See other 9/11 Articles
Title: THE NEW OFFICIAL "Loose Change Final Cut" - Now on Google Video
Source:
http://video.google.com/
URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?d ... 00&so=0&type=search&plindex=10
Published: Dec 1, 2007
Author: www.livevideo.com
Post Date: 2007-12-01 19:57:38 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 3644
Comments: 86
Louder Than Words 2 hr 10 min 8 sec - Nov 11, 200 www.livevideo.com Loose Change Final Cut - Loose Change Final Cut A Louder Than Words Production - The Loose Change crew did a great job compiling this ... all » massive amount of evidence in support for a new investigation. This is a great starting point for anyone who is interested in 911 truth. But viewer beware, certain highly discussed subjects within the truth movement have been withheld from the audience; whether for simplicity's sake, or rather as an attempt to keep your minds under control of the military industrial complex, I am NOT amused. Media complicity, including foreknowledge and premeditated cooperation are extravagantly evident with in all the recorded media of that day. In fact the event itself was a military level media hoax/psychological operation/black op. Once you search a little further down the rabbit hole you will find that Loose Change has only dug so deep. Kudos to all you European Truthers, I know your watchin'... recommended video documentaries Google Video: "Morgan Reynolds Fox News" "911 The Explosive Reality" "September 11 Television Archive" (includes 3 days straight of all nationwide news stations) "TV Fakery" Livevideo.com: "September Clues" "911 a Fake Odyssey" "911 Flatline" "911 octopus" If you would like to support Loose Change goto www.loosechangefinalcut.com and order a High Quality DVD, or search a torrent site for it... Alex Jones, Loose Change, you used to be my heroes, but you are either compromised, or are still trapped in the matrix. TV FAKERY SHALL NO LONGER BE TABOO. For Freedom. For Liberty. For Truth.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 74.
#4. To: robin (#0)
What happened to the theatrical release that was supposed to be narrated by Charlie Sheen?
Hey, what did I tell you about posting here? Your assignment is over. Report back to Jim Robinson immediately for new orders. And please stick to the evil Iran script, OK? That new Hitler needs killing. Thanks, Abe
I don't know, I wasn't paying attention.
What's the problem, ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder)? I have heard that they have meds for that now. Maybe you could check into that, might be just what you need.
What's the deal with "Loose Change?" What happened to the theatrical release? What happened to Charlie Sheen? Here's the deal: the Internet popularity of "Loose Change" was the peak of the 9/11 "truth" movement. It's all downhill from here.
What, do you have a problem with the truth? The way you put quote marks around it would indicate that.
9/11 "truth" is just another conspiracy theory.
And the official version of events is what? To claim (and believe) that not just one but three steel-framed skyscrapers collapsed in one day due to fire when none ever had before or since and which were designed to withstand the impacts of planes as big as the ones that hit 1 and 2 (and no plane hit 7) is goofy beyond belief. Only someone sold out lock, stock and barrel to the government would believe any such deluded nonsense.
The most believable and credible explanation.
Well, of course it is--or would be if we weren't being asked to believe what almost any sane person would right off as the ravings of crackpots. If you believe the Official Party Line™ about the events of 9/11 it is obvious you haven't done much research or you're just willing to believe whatever the government says, no matter how ridiculous it is.
I believe the US government pissed off the wrong Muslims who then decided to get some revenge by attacking US targets in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Kenya and Tanzania, Lebanon and so on until they were able to do something here in the US. You believe in something built entirely on speculation.
But you just indulged in speculation yourself! What the 9/11 truth movement has proven is that the official govt explanation is BULLSHIT. In fact, the govt explanation is so utterly without science and logic, it requires fairy dust to believe in it. Exactly what happened on 9/11 is where the speculation comes into the 9/11 truth movement.
