See other 9/11 Articles
Title: THE NEW OFFICIAL "Loose Change Final Cut" - Now on Google Video
Source:
http://video.google.com/
URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?d ... 00&so=0&type=search&plindex=10
Published: Dec 1, 2007
Author: www.livevideo.com
Post Date: 2007-12-01 19:57:38 by robin
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 3923
Comments: 86
Louder Than Words 2 hr 10 min 8 sec - Nov 11, 200 www.livevideo.com Loose Change Final Cut - Loose Change Final Cut A Louder Than Words Production - The Loose Change crew did a great job compiling this ... all » massive amount of evidence in support for a new investigation. This is a great starting point for anyone who is interested in 911 truth. But viewer beware, certain highly discussed subjects within the truth movement have been withheld from the audience; whether for simplicity's sake, or rather as an attempt to keep your minds under control of the military industrial complex, I am NOT amused. Media complicity, including foreknowledge and premeditated cooperation are extravagantly evident with in all the recorded media of that day. In fact the event itself was a military level media hoax/psychological operation/black op. Once you search a little further down the rabbit hole you will find that Loose Change has only dug so deep. Kudos to all you European Truthers, I know your watchin'... recommended video documentaries Google Video: "Morgan Reynolds Fox News" "911 The Explosive Reality" "September 11 Television Archive" (includes 3 days straight of all nationwide news stations) "TV Fakery" Livevideo.com: "September Clues" "911 a Fake Odyssey" "911 Flatline" "911 octopus" If you would like to support Loose Change goto www.loosechangefinalcut.com and order a High Quality DVD, or search a torrent site for it... Alex Jones, Loose Change, you used to be my heroes, but you are either compromised, or are still trapped in the matrix. TV FAKERY SHALL NO LONGER BE TABOO. For Freedom. For Liberty. For Truth.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 80.
#4. To: robin (#0)
What happened to the theatrical release that was supposed to be narrated by Charlie Sheen?
Hey, what did I tell you about posting here? Your assignment is over. Report back to Jim Robinson immediately for new orders. And please stick to the evil Iran script, OK? That new Hitler needs killing. Thanks, Abe
I don't know, I wasn't paying attention.
What's the problem, ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder)? I have heard that they have meds for that now. Maybe you could check into that, might be just what you need.
What's the deal with "Loose Change?" What happened to the theatrical release? What happened to Charlie Sheen? Here's the deal: the Internet popularity of "Loose Change" was the peak of the 9/11 "truth" movement. It's all downhill from here.
What, do you have a problem with the truth? The way you put quote marks around it would indicate that.
9/11 "truth" is just another conspiracy theory.
And the official version of events is what? To claim (and believe) that not just one but three steel-framed skyscrapers collapsed in one day due to fire when none ever had before or since and which were designed to withstand the impacts of planes as big as the ones that hit 1 and 2 (and no plane hit 7) is goofy beyond belief. Only someone sold out lock, stock and barrel to the government would believe any such deluded nonsense.
The most believable and credible explanation.
(MC)The most believable and credible explanation. Believable and credible? How do you come to that conclusion??? Supposedly, though building 7 was not hit by a plane, fires and damage to the building made it collapse - which by the way happened in under 7 seconds from the time of initiation of collapse to the time the roof "hit the ground"... First, note the layout of the WTC network of buildings: Now if "fires and damage" were responsible for the collapse of 7 (which is the official version of the events, and ARE the most believable and credible according to you), then what about building 3? Seems to me like this building suffered considerably MORE damage from debris impact than what was known to have happened to 7 - YET it didn't go completely down... Seems to me FIRE gutted 4 a LOT worse than what was known to have happened at 7 - YET it didn't go completely down... Did we ever see fire break out to anywhere NEAR that extent in 7? Didn't think so. What about 6? Seems 6 REALLY took a debris impact. Want to see the end result of the damages to 5 and 6? 5 is in the foreground to the left, 6 right beside it... Now I don't see the point of posting the videos of 7 collapsing. You've seen it plenty of times. You just can't explain WHY it happened, especially in light of the EVIDENCE which "stood up" for examination by all with 2 brain cells capable of working in unison. Building 7 collapsing because of damage from debris impact and fires IS the official explanation. Logic and common sense dictate otherwise. Your statement of the "official version being the most believable and credible explanation" shows you are devoid of common sense and the ability to use logic; because, when something as major as the "official explanation" for the collapse of building 7 comes into question, then the entire story becomes suspect.
#81. To: innieway (#80)
Anyone who believes the government's whacked out propaganda about the events of 9/11 and the reasons they claimed those buildings collapsed would believe whatever ludicrous tale Bush spouted. They need help but I think it is beyond what any of us can do on these message boards.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestLoose Change Final Cut - Loose Change Final Cut
#5. To: Mister Clean (#4)
#6. To: Dempsy (#5)
Hey, what did I tell you about posting here?
#10. To: Mister Clean (#6)
I wasn't paying attention.
#13. To: James Deffenbach (#10)
What's the problem, ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder)?
#23. To: Mister Clean (#13)
#25. To: James Deffenbach (#23)
What, do you have a problem with the truth?
#26. To: Mister Clean (#25)
#27. To: James Deffenbach (#26)
And the official version of events is what?
#80. To: Mister Clean, James Deffenbach, Twenty Twelve (#27)
(JD)And the official version of events is what?
What about 4? 
What about 5? 
Replies to Comment # 80.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 80.