

but I have no particular use for it.

But that begs the question, Mike; have you even read it? And if, as I suspect, you have not, how can you make such a statement?

Understand also that the Torah is the first five books of the Bible, and the Bible is about 1000 years older than the Koran.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:22:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: richard9151 (#10)

The Hindu scriptures are even older than that.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-11-30   14:39:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: richard9151 (#8)

Care to be more specific, such as naming names and quoting Scriptures? Rather than just repeating what you have heard elsewhere?

No, because you're an idiot who thinks most of the stories in the Bible are true, and arguing with such a tard is a complete waste of time.

Fuck off, Bible boy.

Paul Revere  posted on  2007-11-30   14:43:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: richard9151 (#7)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2007-11-30   14:44:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: mirage (#11)

The Hindu scriptures are even older than that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_scripture

Literature regarded as central to the Hindu literary tradition were predominantly composed in Sanskrit, ....

The Vedas form the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature[1] and the oldest sacred texts of Hinduism.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit

Sir William Jones, speaking to the Asiatic Society in Calcutta (now Kolkata) on February 2, 1786, said:

The Sanskrit language, whatever be its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure; more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammar, than could possibly have been produced by accident; so strong, indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not hardly. The common root goes back to Babylon. In fact, every major language on earth shows a common link; means they all came from the same place.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Paul Revere (#12)

No, because you're an idiot who thinks most of the stories in the Bible are true, and arguing with such a tard is a complete waste of time.

Well, since no one has been able to prove that such stories are false, that means I am in pretty good company; the company of those who believe that which has been proven, unlike others, such as, oh, for instance, attorneys, who believe whatever they are told to believe, such as in the goddess of justice.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   14:52:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: ghostdogtxn (#13)

I'm a member in good standing at my church, have been for years.

Sure you are. It is a good social gathering; I get it. Good for business too.

And, of course, you celebrate the birth of the son of god, Tammuz, every Dec. 25th along with the rest of your 'church.' Do you help to put up your churches tree as well?

And, do not forget Easter! Eshtar and her holy prostitutes need remembrance and love also!

http://www.piney.com/MuTammuz.html

The only hint to the Ekklesia (synagogue) of Christ not defeated by the GATES OF HELL comes from the Babylonian religionism. Inanna as a type of Eve or Zoe or Inanna or Ishtar (Easter) got the father God--EA the patron god of lmusic--drunk and STOLE the ME: these were magican incantations (songs) which gave her supernatural power. By reading this text you can see how the DOVE identified the SON of the FATHER to repudiate matriarchal religion of Babylon. The Mother Goddess were "holy whores" and delighted in getting the men to build her a grand temple and then in a fit of rage she sowed discord among brothers and broke it down. Sound like a mega church?

"Ezekiel was particularly aghast at the sun worship there and a Canaanite fertility cult, which he calls 'weeping for Tammuz.

The Tammuz cult in the temple was being practiced by women, and it appears that they must bear their full share of responsibility for introducing heathen practices into Israel...

Just got to love those sunrise services, now, don't ya? Not to mention worship on Sun-day; day of the sun.

So go ahead and fill me in!

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   15:01:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: ghostdogtxn (#13)

I've read that, and the references to it are "legion".

Quote me a few please.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   15:02:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: richard9151 (#10)

The Bible is nothing but an instruction manual for astrology.

Genesis 1:14 "And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years..."

Luke 21:25 "And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring..."

Job 9:9 "Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south."

Job 38:7 "When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?"

Job 38:32 "Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?"

Psalm 78:17 "And they sinned yet more against him by provoking the most High in the wilderness."

Psalm 78:24 "And had rained down manna upon them to eat, and had given them of the corn of heaven."

Mark 14:13 "And he sendeth forth two of his disciples, and saith unto them, Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water: follow him."

Luke 22:10 "And he said unto them, Behold, when ye are entered into the city, there shall a man meet you, bearing a pitcher of water; follow him into the house where he entereth in."

Isaiah 14:13-14 "For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High."

Alan Chapman  posted on  2007-11-30   15:13:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: ghostdogtxn (#13)

I think that somewhere along the lines of millenia, odds are that some fool did manage to get swallowed by a whale.

hell, ive got a pic of a dude who got his head stuck in an elephants ass, so odds are, weird shit will eventually happen.

Gypsy woman said to me, one thing you must bear in your mind:
You are young and you are free, but damned if youre deceased in your own lifetime.

