[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel

MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets

Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march

FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters!

Scammers Use AI Bots to Impersonate Students, Stealing Millions in Financial Aid

Bilderberg 2025 begins. Global elites gather in Stockholm. AI, migration, and national security dominate

I Wish We All Could Leave California (Beach Boys Parody)

Exclusive: US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences

Brilliant & Critical Insight!

Legal Immigrants Shift to GOP on Immigration, Shows 40-Point Swing from Democrats

American fuel tankers were spotted REFUELING ISRAELI JETS over Syria.

Does Western Civilization Have Enough Belief to Continue to Exist?

Trump CLEARLY KNEW of Israel's Plan To STRIKE IRAN

Trump Warns 'Even More Brutal' Attacks Coming Without Nuclear Deal

10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation

CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser

Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead'

DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election!

Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks?

Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack'

This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities…

Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs

White House Fears Iranian Response To An Attack Could Overwhelm Israel's Air Defenses

The Money and Power Behind the Riots: This is No Grass-Roots Movement

D.C. Judge Sides With Trump In Lawsuit Over Control Of Corrupt Foreign Aid Agency

Israel Iran Double Standard

Soros Funneled $8.3M into Leftist Group Trying to Turn Lone Star State Blue

California Democrats Under Fire for Buying Bricks During Protests

ICE Launches Campaign to Crack Down on Marriage Fraud Could Ilhan Omar Finally Face Justice?

Joe Rogan's podcast predicted violent LA riots two years ago leaving viewers stunned


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Want to get a peak at Mudboy Slim and some other bushbot freepers?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 2, 2007
Author: FuhQuePunk
Post Date: 2007-12-02 18:29:59 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 9516
Comments: 201

community.webshots.com/sl...iO?mediaPosition=53690671

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 111.

#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)

Five years have certainly zipped by us...

Wondering how many of the bots, are still bots today?

Lod  posted on  2007-12-02   18:36:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: lodwick (#1)

Wondering how many of the bots, are still bots today?

Mudboy Slim claims he isn't but still spends all of his time defending Bush and the RP.

Leadpenny now posts on LP. He's definitely not a bushbot.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2007-12-02   18:38:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Hayek Fan (#2)

"Mudboy Slim claims he isn't but still spends all of his time defending Bush and the RP."

Hogwash!! I defend Bush on the War On Terror...I defended Bush when he tried to reform Social Security.

But yer full of shit when you try to label me as a "Bushbot"...MUD

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2008-04-09   17:10:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Mudboy Slim (#21)

I defend Bush on the War On Terror...I defended Bush when he tried to reform Social Security.

But yer full of shit when you try to label me as a "Bushbot"...MUD

I think the only people who still use the Bushite phrase "War on Terror" (other than ironically) are Bushbots.

Same goes for supporters of the scheme to privatize Social Security. Even the Republicans aren't talking about that too much since the markets took a dive.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-11   10:42:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: aristeides (#56)

Balderdash, dude...privatization of social security is inevitable. I don't want to be beholden to the Federal Leviathan for my retirement, do you?

If you do, feel free to stick within the present broken system...as fer me, I want OUT...MUD

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2008-04-11   11:03:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Mudboy Slim (#57)

feel free to stick within the present broken system

The system isn't broken. It's the most successful government program of all time. It's facing problems because Bush loots 40% of the pay in to pay for his tax cuts to the wealthy. Were this money put into trust, as it was supposed to be, there would be no problem.

Be careful when you let Rush do your thinking for you. He doesn't have your best interests at heart. Modern conservatism is the wealthiest 2% of the country using a billion dollar propaganda machine to play with the heads of people like you.

Recall in 2004 how you told us how Bush would get the budget balanced? How is he doing with this?

...  posted on  2008-04-11   11:14:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: ... (#59)

Were this money put into trust, as it was supposed to be, there would be no problem.

There was never any such intention and there is no "Social Security Trust Fund." Just another scam like the "Federal Reserve," they gave it a name to fool people into believing it was something that it wasn't. Have you actually read any of the cases having to do with Social Security (or more properly, Socialist Insecurity)?

Here is a link to a pretty good article about the alleged Social Security Trust Fund:

Misleading the Public: How the Social Security Trust Fund Really Works

And another one: There Is No Social Security Trust Fund: The Joke's On You

And finally, a short excerpt from a Supreme Court ruling which upheld the validity of what they had to know is a Ponzi scheme and in which they admitted that there is no trust fund, that it all goes into the general revenues.

Title VIII, as we have said, lays two different types of tax, an "income tax on employees" and "an excise tax on employers." The income tax on employees is measured by wages paid during the calendar year. § 801. The excise tax on the employer is to be paid "with respect to having individuals in his employ," and, like the tax on employees, is measured by wages. § 804. Neither tax is applicable to certain types of employment, such as agricultural labor, domestic service, service for the national or state governments, and service performed by persons who have attained the age of 65 years. § 811(b). The two taxes are at the same rate. §§ 801, 804. For the years 1937 to 1939, inclusive, the rate for each tax is fixed at one percent. Thereafter the rate increases 1/2 of 1 percent every three years, until, after December 31, 1948, the rate for each tax reaches 3 percent. Ibid. In the computation of wages, all remuneration is to be included except so much as is in excess of ,000 during the calendar year affected. § 811(a). The income tax on employees is to be collected by the employer, who is to deduct the amount from the wages "as and when paid." § 80a(a). He is indemnified against claims and demands of any person by reason of such payment. Ibid. The proceeds of both taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like internal revenue taxes generally, and are not earmarked in any way. § 807(a).

HELVERING V. DAVIS, 301 U. S. 619 (1937)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-04-13   12:24:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: James Deffenbach (#102)

I know that that the surplus money is not longer put into trust and now goes into the general fund. That's the problem.

One of the first things Bush did was undo the trust the Clinton established and funnel the money back into the general fund. Now about 60% passes through for payment and about 40% is used to help pay for the tax cuts.

I said "If the money was put into a trust" the system would be solvent.

...  posted on  2008-04-14   0:12:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 111.

#118. To: ... (#111)

I said "If the money was put into a trust" the system would be solvent.

Yes, and if "if's and ands" were "pennies and pounds" everyone would surely have all they need. Did you not read either of the articles I linked to which prove that there is NOTHING in the alleged trust funds but government IOU's? Now I submit to you that that is quite a racket. Steal money from people, under color of law--a "law" which doesn't apply to most of them at that--and then write IOU's to cover it and keep them in house. Wouldn't we all like a deal like that? Well, maybe not all of us because it is a scam and very crooked but they sure have gotten by with it a long time.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-04-14 09:13:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 111.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]