But you just indulged in speculation yourself! Not at all. Muslim extremists have been attacking US targets for many years now because of US foreign policy. What the 9/11 truth movement has proven is that the official govt explanation is BULLSHIT. In fact, the govt explanation is so utterly without science and logic, it requires fairy dust to believe in it. The "truth" movement has "proven" nothing. The entire "truth" movement is built on speculation based mostly on video clips.
killtown.911review.org/oddities/2001.html www.serendipity.li/wot/pilger_on_standdown.htm Why did this not happen? The Kean report makes clear that "the defence of US aerospace on 9/11 was not conducted in accord with pre-existing training and protocols ... If a hijack was confirmed, procedures called for the hijack coordinator on duty to contact the Pentagon's National Military Command Center (NMCC) ... The NMCC would then seek approval from the office of the Secretary of Defence to provide military assistance ... " Uniquely, this did not happen.
That doesn't prove 9/11 was an inside job.
Not by itself. But taken together with all the other "coincidences" it is very damning evidence. Why did our jets stood down that day? Why was there such a command? whatreallyhappened.com/911stand.html The US military has spent billions of dollars developing stealth aircraft which are invisible to radar so they can mount surprise attacks on adversaries, but it seems they should have saved their money and bought a fleet of airliners because they appear to be far more effective. On 9/11 the world's only military superpower was apparently oblivious to the location of rogue airliners in it's airspace for over an hour, and military commanders were left perplexed on how to deal with the situation of hijackers using these planes as flying bombs. Click for full sized image This confusion resulted in fighter jets flying around aimlessly whilst the hierarchy fully assessed what was going on, and this total lack of cohesion ultimately led to the loss of nearly 3000 lives. All that was required to overcome America's military might on 9/11 were 19 hijackers on 4 airliners. Does this sound plausible to you? It's what you're expected to believe.
This is where the speculation comes in.
Some of the hijackers worked with or for the US government: * Zacarias Moussaoui claimed he had been under observation before 9/11 and that the hijackers' movements [WWW] had been facilitated by the U.S. government. * Mohammed Atta attended the Defense Language Institute at Monterey. * Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. * One attended "California's Defense Language Institute in Presidio of Monterey, California.
There are no replies to Comment # 74. End Trace Mode for Comment # 74.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestLoose Change Final Cut - Loose Change Final Cut
#5. To: Mister Clean (#4)
#6. To: Dempsy (#5)
Hey, what did I tell you about posting here?
#10. To: Mister Clean (#6)
I wasn't paying attention.
#13. To: James Deffenbach (#10)
What's the problem, ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder)?
#23. To: Mister Clean (#13)
#25. To: James Deffenbach (#23)
What, do you have a problem with the truth?
#26. To: Mister Clean (#25)
#27. To: James Deffenbach (#26)
And the official version of events is what?
#31. To: Mister Clean (#27)
#35. To: James Deffenbach (#31)
If you believe the Official Party Line™ about the events of 9/11 it is obvious you haven't done much research or you're just willing to believe whatever the government says, no matter how ridiculous it is.
#36. To: Mister Clean (#35)
#38. To: robin (#36)
#49. To: Mister Clean (#38)
General Ralph Eberhart, commander of the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD). "Air force jet fighters could have intercepted hijacked airliners roaring towards the World Trade Center and Pentagon," he said, "if only air traffic controllers had asked for help 13 minutes sooner ... We would have been able to shoot down all three ... all four of them."
#55. To: robin (#49)
The Kean report makes clear that "the defence of US aerospace on 9/11 was not conducted in accord with pre-existing training and protocols ... If a hijack was confirmed, procedures called for the hijack coordinator on duty to contact the Pentagon's National Military Command Center (NMCC) ... The NMCC would then seek approval from the office of the Secretary of Defence to provide military assistance ... "
#60. To: Mister Clean (#55)
#62. To: robin (#60)
But taken together with all the other "coincidences" it is very damning evidence. Why did our jets stood down that day? Why was there such a command?
#74. To: Mister Clean (#62)
Replies to Comment # 74.
![[Sept11Wiki]](/img/moin-inter.gif){kind=small}
Hijackers-UsAirBaseConnections