[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Military Overview: Ukrainian Fronts Crumble Under Multi-Axis Assault

ICE prepares full assault on five Democrat cities as LA goes into lockdown amid immigration riots

Invisible Missile Triggers MILITARY PANIC! (This is the Russian Zircon)

Mass arrests as defiant immigration protesters ignore lockdown orders in LA

Visit California: It's America's Future

FBI Director Kash Patel sues MSNBC columnist Frank Figliuzzi

The Ukraine war did not "bleed out" Russia. It bled US taxpayers

America Is Full. Time To Close The Door.

Golden Dome Idiocy

Israeli Media: Trump Told Netanyahu To Permanently End War in Gaza

21 days left till BASEL III is implemented. VIDEO EXPLANATION

China’s bottom half holds twice the wealth of America’s.

China’s extreme weather is leaving devastation across multiple provinces

Salton Sea is emitting foul-smelling hydrogen sulfide gas

Will Treasury Secretary Bessent's Past (Soros) Come Back To Haunt Him Today?

BBC Under Fire for CENSORING Gaza Medic Documentary

US is Agreement Incapable

Blow to Israeli Intelligence. taping Israelis in bathrooms

“They have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline.”

A US federal judge has DENIED Gavin Newsom's request to stop Trump from using the National Guard in Los Angeles.

Have You Noticed That Seismic Activity Has Been Going Nuts All Over The Globe

The Vax was meant to CAUSE cancer.... listen to this - this clip from RFK Jr's site

CNN Immediately Cuts Off Panelist Who Tells the Truth About the LA Riots

Army Secretary declares war on the military industrial complex

Former Israeli PM Threatens U.S. Will Get 'A Re-Run Of 9-11' If It Doesn't Fight Israel's Wars

7 Examples Of The “Mostly Peaceful” Los Angeles Riots Becoming Even More “Peaceful”

Biden Admin and ActBlue Funded Group Behind Abolish ICE Protests in LA

Murderers, rapists, gang members: ICE busts 12 of LA's 'worst' illegal alien criminals amid riots

LA Mayor Karen Bass Threatens Feds: Withdraw From LA Or the Violence Will Escalate –

Woman points gun at police and finds out


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Want to get a peak at Mudboy Slim and some other bushbot freepers?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 2, 2007
Author: FuhQuePunk
Post Date: 2007-12-02 18:29:59 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 8522
Comments: 201

community.webshots.com/sl...iO?mediaPosition=53690671

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 111.

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Five years have certainly zipped by us...

Wondering how many of the bots, are still bots today?

Lod  posted on  2007-12-02   18:36:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: lodwick (#1)

Wondering how many of the bots, are still bots today?

Mudboy Slim claims he isn't but still spends all of his time defending Bush and the RP.

Leadpenny now posts on LP. He's definitely not a bushbot.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-12-02   18:38:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Hayek Fan (#2)

"Mudboy Slim claims he isn't but still spends all of his time defending Bush and the RP."

Hogwash!! I defend Bush on the War On Terror...I defended Bush when he tried to reform Social Security.

But yer full of shit when you try to label me as a "Bushbot"...MUD

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2008-04-09   17:10:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Mudboy Slim (#21)

I defend Bush on the War On Terror...I defended Bush when he tried to reform Social Security.

But yer full of shit when you try to label me as a "Bushbot"...MUD

I think the only people who still use the Bushite phrase "War on Terror" (other than ironically) are Bushbots.

Same goes for supporters of the scheme to privatize Social Security. Even the Republicans aren't talking about that too much since the markets took a dive.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-11   10:42:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: aristeides (#56)

Balderdash, dude...privatization of social security is inevitable. I don't want to be beholden to the Federal Leviathan for my retirement, do you?

If you do, feel free to stick within the present broken system...as fer me, I want OUT...MUD

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2008-04-11   11:03:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Mudboy Slim (#57)

feel free to stick within the present broken system

The system isn't broken. It's the most successful government program of all time. It's facing problems because Bush loots 40% of the pay in to pay for his tax cuts to the wealthy. Were this money put into trust, as it was supposed to be, there would be no problem.

Be careful when you let Rush do your thinking for you. He doesn't have your best interests at heart. Modern conservatism is the wealthiest 2% of the country using a billion dollar propaganda machine to play with the heads of people like you.

Recall in 2004 how you told us how Bush would get the budget balanced? How is he doing with this?

...  posted on  2008-04-11   11:14:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: ... (#59)

Were this money put into trust, as it was supposed to be, there would be no problem.

There was never any such intention and there is no "Social Security Trust Fund." Just another scam like the "Federal Reserve," they gave it a name to fool people into believing it was something that it wasn't. Have you actually read any of the cases having to do with Social Security (or more properly, Socialist Insecurity)?

Here is a link to a pretty good article about the alleged Social Security Trust Fund:

Misleading the Public: How the Social Security Trust Fund Really Works

And another one: There Is No Social Security Trust Fund: The Joke's On You

And finally, a short excerpt from a Supreme Court ruling which upheld the validity of what they had to know is a Ponzi scheme and in which they admitted that there is no trust fund, that it all goes into the general revenues.

Title VIII, as we have said, lays two different types of tax, an "income tax on employees" and "an excise tax on employers." The income tax on employees is measured by wages paid during the calendar year. § 801. The excise tax on the employer is to be paid "with respect to having individuals in his employ," and, like the tax on employees, is measured by wages. § 804. Neither tax is applicable to certain types of employment, such as agricultural labor, domestic service, service for the national or state governments, and service performed by persons who have attained the age of 65 years. § 811(b). The two taxes are at the same rate. §§ 801, 804. For the years 1937 to 1939, inclusive, the rate for each tax is fixed at one percent. Thereafter the rate increases 1/2 of 1 percent every three years, until, after December 31, 1948, the rate for each tax reaches 3 percent. Ibid. In the computation of wages, all remuneration is to be included except so much as is in excess of ,000 during the calendar year affected. § 811(a). The income tax on employees is to be collected by the employer, who is to deduct the amount from the wages "as and when paid." § 80a(a). He is indemnified against claims and demands of any person by reason of such payment. Ibid. The proceeds of both taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like internal revenue taxes generally, and are not earmarked in any way. § 807(a).

HELVERING V. DAVIS, 301 U. S. 619 (1937)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-04-13   12:24:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: James Deffenbach (#102)

I know that that the surplus money is not longer put into trust and now goes into the general fund. That's the problem.

One of the first things Bush did was undo the trust the Clinton established and funnel the money back into the general fund. Now about 60% passes through for payment and about 40% is used to help pay for the tax cuts.

I said "If the money was put into a trust" the system would be solvent.

...  posted on  2008-04-14   0:12:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 111.

#118. To: ... (#111)

I said "If the money was put into a trust" the system would be solvent.

Yes, and if "if's and ands" were "pennies and pounds" everyone would surely have all they need. Did you not read either of the articles I linked to which prove that there is NOTHING in the alleged trust funds but government IOU's? Now I submit to you that that is quite a racket. Steal money from people, under color of law--a "law" which doesn't apply to most of them at that--and then write IOU's to cover it and keep them in house. Wouldn't we all like a deal like that? Well, maybe not all of us because it is a scam and very crooked but they sure have gotten by with it a long time.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-04-14 09:13:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 111.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]