The Core, Eric Clapton

gengis gandhi  posted on  2007-11-30   15:21:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: richard9151 (#14)

From here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedas

The Vedas are arguably the oldest sacred texts that are still used.
The Vedas predate the Bible.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-11-30   15:22:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: ghostdogtxn (#13)

I've been a Christian since birth, confirmed, and I'm a member in good standing at my church,

You know... I was going to let this go, but what the hey!!

First off, it ain't 'your' church; it belongs to God, that is, if you accept anything from the Bible.

Secondly, you claim to be a Christian, AND, to have read the Bible. Thus, how do you qualify this statement?

Jonah was swallowed, if you care to swallow that tale, by a FISH.

From this, are you maintaining that Jesus Christ is a liar? I suggest that you, that great reader of the Bible, read Matthew 12:40. Perhaps you should read all of Matthew for that matter.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   15:34:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: gengis gandhi (#19)

The story of Jonah and the whale is nothing but another interpretation of the winter solstice story. The constellation Cetus (the whale) swallows Jonah (another personification of the sun) for three days.

Alan Chapman  posted on  2007-11-30   15:40:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: mirage (#20)

arguably

Do you understand the word, arguably?

No one can establish a date for the Vedas, much less for Sanskrit, which is the language they were written in. And Sanskrit had to come first, and as I showed, Sanskrit has a common heritage with Greek and Latin. The original language of the first five books of the Bible is older than both.

As I said, try the book, Two Babylons. The author of that book goes right back to the original texts of most major religions to show how they had a common beginning, with a single God, and that the non-sense of multiple gods came later when the priests took over.

That common beginning was in Babylon, but suit yourself. If you would rather believe what the adherents of any religion would like you to believe, you are welcome to that.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   15:41:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Alan Chapman (#18)

The Bible is nothing but an instruction manual for astrology.

LOL!! That is funny! Thanks!!

Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years..."

Ever hear of the passage of time, and how it is checked against the movement of the stars? How navigation is accomplished, or, at least was, with instruments for sighting the stars and the sun? About how people use the seasons to judge when best to plant their crops!

LOL!! Really, really a good one!

And the rest of your post makes about as much sense!!

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   15:47:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: gengis gandhi (#19)

hell, ive got a pic of a dude who got his head stuck in an elephants ass,

LOL!! Pleaaaaassssseeee!!! DO NOT POST IT!!

odds are that some fool did manage to get swallowed by a whale.

As to this, please see Matthew 12:40.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   15:53:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: richard9151 (#24)

Ever hear of the passage of time, and how it is checked against the movement of the stars? How navigation is accomplished, or, at least was, with instruments for sighting the stars and the sun? About how people use the seasons to judge when best to plant their crops!

Yes, I know of those things but what does that have to do with ascension into heaven, being like the "most High," or the "sweet influences of Pleiades" (Job 38:31). What sweet influences? What about the manna from heaven which appears on the ground in the wilderness after the dew. They're mind-altering mushrooms which priests consumed to alter their perception of reality.

It all makes perfect sense to me because I understand what I'm reading. Those Bible verses indicate a belief that the study and worship of celestial phenomena gave them insight and control over events on Earth. It's nothing but hocus-pocus.

Alan Chapman  posted on  2007-11-30   16:33:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: richard9151 (#23)

One has to also have an understanding of history. Civilization in the Indus Valley is equally as old if not older than Ancient Babylon. China has a documented history that pre-dates the Code of Hammurabi [around 1760BC] by more than a thousand years as well.

The problem with most religious adherents is that they try and craft history to fit their beliefs. The reality is, its the other way around and people never realize that religious texts are written for a particular audience and not for someone 10,000 years hence, halfway across the world, and in a completely different culture. That's why there are footnotes that describe the particular cultural oddities of past civilizations that nobody in the modern era has any clue about and why preachers have to say "...and this is how it applies today."

One can also make the argument quickly and truthfully that the Code of Hammurabi and other Babylonian myths pre-date the Bible. So why don't people take Gilgamesh as being scripture then since it too is ancient, if "being old" is the argument for validity?

The whole thing boils down to this -- in religion, it is what you individually accept as true that makes it true to you.

In a sense, all this stuff makes the argument that people chase a religion for what it does for them and what they get out of it and not for any other reason whatsoever.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-11-30   16:44:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Alan Chapman (#26)

Those Bible verses indicate a belief that the study and worship of celestial phenomena gave them insight and control over events on Earth. It's nothing but hocus-pocus.

You might be interested in this forum.

Philosophorum I post there as well.


My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places. -- Winnie the Pooh

farmfriend  posted on  2007-11-30   16:49:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: mirage (#11)

The Hindu scriptures are even older than that.

I explained this to Richard already, but the Upanishads just went right over his head. He hasn'te even read the Gita for crying out loud. He thinks the Bible is the oldest and truest because it's all he has ever read of theology.

abraxas  posted on  2007-11-30   17:00:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: abraxas (#29)

He thinks the Bible is the oldest and truest because it's all he has ever read of theology.

Or History. China developed separately from anything else on earth and pre-dates Babylon. Same with the Indus Valley civilizations.

Thus, my argument is simple: He believes what he believes because it serves his purposes.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-11-30   17:05:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: richard9151 (#21)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2007-11-30   17:06:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: richard9151 (#23)

No one can establish a date for the Vedas, much less for Sanskrit, which is the language they were written in. And Sanskrit had to come first, and as I showed, Sanskrit has a common heritage with Greek and Latin. The original language of the first five books of the Bible is older than both.

Richard you are full of bulls**t. Many Vedas have been dated. Have you ever taken a course in languages, archeology, theology or even basic history? Sanscrit is the oldest language, of which Semetic, Greek, and Latin languages were born. Nobody with an iota of understanding of language, denies that Sanscrit was the first language. Of which mantras to this day are repeated and trusted daily. Tat Tvam Asi, for example. Or, San Kalpa.

Have you heard of the Cradle of Civilization? That's a wonderful place for you to begin your journey of understanding. Education yourself, as your credibility in sinking. Maybe you should refreign from compartive religious commentary until you have actually eductated yourself beyond the Bible. Just because the Bible is YOUR only truth, doesn't make it true for the rest of humanity. Ask any Swami, Guru or Bhodisattva if you don't believe me.

abraxas  posted on  2007-11-30   17:12:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Alan Chapman (#22)

interesting point.

however, i will bet at some point in mans past some dumbass managed to get himself enwhaled.

Gypsy woman said to me, one thing you must bear in your mind:
You are young and you are free, but damned if youre deceased in your own lifetime.

The Core, Eric Clapton

gengis gandhi  posted on  2007-11-30   17:31:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: richard9151 (#0)

Since you are such a scholor on the Bible, I'd like you to clear up a few blatant contradictions in the text for me.

Kings 16: 6-8 Bashaw died in the 26th year of King Asa's reign. Chronicles 16:1 Bashaw built a city in the 36th year of King Asa's reign. How did he do that?

Kings 16:23 Omri became king in the 31st year of Asa's reign and he reigned for a total of 12 years (up to the 43rd year of Asa's reign) Kings 16: 28-29 Omri died, and his son Ahab became king in the 38th year of Asa's reign. How is that possible?

1 Chronicles 3:19 Pediah was the father of Zerubbabel. Ezra 3: 2&3 : 8 Shealtiel was the father of Zerubbabel. 2 Kings 9:27 Jehu shot Ahaziah near Ibleam. Ahaziah fled to Meggido and died there. 2 Chronicles 22: 9 Ahaziah was found hiding in Samaria, brought to Jehu, and put to death. Explain that one.

This is just the tip of the iceburg on Biblical contradiction, which doesn't bode where for blind trust.

2 Chronicles 22:

abraxas  posted on  2007-11-30   17:31:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: abraxas, mirage, farmfriend (#32)

Have you heard of the Cradle of Civilization?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization

This article is about society beginnings. For the beginning of humanity before writing, see History of the world. For other uses, see Cradle of Humankind (disambiguation).

In the history of the world, the cradle of civilization is a title claimed by several regions. It refers to the original location of the development of writing, complex social systems, and cities. In fact it is likely that there was more than one independent origin of civilization rather than a single "cradle". Specifically, the civilizations in the Amercias are typically understood to have emerged independently from those in Eurasia. Debate is also complicated by the difficulty of clearly defining when a culture becomes a "civilization". The extent to which there was significant influence of early civilizations in the Fertile Crescent and East Asia on each other is debated.

There are five rivers that scholars cite as being possible locations for the 'Cradle of Civilization.' They are: the Tigris-Euphrates in modern day Iraq, the Nile in Africa, the Indus in South Asia, and the Huang-He-Yangtze in China.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Second off, it is Sanskrit, not Sanscrit. Then;

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Sanskrit

1 : an ancient Indo-Aryan language that is the classical language of India and of Hinduism

2 : classical Sanskrit together with the older Vedic and various later modifications of classical Sanskrit — see indo-european

Indo–European languages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages

The Indo-European languages comprise a family of several hundred related languages and dialects,[1] including most of the major languages of Europe, the northern Indian subcontinent (South Asia), the Iranian plateau (Southwest Asia), and much of Central Asia. Indo-European (Indo refers to the Indian subcontinent) ...

... 4500–4000: Early PIE. Sredny Stog, Dnieper-Donets and Samara cultures, domestication of the horse. (The early presence of the horse at Sredny Stog has been discredited as decisive—genetic evidence does not supply a single origin for the domesticated horse.) ...

...

... 1500–1000: The Nordic Bronze Age develops (pre-)Proto-Germanic, and the (pre-)Proto-Celtic Urnfield and Hallstatt cultures emerge in Central Europe, introducing the Iron Age. Proto-Italic migration into the Italian peninsula. Redaction of the Rigveda and rise of the Vedic civilization in the Punjab. Flourishing and decline of the Hittite Empire. The Mycenaean civilization gives way to the Greek Dark Ages.

1000 BC–500 BC: The Celtic languages spread over Central and Western Europe. Northern Europe enters the Pre-Roman Iron Age, the formative phase of Proto- Germanic. Homer initiates Greek literature and early Classical Antiquity. The Vedic civilization gives way to the Mahajanapadas. Zoroaster composes the Gathas; rise of the Achaemenid Empire, replacing the Elamites and Babylonia.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, if you read the timeline supplied, it sounds surprisingly Biblical. Well, actually, not to me, you understand.... the surprising part that is.

Now, who is it that believes only that which they wish to believe? Ummm, you did note the reference to Babylonia above, correct? And the time reference to Vedic.

Actually, within the limits of dating anything in history, I find nothing that conflicts with what I have said. But then, having read rather throughly on these subjects, I knew that already.

And if you follow this subject further, it becomes more and more easy to accept that there is a common source for all languages spoken on the earth, just as their has been shown to be a common source for the writings of every religion on the earth.

For reference, see Two Babylons.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   18:00:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: ghostdogtxn (#31)

The Old Testament was written exclusively by Jewish priests.

Really? Ever hear of Israelites? Particularly since the letter j did not exist until about 250 years ago?

And you should be careful what you say about the Old Testament, as you are, once again, making a liar out of Jesus Christ. Who quoted from the Old Testament.

and a lot of collections of mythology and folklore

Such as what? You need to be specific when you say things like that, and not simply make unsupported allegations. Perhaps that is a term you have heard somewhere before.......

But if you do that, prepare to take some heat

Trust me, I can handle it.

If the Rabbis heard the words of God they'd be stoned to death

Here is another problem that you have; the Rabbis had nothing to do with writing the Bible.

Have they had more than a little to do with changing how people think about the Bible, and, what people believe about the Bible?

YOU BET!! That should make you stop and think for just a moment.

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.

richard9151  posted on  2007-11-30   18:07:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: richard9151 (#10)

I was born and raise Christain and have taken Bible study classes and have read the Bible, yes. And I don't give a rip how much older your Bible is then the Koran, as it is, the Bible excludes allot of gospels, and the Gnostic outlook and writings were pro-actively destroyed and percecuted by those that like this 88 book abrided Bible you like so much.

I respect it as writing for your faith, but I reaffirm that I have zero use for the Bible. I see people mis-interpret the Bible for their own political agenda all the time, and I am extremely tired of that, and have zero tolerence or patience for that game.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2007-11-30   18:18:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: richard9151 (#35)

And if you follow this subject further, it becomes more and more easy to accept that there is a common source for all languages spoken on the earth, just as their has been shown to be a common source for the writings of every religion on the earth.

On this point we do agree. In fact, God can be broken down to one syllable-ah-- which is found in God, Krishna, Shiva, Buddha, Yahwah, Ra and several more.

If you can accept that all religions flourish grow from the same root, why is one branch of the tree more trustworthy than another? Why would you discard all other branches as inferior, when all grow from the same light?

Do forgive my spelling error of Sanskrit. I must be more careful, thanks for keeping me in check.

abraxas  posted on  2007-11-30   18:23:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: richard9151 (#35)

So where is China in all of this? China developed completely independently of anything else on the planet.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall and the Congress is out to lunch.

mirage  posted on  2007-11-30   18:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: mirage (#39)

taoist immortals.

enough said.

Gypsy woman said to me, one thing you must bear in your mind:
You are young and you are free, but damned if youre deceased in your own lifetime.

The Core, Eric Clapton

gengis gandhi  posted on  2007-11-30   20:04:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 100) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]